IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Limitation Program Option in Unwired, Am I missing something?
deek
post May 14 2009, 04:37 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



I was reading parts of Unwired last night and I stumbled upon the General Program Option called Limitation. It basically limits a program to only be effective against certain constructs. So, you could have an Attack 5 (Limited: IC) program that was only usable against IC. Or perhaps a Browse 6 (Limited: Ares Nodes) program that the corp uses that is only able to function under an Ares node.

Anyways, my issue that I need help on is, what's the advantage to adding this on a program? Looking at the cost chart, its cost 100 nuyen per rating to add it to an existing program. So, why would a player do this?

As a GM, I can see handing out limited programs quite a bit. But looking at it from a character perspective, my initial assumption was that it would either reduce the cost of the base program (as it is limited) or there would be a bonus or some advantage to using it.

So, am I missing something or is this really just relegated the GM usage/flavor and a way to limit program access in a stolen commlink?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post May 14 2009, 04:43 PM
Post #2


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



i recall that back in SR3 and older, the limitation option would make the program take up less space in storage and ram...

but given how its described in unwired, it seem to be more of a gm tool then a player tool, this time round...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlueMax
post May 14 2009, 04:49 PM
Post #3


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,336
Joined: 25-February 08
From: San Mateo CA
Member No.: 15,708



QUOTE (hobgoblin @ May 14 2009, 08:43 AM) *
but given how its described in unwired, it seem to be more of a gm tool then a player tool, this time round...


Fine, go ahead and say what I was going to say.

Use it as loot prevention. Capture a commlink, but its only good on these nodes. D R M.

BlueMax
/only after you sign my EULA
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post May 14 2009, 06:11 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



Hmmm...that's the path of logic I was going down as well. Mostly a GMing tool and can be used as loot prevention.

I am considering taking the +100 nuyen per rating and subtracting that from the cost of the program. I doubt that would be very unbalanced.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Inane Imp
post May 15 2009, 12:01 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 24-May 08
Member No.: 16,003



From a criminal hacker perspective Limitation is a viable option for viral warfare. Creating a virus which implants the limitation option into other programs would allow you to protect yourself on a node you've already breached or could be seeded via Vector trojans prior to you exploiting a node.
RAW gives some scope for creating your own viruses, and applying the principle of 'if I can do it, so can they' it should be able to be found on a malware Warez site.

That would be a nasty bait and switch option: have a hacker get into an Ares node, finds the pay data, activate it, its a high level Trojan which infects his analyse, and hacking programs with a limitation Not Ares, and watch his frustration as all of his attempts to interact with the attacking IC fails. You could be kind and have him take a Hacking+Logic test to see if he realises the cause of his misfortune. Have him run a purge, in combat, before he can fight his way out.

Imp
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post May 15 2009, 12:18 AM
Post #6


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



I quite Like this... and have been contemplating its use as an offensive tactic for hacking...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 09:53 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.