IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Take Aim and indirect combat spells
Shinobi Killfist
post Apr 23 2009, 04:24 AM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,431
Joined: 3-December 03
Member No.: 5,872



So technically by the rules I don't think it is possible since "A character may take aim with a ready ranged weapon (firearm, bow, or throwing weapon) as a Simple Action" A fireball is not a ranged weapon, you can't "ready it", and not one of the specific examples. But it does follow the ranged combat rules so to me it should be able to work. Am I missing anything outside of house rules that would allow this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Apr 23 2009, 04:28 AM
Post #2


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



Nope. You can Take Aim with a fireball. It's treated as a ranged weapon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Apr 23 2009, 04:42 AM
Post #3


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Heck, I'd let you make a called shot with an indirect combat spell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Apr 23 2009, 04:44 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



I'd allow aiming and called shots with indirect spells. This is their strength, and also why they can be 'dodged'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinobi Killfist
post Apr 23 2009, 04:56 AM
Post #5


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,431
Joined: 3-December 03
Member No.: 5,872



Sweet, I'll have to figure out how to work Krav Maga into my current character then (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Ancient History,(not sure if you are the right person to ask) do you think in an errata the text could be changed to "A character may take aim with a ranged attack such as a firearm, bow, or throwing weapon as a Simple Action" By specifying a ready ranged weapon a literal reading of the rules would remove indirect spells from the equation since they aren't weapons and they can't be readied. Using ranged combat rules is not the same as being a ranged weapon. I thought the intent was to have it work for all ranged combat, but it did not seem to fit the RAW.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Apr 23 2009, 05:06 AM
Post #6


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I have little juice, but I will bring it up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinobi Killfist
post Apr 24 2009, 02:25 AM
Post #7


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,431
Joined: 3-December 03
Member No.: 5,872



Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
darthmord
post Apr 24 2009, 06:49 PM
Post #8


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,245
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia
Member No.: 11,548



It does make sense that if something is affected by all the negatives of ranged combat, it should be affected by the positives to ranged combat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Apr 26 2009, 03:27 AM
Post #9


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



Makes definite sense in my book...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 08:44 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.