IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Bone Lacing
Connor
post Jan 4 2004, 09:18 AM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 30-May 03
From: Tulsa, OK
Member No.: 4,652



I guess I may have to break out my books and see then. The key word there might be 'similar'. Since that implies it's not the same. Perhaps that's what I get for posting without having bothered to break out Man and Machine lately.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Jan 4 2004, 09:22 AM
Post #27


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



The errata reads as follows:
p. 78 Bioware and the Awakened [4]
Replace the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs with the following:

The removed paragraphs include the description of "virtual reduction in Magic Rating". Since that description is now gone, there is no longer a virtual loss of Magic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Jan 4 2004, 09:24 AM
Post #28


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



Damn, I was just about to post that.

ed- The errata does say so explicitly, too. "Magic reduction from bioware functions like other forms of Magic loss-adepts lose some of their powers, for example."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 4 2004, 09:29 AM
Post #29


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (OurTeam)
The errata reads as follows:
p. 78 Bioware and the Awakened [4]
Replace the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs with the following:

The removed paragraphs include the description of "virtual reduction in Magic Rating". Since that description is now gone, there is no longer a virtual loss of Magic.

And that's what I get for posting without checking! :oops:

It's actually a good thing™ in my opinion to get rid of the 'virtual' crap. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Connor
post Jan 4 2004, 09:32 AM
Post #30


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 30-May 03
From: Tulsa, OK
Member No.: 4,652



You know, I completely read past that section of errata awhile back. Yay for us both!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 4 2004, 09:33 AM
Post #31


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Connor)
You know, I completely read past that section of errata awhile back. Yay for us both!

I'm glad you brought it up. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Jan 4 2004, 09:46 AM
Post #32


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



QUOTE (Fortune)
It's actually a good thing™ in my opinion to get rid of the 'virtual' crap. :)

I couldn't agree with you more :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jan 4 2004, 03:10 PM
Post #33


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (Nion)
The first couple of pages of M&M (I think) state that while making the 3rd ed they decided that essence loss came from things communicating with the brain. But still, many things that cost essence do not communicate with the brain.

This is mostly correct. Have a quote.

QUOTE (M&M @ p.7)
Cyberware needs to be implanted and connected to the neuropathways, unlike pins and pacemakers, which have no need to talk to the brain.  So the unique thing about cyberware is that it's a non-natural implant that talks to the brain.

So this machine--metal, ceramic, polymers and other future-tech stuff--must be connected to the 'ol fleshy gray matter.  This is how cyberware differs from all other implants, and it is here that Essence is lost.

Why does Bone Lacing cause Essence loss, you ask? Does it not hurt when you break a bone? Those nerves must be reconnected to the laced bones, thusly causing a loss of Essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanos007
post Jan 4 2004, 04:46 PM
Post #34


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 369
Joined: 1-September 03
From: New York State
Member No.: 5,563



Wait. I'm confused now. Are you saying that with the errata there is NO magic loss from bio-ware?




Thanos :wobble:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jan 4 2004, 04:52 PM
Post #35


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



There is magic loss, just not virtual magic loss (Which you could still Initiate out of).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Jan 4 2004, 05:59 PM
Post #36


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



The magic loss from bioware is now just as real as the magic loss from reduced essense. If by bioware and cyberware you reach a magic rating of zero, then you are fully mundane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr. Man
post Jan 5 2004, 05:06 AM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 313
Joined: 26-February 02
From: UCAS
Member No.: 1,015



QUOTE (toturi)
Do you know how many bones are there in your body?

"There are 215 bones in the human body. That's one."

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jan 5 2004, 06:07 AM
Post #38


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



the real question is, how is titanium lacing more invasive/disruptive than, say, kevlar, ceramic, or plastic lacing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jan 5 2004, 06:11 AM
Post #39


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (mfb)
the real question is, how is titanium lacing more invasive/disruptive than, say, kevlar, ceramic, or plastic lacing?

Good question. Uh...

It's... Uh... Heavier? Wait, that contradicts my posts in the Lacing+Stealth thread...

Uh... Improvement? I mean, uh... It just... Does! So there! :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fresno Bob
post Jan 5 2004, 06:14 AM
Post #40


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Fresno, CalFree
Member No.: 4,252



QUOTE (Mr. Man)
"There are 215 bones in the human body. That's one."


"Eeeehh! Sorry doc, that's wrong! Would you like to go for double jeopardy, where the scores can really get high?"

The human body contains 206 bones. Sarah Conner was wrong.

Also, that was an attempt at quoting Die Hard. I haven't seen it in a while.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 5 2004, 06:18 AM
Post #41


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Voorhees)
The human body contains 206 bones. Sarah Conner was wrong.

Actually, according to this site, the number changes as a human ages. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jan 5 2004, 06:21 AM
Post #42


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (Voorhees @ Jan 5 2004, 05:14 PM)
The human body contains 206 bones. Sarah Conner was wrong.

Actually, according to this site, the number changes as a human ages. :)

*twitch*

Random colors, cheesey graphics, inane use of header tags...

Yup, it's a college-kid-with-no-proper-HTML-skills site!

I should so trademark that...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 5 2004, 06:23 AM
Post #43


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Oh well. It was the first site listed in my Google search. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fresno Bob
post Jan 5 2004, 06:23 AM
Post #44


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Fresno, CalFree
Member No.: 4,252



QUOTE
fuse together leaving only 206 bones in the adult body


Proves me point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 5 2004, 06:25 AM
Post #45


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



I didn't argue that point. My point is that, at some stage in the human's life, he'll (probably) have 215, as they slowly fuse together. In a way, that makes Mr. Man right, only not in the way he thought he was. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fresno Bob
post Jan 5 2004, 06:26 AM
Post #46


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Fresno, CalFree
Member No.: 4,252



Sarah Connor was talking about a grown man, Dr. Silberman, who would have had 206 bones.

He quoted Sarah's incorrect statement, and thus was incorrect himself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Jan 5 2004, 07:32 AM
Post #47


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



QUOTE (tanka)
Why does Bone Lacing cause Essence loss, you ask? Does it not hurt when you break a bone? Those nerves must be reconnected to the laced bones, thusly causing a loss of Essence.

Shouldn't that be true for current replacement bones? Pins too. My friend recently got a couple of titanium vertebrae. My mothers husband has a ceramic sternum and two knees with more metal in them than Voltron. Surely it would hurt if I shattered their knees, sternum, and vertebrae!

I think it would've been much easier and more consistent to say that pacemakers and bone pins do in fact carry a small Essense cost. What's the big deal if the game asserts that my grandfather with the replacement hip actually has 5.85 Essense instead of 6?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Jan 5 2004, 08:15 AM
Post #48


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Zazen)
My mothers husband has a ceramic sternum and two knees with more metal in them than Voltron. Surely it would hurt if I shattered their knees, sternum, and vertebrae!

Your mothers husband?? Why just say your dad?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 5 2004, 08:22 AM
Post #49


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Because it isn't his dad, maybe? It could possibly be his mother's husband, a person she married after she and his dad were no longer together. He might not like the term 'step-dad'. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Diesel
post Jan 5 2004, 08:22 AM
Post #50


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 608
Joined: 9-July 02
From: California
Member No.: 2,955



Perhaps it was a stepfather deal? Don't call on people with that stuff, its just not nice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd January 2026 - 10:37 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.