Best 2 spells for an infil mystic adept |
Best 2 spells for an infil mystic adept |
Jul 29 2008, 08:58 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,069 Joined: 19-July 07 From: Oakland CA Member No.: 12,309 |
I'm playing around with an fairly vanilla ninja mystic adept. Magically boosted infiltration, dodge, and heavy weapons. It will also have Magician magic 2 for overcast force 4 spirits of man.
So the question becomes what are the top 2 spells to start this guy with? Improved Reflexes & Analyze device? Silence & Invisibility? Detect (YMMV) + Demolish (gun) |
|
|
Jul 29 2008, 09:00 PM
Post
#2
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
levitation/improved invisibility
|
|
|
Jul 29 2008, 09:58 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 188 Joined: 24-June 08 From: California Free State Member No.: 16,080 |
Heavy Weapons?
I'd probably go with Invisibilty and a detection spell. |
|
|
Jul 29 2008, 11:12 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,069 Joined: 19-July 07 From: Oakland CA Member No.: 12,309 |
I went heavy weapons because HMG are better than sniper rifles in everything but range where they place a close second. Plus the same skill let's to use an under the 40mm grenade launcher. The only real issue with Heavy weapons is getting them anywhere, but this build is all about the straight up break in. If he's getting searched he's not doing his thing.
|
|
|
Jul 29 2008, 11:38 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 188 Joined: 24-June 08 From: California Free State Member No.: 16,080 |
Really, same as a 40mm grenade launcher? Interesting. (Can you tell I don't actually own a 4th ed book yet? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) )
Sounds like you know your concept, though - so I trust you know what's best. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 04:49 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
The main drawback of magic 2 is that your best possible roll on an overcast invis spell won't let you fool a drone, as you can't possibly beat its object resistance.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 05:15 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 336 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 16,062 |
There are a lot of spells for that:
Improved Invisibility / Camouflage Silence / Stealth Confusion /Stink or similar spell Physical Mask Influence Levitation to name just a few. Heavy Weapons might have some punch, but they are also not very discreet. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 06:57 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-February 08 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Member No.: 15,706 |
The main drawback of magic 2 is that your best possible roll on an overcast invis spell won't let you fool a drone, as you can't possibly beat its object resistance. Drones typically have an Object Resistance of 4. Object Resistance is a threshold, not automatic resistance hits. In other words, 4 hits overcomes a drone's Object Resistance 4. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 07:07 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,069 Joined: 19-July 07 From: Oakland CA Member No.: 12,309 |
Well first off, while it's slower, I would have spirits of man doing the casting. Oversummon a force 4 and have that guy do the spell casting. That's actually where the 2 spell limit comes from. I would only take 1 rank of spell casting.
Levitate is in for sure. It can replace climb, the adept movement powers, and most of gymnastics. Plus it's riff with opportunity for creative use. I'm still not sold on the second pick. Magic detection is generally better than mundane detection but not by tons. Illusions are are really good, but getting one net hit on a OR 4 target as a mystic adept really isn't going to happen. Mind manipulation spells are also really powerful. But are they worth the cost when you have the influence power for free? A lot of the perennial combat spells like power/stun ball/bolt wouldn't have the punch to be worth talking about. I'm thinking about Fix. It's often over looking by a full mage, and would help a on and off the run. During a run you could use it help cover signs of forced entry and combat. After a run your could help patch up the team's equipment. I'm also leaning towards demolish (guns) because the OR is a little more doable. --- About the heavy weapons. What I really like about them is that they scale really well, which allows you to get a lot of millage from focusing really hard on one skill and one weapon. Gas grenade + S&S burst is often a fairly quit 1-shot on an area. That same weapon system can also serve up HE + APDS in short order if the shit hits the fan. Plus you can snipe with it. Max one skill, carry one weapon do it all. Finally, some would say most importantly, I think beefy sci-fi everything-guns are cool. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 07:09 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 1-May 08 From: Montana Member No.: 15,945 |
Shape. Create a new door to walk through anywhere you need one. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
|
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 08:47 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 421 Joined: 4-April 08 Member No.: 15,843 |
Sterilise. No point being stealthy tactically if they can just hunt you down and Ritual Sending you.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 03:31 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 228 Joined: 27-July 08 Member No.: 16,168 |
So it's a troll with 9 STR? As otherwise I'd like to see a "normal" human carry a HMG and infiltrating anything. I know the SR rules don't really cover the weight of the items and one can shoot with a HMG from hip, but if you think about it, you'd be carrying something like 1,5m long and 30ish kg chunk of steel (50kg with the tripod) along while avoiding being detected. I bet crawling through some small air duct with that is a blast (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
The idea of having Fix-spell sounds ok for fixing the signs of b&e but to cover the signs of a firefight? HMG rounds do penetrate enough material that you'd have to run the whole floor and one up&down to fix all the bulletholes. But if realism is not a big issue on such, then the idea sounds cool. Silence would help to suppress the neighborhood waking HMG's song. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 03:48 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
Drones typically have an Object Resistance of 4. Object Resistance is a threshold, not automatic resistance hits. In other words, 4 hits overcomes a drone's Object Resistance 4. Not according to the rules. "The Magic + Spellcasting test must generate at least one net hit to succeed and may need more if the eff ect has a threshold for success" P173 "The more net hits a character scores (the more hits exceed the threshold), the more the task was pulled off with finesse and flair. So a character who rolls 4 hits on a threshold 2 test has scored 2 net hits." P56 Hence you have ZERO net hits against the drone, and the spell fails. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 04:50 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,069 Joined: 19-July 07 From: Oakland CA Member No.: 12,309 |
So it's a troll with 9 STR? As otherwise I'd like to see a "normal" human carry a HMG and infiltrating anything. I know the SR rules don't really cover the weight of the items and one can shoot with a HMG from hip, but if you think about it, you'd be carrying something like 1,5m long and 30ish kg chunk of steel (50kg with the tripod) along while avoiding being detected. I bet crawling through some small air duct with that is a blast (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) The idea of having Fix-spell sounds ok for fixing the signs of b&e but to cover the signs of a firefight? HMG rounds do penetrate enough material that you'd have to run the whole floor and one up&down to fix all the bulletholes. But if realism is not a big issue on such, then the idea sounds cool. Silence would help to suppress the neighborhood waking HMG's song. All valid concerns. The build will have str 3 out of the gate and str 7 pretty quickly. Levitate will help a lot in the interim. Fix and the evidence of a fire fight. I fully understand that 20 .50 cal FMJs are leave evidence of some kind over most of a block. I did feel like you could cover up are small scale encounters. Say you put a gas grenade in guard kiosk. One goes down one fires blindly at you side of the room as they try to run out of the cloud. You drop them with S&S. Fix would let you 'heal' the wall behind you, and the pock mark in the kiosk. |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 07:24 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,058 Joined: 4-February 08 Member No.: 15,640 |
Can you fix the large blood splatters all over the wall though.... If fix fixes the walls per say, what becomes of the bullets? They wouldn't just vanish. The other problem rules wise is that if you have a force four spirit casting fix the most hits they could do to "heal" the wall would be 4. Using a heavy machine gun would probably ding up quite a few walls more then fix might allow. Although fix is not a bad spell for the particular build I would probably suggest something different.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 07:33 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-February 08 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Member No.: 15,706 |
Not according to the rules. "The Magic + Spellcasting test must generate at least one net hit to succeed and may need more if the eff ect has a threshold for success" P173 "The more net hits a character scores (the more hits exceed the threshold), the more the task was pulled off with finesse and flair. So a character who rolls 4 hits on a threshold 2 test has scored 2 net hits." P56 Hence you have ZERO net hits against the drone, and the spell fails. QUOTE (SR4 p.56) In order to succeed completely on a Success Test, you must meet or exceed a gamemaster-determined threshold with your hits. QUOTE (SR4 p.174) The caster must generate at least 1 net hit on the Opposed Test for the spell to succeed.
< > Spells cast on non-living objects require a Success Test with a threshold based on the type of object affected < > If Raze had targeted the bike instead of the ganger, his 4 hits would have been enough to reach the threshold of 4, as a mo- torbike counts as a highly-processed object. Since nonliving objects cannot resist against Direct Combat spells, the bike would have taken 5 DV from the spell (Raze didn't score any net hits over the threshold to raise the damage). |
|
|
Jul 30 2008, 11:51 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
Mush has it right. Drones aren't able to resist spells, so its a threshold test. Now, if a magician was counterspelling a drone (possibly not raw) it'd be easy to stop the spell.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 03:09 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Looking at the table on Object Resistance, drones do not have a fixed OR threshold. The OR of drones is 4+, that is a minimum of 4.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 03:17 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
Mana Static and Detect Magic-Extended Range.
Find the wards, damp them entirely, walk through them, and never alert the ward's caster. Find the enemy mage, damp him, then grenade him. Reveal invisible enemies by damping them. 1001 uses... |
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 05:45 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
Looking at the table on Object Resistance, drones do not have a fixed OR threshold. The OR of drones is 4+, that is a minimum of 4. I'm kind of impressed that they use "threshold" at least two ways in the magic rules that are mutually contradictory fashions, one of which contradicts the actual game definition on page 56, plus using "net hits" in two different contradictory ways in the "determine effects" portion of the spell casting rules, one of which contradicts the actual definition of "net hits" in the book on page 56. As you need a net hit per the the rules on a spellcasting success tests (per page 173) for the spell to take effect, why do they claim that the spell works and gets no net hits on the example? If you get no net hits the spell fails. Direct combat spells can't ever do less than force+1 damage, otherwise they have no net hits and fail. Anyhow, as I both think magic is overpowered and prefer to use rules that are not internally contradictory I'm going to ignore examples that contradict that actual written game mechanics. |
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 08:32 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,058 Joined: 4-February 08 Member No.: 15,640 |
I was under the impression that if you smash someones ward with mana static the caster knows the ward is no longer functional (and thus under attack.)
|
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 08:48 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-February 08 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Member No.: 15,706 |
The example is not contradictory. In the case of Opposed Tests (ie. living/magic target), you need 1+ Net Hits for the spell to take effect. In the case of Success Tests (ie. non-living target), you must beat the Object Resistance threshold - which per the rules for thresholds, you must equal or exceed the threshold. If you beat the threshold with 0 Net Hits, any variables of the spell based on Net Hits are 0, but the spell still takes effect - in the case of Direct spells, you deal Force damage. In the case of, say, Bind, if you beat the threshold with no Net Hits, the spell is succeeds, but has no actual effect.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 01:57 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,512 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 392 |
The Clairvoyance spells are IMMENSLY helpful. Especially since you don't seem to be doing a Hacker adept build.
I personally would do Clairvoyance and Levitate. If you are a true ninja you shouldn't need infil boosting spells (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) |
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 02:41 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 619 Joined: 18-April 03 From: The UV Nexus Member No.: 4,474 |
I'm playing around with an fairly vanilla ninja mystic adept. Magically boosted infiltration, dodge, and heavy weapons.... Heavy weapons toting ninja? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) |
|
|
Jul 31 2008, 05:46 PM
Post
#25
|
|
The back-up plan Group: Retired Admins Posts: 8,423 Joined: 15-January 03 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,910 |
Personally I think the biggest reason to not use an HMG is the fact that it can't be silenced. If you are doing your thing properly, you shouldn't need the suppressive fire capabilities and a tricked out heavy pistol with S&S or Ex-Ex can do comparable single target damage (presuming no BF/FA)
Spells I would take are Physical Mask and Influence. You can utilize Adept powers for Wall running, climbing, sneaking and everything else. As you advance, adding a few more spells such as detection spells and health spells will help. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 05:01 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.