IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 6th World Demographics, Orc population reproductive rates vs. life spans
Adarael
post Sep 4 2009, 06:31 PM
Post #51


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



QUOTE (darthmord @ Sep 4 2009, 11:02 AM) *
It also mentions that 65 is the world-wide age for humans. That takes into account a LOT of variables and some places' rather low life expectancy rates. Conversely, in 1st world countries and AAA corps, life expectancy is MUCH higher. It's quite normal NOW for people to live to their mid to late 70s. People in my family live to their mid 80s. It's gone up each generation.

By taking into account life expectancy from various places, you are by default taking into account access to medical care on a per capita basis.


Yes, yes, we've been over that. My response was to the assertion that death by old age besets Orks at 35-40, because the ork lifespan is "by canon, natural."

I was clarifying that "natural" means very different things when you have medical technology and don't. Orks are no more doddering old men who need canes at 40 than humans are doddering old men who need canes at 60.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cryonic
post Sep 4 2009, 10:35 PM
Post #52


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 17-August 09
Member No.: 17,506



I think a few other things are being forgotten when it comes to the initial numbers (though this won't skew the percentages). Things like the VITAS (http://shadowrun.wikia.com/wiki/VITAS)

2010 - "Virally Induced Toxic Allergy Syndrome (VITAS) kills off a quarter of the world's population."
2022 - "VITAS 2 claims another 10%"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 4 2009, 10:41 PM
Post #53


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Cryonic @ Sep 4 2009, 05:35 PM) *
I think a few other things are being forgotten when it comes to the initial numbers (though this won't skew the percentages). Things like the VITAS (http://shadowrun.wikia.com/wiki/VITAS)

2010 - "Virally Induced Toxic Allergy Syndrome (VITAS) kills off a quarter of the world's population."
2022 - "VITAS 2 claims another 10%"

Which impacted poorer demographics significantly harder tha the wealthier due in large part to symptomatic releif.

Put another way, those plagues hit places like India, China and Puyalup much harer than that "25%" while the upper-class North American population probably saw less than half those rates. If nothing else, it served to dramatically improve the resource drain of population vs. the natural carrying capacity of Gaia. The 25%+10% is a world-wide average, so over a third of the world's total population died, but of those numbers, I expect a log was in the impoverished Third-world (and the un- and under-insured in North America).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Sep 4 2009, 10:45 PM
Post #54


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Sep 4 2009, 06:41 PM) *
Which impacted poorer demographics significantly harder tha the wealthier due in large part to symptomatic releif.

Put another way, those plagues hit places like India, China and Puyalup much harer than that "25%" while the upper-class North American population probably saw less than half those rates. If nothing else, it served to dramatically improve the resource drain of population vs. the natural carrying capacity of Gaia. The 25%+10% is a world-wide average, so over a third of the world's total population died, but of those numbers, I expect a log was in the impoverished Third-world (and the un- and under-insured in North America).

on the other hand, orks also have a much higher body value than humans. while it may not make it particularly probable that they survive, it would certainly make it more probable.

plus, that still leaves a ridiculously low number of orks, given their birth rates etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 4 2009, 11:08 PM
Post #55


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 4 2009, 05:45 PM) *
on the other hand, orks also have a much higher body value than humans. while it may not make it particularly probable that they survive, it would certainly make it more probable.

plus, that still leaves a ridiculously low number of orks, given their birth rates etc.

The question there would be if BODy really factored into survival rates. I don't remember TOO much detail abou the pathology of the plagues, myself. It's entirely possible that good medical care could eliminate most of what was really doing the killing, like high fevers or dehydration for example. Dehydration and fever don't make exceptions for size or health of the victim, and they can be as deadly as the toxins in the system. Now that I say that, dialysis or immuno-stimulants might have had some effect. And just because you have a high BODy stat, doesn't automatically make you HEALTHIER (game rules aside). BODy is an abstraction based on physical size, endurance, health and several other factors; Orcs are ROBUST, but if they live in squallor and eat out of dumpsters (like early after the Awakening many outcast goblinized orcs DID) they are going to have weaker immune systems. Sure, there's more mass for the bugs to work their way through, but the actual ability to STOP the bugs would be less.

But no we're whistling in the dark, and have (surprise, it's DumpShock) drifted off my OP a hair. Those plagues were single events, and unless they DRAMATICALLY singled out the orc metavariants over any other, I don't see how it would materially have affected current population percentages and continued growth rate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Sep 4 2009, 11:31 PM
Post #56


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Sep 4 2009, 06:08 PM) *
The question there would be if BODy really factored into survival rates. I don't remember TOO much detail abou the pathology of the plagues, myself. It's entirely possible that good medical care could eliminate most of what was really doing the killing, like high fevers or dehydration for example. Dehydration and fever don't make exceptions for size or health of the victim, and they can be as deadly as the toxins in the system. Now that I say that, dialysis or immuno-stimulants might have had some effect. And just because you have a high BODy stat, doesn't automatically make you HEALTHIER (game rules aside). BODy is an abstraction based on physical size, endurance, health and several other factors; Orcs are ROBUST, but if they live in squallor and eat out of dumpsters (like early after the Awakening many outcast goblinized orcs DID) they are going to have weaker immune systems. Sure, there's more mass for the bugs to work their way through, but the actual ability to STOP the bugs would be less.

But no we're whistling in the dark, and have (surprise, it's DumpShock) drifted off my OP a hair. Those plagues were single events, and unless they DRAMATICALLY singled out the orc metavariants over any other, I don't see how it would materially have affected current population percentages and continued growth rate.


New adventure hook? Ares invents STD to kill off Ork populations?[ /crockpot conspiracy theory]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 4 2009, 11:35 PM
Post #57


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ Sep 4 2009, 06:31 PM) *
New adventure hook? Ares invents STD to kill off Ork populations?[ /crockpot conspiracy theory]

What's so crackpot about it? Well, ok, make it Aztechnology.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Sep 4 2009, 11:40 PM
Post #58


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Sep 4 2009, 06:35 PM) *
What's so crackpot about it? Well, ok, make it Aztechnology.


I was cracking wise at the conspiracy theory of AIDS being man-made to kill off africans. Given the parallels to black society, I thought it fitting, if dark.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Sep 5 2009, 12:00 AM
Post #59


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Sep 4 2009, 03:35 PM) *
What's so crackpot about it? Well, ok, make it Aztechnology.



Make it Shiawase. Nobody ever does anything with Shiawase.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Krypter
post Sep 5 2009, 12:18 AM
Post #60


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Toronto, Canada
Member No.: 1,495



QUOTE (Cryonic @ Sep 4 2009, 05:35 PM) *
2010 - "Virally Induced Toxic Allergy Syndrome (VITAS) kills off a quarter of the world's population."
2022 - "VITAS 2 claims another 10%"

Those are quite shocking numbers for those of us who study such things, but unfortunately the world of Shadowrun doesn't really delve into the social and demographic consequences of such a catastrophe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Sep 5 2009, 12:24 AM
Post #61


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Adarael @ Sep 4 2009, 07:00 PM) *
Make it Shiawase. Nobody ever does anything with Shiawase.

hmmm... yeah, the only thing i can think of as a major plot point involving shiawase heavily has been the shiawase decision. so it's been what... 20 years now since anything big happened with them?

seems to me if we were gonna lose a mega, we should've kept CATco and ditched shiawase... anything that did happen with them was more with them in the curtains than anything (ex: a part of fuchi went to shiawase when it broke apart, i think there was a run where shiawase nuke plant had a glitch that caused a major embarassment for them in the brainscan arc, and ummm... empress hitomi is from the shiawase family, i guess. other than that, their major feature as a mega appears to be super-blandness. i mean, really... that's the most noteworthy stuff i can come up with for them)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 5 2009, 02:24 AM
Post #62


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Krypter @ Sep 4 2009, 07:18 PM) *
Those are quite shocking numbers for those of us who study such things, but unfortunately the world of Shadowrun doesn't really delve into the social and demographic consequences of such a catastrophe.

Shocking by modern standards. Compared to the successive waves of the Black Death?

Besides, there are enough dark hints that they were genetically (where you no longer worry particularly about the viability of the host organism for further propogation and rapid onset andlethality are possible) or magically (where you have mana pulling the strings) engineered to be as deadly as they were.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 5 2009, 02:27 AM
Post #63


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 4 2009, 07:24 PM) *
hmmm... yeah, the only thing i can think of as a major plot point involving shiawase heavily has been the shiawase decision. so it's been what... 20 years now since anything big happened with them?

seems to me if we were gonna lose a mega, we should've kept CATco and ditched shiawase... anything that did happen with them was more with them in the curtains than anything (ex: a part of fuchi went to shiawase when it broke apart, i think there was a run where shiawase nuke plant had a glitch that caused a major embarassment for them in the brainscan arc, and ummm... empress hitomi is from the shiawase family, i guess. other than that, their major feature as a mega appears to be super-blandness. i mean, really... that's the most noteworthy stuff i can come up with for them)

*waggles hand back and forth*

Yes and no. The way the world is written, they're the quiet mega, the one churning away in the background making money where the other megas's deign to invest. I'm trying to remember if they own Gaeatronics or not (Seattle's fusion power plant). Killing them off wouldn' be particular interesting, and the other megas like them right were they are - quietly making money on the crap most other mega's executives don't want on their expensive designer shoes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Krypter
post Sep 5 2009, 03:03 AM
Post #64


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Toronto, Canada
Member No.: 1,495



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Sep 4 2009, 09:24 PM) *
Shocking by modern standards. Compared to the successive waves of the Black Death?

But that's a completely different level of development, technology and several orders of magnitude difference in population, plus the Black Death took a century to traverse the world. Even a 10% mortality rate today would be almost 700 million people. The logistics of corpse-removal would be a major challenge just by themselves. Humanity's never encountered a calamity of this scale in such a short period of time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Sep 5 2009, 04:16 AM
Post #65


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Kerenshara @ Sep 4 2009, 10:27 PM) *
*waggles hand back and forth*

Yes and no. The way the world is written, they're the quiet mega, the one churning away in the background making money where the other megas's deign to invest. I'm trying to remember if they own Gaeatronics or not (Seattle's fusion power plant). Killing them off wouldn' be particular interesting, and the other megas like them right were they are - quietly making money on the crap most other mega's executives don't want on their expensive designer shoes.

i dunno. i think you could just as easily say that the other megas split up the minor stuff in the background between them. i mean, honestly, if you just got rid of shiawase and split all their business between the other megas, would you even really notice?

also, shiawase used to own the nuke plant back in the day. they do not now, and as i recall it was partly because of the embarassing power outage that happened as part of brainscan.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 5 2009, 05:33 AM
Post #66


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Krypter @ Sep 4 2009, 10:03 PM) *
But that's a completely different level of development, technology and several orders of magnitude difference in population, plus the Black Death took a century to traverse the world. Even a 10% mortality rate today would be almost 700 million people. The logistics of corpse-removal would be a major challenge just by themselves. Humanity's never encountered a calamity of this scale in such a short period of time.

Ah, but it's NOT that big a change in many of the poorest parts of the world at all! (That was my point about the higher death rates probable in the 3rd World nations because of their similarities to that time.) Furthermore, that's why I brought up the "engineered" aspect to help explain transmissibility. But don't forget, the Black Death traveled by ship - slow sailing ships that visited port after port. THIS plague travels on supersonic transports from one point to any other in just hours. That's why the danger of a true worldwide endemic is actually higher now than ever: air trvel.

I'm not doubting for a moment the level of difficulty inherent in a 50% dieoff in an isolated area (or possibly even 100% in an isolated primitive village by the time secondary concerns set in). I don't think the authors discounted it either, they just didn't see reason to spend column-inches on something that was over decades before even 1st Ed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 5 2009, 05:34 AM
Post #67


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 4 2009, 11:16 PM) *
i dunno. i think you could just as easily say that the other megas split up the minor stuff in the background between them. i mean, honestly, if you just got rid of shiawase and split all their business between the other megas, would you even really notice?

Still doesn't make it an interesting or exciting plot turning point. *grin*

QUOTE
also, shiawase used to own the nuke plant back in the day. they do not now, and as i recall it was partly because of the embarassing power outage that happened as part of brainscan.

Ah, thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Sep 5 2009, 05:51 AM
Post #68


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



my point about shiawase is that you could pretty near remove them from the setting and not notice them. this is not an observation that it would be a good plot point to remove them, rather i'm saying that it would be better to have either kept the mega that was making things interesting, or to at the very least do something with shiawase, otherwise they may as well not even be there. (truth be told, saeder-krupp also doesn't seem very interesting, but at least has something of a personality, courtesy of lofwyr)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daddy's Litt...
post Sep 5 2009, 10:31 PM
Post #69


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Near my daughters, Lansdale PA
Member No.: 6,668



The books do not list the infantile mortality rate. In the animal kingdom animals with a high birth rate usually have a high mortality rate. I think the 35 year lifespans-compared with humans at 65 and elves and dwarves at over a century, is an equalizing factor. One of the earlier books said that orks do age to elderly at 35 unless they had goblinized which means they have a Human lifespan.

I think more importantly is the infant mortality rate though. If you look at Gators and turtles they lay a lot of eggs but most do not live to maturity. Trust me, giving birth to one child at a time is more than enough.

It would be interesting to see if wealthy ork women have 'litters' or if the size of their birthings do decrease as the environment improves.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kerenshara
post Sep 5 2009, 10:46 PM
Post #70


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,894
Joined: 11-May 09
Member No.: 17,166



QUOTE (Daddy's Little Ninja @ Sep 5 2009, 05:31 PM) *
It would be interesting to see if wealthy ork women have 'litters' or if the size of their birthings do decrease as the environment improves.

You mean some kind of psychosomatic feedback mechanism? THAT's a cool idea. After all, UGE and Goblinization are both results of mana interaction with the magus factor/meta gene, so a "smarter" evolution factor would be completely legitimate and believable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daddy's Litt...
post Sep 5 2009, 10:59 PM
Post #71


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Near my daughters, Lansdale PA
Member No.: 6,668



Exactly. Many orks live in poverty and they suffer malnutrition and exposure. So their bodies go for the max. A well off Ork though does not 'need' to worry as much about her children surviving so her body does not 'produce' as many eggs when the mothers 'comfort' level is at a certain point.

Remember also that the children of a litter will be smaller than of a single birthing. The mother can only stretch so far. Even with the extra bulk orks carry they are still relatively the same size as human mothers. I know how far each of my two girls 'pushed' me and they are two years apart. If I was to carry 6-8 at a time instead of just one, there is no way they could have been as large at birth and smaller babies are much more vulnerable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Sep 6 2009, 02:04 AM
Post #72


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



I think this idea is total genius. Score for you, DLN.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cryonic
post Sep 6 2009, 05:09 AM
Post #73


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 17-August 09
Member No.: 17,506



QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 4 2009, 03:45 PM) *
on the other hand, orks also have a much higher body value than humans. while it may not make it particularly probable that they survive, it would certainly make it more probable.

plus, that still leaves a ridiculously low number of orks, given their birth rates etc.


Orks didn't exist for the first plague as Goblinization started after 2010.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bull
post Sep 6 2009, 06:00 AM
Post #74


Grumpy Old Ork Decker
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,794
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Orwell, Ohio
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Cryonic @ Sep 6 2009, 01:09 AM) *
Orks didn't exist for the first plague as Goblinization started after 2010.


Even later. The first round of Goblinization didn't start till 2021.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanadianWolverin...
post Sep 6 2009, 04:44 PM
Post #75


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 574
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Ucluelet - Tofino - Nanaimo Salish-Sahide Council
Member No.: 17,309



QUOTE (Daddy's Little Ninja @ Sep 5 2009, 03:59 PM) *
Exactly. Many orks live in poverty and they suffer malnutrition and exposure. So their bodies go for the max. A well off Ork though does not 'need' to worry as much about her children surviving so her body does not 'produce' as many eggs when the mothers 'comfort' level is at a certain point.

Remember also that the children of a litter will be smaller than of a single birthing. The mother can only stretch so far. Even with the extra bulk orks carry they are still relatively the same size as human mothers. I know how far each of my two girls 'pushed' me and they are two years apart. If I was to carry 6-8 at a time instead of just one, there is no way they could have been as large at birth and smaller babies are much more vulnerable.


Great points. I know one of the first things I thought of when I came across Orks having litters was: Ork ladies have only 2 breasts, yes? Given what I know about my wife breast feeding my one daughter, those breasts are only going to produce so much milk and you are going to have some malnutritioned infant orks ... makes me wonder if Ork moms give preferential treatment to the infants they think are most likely to survive. What a totally dark thought, now I am picturing Ork moms putting a few of the litter in a dumpster or mercy cullings that the Ork dad has to commit. Maybe that is why Orks have higher stats in some areas, the other ones with the lesser stats just don't live past the boob, let alone being a toddler in a seriously impoverished enviroment?

Other than that dark thought, I wonder if on average Ork ladies have bigger tits, maybe making human ladies who get boob jobs jealous on some level? Ork ladies who do cosmetic surgery on the teeth rather than boobs to work in the sexual entertainment industry?

Personally, I've always got the impression the life expectancy for Orks had less to do with metabolism and more to do with their rough and tumble place in society. Like not living past 20 in the ghetto or some such. What are you willing to bet gangs have a larger number of Orks in them?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 08:30 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.