IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Combat spells vs drones/vehicules
PatB
post May 25 2009, 12:45 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 6-March 09
Member No.: 16,949



I need to confirm the following, using SR4A:

1- Direct Combat spells doing stun: no effect on drones
2- Direct Combat spells doing physical: Need a Force 6 spell or better to hope to damage the drone (need 6 successes to reach the object resistance threshold and the maximum number of hits on a spell equals its force)
3- Indirect Combat spells: On a hit, the drone resists with Body + Armor (half armor from spell, double armor because it is an object, both notes as per Indirect section description). This is where I'm getting confused because the example in that same section says Body + half armor resistance for the drone. Which one is correct ??

Tx a bunch
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Prime Mover
post May 25 2009, 12:59 PM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,755
Joined: 5-September 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 9,313



1. Vehicles DO NOT take stun. Correct.
2. Object resistance has been lowered to a max of 5 in the changes reference document download.
3. Target resists with Body+half impact armor. Non living objects resist with Armor rating x2. I believe this rule stays the same from first version.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinobi Killfist
post May 25 2009, 02:58 PM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,431
Joined: 3-December 03
Member No.: 5,872



I believe a drone will resist with body + 1/2 armor. Its armor wont be doubled first because even though its an object it is not like a barrier with a structure rating, vehicles have there own type of resistance modeled more after a living being than a wall.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Prime Mover
post May 25 2009, 03:16 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,755
Joined: 5-September 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 9,313



Only reference I'm seeing in indirect definition is Armor x2 with non-living objects. Is there another spot I'm missing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PatB
post May 25 2009, 04:02 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 6-March 09
Member No.: 16,949



QUOTE (Prime Mover @ May 25 2009, 11:16 AM) *
Only reference I'm seeing in indirect definition is Armor x2 with non-living objects. Is there another spot I'm missing?


The example that follows. It's about a mage hitting a drone with Flamethrower. The drone has a Body of 3 and an Armor of 2 and resists with Body + half Armor.

Still wondering if the drone resists with Body + Armor or Body + half Armor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinobi Killfist
post May 25 2009, 04:38 PM
Post #6


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,431
Joined: 3-December 03
Member No.: 5,872



due to the quote I think objects is generally referring to things with an Armor and Structure rating. Vehicles have armor and body and are treated like people to see if armor is halved. Pg 167 of 4A says vehicle armor is treated just like character armor. Since vehicles move around and are a part of the standard combat round I think it is supposed to work like people not objects for ease of use, so the armor is just halved, not doubled and then halved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th October 2024 - 02:29 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.