IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Drawbacks of not getting SR4A, Voting No with your wallet...
Ancient History
post Apr 2 2009, 11:29 PM
Post #26


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



What? You mean you're willing to miss out on the two (2) short stories I wrote for SR$A? I am hurt, yea, e'en wounded...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Apr 2 2009, 11:31 PM
Post #27


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Apr 2 2009, 07:29 PM) *
SR$A?


Ah, SR$A, that's what we should call it.

TBH, I don't read much of the fiction in the source books.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Apr 3 2009, 02:32 AM
Post #28


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Apr 2 2009, 04:31 PM) *
Ah, SR$A, that's what we should call it.

TBH, I don't read much of the fiction in the source books.

I don't think I even fully read Buzzkill; and I flat-out ignore the opening chapter pieces.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Apr 3 2009, 03:35 AM
Post #29


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Apr 3 2009, 07:29 AM) *
What? You mean you're willing to miss out on the two (2) short stories I wrote for SR$A? I am hurt, yea, e'en wounded...

Not as wounded as I am for you to admit that it is indeed a $ edition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Mack
post Apr 3 2009, 03:52 AM
Post #30


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 220
Joined: 15-March 09
Member No.: 16,972



QUOTE (toturi @ Apr 3 2009, 12:35 PM) *
Not as wounded as I am for you to admit that it is indeed a $ edition.



That damned caps button, revealing all dark secrets! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/spin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Apr 3 2009, 04:29 AM
Post #31


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Did I accidentally log onto the WotC boards?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matsci
post Apr 3 2009, 05:21 AM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 664
Joined: 3-February 08
Member No.: 15,626



QUOTE (eidolon @ Apr 2 2009, 08:29 PM) *
Did I accidentally log onto the WotC boards?


Nah, all the Nerdrage left there. I think it came here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
darthmord
post Apr 3 2009, 11:44 AM
Post #33


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,245
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia
Member No.: 11,548



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Apr 2 2009, 06:29 PM) *
What? You mean you're willing to miss out on the two (2) short stories I wrote for SR$A? I am hurt, yea, e'en wounded...


I read *EVERY* short story in SR4A. I liked them. So nyah!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post Apr 3 2009, 01:14 PM
Post #34


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



One thing I've enjoyed about SR4A is that they fixed some of the inexplicably bad choices about layout that the first version (was it Catalyst or FanPro?) made. For instance, the way you have stock commlinks on one page in the Wireless World section instead of the gear section, stock operating systems on another page, software upgrades on another page, and hardware upgrades on ANOTHER page... SR4A takes all that stuff and puts it in the same place in the gear section where it rightfully belongs. It also codifies the fixed sensor rules that allow you to upgrade sensor packages, as well as giving ratings and capacities for hearing and vision aids. It's still a little confusing, but it's nice to have. Overall, it's just an easier book to use, especially with the master index that greatly helps when finding stuff when you're not even sure where to look for it.

As for voting 'no' by not buying it... Well they can't de-publish the book, can they? I think a 'no' vote is a day late and dollar short at this point. Obviously, you don't have to buy it if you think there are more bad rules changes than good ones, but then again Catalyst has stressed that nobody has to buy this book in the first place -- it's not much more than an errata with a new format and some new art. It's an updated shiny new version of the same book, it's not Shadowrun 4.5. I don't think they expect everyone to buy this book, especially seeing how they're releasing an errata for free that contains all the changes. I think they're simply banking on the fact that no matter if a few dozen dumpshockers hate whatever they do, they continue to sell out of each printing of the books. If you want them to hear your voice, I'd suggest you contact them directly. Not buying the book is something that millions and millions of people who've never heard of Shadowrun do -- they're not paying attention to who doesn't buy it. And carping on dumpshock is only sporadically attended to buy the devs, and it's hard for them to take it seriously when it's just a small group of people who seem determined to complain no matter what.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Apr 3 2009, 01:26 PM
Post #35


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



I'm not currently running an SR campaign, but I just pre-ordered the hardback. I figure that my current core book has enough changes to it that getting a new book that's up to date will be a good thing. Plus, it sounds like I'll be starting up a game later this year, so it will be nice to have a new starting point.

Plus, based on what I have read, the rules that have changed, I either like or they really never came up enough in game to warrant venom spitting at our table. And, the re-org of the sections and a master index...all worth the $30 to me.

What I have never been able to understand is people thinking they have to change additions or rules just because something is published. I don't know, maybe I just play with too many people that are into WoW. And when they change something, for better or worse, you just work with it and move on. Developers don't make changes to intentionally ruin our fun...they make changes to better balance or simply fix problems. Most of us don't like them because we've been used to playing a different way, and most people don't like change and will find negative in almost anything.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Apr 3 2009, 01:30 PM
Post #36


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (Larme)
As for voting 'no' by not buying it... Well they can't de-publish the book, can they? I think a 'no' vote is a day late and dollar short at this point. Obviously, you don't have to buy it if you think there are more bad rules changes than good ones, but then again Catalyst has stressed that nobody has to buy this book in the first place -- it's not much more than an errata with a new format and some new art. It's an updated shiny new version of the same book, it's not Shadowrun 4.5. I don't think they expect everyone to buy this book, especially seeing how they're releasing an errata for free that contains all the changes. I think they're simply banking on the fact that no matter if a few dozen dumpshockers hate whatever they do, they continue to sell out of each printing of the books. If you want them to hear your voice, I'd suggest you contact them directly. Not buying the book is something that millions and millions of people who've never heard of Shadowrun do -- they're not paying attention to who doesn't buy it. And carping on dumpshock is only sporadically attended to buy the devs, and it's hard for them to take it seriously when it's just a small group of people who seem determined to complain no matter what.


I vote this "best post made to Dumpshock in the last few weeks", and I wish it would fit in my sig.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
InfinityzeN
post Apr 3 2009, 01:48 PM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 992
Joined: 23-December 08
From: the Tampa Sprawl
Member No.: 16,707



Seconded... the motion is up for general vote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Apr 3 2009, 07:08 PM
Post #38


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



I'd just like to point out a flaw in the argument here:

"I don't want to buy the book, I don't like the changes."
"You don't have to, the changes are going to be released free as errata."

Excuse me. But I don't want the damn errata. That's the exact part of why I'm NOT BUYING the damn book!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Apr 3 2009, 07:51 PM
Post #39


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



You can buy my gently-used un-errata'd printing of SR4. I'll sell it cheap.

Seems to solve all problems:)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 3 2009, 07:58 PM
Post #40


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Apr 3 2009, 01:29 AM) *
What? You mean you're willing to miss out on the two (2) short stories I wrote for SR$A? I am hurt, yea, e'en wounded...

you added two short stories to SR4A?
ok, just for that i am buying . . i allready have very first printing of 4th ed, and i don't even play, so yeah, fanboy here *g*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Apr 3 2009, 09:02 PM
Post #41


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (deek @ Apr 3 2009, 02:51 PM) *
You can buy my gently-used un-errata'd printing of SR4. I'll sell it cheap.


We have a copy, thanks. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Apr 3 2009, 10:47 PM
Post #42


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE
As for voting 'no' by not buying it... Well they can't de-publish the book, can they?

As a matter of fact, they can. The hardcopies haven't even reached the printers yet; I'll bet that errata and changes discovered on Dumpshock are going to make it into the final version. But indeed, they still could scrap the entire print run at this point, and refund the pre-orders.

As for voting with your wallet: if the book languishes on shelves, that's going to say something. Every dollar spent is a vote. If people don't buy the pdfs and hardcopies, preferring to stick to the errata and/or resorting to piracy, that's going to say something as well.

Really, all SR4.5 has got going for it is that it's shiny. It's got some cool artwork, more fiction, and just enough rules changes to keep things from being backwards-compatible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 3 2009, 11:20 PM
Post #43


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



how's that positive at all?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Apr 3 2009, 11:28 PM
Post #44


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 3 2009, 04:20 PM) *
how's that positive at all?

Huh?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Apr 3 2009, 11:46 PM
Post #45


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 3 2009, 08:58 PM) *
you added two short stories to SR4A?
ok, just for that i am buying . . i allready have very first printing of 4th ed, and i don't even play, so yeah, fanboy here *g*

Yeah. There's a story in how the stories got in there...but I'll save that for another time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Malachi
post Apr 4 2009, 12:30 AM
Post #46


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,228
Joined: 24-July 07
From: Canada
Member No.: 12,350



My favourite is the one AH wrote where FastJack fights the Crash Worm. Very, very good.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tyro
post Apr 4 2009, 12:36 AM
Post #47


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,768
Joined: 31-October 08
From: Redmond (Yes, really)
Member No.: 16,558



QUOTE (Malachi @ Apr 3 2009, 05:30 PM) *
My favourite is the one AH wrote where FastJack fights the Crash Worm. Very, very good.

Where is that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Apr 4 2009, 12:42 AM
Post #48


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Tyro @ Apr 3 2009, 05:36 PM) *
QUOTE
My favourite is the one AH wrote where FastJack fights the Crash Worm. Very, very good.

Where is that?

Right next to the sidebar advertisement for Holostreets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tiger Eyes
post Apr 4 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #49


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 732
Joined: 21-July 05
From: Seattle
Member No.: 7,508



QUOTE (Ancient History @ Apr 3 2009, 07:46 PM) *
Yeah. There's a story in how the stories got in there...but I'll save that for another time.


That story involves some winsome begging on my part. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tiger Eyes
post Apr 4 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #50


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 732
Joined: 21-July 05
From: Seattle
Member No.: 7,508



QUOTE (Malachi @ Apr 3 2009, 08:30 PM) *
My favourite is the one AH wrote where FastJack fights the Crash Worm. Very, very good.


My favorite too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th January 2025 - 03:01 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.