Unconsciousness and Spell Resistance |
Unconsciousness and Spell Resistance |
Jan 19 2004, 03:37 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Technomancer Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
Do unconcious characters, either through drugs or through damage, get to resist spells? Obviously, illusions probably don't make sense because I think you need to be conscious of the illusion to even have the chance of resisting it. But, if what about spells like mana- or powerbolt?
-- Dashifen -- |
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 06:18 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Edinburgh, Scotland Member No.: 2,032 |
Wow. Interesting point. There's also the question of wether or not they resist all spells, in which case things like heal can't be cast on them, or wether they subconciously choose what to resist.
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 06:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 611 Joined: 21-October 03 From: Yorkshire Toxic Zone Member No.: 5,752 |
Under mindprobe I beleive the basic TN# is 4 with no resisitance test if the target is unconscious. If that's the case, then I'd say that rule would hold true of all spells.
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 06:34 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
I'd say you resist all damaging/screw you up spells.
And do not resist healing spells. After all, you are running on automatic. |
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 06:40 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Edinburgh, Scotland Member No.: 2,032 |
Hmm. With the canon example of someone not getting a resistance roll when they're unconcious I'd say no to resistance rolls (except against elemental manipulations, which are actually damage resistance tests) against spells when unconcious.
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 06:54 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 1-January 04 Member No.: 5,948 |
Well, taking a cue from those that practice magickal ritual in real life, I would likely go along with what the idea that the subconscious will of the character would deterring if a spell is resisted or not. Things that the subconscious would obviously or directly benefit the body would be allowed. Thus the subconscious would likely allow healing magic, such as Treat, Heal, spells to cure poisons or toxins, etc., while resist all others. Since the subconscious is not very sophisticated in terms of reasoning, and, for the most part, does not look past immediate circumstances or need, thus even spells like Armor or Levitate I would rule being resisted, sine their benefits are likley not obvious to the subconscious.
Spells such as Mind Probe are actually detection spells. Since it is a detection spell the intent of the magic is not to directly influence the mind of the target only try to perceive what is already there. When a person is unconscious the mind not as cluttered with the random barrage of thoughts, images, internal dialogue, etc. that normally make Mind Probe more difficult. |
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 07:15 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
I really don't like the idea of letting someone "know" whether magic is harmful or beneficial. I'd say either everything is resisted or everything is unresisted.
~J |
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 07:20 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 1-January 04 Member No.: 5,948 |
That's why you don't let them know when they are unconsious, just make the resistance for them.
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 07:45 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
This has been discussed before I think. Anyway, on page 183 in SR3, it says "Living targets may always make a Spell Resistance Test against spells, unless the target of the spell is willing." Since an unconscious target can not indicate his or her willingness to accept a spell, he or she would get a resistance test automatically.
The condition is not that you must be unwilling to get a resistance test, but that you must be willing to accept the spell to bypass the automatic resistance test. |
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 07:55 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
I would suggest it should definitely be all or none: either the unconscious person instinctively and on a very deep level resists all magic interfering with them (including Healing and Detection, without distinction for whether the magic would be beneficial to them or not), or they don't resist at all.
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 08:06 PM
Post
#11
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
Actually, no. Page 56, MITS "Unconscious targets are considered voluntary targets for health spells." |
||
|
|||
Jan 19 2004, 08:09 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
So that would suggest only one of the options I gave could be valid :)
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 08:27 PM
Post
#13
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
-sigh- I suppose I should provide the entire quote, though the fact that it mentions health spells specifically in that first part should *imply* the rest.
(emphasis is mine) |
||
|
|||
Jan 19 2004, 08:34 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 1-January 04 Member No.: 5,948 |
So it looks like the issue has already been resolved by the rules, with spells that have a special exception (such as Mind Probe) having that noted in the spell description.
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 08:50 PM
Post
#15
|
|||||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
I must admit that I'm a bit confused about all of this talk concerning the mind probe spell. Here is the entirety of the description in my book (the 12th printing):
And here is a relevant excerpt from the description of Detection Spells on page 192:
So... where are these references to Mind Probe bypassing the normal rules of Spell Resistance coming from? |
||||
|
|||||
Jan 19 2004, 09:02 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
I stand corrected. Thanks, Jason. (That will teach me to post on canon issues without having the sources on me! :spin: )
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 11:50 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
So even harmful Health spells are unresisted on unconscious targets. I like that solution.
~J |
|
|
Jan 20 2004, 03:08 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Technomancer Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
Good. Glad there was something in the books that I could use to back myself up with. Had this happen when one of my NPCs resisted a spell after being knocked unconscious and the others in the group said that it wasn't fair. I said we'd move on I'd make a ruling on it later. Now, I can.
Thanks everyone!!! -- Dash -- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 04:45 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.