The Horrors and Death Magic? Answers In Earthdawn, And Who's Really Behind Aztlan-SPOILERS- |
The Horrors and Death Magic? Answers In Earthdawn, And Who's Really Behind Aztlan-SPOILERS- |
Jan 31 2004, 12:48 AM
Post
#301
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 12-March 03 Member No.: 4,241 |
The flat-topped pyramids of Latin America would be perfect landing pads for vertical take-off boulders - what if there was a submerged krial crash-landed in the mud around Technotitlan.
|
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 12:49 AM
Post
#302
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
The general problem with Shake and his alter egos (or minions) falls along these lines:
Whether or not you think you're right, please refrain from belittling and insulting the people who disagree. That was my biggest gripe about Doc Funk -- if you managed to prove him(?) wrong, buckle up and hang on because he was going to pound on you personally with both barrels. That's what Shake did and it painted him(?) as a juvenile twit whining, sniveling and resorting to ad hominem attacks to abuse the plantiff (old Cicero reference). -Siege |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 01:16 AM
Post
#303
|
|
The Ghost in our Machine Group: Retired Admins Posts: 166 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Unlisted Datastore Member No.: 52 |
This thread needs to display some redeeming qualities pretty damned quick (I know they're in there -- I saw some a couple pages back!) or it's going to get closed.
The name calling, trolling, and flaming are going to stop. |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 02:03 AM
Post
#304
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
CLOSE IT!
Oh, please, dear lord, close it. I just copied the whole thread into a text editor. With standard margins and such, it's 170 fragging pages. Hope your all happy. IN OTHER NEWS: A whole lot of you are getting major cuttage. Just so it's readable. Also, whenever I get to a Master Shake article, I just want to cry. HE TYPES SO MUCH! &*#%# |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 07:14 AM
Post
#305
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 228 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Melbourne Member No.: 652 |
I've been thinking about Parlainth/Teounspellable for a little while now and about what I think would need to happen for either shake's theory, or my half-assed one, that links the two to work.
One thing that comes to mind is that there's about 200 years or so (I haven't bothered to check) of reasonably modern scientific exploration that needed to be controlled in some fashion. This pretty much needs a person or secret group hanging around keeping an eye on things and squashing the odd important discovery. It also seems to me that somebody would need to be keeping some sort of control of the local government. This same person or group could quite happily have been laying the foundations for Aztlan and Aztechnology, intentionally or not. (No I've never read Aztlan) |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 08:20 AM
Post
#306
|
|||
Target Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 14-January 04 Member No.: 5,978 |
Those halcyon days of faith and hope, the pre-Prosperi times of innocence and respect. I liked the guy and defended every ‘coincidence’ and hole as being a mystery to unrevealed truths. The truth he revealed wasn’t what I was expecting. Considering that I made an ass of myself defending E/S and him, I still don’t understand what prompted his attacks on me, his biggest fan on the board. This thread is so fucking ironic it’s unreal. The greatest irony is that if the developers had half of the passion that the fans do, they wouldn't need to fire people or sell themselves. Every GOOD storyteller knows that endings are the hardest and most important. Because it's easy to get caught up in action but the ending is the last thing remembered and first thing judged when the story is over. Having Lou slink away into the darkness isn't a fitting ending to this thread which has been more entertaining than most stories. So how does this end? Certainly not with apologies for defending yourself. Some people came here trying to attack people personally which they can. And those who are attacked certainly are within their rights to defend themselves. You can't whine about being beat up if you're the one who started the fight, nor can you expect any respect or favor from the person you attacked without cause. If some want to claim that Ancient History apologized, I certainly never saw it, though I would have no problems accepting his apologies. I have no problem apologizing to Ancient History and Lou if I was a little too rough on them. It wasn't my intention to come here and beat up on total strangers, but restraint, even in defense, is a virtue I need to work on. Well, the mistake was in taking this seriously. Some did and some didn't. If you didn't, who cares. If you did, well, what now? Clearly the approach of Canon Law was misguided. If the discussions on this board exist to amuse and interest players or fans, the constant harping about 'canon' serves only to be divisive. It's clear that 'canon' ain't all you thought it was. The lesson is that if someone has opinions about E/S that differ from yours, that there is no 'correct answer,' only opinions. Since Lou won't apologize for his shameful and disrespectful posts, or show us the respect to explain and illuminate the other ‘mistakes’ from E/S so we could avoid them, it won't end that way though that would be a decent ending. The passion still exists for some, but 'canon' is a wasted outlet of their imaginations. So why not flip the entire premise? No discussing what is or isn't canon, but really accepting the premise of the willing suspension of disbelief? Sure the E/S folks are morons, but there's clearly a gem there underneath that all of us gained some enjoyment from. So ignore the fact that their world is a shallow and unfinished one and instead try to fill it with imagination that the board has in abundance, but the developers lacked. There is the malformed 'canon' world of E/S, but this board has more passion and intelligence about E/S than that. So why not focus on the 'Shadow' Shadowrun? Everyone who plays or runs a game has their own slant on the game so why not embrace that? No more flame wars about who knows the texts best, but more on your own imaginations which is far superior to the 'canon' anyway. Why not share ways to improve this imaginary world from your own perspective? If they go out of business, you’ll have to do that anyway. The Inquisitors of 'Canon Law' attack and attempt to dominate those who would deviate from their Faith. This spirit of banality has reduced the discussion to challenges of quotes. 'Where are your citations!' If the champions of Canon Law and unimagination wouldn't harass and scare posters away because they might not have all the 'canon' references ready for examination, we could move beyond this stupidity. Time, threads and bandwidth spent on your own imaginings and ideas to enrich this stale Mythos that others could appreciate, and maybe incorporate into their own games, would be more valuable than attacking any deviation from a canon that is more defined by the price of free lance writers than any grand vision. The books are clearly the basis for any discussion, but the goal shouldn’t be arguing over what those books say absolutely, but looking at what they do say and HOW WE CAN IMPROVE ON THEM. Faith in 'canon' is not warranted, but faith in yourself and a passion for these games and a respect for the ideas of others is good enough for an interesting discussion. That's all any of us could hope for from a board like this. |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 08:31 AM
Post
#307
|
|||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
I might not have treated Master Shake with respect but I certainly claim that I treated him with the respect he is due. If I may use your own argument, I might say the same about you saying posts about "Cliff's notes" and ":noob:" are juvenile and leaving a bad taste as well. But I have not. Think about it. Personally, I reciprocate respect and maturity. If that someone has proven his immaturity, I will therefore treat that person like a child, hence :noob:. A theory that was good but was proven false is still false. There was no reason to go on and on about why it should be right. We may speculate about the origin of the world but when God says he made it, I think we should take it as gospel. Further argument is irrational and juvenile. |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 08:49 AM
Post
#308
|
|||||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Lou already told you your speculations were invalid, that he certainly did not intend for certain things to be linked. Clearly your claim that Canon should be ignored is misguided. While what I think of Canon may be different than yours, you do not argue with the line developer since he wrote the damned thing. Arguing about it is akin to arguing if the world is flat after it has been proven that it is not. Your claim that your brand of E/S history is correct and that Canon is false is certainly ridiculous since without Canon, we might as well just argue about the weather. Since everyone has their own opinion on the "truth", whose truth is more true? You advocate a departure from Canon. That, in itself, is alright since as every GM knows, everyone else's game world is different. But in order to have a constructive argument, one that we can prove or disprove or agree to disagree is namely to quote Canon references. Speculation is fine as long as you have some Canon proof to support your claim but please accept it when other people start shooting down your theories especially if you have no solid Canon reference to back it up. |
||||
|
|||||
Jan 31 2004, 12:09 PM
Post
#309
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 228 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Melbourne Member No.: 652 |
Toturi: It's bad enough that he quoted the entirety of one of his own posts, then wrote one of his normal responses. But did you really have to quote the entirety of both of them as well?
:) |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 12:48 PM
Post
#310
|
|||
Target Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Glasgow, UK Member No.: 246 |
I posted some questions etc. a while back that seem to have got lost in the noise. Anyone still up for a bit of ED/SR debate? |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 01:04 PM
Post
#311
|
|||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Perhaps it would be best if theories about the metaplot would go more along the lines of "It says X on p. Y of book Z, which could be taken to mean A" etc, and not like "It says X on p. Y of book Z, which obviously must mean A". This thread seems to have been far more of the latter. There will be clashes whenever one takes an interpretation of a text and pronounces it the right one. Whenever discussing interpretations, just suggest -- never claim it is correct, never claim it is best. While I still don't agree with the tone of Master Shake's messages, if he (and everybody else who might have trouble with this point) does take heed of his own words "The lesson is that if someone has opinions about E/S that differ from yours, that there is no 'correct answer,' only opinions" the world will be a better place. Just remember to put your opinions forward as opinions and nothing else. Arguing about what canon actually says is still to be expected. Sometimes you have got to know what, exactly, the books do say. You can't interpret something if you don't even remember what it said in the first place. And if you don't care about what the books say at all, then you're on a very different level of opinions and interpretations. |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 01:49 PM
Post
#312
|
|||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Actually, all I'm doing is to mirror image all he does. I'm a simple person. If someone's stye rubs me the wrong way, I'll do the same to him and see if he likes it. Some people call this retribution. :) If he quotes his whole post, I'll quote him quoting his whole post. If he writes a two page essay, I'll write what I've to say and put it into a 2 page essay. God knows, he's pissed me off enough by dissing Canon. |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 02:00 PM
Post
#313
|
|||||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,757 Joined: 11-December 02 From: France Member No.: 3,723 |
There's a difference between being behind something, and being in charge of it. In Ares' case, Dunkelzahn didn't only held 12% of the capital, he was also the one who allowed David Gavilan to become President/CEO Damien Knight, probably motivated all those anti-bugs operations, associated the corp to its campaign, and when he warned Knight that going at war with Cross wouldn't be tolerated, Knight listened (and, as you know, as soon as the dragon was dead, he started again). Dunkelzahn didn't bother to control every action of Ares, but caused or delayed some major events in Ares existence. That's particular to Ares. I'd agree with you concerning Renraku. Concerning Aztechnology, I don't think he was behind Aztechnology's policy, but I'd doubt you could resume the fact that Dunkelzahn had shares and seat just for the dividends. On the other hand, Rhonabwy is an example of a wealthy dragon having just "interests" in Ares (and Shiawase).
I didn't read it, but IIRC it involves Alamais manipulating one of Winternight cell to attack his brother. |
||||
|
|||||
Jan 31 2004, 03:37 PM
Post
#314
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
I don't believe this. Not only is Master Shake now quoting himself, he still thinks I haven't apologized.
Enough with the Prosperi-bashing guys! Jeez, I've put at least as much work into this as anybody and nothing he's said made me flip my gourd (although the Hecate = Alachia was a surprise). |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 04:39 PM
Post
#315
|
|||||
Shooting Target Group: Validating Posts: 1,618 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Montevideo, Uruguay. Member No.: 3,992 |
Excuse me? I've re-read LouP's again and again, and I can't find anything that qualifies as a personal attack. He debunked your theory, end of the story. Stop insulting our intelligence.
You, obviously, don't have a clue about how the gaming industry works, right? (*) * Not that I know a lot, but you make me look like Adam-fragging-Smith. Ok people, shall we change the topic? I'm more itnerested in the implications of Alachia being Sheila Blatavska? How would you re-interpretate some of the AF's actions in light of this? |
||||
|
|||||
Jan 31 2004, 05:13 PM
Post
#316
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Target Group: Members Posts: 93 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,576 |
He has, repeatedly.
and
To just point out a couple. If you are expecting him to get on his knees and beg forgiveness, you are out of luck. That is about as good an apology as I have ever seen on DSF. If that isn't good enough for you, you are SOL, and a complete shit.
So, because he didn't support TWO of your theories, he is a jerk, and everything about ES/SR is bad now? Holy fuck, what an insecure, self-absorbed jackass you are.
No, you made an ass of yourself defending your own theories, after many, many people put holes in them, simply by using the canon materials. And when LouP came out of lurking to set the record straight, and to perhaps give you a graceful exit to discuss your other theories instead of harping on just two, you attack him. Making yourself into likely the biggest ass ever to post on these boards buy attempting to make yourself more important than the gentleman who gave us Earthdawn. Perhaps when you create and develop a game as good as ES, maybe then you'll have the credibility to say the trash you are saying now.
No actually, 'Canon Law' is the best route to take. By using canon, differing viewpoints can use it as a basis for finding consensus. Unfortunately for you, Canon has proven your theories incorrect, so you must attack the canon. Deal with the fact that your theories are wrong, as supported by Canon Law. If you don't like it, go make your own game, or version of ES. Do not attack the canon, line developer, and other fans who have different opinions. Your word is not law, so grow up, and realise that the world doesn't revolve around you.
As long as it is your imagination leading the way, right? Seems to me a lot of imagination has gone into alternate arguments to your theories, so why are you trivialising and attacking those so much? Oh yes, because these alterate ideas are not yours.
Stale? Says who? Oh yes, you say that. Because we don't accept your theories.
Actually, I reread this thread, and found that many people were accepting of your theories, but some had some critiques, based on the canon material. Which you totally flamed on, starting the whole flame war. The reason "Canon Law" is used so much is because without it, we would sooner rather than later have punks telling us how their kewl new corp (run by their PCs, natch) took over Ares and are about to take over all of North American and set up their own really kewl state with Battlemechs. And also because of the rather large number of people who post here who have a high level of education and maturity, and by experience expect theories to be supported by root sources (as in Canon material). If you had tried to pull this crap in the Lounge (may it rest in peace), you would have been ripped apart and ridiculed on Day One. Too bad you had be such an ass and focus only on the critques of a few parts of your theories. Instead of going all psycho, you could have said "Yes, I see where I may be wrong here, but let's talk about my other stuff. What do you think of that?". And finally,
LouP NEVER attacked you. He merely set the record straight. So I suggest you better stop your attacks on him, as he has a lot more credibility than you will ever have. Basically like I stated earlier. Unless you have something constructive to say, please shut your pie-hole. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Jan 31 2004, 05:28 PM
Post
#317
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Alright, I second the "please nuke this thread now" motion.
-Siege |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 06:21 PM
Post
#318
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
Sheer curiosity - why? Because that was one that was dead obvious to me from the first time I read Aztlan: just look at the tone of her interaction with the Lady. Still, I always knew I was in the severe minority in that association. Maybe your answer might explain that part of the majority's beliefs where they didn't follow from quasi-canonising your site? Because I never saw it, and obviously there were things in there that caused others to do so. And now for the short form (edited to say what I wanted to say originally - sigh): On behalf of everyone whom someone feels owes them an apology (or more of an apology): I'm sorry. On behalf of everyone who wants an apology (or more of an apology): 'Sokay. It's over and done with. :evil: |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 06:49 PM
Post
#319
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
Can I second myself? |
||
|
|||
Jan 31 2004, 07:08 PM
Post
#320
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 198 Joined: 26-December 03 Member No.: 5,935 |
Okay, I've been passively reading this thread for what 2 weeks, 3 weeks?
Before I start I'd like to also put in my vote for shutting down this pointless flame war, or moving it over to the "Examples of how not to discuss things on Dumpshock" folder. All I've got to say is this. Master Shake, the theory was good and believable. The writers apparently didn't intend it to work that way, and perhaps canon doesn't support it but that doesn't mean it's not usable in a game. However, just because you put write a 3 page essay that people largely liked, but didn't think was fully supported by canon doesn't give you the right to berate them. Had you defended yourself on the issues only and made no reference to the people writing the responses this all would have turned out differently and people wouldn't be calling you immature. But ah well, that's not how it played out. Instead you responded venomously toward anyone who contradicted your point of view. I'm not sure why you bothered posting it if you weren't ready to have people look at it critically. To the rest of you (note that I'm not directing this at anyone in particular so if it doesn't apply to you feel good that it doesn't because there is no need to tell us you point X doesn't apply to you because of Y): While I agree that MS has been rude, immature, and possibly irrational that doesn't we should all gather around and pick on him. You don't agree with him and you think your right. You have your thinking and he his. You've all layed down your evidvence and nobody has changed position. Leave it at that. Speaking profanely and rudely to him isn't going to make your agruement any stronger and goes a long way toward making him want to resist the validity of your arguement. If you stuck to just discussing what was presented and didn't respond to his personal attack then he'd be left as an example of immature behavior, but you didn't instead you acted just like him and so are no more mature than he is. Now, you did try and apologize, but when your apology wasn't accepted you just went back to acting the way you had just apologized for acting. Making that and all future apologies hollow. I could continue on this point for some time, but my post is getting long and you either already know this or don't. Respond, flame, accept. I don't care I'm done with this thread. |
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 07:17 PM
Post
#321
|
|||||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
I personally just thought Aina fit the role better. But it works well either way. |
||||
|
|||||
Jan 31 2004, 09:29 PM
Post
#322
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
Thanks, Ancient History. Useful, that: different people, different ways of seeing. (For I would never have seen Aina that way without looking through your eyes! ;) )
|
|
|
Jan 31 2004, 10:42 PM
Post
#323
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,925 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 948 |
Damn, Is this thread alive and writhing in it's own severe agonies?
Well, I guess it's all up to me now. *Looks sad but determined* *Carefully plant nukes all around the thread, add one or two extras to the extremely long posts of Master Shake and sits down with the detonator.* Well, it's been fun folks but it is time to put it out of it's misery. *Nukes thread with digital nuclear binary fire* See, even nuclear clouds have a silver lining. :D |
|
|
Feb 1 2004, 12:07 AM
Post
#324
|
|||
Target Group: Members Posts: 75 Joined: 24-August 02 Member No.: 3,168 |
In the 4th age Harlequin was ambassador to the Blood Wood from the Northern Isles. Why he knows most of the bad-boys kicking about down there. He is definitely a Lightbearer and is described as being a Sorcerer Adept and something else as well. So he is in the Blood Wood, and it's in the sourcebook of the same name you can find out more about him. As I've said before, I reckon Juan is some sort of power-unto-himself, but forced into his past role by a greater power still. The most likely thing I would think is that he is controlled/manipulated/corrupted himself, this makes most sense in light of his role inside Aztechnology, his sporadic appearances, and the instructions in Dunkelzahn's will for him and his subsequent disappearance. Black Lodge/Denairastas connection makes some sense based on what little I know of said clan. However, Black Lodge is a kinda silly concept... teleportation and super-magic are a bit gay, for want of a better word, for Shadowrun in my mind. As for Ragnarok, basics are that Lofwyr's bro gets Winterknight to take on the big man himself and it ends with Lofwyr giving him a bit of a kicking in a fight and having him teeth at his throat. Apparently that's enough to teach a dragon a lesson though and they don't go about wantonly killing each other so he lets him go live in shame or somesuch. Read the last few chapters in a shop one day! |
||
|
|||
Feb 1 2004, 12:36 AM
Post
#325
|
|||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
"Your mission is to fly stright down this trench... only a direct hit would destroy this thread." You're not an admin, are you? *Vader voice* "Stay in attack formation." "Stay on the leader." "I'll take him myself." 8) |
||
|
|||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 12:44 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.