Avitar Change |
Avitar Change |
Sep 23 2009, 03:24 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 22-September 09 From: Greensburg, PA Member No.: 17,665 |
how do i do it? i want to upload my own...like from my computer....not one of the pregenerated ones.
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 06:01 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Old Man of the North Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 10,016 Joined: 14-August 03 From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe Member No.: 5,463 |
It's not allowed. The site managers don't have the time to vette personal images for correctness.
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 05:22 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 22-September 09 From: Greensburg, PA Member No.: 17,665 |
cool deal, thanks
|
|
|
Sep 25 2009, 12:08 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,001 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Michigan Member No.: 1,514 |
Why can't any of the several dozen admins do it? No the answer is they don't want to do it. And that's okay. I mean it is their site.
|
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 03:59 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Old Man of the North Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 10,016 Joined: 14-August 03 From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe Member No.: 5,463 |
For the administrators to do the job of vetting pictures before they are posted, they would have to either set up a system in which images are submitted to them first, or continually scan the forums for objectionable material. The latter would parallel their task of checking posts for acceptability, and in that task already there is a significant time lag. The former works in dating sites but I don't know how much time and effort is spent is those venues.
We have been told it takes too much time, and it would appear most of us accept that answer. |
|
|
Oct 22 2009, 05:08 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Free Spirit Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,948 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Bloomington, IN UCAS Member No.: 1,920 |
It's not just objectionable material, as in content, but image size, like in bits and bytes and megs. I think I read something about having large memory requirement avatars would slow down the time it takes for the page to load. Personally, I think avatars are stupid, I can't think of any that raised my admiration for a poster, but I can think of a few that reinforced my feeling the poster was a jerk or idiot.
It is kind of nice for the original poster to so graciously accept the answer of it isn't allowed. |
|
|
Jan 15 2010, 04:54 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 533 Joined: 26-February 02 From: In a hot tub, with lots of bubbles and champagne waiting for you. Member No.: 1,972 |
if only. I got several pics of nice chested women just wanting to jump out on da scene (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Jan 16 2010, 09:47 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 266 Joined: 21-November 09 Member No.: 17,891 |
Personally, I think avatars are stupid, I can't think of any that raised my admiration for a poster, but I can think of a few that reinforced my feeling the poster was a jerk or idiot. They can be a useful way of adding "style" to an individual's postings. Coupled with handle, .sig, etc., you can get more of a feel for people. |
|
|
Jan 17 2010, 07:05 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Old Man of the North Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 10,016 Joined: 14-August 03 From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe Member No.: 5,463 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st December 2024 - 11:28 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.