IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages V  « < 11 12 13  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Echolocation, Can a mage target with the bioware?
Ol' Scratch
post Sep 22 2008, 09:04 AM
Post #301


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



Actually the text says "...that is laid over (or replaces) the user's normal visual sensory input." Which is prefectly accurate. In normal circumstances it's laid over your normal vision. Find yourself in total darkness, and it effectively replaces your vision as there's nothing to ovrelay except darkness. Same philosophy applies to invisible targets and so on. There's a reason they put it in parenthesis rather than normal text. It context (a word people hate around here apparently) it's a conditional statement.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BullZeye
post Sep 22 2008, 09:35 AM
Post #302


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 228
Joined: 27-July 08
Member No.: 16,168



QUOTE (Platinum Dragon @ Sep 22 2008, 11:45 AM) *
It's not really an issue of technology, it's an issue of information. We have technology now that can monitor and display ultrasound in realtime, but that doesn't change the fact that we can only process so much (visually) at a time. In your example above, the truck driver would actually have a penalty to his visual perception tests due to 'visual noise,' but a bonus to his 'deforestation check' (or whatever) due to the additional knowledge the overlay gives him.


Actually it helps the driving as you can see how the land is shaped and can avoid holes and such but has no effect on the cutting as then the machine is stopped anyway. On a forest there can be lots of "hidden" holes, ditches, covered tree stumps and stones that you want to avoid while driving but because of moss, bushes and small plants you can't see them before you actually drive over them and then it's already too late to avoid them. There comes the effectiveness of the (I guess it is ultrasound sensor, didn't bother checking what system it uses) fact that you can see a simplistic overlay of obstacles and land shape that you can avoid driving into stuff you should avoid (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Odsh
post Sep 22 2008, 01:09 PM
Post #303


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 14-August 07
Member No.: 12,638



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Sep 21 2008, 05:29 PM) *
What I'd suggest for errata (since its fairly obvious they only want the normal vision to be used) would be to make the sentence something like, "Mages can only cast with normal, low-light, or thermographic vision, whether natural or implanted. Mages can use external vision enhancements, but they must be optical. (Example, Optical Devices, Pg 324). Mages can also target using astral perception."


I agree this would clarify the rules.
Maybe add an exception for touch spells, spells cast on yourself (you don't need to see yourself, do you?) and ritual spellcasting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TKDNinjaInBlack
post Sep 22 2008, 01:18 PM
Post #304


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 8-September 08
From: St. Louis, UCAS
Member No.: 16,329



also remember that while the greyscale or wire frame (however you wish to see it or imagine it, I've seen both in real life) lays over your vision, it wouldn't necessarily be a hinderence. There are levels of opacity and transparency one can adopt for optimum usage. Even basic AROs aren't fully opaque and have some level of transparency to them. Could you imagine having fully opaque AROs blocking your vision to the point you couldn't see where you are going? (I can imagine this being a tactic in heavy spam zones) It wouldn't be good practice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Sep 22 2008, 02:51 PM
Post #305


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



Odsh, The sentence before it covers for touch spells, though, I wouldn't be against having it be "Mages can only cast LOS range spells..." instead. As far as ritual spellcasting, it has its own section a few pages later, that describes how it works.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Platinum Dragon
post Sep 23 2008, 02:25 AM
Post #306


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 265
Joined: 30-July 08
Member No.: 16,176



QUOTE (Dr. Funkenstein @ Sep 22 2008, 07:04 PM) *
Actually the text says "...that is laid over (or replaces) the user's normal visual sensory input." Which is prefectly accurate. In normal circumstances it's laid over your normal vision. Find yourself in total darkness, and it effectively replaces your vision as there's nothing to ovrelay except darkness. Same philosophy applies to invisible targets and so on. There's a reason they put it in parenthesis rather than normal text. It context (a word people hate around here apparently) it's a conditional statement.


My bad, I was arguing from memory and got the text wrong. I was thinking it was 'laid over (replaces)' not 'laid over (or replaces).' So yes, you're right, in context it's a conditional, but the way I thought it was phrased it would be a clarification. Like I said, my bad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TKDNinjaInBlack
post Sep 23 2008, 02:29 AM
Post #307


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 8-September 08
From: St. Louis, UCAS
Member No.: 16,329



I love good sports. Recommended bonus Karma to Platinum Dragon for accepting a mistake and keeping things cordial.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

13 Pages V  « < 11 12 13
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th July 2026 - 01:04 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.