My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Feb 15 2004, 09:25 PM
Post
#51
|
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,546 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
This might be from second edition, but I believe on the astral you appear how you think you should look, your own ideal self. Assumedly, other people would see you this way as well (there's nothing to indicate to the contrary). Ergo, people on the astral see everything as it believes itself to be, which usually would probably be the person's 'true nature' (or at least the correct species).
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2004, 10:17 PM
Post
#52
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 777 Joined: 18-February 03 Member No.: 4,110 |
what about people suffering from deep psychosis? Just because someone's ideal true self is a toaster, does that mean they appear astrally as a toaster? :wobble: |
||
|
|
|||
Feb 15 2004, 10:27 PM
Post
#53
|
|||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 20-October 03 Member No.: 5,740 |
I once had a character in a story who, due to a spell gone awry, believed that he was a glass of orange juice. He was always paranoid that someone would spill him. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Feb 15 2004, 10:35 PM
Post
#54
|
|||||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 777 Joined: 18-February 03 Member No.: 4,110 |
I remember hearing about that! Too funny. Didn't you say he just stood there perfectly still, freaking out? |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Feb 15 2004, 10:36 PM
Post
#55
|
|||||||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 20-October 03 Member No.: 5,740 |
Yep. The person responsible for his state had to take care of all his needs.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Feb 16 2004, 03:13 PM
Post
#56
|
|||||||||||
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,546 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
If someone, deep in their heart, truly and honestly believed they're a toaster, I'd say sure (largely for the amusement factor). A sentient, living, moving about toaster with an aura, but a toaster nonetheless. Then again, how many people do you see who believe they're kitchen appliances (consciously and subconsciously). |
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Feb 16 2004, 04:51 PM
Post
#57
|
|||||||
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Please refer to SR3 page 171, Astral Perception.
Unless the shapeshifter is specifically trying to hide, you do not need a "Perception Test" (p171 SR3).
Correct. If a shapeshifter was not actively hiding from you (no Perception test needed at all), you can immediately see that it is a shapeshifter. But if it was actively hiding, then the Perception test comes into play here. And the table I gave was me abridging the Perception Success Table for Astral Perception. As you can see from the Perception Success Table, even with 4 successes you still need an Assesing Test(the "further examination" in the table) for more specifics. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Feb 16 2004, 06:24 PM
Post
#58
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 22-October 03 From: Marianna Member No.: 5,753 |
Yes when our shaman was astral projecting he just happened to look at my Charicter Alex who is a cat shyape shifter. Now bob the shaman has the oblivious flaw and didnt really consider what it meant. Instead he decided to pet my astral form. Our GM decided that that felt rather strange to me.
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2004, 09:52 PM
Post
#59
|
|||||||||||||
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 26-April 03 From: Sweden Member No.: 4,516 |
toturi:
Very true - astral perception has no connection with physical vision. This does not mean that you do not use vision, however. The text is completely packed with refrences to seeing and vision, and under Astral Senses on pg.173 SR3 it says "Your astral form has normal human senses of sight and hearing." Thisgoes on to talk about the other senses and mentiones assensing in a way as to imply that this is a separate, 'sixth', sense if you will.
Which is what I said. But you said in your previous post you needed 5+ successes to determine that - since the perception test table you mentioned only goes to 4+, I believed you were talking about the assensing table, which goes to 5+.
Again, no offense meant, but if you were abridging the perception test table, how come you differentiated between 4 and 5 successes when there is no difference according to that?
Yes, this is also true, but as you pointed out it requires the shapeshifter actively hiding (using Stealth skill, for instance) in which case the viewer does not necessarily see the shapeshifter. As to exactly what information you get with which successes is open to some interpretation: "Something is there" - self explanatory; 'something' can mean anything. "Something is definately there, and the perceoiver suspects what general type of thing it is." - this depends on your interpretation of 'general'. Does this differ between 'animal', 'metahuman' and 'object', or does it differ between 'human-like', 'dog-like', 'car-like'? To me, he suspects it's a person and the general size (big(troll size or so), small(dwarf size or so), medium(normal human/elf/ork size). "The perceiver knows what type of thing it is, and suspects it's exact nature." - what is the 'exact nature' of something? For instance, what would constitute the 'exact nature' in question when viewing a shapeshifter in the astral? To me, the use of exact implies that the mage not only suspects it's a shapeshifter, he suspects it's a wolf (or whichever) shapeshifter. "The perceiver knows what it is, but has no specifics without further information." - To me, coupled with the result given for 3 successes, this means the mage knows it's a wolf shapeshifter, but he doesn't know any more information. To me, it seems odd to assume a mage can't identify a hiding aura with 4+ successes on a Perception test - in this case determine if the hiding thing is a dwarf, troll, seal, eagle, wolf or bear. (All this assumes that the mage 'knows' enough to identify whatever it is he sees on sight. If he lacks the necessary skills or experience to determine what it is he is viewing, he shouldn't get the info. (for instance, if he's looking at a wolf shapeshifter and has no previous knowledge of shapeshifters and how they look astrally, simply tell him it looks like a dog-like being standing on two legs) If you allow someone who gets 4 successes on a physical, real world, perception test to know whether the thing hiding from him is a dwarf, troll or a wolf on two legs, then you should do the same for an astral test. Or? |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Feb 18 2004, 06:39 PM
Post
#60
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 71 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,832 |
Just to stir things back up, cause I like topics about Shifters (as many may recall):
Don't forget the occassional LS astral patrols. They'd probably investigate just about every astral presence they see (I mean, why would John Streetcorner be astrally active midday, downtown?) and would likely return to report a shapeshifter wandering about. |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2004, 02:46 AM
Post
#61
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 22-October 03 From: Marianna Member No.: 5,753 |
Of course this is why my Shifter prefers to work at night. |
||
|
|
|||
Feb 19 2004, 02:54 AM
Post
#62
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 20-October 03 Member No.: 5,740 |
Of course, they could be patrolling at night, too.
badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger... |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2004, 02:59 AM
Post
#63
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 22-October 03 From: Marianna Member No.: 5,753 |
in wich case i promptly hope they go and <explitive deleted> themselves.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th April 2022 - 04:26 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.