IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Neoteny and Orks?
Machiavelli
post Jun 14 2009, 06:21 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,911
Joined: 26-February 02
From: near Stuttgart
Member No.: 1,749



I just read the Neoteny-surge-effect and recognized that the aging virtually stops at the age of 13. But Orks are almost fully-grown (if not complete mature) at this age. Are they also influenced by this flaw? Is there the only affect that they lack the full-body-monitor?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post Jun 14 2009, 07:36 PM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



I would assume that their development is halted when they're still children.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Jun 14 2009, 07:37 PM
Post #3


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



The quality gives the character the physical traits of a child or adolescent. An ork with this quality would stop developing way shy of 13 - "up to a 13 year old" describes the upper limit of the character's physical appearance. At least, that's how I read it. Otherwise, you would have orks with this flaw that appear fully-grown, and elves with this flaw that look like toddlers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EKBT81
post Jun 14 2009, 08:11 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 195
Joined: 7-July 08
From: Germany
Member No.: 16,124



QUOTE (Glyph @ Jun 14 2009, 09:37 PM) *
(...) and elves with this flaw that look like toddlers.


I don't think so. IIRC, one of the 2nd edition books (Tir Tairngire?) stated that elves age like normal humans until their mid-twenties and then the aging process "freezes".

Shadowrun elves certainly don't need a century to grow up like their D&D counterparts. Otherwise there wouldn't have been adult elf characters in the 2050s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ludomastro
post Jun 14 2009, 09:19 PM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,382
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Shadowland
Member No.: 8,297



After the completely realistic application of GM handwavium, the ork with neoteny would stop aging around 8 or 9.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Machiavelli
post Jun 15 2009, 06:00 PM
Post #6


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,911
Joined: 26-February 02
From: near Stuttgart
Member No.: 1,749



But what about the sentence "They are usually quite short and may have underdeveloped sexual attributes (though this is not the case with metavariants)". When do some metavariants express their sexual attributes? The text also says "up to a 13-year old" which sounds to me like you have a choice. 13 year old ork would be grown up at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Jun 15 2009, 08:14 PM
Post #7


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Machiavelli @ Jun 15 2009, 01:00 PM) *
But what about the sentence "They are usually quite short and may have underdeveloped sexual attributes (though this is not the case with metavariants)". When do some metavariants express their sexual attributes? The text also says "up to a 13-year old" which sounds to me like you have a choice. 13 year old ork would be grown up at all.

i assume the metavariants comment is referring to gnomes. presumably they express their sexual attributes at the normal time for dwarves, though i would expect them to be less noticeable on average than a normal dwarf would have.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post Jun 15 2009, 08:21 PM
Post #8


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



To me, it's an issue of good faith. What kind of weasly punk says "Hey, I'll get points for looking like a child, but because of the wording of the flaw, I won't even look like a child!" Who can make that argument without feeling greasy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cabral
post Jun 16 2009, 01:00 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 30-August 05
Member No.: 7,646



QUOTE (Larme @ Jun 15 2009, 03:21 PM) *
To me, it's an issue of good faith. What kind of weasly punk says "Hey, I'll get points for looking like a child, but because of the wording of the flaw, I won't even look like a child!" Who can make that argument without feeling greasy?

I think the childlike appearance is meant as a wash. Pros and cons that can cancel each other out depending on how the character is played. In the case of the gnomes/metavariants (depending on your interpretation), the sexual characteristics just means your a stunted child-like adult with normal (and I hope proportional!) sexual characteristics.

The big hit from the flaw, IMO, is the reduction in the physical condition monitor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CodeBreaker
post Jun 16 2009, 01:24 AM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 317
Joined: 7-June 09
From: Scotland
Member No.: 17,249



I remember reading somewhere that Orks and Trolls dont express Orky and erm... Trolly characteristics untill puberty (Cant remember where...) Would this mean that characters with this fault would even really be that distinguishable from Human kiddies? I mean sure, the Troll kid might be bigger/bulkier, but he would look just like a Human. No tusks, no dermal accumulations, no horns.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cabral
post Jun 16 2009, 01:42 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 30-August 05
Member No.: 7,646



Orks and trolls initially expressed during puberty but now are born orks/trolls with some (a significant minority?) expressing at puberty.

Now, you could always combine Neoteny with human looking ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CodeBreaker
post Jun 16 2009, 01:47 AM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 317
Joined: 7-June 09
From: Scotland
Member No.: 17,249



I aint talkin' about Goblinisation, I am sure I read somewhere that current generation Goblin types didnt express their more obvious features untill puberty. Plus, if that Troll has his horns during birth it must be one hell of a strain on the Mother. Ouchie.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cabral
post Jun 16 2009, 02:01 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 30-August 05
Member No.: 7,646



Well for the horns, I picture it like deer antlers. I'm pretty sure they start as nothing, become nubs then grow to full horns. While they may not get in their adult tusks, I think the horns are more like fingernails and they'd have oddly developed horns for their apparent age.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Jun 16 2009, 04:35 PM
Post #14


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (CodeBreaker @ Jun 15 2009, 07:47 PM) *
I aint talkin' about Goblinisation, I am sure I read somewhere that current generation Goblin types didnt express their more obvious features untill puberty. Plus, if that Troll has his horns during birth it must be one hell of a strain on the Mother. Ouchie.

What you're thinking about is probably that Orks can give birth to humans, but like 90% of them express orkdome at puberty. And Fomori are the one metatype that most often (still rarely) "regress", that is, they are the metavariant that is most likely (again, still rare) to give birth to full vanilla humans.

To the OP, I'd say he would get the ork end of the stick even more than others. If an ork at age 13 to 15 is already "full grown", and is still prevented from doing things (driving, drinking, getting married), imagine an ork that's actually 35 (like 50 in human years) that still looks 13. Even the orks would pick on him, and that's just not fair.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Machiavelli
post Jun 16 2009, 04:44 PM
Post #15


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,911
Joined: 26-February 02
From: near Stuttgart
Member No.: 1,749



I think this alone would be worth the points.^^
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2025 - 10:45 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.