IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Meat Shield, Stopping power!
CoalHeart
post Jan 29 2004, 06:02 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 22-October 03
Member No.: 5,757



How powerful does a gunshot have to be to travel through it's target?


Lets just say we had a puny daisy eater mage, Minni the Magial standing behind Mongo the Metallic (Cybertroll) with all the +bod and armor cyber he can cram in him. A gunshot rings out aimed for Minni and nails Mongo the Metallic because he steps into the line of fire. How do I figure out if the bullet passes through Mongo the Metallic and can potentally damage Minni the Magical?


Would ExEx have no chance of passing through?
would APDS have a great chance of passing through?
would an arrow?
would a regular round?
would any of the other bullets?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 29 2004, 06:14 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



EX-Ex would almost certainly not penetrate, unless it only hits someone in the side of the next, in the cheeck, hand, etc. Even then, it wouldn't be very dangerous to someone behind the target.

APDS rounds from any reasonable firearm will penetrate a metahuman being regardless of where they hit. When ware is involved, it depends on exactly what is inbetween. If the shot hits the troll in the middle of the chest, and he's got Titanium Bone Lacing and Dermal Sheath-3, then Light Pistol APDS might be stopped.

What do you consider a regular round? A FMJ/military ball 9mm parabellum round will easily penetrate a human, but might have slight trouble with a troll's bones. An expanding or fragmenting bullet from almost any weapon will not consistently penetrate a troll, from pistols they usually don't penetrate humans either, and aren't that dangerous in any case.

Arrows SUCK. I won't comment further...

What other kinds of bullets are there? AV is just APDS with a different name and more hype.

If you want, I can get more specific, but if you don't want to break out some better system for ammunition, there's no point.

For some indication of how much flesh bullets penetrate, look here. Any of those bullet types could be considered "regular", with FMJ being most common for military weapons and the JSPs etc for civilian small arms.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 29 2004, 06:19 PM
Post #3


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



If two people are pressed up against each other cozy-like, and the arrow in question is sufficiently large and shot from a sufficiently powerful bow, it might penetrate both. However, the arrow isn't going to be passing completely through just about anyone, save maybe a Troll physad arrow to someone's neck.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dogsoup
post Jan 29 2004, 06:45 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 291
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 806



How's this?
First guy's [armor+body+dermal armor] as a negative modifier to the PowLvl of the gunshot, sort of like when firing through barriers. Half this modifier for APDS as usual.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deep Blue
post Jan 29 2004, 06:52 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Between the electrons
Member No.: 465



Why do you say arrows suck? Have you ever fired a compound bow with a hunting broadhead at a chunk of wood? Serious damage. From a troll you could get a lot more damage. And crossbows are something else again -- a good heavy crossbow will punch through plate-mail. I remember reading somewhere that, back in the day, crossbows were considered 'un-sportsmanlike' because of their killer penetration. An arrow or bolt fired from a decent compound bow or crossbow will punch right through a person and into whatever (or whoever) is behind them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jan 29 2004, 06:56 PM
Post #6


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Actually I use Armor*2 +body to determine blowthrough for ammo, because the bullet has to pass through BOTH sides of the armor (one entering and one exiting) and the person.

For EX and EXEX I halve the power of the round for penetration.
For APDS use 150% of the power for penetration.
For AV I double the power of the round for penetration.

round up.

This means against armored targets its not liekly there is going to be blowthrough.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeel De Mort
post Jan 29 2004, 06:57 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Scotland
Member No.: 3,175



Regular (as in what SR calls regular) ammo would pass through most normal guys if they're unarmoured, and APDS certainly would. But remember that even a *fairly* light bullet-proof vest will stop a 9mm round in today's terms, and heavy stuff (e.g. heavy vest with ceramic plates (i.e. armour vest with plates in SR)) will stop a 7.62 rifle round. Assuming you're hit in the torso, of course.

So I guess what you'd have to do, when penetration matters, is fudge some way of deciding where the bullet lands on a person, even though they'll get their normal armour rating against it regardless. Not very realistic, but hey what else is new? :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jan 29 2004, 07:17 PM
Post #8


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



This has been brought up before, the most accurate answer I would say is if the power of a single shot overcomes a barrier with a rating of 4(body)+2xArmor. This also means that if a gun can do it once, most likely it'll do it with every shot (nicely perforating your poor troll). Consider NOT having them go through if they do an exceptional amount of damage, saying instead the bullet fragmented or deflected inside of the body.

The quick way is if the shooter has a lot of successes, go ahead and hit the mage too.

The smart way is if the mage's player didn't buy you a beer at the end of last game, the bullet fragments and hits him twice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Jan 29 2004, 07:25 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



[Edit]Wow, I'm in a really bad mood today. Sorry. I'll be editing this into a bit more reasonable form...[/Edit]

QUOTE (Deep Blue)
Why do you say arrows suck?

Because my experience is mainly with firearms, which are superior. Compared to firearms, penetration-wise, arrows do suck.

QUOTE
Have you ever fired a compound bow with a hunting broadhead at a chunk of wood? Serious damage.

Nope, but I've fired a 7.62x53mmR into a chunk of wood. Clean hole and splinters. And I've fired a 12.7x107mm HMG -- unless we're talking several meters of hard wood here, that will come on top. Not to mention that the latter will punch through a few centimeters of homogenous rolled armor steel.

QUOTE
And crossbows are something else again -- a good heavy crossbow will punch through plate-mail.

Even pistols with "regular" (FMJ) ammunition will punch right through plate mail. Rifles will punch through several suits. A 12.7x109mm with FMJ will send strips of metal flying after 5. An APDS round from a 7.62x51mm nato will penetrate ~3 full suits of plate mail (front and back, 15mm of armor steel) and still kill a guy. An APDS round from a 12.7mm (in SR terms a Barrett M121 or any HMG) will penetrate 6 suits at 500 meters, fly 300 more meters, and blow your head into tiny little pieces.

QUOTE
I remember reading somewhere that, back in the day, crossbows were considered 'un-sportsmanlike' because of their killer penetration.

Compared to normal bows, right? Now compare rifles to normal bows...

This post has been edited by Austere Emancipator: Jan 29 2004, 07:36 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Jan 29 2004, 07:32 PM
Post #10


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



Bow/crossbow vs firearm - absolutely zero contest. By and large, arrows and bolts don't even hit very hard, they just happen to be pointy and they cut you. Then you bleed to death. But it's the pointy bits that do the damage, not the amount of energy they deliver. I'd be real surprised if you could get through any sort of remotely-modern armor with a crossbow.

Well, unless you Dikote™ it. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Jan 29 2004, 09:10 PM
Post #11


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



There are rules for overpenetration on my site. Not an easy thing to make practical rules for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Jan 30 2004, 12:27 AM
Post #12


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



QUOTE
Arrows SUCK. I won't comment further...


Get a Ranger-X bow. Get a minimum pull of 10 strength (assuming you have 10 strength). Dikote the arrowhead.

BOOM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lilt
post Jan 30 2004, 12:48 AM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



I forget: Is it impact or ballistic armor that is used to reduce the damage from bows&similar?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 30 2004, 12:55 AM
Post #14


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Impact.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lilt
post Jan 30 2004, 12:57 AM
Post #15


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
Impact.
Just curious, where do you get that from?

Under the combat section it says that they use the rules for firearms for bows & thrown weapons, but under the equipment listing it calls them Impact projectile weapons (not 100% proof, but why call them impact weapons otherwise?).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 30 2004, 01:12 AM
Post #16


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (SR3 P283)
Impact armor protects against projectiles with lesser kinetic transfer: projectile weapons, explosives, hand-held weapons, stun ammunition and damaging manipulation spells.


(Bolding added; italics original to text)

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 08:52 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.