My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Jan 28 2004, 03:19 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Yeah, a HMG has internals that are (as far as I know) quite a bit like those on a LMG or MMG. That's why I didn't mentioned anything but an LMG. Had I mentioned "with internals similar to HMGs", that could've been taken to imply that autocannons are included.
A semi-automatic small-caliber cannon is not very different from a semi-automatic large-caliber rifle. Compare Barret M82 vs Barrett Payload Rifle, or NTW-20 in 14.5x114 and 20x83.5. AFAIK, an assault cannon is still a personal firearm with internals very similar to those of a semi-automatic rifle, albeit at a far larger scale. I've got hands-on experience with an NSV-12.7, but I've got no idea what the internals of one look like. From the way it works, I guess the internals might actually look quite unlike what LMG internals look like. But I'm not sure, better wait for word from someone who has handled the insides of those kinds of weapons (I've spent enough times with the internal organs of a LMG, but never with anything bigger than that). In any case, revolvers, pistols, SMGs, ARs and bolt-action, fully automatic, semi-automatic, pump-action, lever-action and single-shot rifles and shotguns as well as LMGs and MMGs (GPMGs) should certainly be included, most likely assault cannons as well. [Edit]Way to change opinions midway through a post, me! So, uhh, I really haven't got a clue what the internals of a HMG look like. They might look almost exactly like those on a belt-fed LMG, or they might look very different. All that other stuff still stands, though.[/Edit] This post has been edited by Austere Emancipator: Jan 28 2004, 03:26 PM |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2004, 03:21 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
I'd rule that tinkering with a Nuclear Reactor requires it's own seperate skill.
It's too intense a subject to be lumped under group headings (IMHO). Mostly because I know a guy who was trained as a nuclear tech on a sub. :grinbig: -Siege |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2004, 04:05 PM
Post
#28
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 475 Joined: 17-June 02 From: Concord University, Athens, WV Member No.: 2,880 |
Plastic Warriors has a skill web up that I use. |
||
|
|
|||
Jan 28 2004, 08:00 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 675 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 2,034 |
I think that submarine, like hovercraft is wierd enough to be on its own.
Then you also need spacecraft on its own. Mmmm... skillweb. Thanks. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 09:00 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.