IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Chemical Seal rating of a trashbag?, Low-tech, low cost solutions to problems
Jason Farlander
post Jan 22 2004, 06:41 PM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



So... if you were to cut holes in a heavy-duty trashbag for your head and arms, what chemseal rating would that give you? Would "reinforcing" the trash bag with thick(ish) plasting sheeting and duck tape help?

Since you can get a rating 7 chemseal on an armored vest with plates (somehow those plates make the vest more chemsealable...), and that basically means that most chemicals will not penetrate it, how would the plastic vest be any different?

This situation came up in my last game when the runners discovered that they security at their target facility used chem weapons, but they didnt have the time to get "proper" chemsealed armor (the run was sheduled to take place the next day). On the fly, I decided to give them an effective chemseal rating of +2... but now I'm wondering if that was reasonable.

I'm also interested in the other sorts of low-cost solutions to problems that others have come up with... so if you have an example of such a thing, I'd like to hear it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reaver
post Jan 22 2004, 06:43 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 24-February 03
From: Tucson
Member No.: 4,153



QUOTE (Jason Farlander)
So... if you were to cut holes in a heavy-duty trashbag for your head and arms, what chemseal rating would that give you? Would "reinforcing" the trash bag with thick(ish) plasting sheeting and duck tape help?

Since you can get a rating 7 chemseal on an armored vest with plates (somehow those plates make the vest more chemsealable...), and that basically means that most chemicals will not penetrate it, how would the plastic vest be any different?

This situation came up in my last game when the runners discovered that they security at their target facility used chem weapons, but they didnt have the time to get "proper" chemsealed armor (the run was sheduled to take place the next day). On the fly, I decided to give them an effective chemseal rating of +2... but now I'm wondering if that was reasonable.

I'm also interested in the other sorts of low-cost solutions to problems that others have come up with... so if you have an example of such a thing, I'd like to hear it.

I might give it a 3 or 4 (max) with some kind of successful skill check to make sure it was properly sealed. Of course, the right chemicals will eat right through the duct tape. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spotlite
post Jan 22 2004, 07:04 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 21-October 03
From: Yorkshire Toxic Zone
Member No.: 5,752



That is JUST the sort of thing my players would do. Fantastic. God I must never let them read this board....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reaver
post Jan 22 2004, 07:09 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 24-February 03
From: Tucson
Member No.: 4,153



QUOTE (spotlite)
That is JUST the sort of thing my players would do. Fantastic. God I must never let them read this board....

I'll second that. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Jan 22 2004, 07:11 PM
Post #5


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



Our team got rain suits and rubber boots at the hardware store. Only one of our characters got infected, and he's just a carrier. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Collins
post Jan 22 2004, 07:28 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 22-January 04
Member No.: 6,001



Realistically, a trash bag wouldn't do you much good. It may help a little, but it'll be damn near immposible to seal properly and it's not going to keep vapors from leaking in like a true chemsuit would (of course, if vapors truly are a problem, they'd need respirators anyways). It may give them a minute or two to get their clothes off if the splash themselves with something, but thats about it. +2 sounds like a reasonable bonus to give them, for being creative if nothing else. I don't think I'd go above that though (unless they go out of their way to reinforce the bags, but Im not coming up with any way of doing it right now).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 22 2004, 07:41 PM
Post #7


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



I dunno how easily a "heavy duty trashbag" rips, but I'm guessing too easily when your life's on the line.

I've never given much thought to the Armor Modifications, including Chemical Seals. If you want a low-cost solution, get a rain suit (be sure to get one with a good hood) and rubber boots (as OurTeam already mentioned), a pile of light plastic/latex and cotton gloves (wearing them in 3 layers, plastic+cotton+plastic), and a gas mask. If breathing the stuff isn't an issue, you can go with full-face plastic hood -- transparent with breathing holes preferably in the back or near the neck, located so that they open to the space between the transparent hood and the rain suit, and the rain suit has separate openings some distance away, kept open somehow that you can still breath.

That shouldn't be too expensive (probably less than 100 nuyen without the gas mask) and, if you duct tape all the joints, should protect you quite well against splashes. I might give such a set-up up to 8 points of ChemSeal. Will be slightly uncomfortable in hot places, however.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
boodah
post Jan 22 2004, 07:47 PM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: 8-September 03
From: Tempe, AZ
Member No.: 5,596



woot! ill keep this in mind, Reav!

:rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Jan 23 2004, 12:21 AM
Post #9


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



QUOTE (Jason Farlander)
Would... duck tape help?

If your opposition is some kind of water fowl, sure. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GoldenAri
post Jan 23 2004, 12:40 AM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 198
Joined: 26-December 03
Member No.: 5,935



[/QUOTE]I might give such a set-up up to 8 points of ChemSeal.[QUOTE]
Wow, your generous. I'd give maybe a 4 or 5 to that, but I'd require Armor B/R rolls. Those hard rain suits should work though with a little modification as you said. I'd probably give a +1 to movement based TNs. But yeah, 2 points of chemical protection seems fair under the circumstances.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 23 2004, 12:45 AM
Post #11


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



If correctly duct-taped, the person in question should have no openings on his body other than the breathing holes, which would require the liquid to travel in between the suits from around his face to behind his head/down his neck. Unless the chemical is extremely potent or capable of eating through that gear, the protection would be absolute.

Actually, it's so high because I was only thinking about liquids. Gases would be a different matter altogether, against those the set-up wouldn't be more than a 4 at best. With a gas mask it could get back up to 6 or 7, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Jan 23 2004, 01:17 AM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



QUOTE (Zazen)
QUOTE (Jason Farlander @ Jan 22 2004, 01:41 PM)
Would... duck tape help?

If your opposition is some kind of water fowl, sure. ;)

Actually, "Duck Tape" was the original name. Here is an explanation. If you want to read an overabundance of sources saying essentially the same exact thing, here is the Google search I used.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Panzergeist
post Jan 23 2004, 03:38 AM
Post #13


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,362
Joined: 3-October 03
From: Poway, San Diego County, CA, USA
Member No.: 5,676



Holy crap, that just gave me an idea! I was wondering what the chemical seal rating of a condom was, then it hit me: What about a chemical gland that secretes poison into your semen? You could be a hooker-assasin. Of course, a cyberware chemical tank would be better, since it could be turned off.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Collins
post Jan 23 2004, 03:44 AM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 22-January 04
Member No.: 6,001



Guys, realize that short of specifically designed suits, not much will offer you complete protection. I have to wear different gloves in lab when Im working depending on what Im working with, because one polymer will not protect me against everything. What works well against acids or bases may be suceptable to some organics. They used ralatively specialized materials and treatments in the hazard suits. Because of this, most stopgag measures just dont work well. Also realize that the pore sizes in your standard garbage bag may let vapors through like terry clothe. Whether or not they have to worry about vapors depends on what they are wearing. If its an aquaeous soln. of, say, HCl or KOH, I wouldn't worry. Phosgene on the other hand, would definately be bothersome (a small molecule that turns into HCl in your lungs is definately something that I highly doubt would be kept out by duct tape and you wouldn't want to breath in). Biohazards are something else entirely. Most bios are large molecules that probably wouldn't penetrate the plastic, but virii might.

I would say the +2 should be the maximum. If people are really interested, I might be able to dig up some hard facts, but Im rather busy so it may take a while.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jan 23 2004, 03:59 AM
Post #15


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Tom's insights notwithstanding, do you really want to entrust your safety to the ability of a converted garbage bag to repel chemicals, toxins and related things that go squish in the air?

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Jan 23 2004, 04:45 AM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



QUOTE (Siege)
Tom's insights notwithstanding, do you really want to entrust your safety to the ability of a converted garbage bag to repel chemicals, toxins and related things that go squish in the air?

No, but it is a little better than nothing. If you have the option and information, go with the real safety gear. If you learn about the toxins too late, and only have a bunch of garbage bags and tape, it might make the difference.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 23 2004, 07:11 AM
Post #17


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



I'd add a +1 for creativity. Realistically, even with duct tape, there's plenty of micropores for things to leak through. Trash bags also tear rather easily, from simple walking-around. (When I took my Christmas tree to the recycling place, I started with it in a heavy duty trashbag. When I got there, I had a tree with plastic bits on it.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Jan 23 2004, 07:32 AM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



If the chemical agents don't have very low dosages, the amount that leaks through the garbage bag might not be enough to do the deed. If they are trying to avoid the squirtguns of death ™ then giveing them a +3 or +2 sounds fine. If they are trying to avoid some much better method of chemical delivery, they are probably out of luck.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Birdy
post Jan 23 2004, 12:14 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 637
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,528



Dumb Question:

What do you need protection against?

I mean basic NBC gear still is a rubberized poncho and a gas<<<NBC mask. Giving you the choice between drowning in your sweat and dying by the chemical agent.

A lot of the (military) stuff can be stopped by heavy duty rubber trousers / jackets like the stuff worn by channel workers and a mask since it is a liquid (Most WWI chemical agents I.E, Teargas, Pepperspray)

If you seek protection against the WWII and later stuff (Tabun, Sarin, VX and the other nerve agents) you'll basically need a classic MOPP suit. You might (for short exposure) get away with mask, rubber poncho, waterproof boots (some mil. boots are actually) and a complete coverage of all skin.

With all milspec agents make sure you get rid of the stuff before undress.

Some milspec agents are multi-component stuff, some for clogging the mask-filter and some for killing you.


Birdy

Q: Why are those recruits performing constant NBC drill?
A: Don't know. Give me another of the signal cartridges. Must me multi-star red again since the last was white.
(Hint Multistar Red - NBC alert ;-) Sadly, this happened IRL)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 23 2004, 03:09 PM
Post #20


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Tom: Corrosive substances are another matter entirely. I don't think any of us was suggesting that these set-ups would be a significant defense against them. I was thinking about the Squirtguns of Death™, like Bob put it, when I was discussing protection against liquids, and maybe other similar attacks, like capsule rounds with generic nasties (Narcoject etc) inside. The suit I described should prove a pretty good defense against those kinds of threats.

Basically, what I typed in was a "Product Improved" version of the military NBC-protection mentioned by Birdy. With the gas mask, it should be more effective against standard gases than a basic military set-up, allowing for longer exposion (because there aren't any significant holes where the chemical might leak in).

QUOTE (Birdy)
Why are those recruits performing constant NBC drill?

We did it because our squad leaders were pricks. We never needed any other reasons...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Jan 23 2004, 03:38 PM
Post #21


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



QUOTE (Jason Farlander)
Actually, "Duck Tape" was the original name. Here is an explanation.

"In Finland and Sweden, they refer to duct tape as “Jesus Tape.” "

I'm going to start calling it Jesus Tape from now on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 23 2004, 03:56 PM
Post #22


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



'sright. Works miracles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spotlite
post Jan 23 2004, 04:08 PM
Post #23


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 21-October 03
From: Yorkshire Toxic Zone
Member No.: 5,752



QUOTE (Zazen)
QUOTE (Jason Farlander @ Jan 22 2004, 08:17 PM)
Actually, "Duck Tape" was the original name.  Here is an explanation.

"In Finland and Sweden, they refer to duct tape as “Jesus Tape.” "

I'm going to start calling it Jesus Tape from now on.

And here in the UK it gets called Gaffa Tape. Mainly because the stuff is comparitively expensive so the gaffer is the one who hands it out to people. Either than or because 'it does as good a job as the gaffer' I've never sussed out which. And that whole duck/duct thing could be a marketing ploy, because every roll of it I've ever seen has 'elephant tape' stencilled round the inside.

So which is it? If you think that it must be true cos its on the internet in multiple places, then i pity your reasoning faculties. Case in point - googlewhacking. Search for any of the well known googlewhacks now and you'll get a lits of sites which in turn list successful googlewhacks, thereby rendering them immediately NOT googlewhacks. don't trust the internet. Use it, but use it like you would intelligence gathering - it gives you a place to start, but it won't stand up in court. So it MIGHT be true that it started as duck tape. It might not, but answer me this - if a tree falls in the woods and there's no-one there to hear it - who gives a frag, really?

Here endeth the unnecessary threadjacking sermon...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Birdy
post Jan 23 2004, 04:58 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 637
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,528



QUOTE (Austere Emancipator)
Tom: Corrosive substances are another matter entirely. I don't think any of us was suggesting that these set-ups would be a significant defense against them. I was thinking about the Squirtguns of Death™, like Bob put it, when I was discussing protection against liquids, and maybe other similar attacks, like capsule rounds with generic nasties (Narcoject etc) inside. The suit I described should prove a pretty good defense against those kinds of threats.

Basically, what I typed in was a "Product Improved" version of the military NBC-protection mentioned by Birdy. With the gas mask, it should be more effective against standard gases than a basic military set-up, allowing for longer exposion (because there aren't any significant holes where the chemical might leak in).

QUOTE (Birdy)
Why are those recruits performing constant NBC drill?

We did it because our squad leaders were pricks. We never needed any other reasons...

Well, we (bunch of Privates lead by a trigger-happy Staff Seargeant) where ordered to dispose some aged ammo and did so by using the firing range. Part of the stuff was 18mm signal ammo and we finished the day firing them of at the protective embankment overlooking the barracks training area. Some Grenny[1]-Recruits trained there and considered us part of the setup. Took everybody a while to realise what was happening. Them longer than us (What you thought we stopped - hey, they where Grenadiers!)[2]


As for using Duct Tape (Panzerband - Armortape is the german version) to improve protection, by all means! Taping shut the rubber trousers, attaching them to the boots/jacket all will help. Might be a tad difficult to get out of the cloth afterwards.[3]


Michael

Airborne is the equivalent to modern tourists. They fly in in cushy planes, stay just long enough to ruin the place and disappear without cleaning up (German Staff Sgt, 1988)



[1] Mechanized Infantry
[2] And we were light (Jäger)
[3] The word was that a Citroen 2CV that stopped at a piece of double sided tape wouldn't be able to drive off again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 24 2004, 03:38 AM
Post #25


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (spotlite)
[I]f a tree falls in the woods and there's no-one there to hear it - who gives a frag, really?

The guy who owns the forest, if it's meant for use by industry. Perhaps the guy who owns the summer cottage the tree just fell on. Perhaps the guy whose electricity or phone lines were just cut off.

In the modern world, falling trees can have all kinds of negative side-effects even when no one is there to hear it fall. Unfortunately. And then there's all the animals and crap.

(Yes, I've got issues with the "falling tree, no one hears" thing.)

Does "gaffer" mean (among other things) the kind of person that puts together all the stage-stuff in live performances?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 09:29 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.