IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Errata, karma costs for skill increases
JAG
post Jan 14 2004, 10:59 AM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 25-November 03
From: Somewhere in the back of your mind
Member No.: 5,845



The errata states
p. 245: Skill Improvement Cost Table [3]
Less than or equal to Attribute Rating 0.5
Less than or equal to (2 x Attribute Rating) 1
More than (2 x Attribute Rating) 1.5


Im currently working from what I believe is a first print (it is FASA labelled)

does this now mean all the variable increase costs for skills/knowledges and specialisations have been dumped and all skills increases regardless cost the same?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Jan 14 2004, 11:13 AM
Post #2


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



Negative, the errata is for the 2nd printing and before. Therefore, for all printings after 3rd, it is irrelevant.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Domino
post Jan 14 2004, 11:13 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 498
Joined: 31-May 02
From: All the way in the Back to the Left.
Member No.: 2,800



Having a very tattered Third Printing that matchs the specialization table. I think Specialization was left out of the errata heading.

These things aren't perfect. They still don't have the TN for the availibility of Offensive or Defensive Grenades after what 12 printings? ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JAG
post Jan 14 2004, 11:18 AM
Post #4


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 25-November 03
From: Somewhere in the back of your mind
Member No.: 5,845



QUOTE (Domino)
Having a very tattered Third Printing that matchs the specialization table. I think Specialization was left out of the errata heading.

The errata needs an errata
:D :rotfl: :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Domino
post Jan 14 2004, 11:22 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 498
Joined: 31-May 02
From: All the way in the Back to the Left.
Member No.: 2,800



QUOTE (JAG)
QUOTE (Domino @ Jan 14 2004, 06:13 AM)
Having a very tattered Third Printing that matchs the specialization table. I think Specialization was left out of the errata heading.

The errata needs an errata
:D :rotfl: :grinbig:

I'm sure that there will be 10 or 20 more before 4th edition comes out. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Jan 14 2004, 01:49 PM
Post #6


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



JAG, FASA made many printings. You'll find the printing number on page 5, right column, about 3 inches from the bottom, just above the trademark notices. As others have said, that correction is already in the third printing and all later printings.

The correction is ONLY to the "Knowledge/Language" column for "Specializations", which were published in first/second printings with the following numbers: .5, 1.5, 2.5
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bearclaw
post Jan 14 2004, 04:29 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



Here's the whole entry:

*Page 245 - Skill Improvement Cost Table
The cost for Knowledge/ Language Specializations should read as follows:
Less than or equal to Attribute Rating .5
Less than or equal to (2 x Attribute Rating) 1
More than (2 x Attribute Rating) 1.5

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 08:51 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.