![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 932 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Orlando, Florida Member No.: 1,042 ![]() |
Because they don't make any sense to me.
When a PC shoots at a metahuman with a standard attack roll, what's he trying to do? Kill them. So, when he shoots at a metahuman with a called shot for damage, what's he trying to do? Really, sincerely try to kill them? And why is it harder to really, sincerely try to kill someone than it is to try to kill them in a more desultory way? With the called shot he's aiming at the head, but with the standard roll, he's aiming at the toe? In real life, the shooter automatically aims at the head or the center of mass, the most vulnerable, and in the latter case also most easily hit, targets. How well our PC hits these areas is reflected in the damage he does with a standard roll, and can be forecast, more or less, by their die pool. I do allow called shots for things like trying to shoot an item out of a target's hand, or shooting out a tire. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 17-June 08 Member No.: 16,061 ![]() |
i guess its more like how much focus the targeting person is using to aim, so if he tries to be more precise its more probable he actually hits exactly what he wants, the normal method is more the oh there is my target, SHOOT IT reflexive style of aiming and instantously pulling the trigger, therefore more unprecise but easier to do since you dont focus so much..
hope that helps |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 497 Joined: 16-April 08 From: Alexandria, VA Member No.: 15,900 ![]() |
Most shooters are trained for center-mass only. I always assumed the extra damage was going for a head-shot...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,768 Joined: 31-October 08 From: Redmond (Yes, really) Member No.: 16,558 ![]() |
Most shooters are trained for center-mass only. I always assumed the extra damage was going for a head-shot... Seconded. A standard shot is assumed to be aimed at the easiest spot to hit (i.e. center-mass, or torso, shots). A called shot for damage is a headshot, kneecap, or similar. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 25-November 08 Member No.: 16,629 ![]() |
Police are trained to shoot for the chest, although a head shot is much more effective, but harder to pull off.
So yes, shooting them twice in the chest should kill them, but if you need to kill them faster, a head shot does more damage, but is harder to hit. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
This rule is the single best way to attack...PERIOD. When will you roll 4 extra hits for damage on four dice? Almost never unless you blow Edge. With this you get a huge boost in per-shot "oomph" and you can still blow Edge to make sure it counts if you want it that bad.
1.33 hits for +4 DV? I'll buy that for a dollar! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) And yes, we have banned it in our game as well. PS: Anyone else notice that the piss ant "-dice" as a penalty mechanic is as worthless as my group has? I mean, it's been pretty well demonstrated here that you can easily make a 15+ dice monster (insert character type here) with the 400 BP base build pretty easily... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,556 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 98 ![]() |
We *used* to ban this, but then we did the math on it.
Burst and autofire give a (similar, not identical) increase in damage output, without having to take a free action to call the shot and with RC allowing you to reduce or eliminate the penalty. Only downsides are increased ammo consumption (almost a non-issue) and the +DV doesn't count towards armor penetration. That free action is also what you could or should be using to dive prone or take cover during the off-turn. Called shot also restricts you to short bursts or semiauto fire... putting the DV through the ceiling, even if it ends up being only stun damage, is a lot easier with an automatic weapon. The free action prerequisite also means you can only fire one called shot a turn, whereas you can fire two short bursts, a long and a short, or (with an HV weapon) two longs. Recoil compensation that'll mostly handle two long bursts takes some work, but it's far from unreasonable to get. Call-for-+DV only looks broken when you compare it to Call-for-AP... which is horribly underpowered, in the long run (I've never seen it used, even when we had Call-for-+DV banned). When compared to the other ways you can increase damage (Nuyen-for-+DV, also known as "buying a bigger gun and/or good ammo" or Nuyen-and-recoil-for-+DV, also known as "buy more ammo and get some recoil compensation"), Call-for-+DV really isn't all that big of a deal. And with burst and autofire weapons available within pretty much every weapon type and under every Skill umbrella, letting the folks who stick with a hunting rifle, hold-out, or other low-ROF weapon keep up with the damage curve doesn't bug me in the least. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
That's all fine and dandy, Shrike30, but you forgot one thing...there is nothing in the rules that says you can't call the shot for DV and fire a weapon in bursts. In fact, it specifically states that the "called for damage" option is only for SS, SA, and BF mode weapons on pg. 149 of the BBB.
Hmm...yikes? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 ![]() |
First you aim (simple action), then you Call the Shot (Free action), then you fire once. Most of the 15+ dice monsters are better off shooting twice.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
First you aim (simple action), then you Call the Shot (Free action), then you fire once. Most of the 15+ dice monsters are better off shooting twice. How so? You still get trade +4DV for a typical loss of only 1.33 hits. You won't get the +4 DV with the extra dice very often (if ever), and you're still rolling an average of 3.66 hits per test before tossing in Edge: 2 RC for an average of SMG 3-shot burst 7DV + 5.33 hits compared to 11DV + 3.66 hits on average. Oh yeah, and my way still lets you fire a second burst, just in case they need extra convincing. Good trade? I think so! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-February 08 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Member No.: 15,706 ![]() |
That's all fine and dandy, Shrike30, but you forgot one thing...there is nothing in the rules that says you can't call the shot for DV and fire a weapon in bursts. In fact, it specifically states that the "called for damage" option is only for SS, SA, and BF mode weapons on pg. 149 of the BBB. Hmm...yikes? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) Yes, you can use Called Shots with Burst Fire, as Shrike said. Long Bursts, however, are not considered Burst Fire, but Full Auto, & thus only Short Bursts are allowed with Called Shot rules. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
Yes, you can use Called Shots with Burst Fire, as Shrike said. Long Bursts, however, are not considered Burst Fire, but Full Auto, & thus only Short Bursts are allowed with Called Shot rules. Oh yes, I forget that some of y'all have characters that waste ammo...err, fire on Full Auto more than maybe once every two or three runs. My bad... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 829 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 770 ![]() |
PS: Anyone else notice that the piss ant "-dice" as a penalty mechanic is as worthless as my group has? I mean, it's been pretty well demonstrated here that you can easily make a 15+ dice monster (insert character type here) with the 400 BP base build pretty easily... In a specialist character's area of expertise, losing less than 8 dice is usually not horrible, no. Of course, said expert is probably looking at dicepools of no more than 6-8 in anything other than his specialization, so losing dice can hurt lots there. Which is, in some ways, actually an improvement over earlier versions of the game, since a +TN penalty was often even more laughable, such as when choosing whether to use your recently-learned skill of 1 die, or to "default" to a nearby skill/attribute of 10 or more dice. Shrike30: I have seen call for -AP used effectively once...against a spirit's immunity-to-normal-weapons. Since it's not limited to 4, and the player had a brick of dice to throw, he could toss in edge to damage any spirit up to about force 15 or so. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-February 08 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Member No.: 15,706 ![]() |
Ammo is cheap. Using Long Bursts is not even remotely close to a waste; +5 DV for zero to two Dice Pool loss is a significantly better deal than +4 DV for -4 Dice Pool and a Free Action.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 992 Joined: 23-December 08 From: the Tampa Sprawl Member No.: 16,707 ![]() |
*SNIP* Call-for-+DV only looks broken when you compare it to Call-for-AP... which is horribly underpowered, in the long run (I've never seen it used, even when we had Call-for-+DV banned). *SNIP* Sucks for your players then. They must all have really low Edge or never use the long-shot rules. When your shooting at something with so much armor you don't have a chance of hurting it, the Call-for-AP and Edge-Dice-Long-Shot combine for a nice little "Golden BB". (If you don't know what a Golden BB is, ask any old time BattleTech player) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 ![]() |
Call for -AP works really, really well on vehicles. And that's all I'm allowed to say on the subject.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 4-September 07 Member No.: 13,115 ![]() |
It also works well for calling shots in situations where you haven't a non-lethal way of taking an opponent down. Called shots have been used several times in my games and I allow them with my approval, which is better than banning them outright. So far they've been used to damage cyber limbs, disarm opponents, take down fleeing informants, etc...
Now, I could use the logic some of the above have stated and it go like this: "I shoot the guy as he's running away. We need him to tell us where the bombs are rigged." "Okay, he flees and you shoot him twice. He'd dead." "I didn't want to kill him." "Yeah, well, people go for the largest portion for maximum efficiency, the chest in this case. The bullets killed him." The rule is fine as it is, it's only when it's abused by players that it really become an issue. My group is comprised of 6-10 dice pool characters, and they have no issues with pulling of called shots or even regular shots with no problem. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 ![]() |
How so? You still get trade +4DV for a typical loss of only 1.33 hits. You won't get the +4 DV with the extra dice very often (if ever), and you're still rolling an average of 3.66 hits per test before tossing in Edge: 2 RC for an average of SMG 3-shot burst 7DV + 5.33 hits compared to 11DV + 3.66 hits on average. Oh yeah, and my way still lets you fire a second burst, just in case they need extra convincing. Good trade? I think so! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif) How do you get the second burst? I think you need to aim as prequeresite for calling a shot? If you don´t have to do that, calling the shot will indeed be a no-brainer. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 497 Joined: 16-April 08 From: Alexandria, VA Member No.: 15,900 ![]() |
Call for -AP works really, really well on vehicles. And that's all I'm allowed to say on the subject. Ditto. Also effective on certain critters. I think his signature line probably says everything else on the subject he wants to contribute (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,228 Joined: 24-July 07 From: Canada Member No.: 12,350 ![]() |
Call for -AP works really, really well on vehicles. And that's all I'm allowed to say on the subject. QUOTE (BBB p. 149) The gamemaster decides if such a vulnerable spot is accessible. Vehicles, Spirits, and some Critters are "armored everywhere." You cannot shoot for an armor-less spot that doesn't exist. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 664 Joined: 3-February 08 Member No.: 15,626 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 497 Joined: 16-April 08 From: Alexandria, VA Member No.: 15,900 ![]() |
Vehicles, Spirits, and some Critters are "armored everywhere." You cannot shoot for an armor-less spot that doesn't exist. I would rule at my table that you can't bypass the armor on a spirit, but how can you honestly declare some critters and all vehicles to not have weak spots? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 ![]() |
I would rule at my table that you can't bypass the armor on a spirit, but how can you honestly declare some critters and all vehicles to not have weak spots? He didn´t. He declared that there are no armor-less spots. Shooting for +4 DV compensates for some 12 armor dice. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 992 Joined: 23-December 08 From: the Tampa Sprawl Member No.: 16,707 ![]() |
Vehicles, Spirits, and some Critters are "armored everywhere." You cannot shoot for an armor-less spot that doesn't exist. Sorry but no vehicle is "armored everywhere". That is actually impossible to do. Take the M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank for example. RPGs that hit it's front or side armor are pretty much a waste. But RPG's still kill them sometimes with a single shot! How?! Easy, they hit a weak spot. One of the tanks that got taken out during the Thunder Run took an RPG up the exhaust (I was there so please don't get snarky with me about it). So for very armored vehicles, I would only rule that you can't use the Called for AP if you were shooting it from the front, and then only if it was something like a APC, IFV, or MBT. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 872 ![]() |
Compared to older rules, called shots in SR4 are actually more balanced.
Better than the -4 dice to ignore all armor. I just have an open rule to my PCs whatever tactics they use, the NPCs will use. The MAD principle I call it... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) - J. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2025 - 08:28 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.