IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Suppressive fire, Rules discussion
Warlordtheft
post Aug 18 2009, 03:23 PM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



As per RAW-Suppressive fire lasts until the PC's next IP. This leads to a paradox where the 4IP street sam uses 4 times as much ammo as a 1 IP grunt to do the same thing for the entire combat round.

1. Did I get the rules right? (no books on me)
2. Has this ever come up in your game?
3. What, if any, house rules did you make to address this?
4. Is it really a non-issue?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinxy
post Aug 18 2009, 03:42 PM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 21-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 16,540



I noticed this too.

Remember though that the sammy only needs to use his first IP to suppress everyone with 1 IP. If he suppresses, all the grunts duck, and then he has all the rest of his IPs to run up and melee, or toss a grenade, or whatever else he wants to do. If he's facing cybered opposition, he might need to spend more bullets to keep them suppressed.

Of course, this doesn't fix the reverse problem, that a grunt can keep a sammy suppressed for all his IPs by just spending one. Suggestions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
McCummhail
post Aug 18 2009, 03:46 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 30-July 09
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 17,452



You could allow a character to skip an IP in order to continue a sustained action.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Aug 18 2009, 03:52 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



QUOTE (Shinxy @ Aug 18 2009, 10:42 AM) *
I noticed this too.

Remember though that the sammy only needs to use his first IP to suppress everyone with 1 IP. If he suppresses, all the grunts duck, and then he has all the rest of his IPs to run up and melee, or toss a grenade, or whatever else he wants to do. If he's facing cybered opposition, he might need to spend more bullets to keep them suppressed.

Of course, this doesn't fix the reverse problem, that a grunt can keep a sammy suppressed for all his IPs by just spending one. Suggestions?


Given that the wired up guy still gets his Reaction+Edge+Cover bonus on the test when he pokes his head out to gun down the supressing guy. That pool will probably be far larger than the suppressing guard's pool. More importantly, if he does get hit, it's probably not more than a 6P hit with a -1 AP, which is pretty much guaranteed to be converted to Stun damage, most of which will be soaked.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinxy
post Aug 18 2009, 03:58 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 21-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 16,540



QUOTE (McCummhail @ Aug 18 2009, 11:46 AM) *
You could allow a character to skip an IP in order to continue a sustained action.


I like this solution. Just have the initial expenditure of bullets and if the sammy wants to continue suppressing, he just declares it as a complex action with no further ammo spent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerrang
post Aug 18 2009, 04:23 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 17-April 09
Member No.: 17,088



Two ways you can handle this via House Rule:

1) Divide the number of rounds used for suppressive fire by the number of initiative passes the PC has, and use this as the number of rounds used per IP.

2) Have suppressive fire only last for a single full IP. If the person firing to suppress has an 11 init and one IP pass, the suppressive fire only lasts until init 11 on IP pass 2.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Aug 18 2009, 04:31 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (DWC @ Aug 18 2009, 10:52 AM) *
Given that the wired up guy still gets his Reaction+Edge+Cover bonus on the test when he pokes his head out to gun down the supressing guy. That pool will probably be far larger than the suppressing guard's pool. More importantly, if he does get hit, it's probably not more than a 6P hit with a -1 AP, which is pretty much guaranteed to be converted to Stun damage, most of which will be soaked.

Um, is that SR3? In SR4 it's just Edge+Cover. Or did SR4A erata it and I missed it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerrang
post Aug 18 2009, 04:41 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 17-April 09
Member No.: 17,088



SR4A pg 154:
"Any character that is currently in the suppressed area (but not
behind cover or prone), or who moves into or out of the area before the
shooter’s next Action Phase, risks catching some flying lead. That character
must make a Reaction + Edge Test (+ Dodge if on full defense)
with a threshold equal to the hits scored by the suppressing attacker."

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Aug 18 2009, 04:42 PM
Post #9


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



Per SR4A, it's Reaction+Edge, though I'm extrapolating that Cover would apply since you're defending against a ranged attack.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DuctShuiTengu
post Aug 18 2009, 04:45 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,162



QUOTE (Kerrang @ Aug 18 2009, 06:41 PM) *
SR4A pg 154:
"Any character that is currently in the suppressed area (but not
behind cover or prone), or who moves into or out of the area before the
shooter’s next Action Phase, risks catching some flying lead. That character
must make a Reaction + Edge Test (+ Dodge if on full defense)
with a threshold equal to the hits scored by the suppressing attacker."


Which looks like being behind cover means you're completely protected against suppressive fire, rather than getting a bonus to avoid it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerrang
post Aug 18 2009, 04:52 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 17-April 09
Member No.: 17,088



QUOTE (DuctShuiTengu @ Aug 18 2009, 10:45 AM) *
Which looks like being behind cover means you're completely protected against suppressive fire, rather than getting a bonus to avoid it.


According to RAW, that looks to be the case, any cover would keep you from being suppressed. That is not the way I play it though, if you are in anything less than full cover I would make you take the soak roll and add the cover modifier as a bonus to the pool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Aug 18 2009, 04:54 PM
Post #12


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 9,576
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



From the same SR4A section on p. 154, it would seem that a prone character (maybe already prone?) need not worry about suppressive fire, and may return fire as he sees fit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Aug 18 2009, 05:06 PM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



Thanks for bringing the change to my attention.

The Combat Sense adept power would also apply given the wording.

But as to being fully behind cover... THAT'S THE POINT! *grin*

You're shooting to keep the defender suppressed - keep their head down or at least force them to act circumspectly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Aug 18 2009, 05:13 PM
Post #14


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



QUOTE (Kerrang @ Aug 18 2009, 11:52 AM) *
According to RAW, that looks to be the case, any cover would keep you from being suppressed. That is not the way I play it though, if you are in anything less than full cover I would make you take the soak roll and add the cover modifier as a bonus to the pool.


The rule specifies full cover, not partial, so if you expose any part of yourself to shoot back, you'd be subject to wandering damage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DuctShuiTengu
post Aug 18 2009, 05:28 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,162



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Aug 18 2009, 07:06 PM) *
Thanks for bringing the change to my attention.

The Combat Sense adept power would also apply given the wording.

But as to being fully behind cover... THAT'S THE POINT! *grin*

You're shooting to keep the defender suppressed - keep their head down or at least force them to act circumspectly.


If it were limited to being fully behind cover, I'd agree. However, the rules make no such restriction.

Being prone is enough to completely protect against suppressive fire, and gives the same bonus as good cover against other attacks - implying that good cover would also be enough.

There's absolutely no qualifiers on the "behind cover" protection, which implies that any cover, even the partial cover that leaves at least 50% of the defender's body exposed, is enough to provide absolute safety from suppressive fire.

Of these, only good cover causes any penalty for them to return fire, and that one is only a -2. Which means that if these are all enough to protect against suppressive fire, it's failing at its intended purpose of pinning the target down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Aug 18 2009, 05:33 PM
Post #16


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



If you choose to act while in the area of suppressive fire you risk catching a bullet. If you don't act, dropping prone or taking cover, you avoid the effects. Without worrying about the details of where every bullet went or resolving aiming or any other details a shooter using suppressive fire is accomplishing what they want. Discouraging opponents in the target are from acting. If someone does choose to act, then more dice rolls. You want to take a risk, then we get dice rolls to model it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Aug 18 2009, 05:37 PM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



The qualifier is there. Per SR4A, page 154: "Characters in the suppressed area who do not move, remain behind full cover, or simply drop prone are not at risk."

Oddly, while being prone does grant you immunity to suppressive fire, it doesn't actually help you with avoiding directed fire beyond the obvious of making it easier to take advantage of any ground cover (curbs, dropped motorcycles, dead bystanders, and so on).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DuctShuiTengu
post Aug 18 2009, 05:51 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,162



QUOTE (DWC @ Aug 18 2009, 07:37 PM) *
The qualifier is there. Per SR4A, page 154: "Characters in the suppressed area who do not move, remain behind full cover, or simply drop prone are not at risk."

Oddly, while being prone does grant you immunity to suppressive fire, it doesn't actually help you with avoiding directed fire beyond the obvious of making it easier to take advantage of any ground cover (curbs, dropped motorcycles, dead bystanders, and so on).


Huh. Missed the later part. Given that I like that reading better (though I could potentially still argue for why the RAW supports the other one), I'm going to concede the point.

On the subject of being prone, see page 160:
Defender/Tar get has Good Cover
If more than 50 percent of the defender’s form is obscured by intervening terrain or cover, he gains a +4 dice pool modifier to his Defense roll against any attack. This modifier can also apply to prone targets that are at least 20 meters away from their attackers. This modifier too is applicable to both Ranged Combat and Spellcasting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shinxy
post Aug 18 2009, 05:53 PM
Post #19


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 21-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 16,540



QUOTE (DWC @ Aug 18 2009, 01:37 PM) *
The qualifier is there. Per SR4A, page 154: "Characters in the suppressed area who do not move, remain behind full cover, or simply drop prone are not at risk."

Oddly, while being prone does grant you immunity to suppressive fire, it doesn't actually help you with avoiding directed fire beyond the obvious of making it easier to take advantage of any ground cover (curbs, dropped motorcycles, dead bystanders, and so on).


I don't think it's that odd. The goal of suppressive fire is to suppress, to keep your head down- if it hits someone, great, but that's not strictly speaking what it's for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Aug 18 2009, 06:06 PM
Post #20


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



I don't consider it odd that hugging the deck under someone's cone of fire will reduce the risk that you'll catch a stray round. I consider it odd that someone lying down on an open featureless plain is as easy to hit with direct fire as they would be if they were standing straight up.

But this really is going way off target. The point being that yes, the unaugmented shmuck does get a lot more suppression per round than the wired up supertranshuman, but that he's far less likely to effectively suppress the vatjob.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Aug 18 2009, 06:14 PM
Post #21


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (DWC @ Aug 18 2009, 01:06 PM) *
I don't consider it odd that hugging the deck under someone's cone of fire will reduce the risk that you'll catch a stray round. I consider it odd that someone lying down on an open featureless plain is as easy to hit with direct fire as they would be if they were standing straight up.

But this really is going way off target. The point being that yes, the unaugmented shmuck does get a lot more suppression per round than the wired up supertranshuman, but that he's far less likely to effectively suppress the vatjob.

I really liked the idea of breaking the number of rounds into four, per IP. Guns don't really fire any faster for the augmented than the mundane. Mind you, the augmented still gets up to 4 long bursts per turn in theory but... I'm not touching that at this point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
InfinityzeN
post Aug 18 2009, 06:20 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 992
Joined: 23-December 08
From: the Tampa Sprawl
Member No.: 16,707



Actually a prone target at distance is a harder to hit target. Even though you don't see most players do it, that +4 to defend from dropping prone is a useful thing to use to help your NPCs live a little longer and actually get to shoot back at the PCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Aug 18 2009, 06:24 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (InfinityzeN @ Aug 18 2009, 01:20 PM) *
Actually a prone target at distance is a harder to hit target. Even though you don't see most players do it, that +4 to defend from dropping prone is a useful thing to use to help your NPCs live a little longer and actually get to shoot back at the PCs.

Thanks for the speciffic, I wanted to toss it up but didn't have the BBB handy.

Now, if you can go prone behind even a LITTLE cover... every infantryman knows that even the least depression or rise to hid behind can make the diference between life and death. Those shovels aren't for digging trenches and foxholes (well, ok, but it takes a while) - they're for digging quick and dirty slit depressions to lower your profile just that extra couple inches.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toolbox
post Aug 18 2009, 06:32 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 209
Joined: 7-June 09
Member No.: 17,251



QUOTE (DWC @ Aug 18 2009, 09:37 AM) *
The qualifier is there. Per SR4A, page 154: "Characters in the suppressed area who do not move, remain behind full cover, or simply drop prone are not at risk."

Characters who do not move? Does this mean you can be safe from suppressive fire just by standing still?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Aug 18 2009, 06:34 PM
Post #25


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



QUOTE (InfinityzeN @ Aug 18 2009, 01:20 PM) *
Actually a prone target at distance is a harder to hit target. Even though you don't see most players do it, that +4 to defend from dropping prone is a useful thing to use to help your NPCs live a little longer and actually get to shoot back at the PCs.


My example was based on the rules, not on reality. I was looking through SR4A and I couldn't find any reference to there being a defense bonus for being prone because it's apparently buried in the section on good cover. Having found it, I stand corrected.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 09:01 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.