IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Spell sustaining penalty question, To other spells or to everything?
Knight Saber
post Jun 22 2009, 07:20 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 315
Joined: 30-December 08
Member No.: 16,720



Going by SR4 p. 174, I thought that a spell sustaining penalty applied to everything you did while sustaining the spell, as it says "-2 penalty on all other tests."... but then I looked more carefully at the line before that... "Draining to the magical abilities." Some people here still say "-2 to EVERYTHING" though. So which is it? -2 to other spellcasting, summoning and the like, or -2 to everything you do? It'd severely reduce the usefulness of any buff spells if it was the latter... Increase Agility by 3, then take -2 to your Agility rolls.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Knight Saber   Spell sustaining penalty question   Jun 22 2009, 07:20 AM
- - kzt   There is a reason why many character designs have ...   Jun 22 2009, 07:59 AM
- - EnlitenedDespot   It does seem a bit silly, if you ask me. Honestly...   Jun 22 2009, 08:03 AM
- - Chibu   Anyway, to answer your question... You're righ...   Jun 22 2009, 11:49 AM
|- - crizh   QUOTE (Chibu @ Jun 22 2009, 12:49 PM) So,...   Jun 22 2009, 05:49 PM
||- - The Jake   QUOTE (crizh @ Jun 22 2009, 06:49 PM) It ...   Jun 23 2009, 04:19 AM
|- - nezumi   QUOTE (Chibu @ Jun 22 2009, 06:49 AM) So,...   Jun 23 2009, 12:50 PM
- - knasser   Wait! What? Some people play with the -2 susta...   Jun 22 2009, 05:31 PM
- - Chibu   Knasser: yeah, I know. I read that part as well. M...   Jun 22 2009, 05:47 PM
- - Larme   QUOTE (Knight Saber @ Jun 22 2009, 03:20 ...   Jun 22 2009, 05:57 PM
- - Chibu   Hmm... Seems in third edition, you are in fact, co...   Jun 22 2009, 06:00 PM
|- - Doc Chaos   QUOTE (Chibu @ Jun 22 2009, 08:00 PM) Hmm...   Jun 22 2009, 10:32 PM
- - knasser   @Chibu - Ah, you meant mechanically. I understand ...   Jun 22 2009, 06:05 PM
- - Dragnar   To make it a bit more complicated: Keep in mind th...   Jun 22 2009, 09:22 PM
|- - Larme   QUOTE (Dragnar @ Jun 22 2009, 04:22 PM) T...   Jun 22 2009, 11:45 PM
|- - kzt   QUOTE (Larme @ Jun 22 2009, 04:45 PM) One...   Jun 23 2009, 03:58 AM
- - Chibu   well then... i guess it was a houserule and no one...   Jun 22 2009, 10:58 PM
- - Doc Chaos   It does make some sense though. That house rule wo...   Jun 22 2009, 11:41 PM
|- - Chibu   QUOTE (Doc Chaos @ Jun 22 2009, 07:41 PM)...   Jun 23 2009, 12:07 AM
|- - Doc Chaos   QUOTE (Chibu @ Jun 23 2009, 02:07 AM) How...   Jun 23 2009, 11:26 AM
|- - Chibu   QUOTE (Doc Chaos @ Jun 23 2009, 07:26 AM)...   Jun 23 2009, 12:35 PM
|- - Doc Chaos   QUOTE (Chibu @ Jun 23 2009, 02:35 PM) Lar...   Jun 23 2009, 01:09 PM
|- - Chibu   QUOTE (Doc Chaos @ Jun 23 2009, 09:09 AM)...   Jun 23 2009, 01:26 PM
|- - Larme   QUOTE (Doc Chaos @ Jun 23 2009, 08:09 AM)...   Jun 23 2009, 02:27 PM
- - Chibu   Larme: Huh, yeah *fail again* I guess I did think ...   Jun 23 2009, 07:32 PM
- - Trench   So, just to be clear, all tests would include Ini...   Oct 31 2009, 02:17 AM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Trench @ Oct 30 2009, 08:17 PM) So...   Oct 31 2009, 05:16 PM
- - Axl   I recommend sustaining foci. Quickening metamagic ...   Oct 31 2009, 09:18 PM
- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Axl @ Oct 31 2009, 03:18 PM) I rec...   Oct 31 2009, 09:21 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th July 2026 - 10:45 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.