IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Poor Man's Delta grade cybereyes, Interested? =^.^=
KCKitsune
post Aug 29 2008, 09:24 AM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



OK people, I'm at work right now and I've been thinking? There is a device today that is used by eye doctors to help correct vision problems. Here is the links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraocular_lens

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraocular_l..._contact_lenses

If you notice, the second link is for a contact lens that is implanted into the eye. You can get a "skinlinked" contact lens with vision enhancement at character gen (without Restricted gear) that has the following: Low-light vision, Flair Comp, and Image Link. With restricted gear you can add Vision Enhancement 3 and smartlink.

If you are a metahuman and don't need low-light or thermo, then you can replace low-light with Vision Magnification. There would be no change in price.

This contact lens cost? 1075 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) . 1075 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) to have a device that is implanted in the eye and I don't think it would have ANY Essence impact because it isn't hooked up to ANY nerves and because of the skinlink you would still have "DNI" capabilities. It's like having a RFID tag implanted in you, a RFID tag costs no Essence.

You could even take my idea and go a little further. Disguise a Olfactory Booster as a nose ring and skinlink it. Instant "cyberware" without any Essence loss and costs less too. Also VERY easy to upgrade to boot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Aug 29 2008, 01:16 PM
Post #2


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



This is actually a point that has existed in Shadowrun for a while, and I think you highlight the fact that it's even easier to do so in 4th Ed. The "why get cyber when you can get gear" argument has been viable for some time. Indeed, that's what leads to the conclusion that soldiers, for example, can receive many enhancements through gear, which is reusable and cheaper and requires no surgery.

The Gear vs Cyber debate, at this point, as you illustrate, IMO basically just comes down to - do you want to take the risk of not having the gear with you? That's pretty much the only difference in many cases. Cyber is guaranteed to always be there. Gear can be lost or removed from you.

There is also the consideration that cyber can allow you to "hide" illegal mods, but that's not always an issue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eryk the Red
post Aug 29 2008, 01:23 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 633
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 8,301



That reminds me. I need to start having characters' glasses and whatnot get knocked off sometimes in combat. You know, like when they get punched in the mouth.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rad
post Aug 29 2008, 03:18 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Pismo Beach, CA
Member No.: 15,715



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Aug 29 2008, 02:24 AM) *
OK people, I'm at work right now and I've been thinking? There is a device today that is used by eye doctors to help correct vision problems. Here is the links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraocular_lens

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraocular_l..._contact_lenses

If you notice, the second link is for a contact lens that is implanted into the eye. You can get a "skinlinked" contact lens with vision enhancement at character gen (without Restricted gear) that has the following: Low-light vision, Flair Comp, and Image Link. With restricted gear you can add Vision Enhancement 3 and smartlink.

If you are a metahuman and don't need low-light or thermo, then you can replace low-light with Vision Magnification. There would be no change in price.

This contact lens cost? 1075 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) . 1075 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) to have a device that is implanted in the eye and I don't think it would have ANY Essence impact because it isn't hooked up to ANY nerves and because of the skinlink you would still have "DNI" capabilities. It's like having a RFID tag implanted in you, a RFID tag costs no Essence.

You could even take my idea and go a little further. Disguise a Olfactory Booster as a nose ring and skinlink it. Instant "cyberware" without any Essence loss and costs less too. Also VERY easy to upgrade to boot.


One thing: Skinlink doesn't give you DNI, it allows the device to connect to other skinlinked devices, not your brain. I get what you're saying about making an inplantable contact lens, but by RAW you'd need trodes or an implanted commlink to get DNI out of the deal. Besides, RFID tags don't cost essence because they basically just sit under the surface and don't really interfere with any of your internal systems--implanting a lens into the eye sounds too invasive and too much like the retina replacement option for cybereyes to have zero essence cost.

On the other hand, a normal contact lens that connects to either an implanted commlink or a trode net gives pretty much the same result as cybereyes, with the added benefits of being both swappable and RAW, for 0 essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
darthmord
post Aug 29 2008, 03:42 PM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,245
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia
Member No.: 11,548



Reading about that was interesting for RL concerns. I have a daughter who will at some point need that surgery so she can have something approximating normal vision.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Aug 29 2008, 03:44 PM
Post #6


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



QUOTE (Rad @ Aug 29 2008, 10:18 AM) *
One thing: Skinlink doesn't give you DNI, it allows the device to connect to other skinlinked devices, not your brain. I get what you're saying about making an inplantable contact lens, but by RAW you'd need trodes or an implanted commlink to get DNI out of the deal.


A Datajack (with a skinlink module as well) can be used for DNI access.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Aug 29 2008, 06:16 PM
Post #7


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Backgammon @ Aug 29 2008, 09:16 AM) *
The Gear vs Cyber debate, at this point, as you illustrate, IMO basically just comes down to - do you want to take the risk of not having the gear with you? That's pretty much the only difference in many cases. Cyber is guaranteed to always be there. Gear can be lost or removed from you.

There is also the consideration that cyber can allow you to "hide" illegal mods, but that's not always an issue.


Actually, with what I was saying, you would have the lenses implanted into your eyes. Check out the second link in my original post.

QUOTE (Rad @ Aug 29 2008, 11:18 AM) *
One thing: Skinlink doesn't give you DNI, it allows the device to connect to other skinlinked devices, not your brain. I get what you're saying about making an inplantable contact lens, but by RAW you'd need trodes or an implanted commlink to get DNI out of the deal. Besides, RFID tags don't cost essence because they basically just sit under the surface and don't really interfere with any of your internal systems--implanting a lens into the eye sounds too invasive and too much like the retina replacement option for cybereyes to have zero essence cost.

On the other hand, a normal contact lens that connects to either an implanted commlink or a trode net gives pretty much the same result as cybereyes, with the added benefits of being both swappable and RAW, for 0 essence.


OK, how would it be invasive? It's skinlinked, and NOT wired into your nervous system. That was the whole point to this. It replaces nothing, not even the regular lens in your eye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post Aug 29 2008, 07:15 PM
Post #8


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



Neither does Bone lacing.

Whatever metaphysics they espose in various editions, What causes essence loss is having something implanted or modified. Put it in a contact and wear it: zero essence loss. Implant that contact? Essence loss. A lot of it, actually, because I would rule as GM that this is the method by which eyeware is implanted when you don't get cybereyes. Remember that almost all eyeware is available as mods to your eyeball, and the metal orbs are actually more essence friendly because they have capacity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Aug 29 2008, 09:21 PM
Post #9


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



Yup, what Pimp said.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Aug 29 2008, 10:21 PM
Post #10


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (PlatonicPimp @ Aug 29 2008, 02:15 PM) *
Neither does Bone lacing.

Whatever metaphysics they espose in various editions, What causes essence loss is having something implanted or modified. Put it in a contact and wear it: zero essence loss. Implant that contact? Essence loss. A lot of it, actually, because I would rule as GM that this is the method by which eyeware is implanted when you don't get cybereyes. Remember that almost all eyeware is available as mods to your eyeball, and the metal orbs are actually more essence friendly because they have capacity.


Except bone lacing has to modify the human physiology to continue having the augmented bones produce blood cells. That's what I think causes the Essence loss.

My idea for the contact lenses is such that you don't have to modify the human body AT ALL. Literally, you don't have to remove even a single organelle. You have to have your commlink skinlinked (or implanted), but most runners would have that anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rad
post Aug 29 2008, 11:09 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Pismo Beach, CA
Member No.: 15,715



Here's the thing, shoving a device into the functional part of the eye is much different than having an RFID tag (much smaller than a contact, by description) floating around underneath the skin or in the cavities between organs. Here you're actually disrupting a major organ and placing a device smack in the middle of it's inner workings--that to me reads Essence Loss.

Going back to the bone lacing, IIRC it's the bone lacing that's modified to be microscopically porous to allow new blood cells to continue being released from the marrow, because otherwise coating your bones with metal would seal the natural pores and prevent that.

Likewise, an implanted lens would have to be designed to account for the interference with normal blood flow and fluid transmission, and coated with immunosuppressants to prevent rejection. Hell, the immunosuppressants alone could account for the essence loss.

It's a neat idea--but beside all the in-game reasons the biggest problem I have with it is that it seems like a thinly veiled excuse to circumvent the rules and get cheap essence-free cybereyes. The problem with being a scientist or--god forbid--an engineer who roleplays is that it's easy for us to come up with completely reasonable ideas that would still unbalance the game. One has to keep in mind that if it could be done that easily in the game world, one of the corps R&D depts would already have discovered it.

Of course, maybe they're holding back the technology until regular cybereye profits dip. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ludomastro
post Aug 29 2008, 11:27 PM
Post #12


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,382
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Shadowland
Member No.: 8,297



QUOTE (Rad @ Aug 29 2008, 05:09 PM) *
The problem with being a scientist or--god forbid--an engineer who roleplays is that it's easy for us to come up with completely reasonable ideas that would still unbalance the game.


What do you have against us engineers? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

But seriously, you have a point. I can break anything if I set out to do so. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/spin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rad
post Aug 29 2008, 11:32 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Pismo Beach, CA
Member No.: 15,715



QUOTE (Alex @ Aug 29 2008, 04:27 PM) *
What do you have against us engineers? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

But seriously, you have a point. I can break anything if I set out to do so. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/spin.gif)


Nothing. I just recognize that our real world technical knowledge tends to eat game worlds for breakfast. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/vegm.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Aug 30 2008, 02:34 AM
Post #14


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Rad @ Aug 29 2008, 07:09 PM) *
Here's the thing, shoving a device into the functional part of the eye is much different than having an RFID tag (much smaller than a contact, by description) floating around underneath the skin or in the cavities between organs. Here you're actually disrupting a major organ and placing a device smack in the middle of it's inner workings--that to me reads Essence Loss.

Going back to the bone lacing, IIRC it's the bone lacing that's modified to be microscopically porous to allow new blood cells to continue being released from the marrow, because otherwise coating your bones with metal would seal the natural pores and prevent that.

Likewise, an implanted lens would have to be designed to account for the interference with normal blood flow and fluid transmission, and coated with immunosuppressants to prevent rejection. Hell, the immunosuppressants alone could account for the essence loss.

It's a neat idea--but beside all the in-game reasons the biggest problem I have with it is that it seems like a thinly veiled excuse to circumvent the rules and get cheap essence-free cybereyes. The problem with being a scientist or--god forbid--an engineer who roleplays is that it's easy for us to come up with completely reasonable ideas that would still unbalance the game. One has to keep in mind that if it could be done that easily in the game world, one of the corps R&D depts would already have discovered it.

Of course, maybe they're holding back the technology until regular cybereye profits dip. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Actually, I talked with my optometrist and he said that there is no "interference with normal blood flow" as the IOL* doesn't require blood supply as it isn't organic and doesn't replace the regular lens of the eye. Also the body doesn't reject the lens because the lenses are inert. Let's face it, my idea would work... you just have to have a cybercommlink, trodes, or a datajack to control it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

* = IntraOccular Lens
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ludomastro
post Aug 30 2008, 03:58 AM
Post #15


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,382
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Shadowland
Member No.: 8,297



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Aug 29 2008, 08:34 PM) *
Actually, I talked with my optometrist and he said that there is no "interference with normal blood flow" as the IOL* doesn't require blood supply as it isn't organic and doesn't replace the regular lens of the eye. Also the body doesn't reject the lens because the lenses are inert. Let's face it, my idea would work... you just have to have a cybercommlink, trodes, or a datajack to control it.


Except for the whole common sense thing that you aren't allowed to use with any edition of Shadowrun rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Aug 30 2008, 04:15 AM
Post #16


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



Bah, to me it still sounds like eye-mods, remember that Essence loss has never really been nailed down in Shadowrun, and now even plastic surgry costs Essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Aug 30 2008, 04:44 AM
Post #17


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Alex @ Aug 29 2008, 10:58 PM) *
Except for the whole common sense thing that you aren't allowed to use with any edition of Shadowrun rules.


Huh? What do you mean?

==================================================

QUOTE (Ravor @ Aug 29 2008, 11:15 PM) *
Bah, to me it still sounds like eye-mods, remember that Essence loss has never really been nailed down in Shadowrun, and now even plastic surgry costs Essence.


Actually cosmetic surgery is covered in Augmentation pg 61. What we consider plastic surgery is minor biosculpting. Moderate biosculpting costs Essence... here is what is considered moderate:

QUOTE
Typical moderate modifications would include altering apparent ethnicity, giving a face an anime idol appearance, sanding down troll dermal deposits, or replacing hair with feathers.


Notice ALL of those are MAJOR changes in a person. An anime idol "appearance"... that the big eyes weird, hair color look. Replacing hair with FEATHERS... Good God Ravor, that's COMPLETELY on a whole different level than plastic surgery!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ludomastro
post Aug 30 2008, 05:11 AM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,382
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Shadowland
Member No.: 8,297



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Aug 29 2008, 10:44 PM) *
Huh? What do you mean?


Only that if you start applying common sense to any set of rules for any edition of SR (or any other RPG for that matter), the whole thing starts coming apart at the seams. The rules only exist (or make sense) inside the game world.

However, if it floats your boat, then have fun. I am NOT the fun police.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Aug 30 2008, 05:49 AM
Post #19


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



None of which should cost any Essence in my opinion... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rad
post Aug 30 2008, 12:26 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Pismo Beach, CA
Member No.: 15,715



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Aug 29 2008, 07:34 PM) *
Actually, I talked with my optometrist and he said that there is no "interference with normal blood flow" as the IOL* doesn't require blood supply as it isn't organic and doesn't replace the regular lens of the eye. Also the body doesn't reject the lens because the lenses are inert. Let's face it, my idea would work... you just have to have a cybercommlink, trodes, or a datajack to control it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

* = IntraOccular Lens


Unless it's inserted in an area that has no blood vessels, your optometrist lied to you. Blood vessels would need to regrow around the lens in order to reconnect the tissue you now have a lens jammed in the middle of. Likewise, having a physical object where there didn't use to be one can interfere with nerves, osmosis, the clearing away of dead cells, ect. As for the body not rejecting it, SR clearly states that immunosuppressants are used when implanting cyberware, to reduce the chance of rejection. Again, it comes down to the difference between the way our world works and the way the game world works. If shadowrun obeyed the same rules as our universe, the books would double as that unified field theory physicists have been searching for.

In our world, if you had certain pieces of SR tech it could work, in the SR world, it's highly questionable--and unnessecary since you can just use regular skinlinked contacts without having to surgically implant them. There's no rules for contacts popping out in SR, so wearing them normally isn't an issue.

QUOTE (Ravor @ Aug 29 2008, 10:49 PM) *
None of which should cost any Essence in my opinion... cyber.gif


Especially sanding down the dermal deposits--that's like clipping toenails. Does that mean your characters lose essence if they get a pedicure? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Aug 30 2008, 02:13 PM
Post #21


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Rad @ Aug 30 2008, 08:26 AM) *
Unless it's inserted in an area that has no blood vessels, your optometrist lied to you.


Sorry to say it this way, but I believe my Optometrist a LOT more than I believe you. He knows how this crap works and besides even in the description in the Wiki site it says that the lens is between the iris and the regular lens. It doesn't need ANY blood vessels or blood supply or interfere with nerves.

QUOTE (Rad @ Aug 30 2008, 08:26 AM) *
There's no rules for contacts popping out in SR, so wearing them normally isn't an issue.


So why not say that they can be "implanted as an IOL" and leave it at that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Aug 30 2008, 02:29 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



I am not arguing that in RL that it can be done. But I think the major point that some of the others are trying to make is that you are circumventing all the rules laid down for Eye Cyberware for a greater reduction in both price and essence.

It is not an arguement that in real life or the game that it is impossible. But I think that if you could get the procedure done that can give you better than Delta-Grade Cybereyes for less than Alpha then it is unbalanced to the game. I personally would not allolw it in any of my games but if your the GM and want to then it is up to you. Just don't expect it to be allowed at every table.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Aug 30 2008, 05:21 PM
Post #23


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



iirc, you can get things like lowlight vision without going for a full cybereye.

so, what if that enhancement is basically a implanted lense as described on the wikipedia page?

bbb 332 for those interested...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Aug 30 2008, 06:10 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



I think the intent of the OP is to avoid the Mods all together by just planting the gear Contact lenses without paying the essense for any of the mods. Just the cost of getting the enhanced contact lenses and then a small fee to a doc for implanting them stright into the eye. Yes it may be done but I see it as a way of cheating the now existing rules on cyber enhancements to the eyes.

Of course, if I am mistaken please explain what I am missing KC. If you are trying for a different approach and I have misread then I'll admit my mistake.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Aug 30 2008, 07:34 PM
Post #25


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Aug 30 2008, 12:21 PM) *
iirc, you can get things like lowlight vision without going for a full cybereye.

so, what if that enhancement is basically a implanted lense as described on the wikipedia page?

bbb 332 for those interested...

Actually you should have read page 332 more closely because here is what it says about non-replacement augments to eyes:
QUOTE (Shadowrun 4th Ed_pg 332 @ 2005)
For those who don’t want to go for the full switch, many cybereye features are of offered as non-replacement retinal modifications to the natural eyes


==============================================================

QUOTE (ravensoracle @ Aug 30 2008, 01:10 PM) *
I think the intent of the OP is to avoid the Mods all together by just planting the gear Contact lenses without paying the essense for any of the mods. Just the cost of getting the enhanced contact lenses and then a small fee to a doc for implanting them stright into the eye. Yes it may be done but I see it as a way of cheating the now existing rules on cyber enhancements to the eyes.

Of course, if I am mistaken please explain what I am missing KC. If you are trying for a different approach and I have misread then I'll admit my mistake.


Actually that's exactly what I'm saying. The thing is you need some way to control the lenses... Hence the title of this thread: "Poor Man's Delta Grade cybereyes. This also doesn't include eye recording mod... you'll need a camera for that. If you don't have any DNI (trodes or Datajack) you can't control the lenses.

As for this cheating the system... not really. You have to GET the lenses and cybereyes are MUCH easier to get then a set of Availability 20 IOLs. Also if you want to upgrade your cybereyes, you go to the cyberdoc, you pop your eyes out, presto change-o, pop them back in and out the door you go. Also human mages would not be able to use the thermo or low-light to target spells. That's pretty big.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 05:29 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.