IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> IPs- how many?
Mongoose
post Nov 24 2009, 08:58 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



Is there a hard maximum to the number of IPs a character can have?
What if they are at this maximum (say from implants / magic) and spend edge for another IP? Or if they take drgugs that grant extra IPs?
Would drugs that grant extra IPs stack with other drugs (such as using both Jazz and Cram) and / or with implants / magic?

And lastly, at what point do you declare spending edge for an extra IP? Any time during the turn? Since movment is tied to the number of IPs in a turn, what effect does this have on movment?

This last question has prompted me to consider a few house rules. First, all turns are treated as having 5 IPs. You can move in all 5, but can only act in as many as you'd normally be able to. And yes, you can get up to 5, but only by using edge. You could get to 4 with implants / magic / drugs, but can only benefit from one drug at a time. Also, you can move twice in an IP by spending a complex action to do nothing but move in that IP (effectively giving up an IP). Yes, this does let charactwers with IP boosting effects move (a bit) faster- at most, you could move twice as fast as normal, if you somehow had actions in all 5 IPs.
Any glaring problems with these house rules?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Nov 24 2009, 08:59 PM
Post #2


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



The Maximum is 4.
5 for Technomancers and Hackers in full VR with certain special things in their belonging.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Nov 24 2009, 09:02 PM
Post #3


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



IP-enhancing materials are not cumulative - only the highest applies. Therefore, spending Edge to gain an IP is only for un-augmented people who are not on one of the many available drugs out there that add IPs.

The effect on movement is still "you move X meters in one CT." You then need to divide the distance you are moving by the number of IPs you have to determine your movement per IP.

No, you cannot get up to 5 IPs using Edge. You may only get 5 IPs using a Simsense Booster and Simsense Accelerator in Hot Sim VR.

QUOTE
Also, you can move twice in an IP by spending a complex action to do nothing but move in that IP (effectively giving up an IP).
Where is that from?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongoose
post Nov 24 2009, 09:03 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



So if you have, say, the Adept Power "Improved Reflexes, level 3", you simply can not spend edge to gain an extra IP, because you already have 4?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongoose
post Nov 24 2009, 09:06 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



QUOTE (Neraph @ Nov 24 2009, 10:02 PM) *
QUOTE
Also, you can move twice in an IP by spending a complex action to do nothing but move in that IP (effectively giving up an IP).

Where is that from?


Its from the house rules I was considering, as are the entire last two paragraphs of my initial post post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Nov 24 2009, 09:09 PM
Post #6


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Mongoose @ Nov 24 2009, 10:03 PM) *
So if you have, say, the Adept Power "Improved Reflexes, level 3", you simply can not spend edge to gain an extra IP, because you already have 4?

oh yes, you can.
but you will spend the edge for nothing, because you still stay on your 4 passes.
just like doing drugs. you can take them, you will get all the other benefits and problems of the drugs.
but not the additional IP.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Nov 24 2009, 09:39 PM
Post #7


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Mongoose @ Nov 24 2009, 03:58 PM) *
Is there a hard maximum to the number of IPs a character can have?
What if they are at this maximum (say from implants / magic) and spend edge for another IP? Or if they take drgugs that grant extra IPs?
Would drugs that grant extra IPs stack with other drugs (such as using both Jazz and Cram) and / or with implants / magic?

And lastly, at what point do you declare spending edge for an extra IP? Any time during the turn? Since movment is tied to the number of IPs in a turn, what effect does this have on movment?

This last question has prompted me to consider a few house rules. First, all turns are treated as having 5 IPs. You can move in all 5, but can only act in as many as you'd normally be able to. And yes, you can get up to 5, but only by using edge. You could get to 4 with implants / magic / drugs, but can only benefit from one drug at a time. Also, you can move twice in an IP by spending a complex action to do nothing but move in that IP (effectively giving up an IP). Yes, this does let charactwers with IP boosting effects move (a bit) faster- at most, you could move twice as fast as normal, if you somehow had actions in all 5 IPs.
Any glaring problems with these house rules?


Some big problems include the fact that a slightly cybered person can easily outrun a world class runner without really trying. I do like the 'divide movement into IPs even if you don't have multiple IPs' because otherwise you run into the problem of someone with 1 IP moving 25m in 1 IP, while someone with 4 IPs only moves 6.25m in that same IP. This means that closing into melee combat is way more effective with only 1 IP, which never made alot of sense to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Nov 24 2009, 09:45 PM
Post #8


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Karoline @ Nov 24 2009, 03:39 PM) *
Some big problems include the fact that a slightly cybered person can easily outrun a world class runner without really trying. I do like the 'divide movement into IPs even if you don't have multiple IPs' because otherwise you run into the problem of someone with 1 IP moving 25m in 1 IP, while someone with 4 IPs only moves 6.25m in that same IP. This means that closing into melee combat is way more effective with only 1 IP, which never made alot of sense to me.

Just because you are capable of assessing and acting to external stimuli much more efficiently than the average person does not make your legs move faster.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warlordtheft
post Nov 24 2009, 09:52 PM
Post #9


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



The problem with the movement and IP's is that in that 1 IP person moves faster than a 4IP person would and could charge him from 25m away and not get hosed down by all 4IPs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JoelHalpern
post Nov 24 2009, 09:54 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 18-January 06
From: Leesburg, Virginia, USA
Member No.: 8,177



Neraph, the problem is that, by the rules, if you have multiple IPs you get multiple running tests. Thus, your effective speed does get faster. Enough faster to be quite noticeable for human-sized figures.

Joel

PS: The oddity of being able to cover more ground in 1IP if one has only 1IP did strike me before.
Another related oddity is suppressive fire. If you have one IP, you spend it, and you cover the area for the entire turn, affecting fast characters in the area of effect every time they get an IP. For the same 10 bullets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Nov 24 2009, 09:54 PM
Post #11


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Nov 24 2009, 03:52 PM) *
The problem with the movement and IP's is that in that 1 IP person moves faster than a 4IP person would and could charge him from 25m away and not get hosed down by all 4IPs.

No, he "appears" to move faster. They move the same amount, but the person with only 1 IP gets to act fully on the first IP, including reacting to his total movement taken.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 24 2009, 10:36 PM
Post #12


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



By RAW, Movement is per Combat Turn, and maintained until the next Action Phase - and movement is diveded by the number of passes in that turn.

So Joe Average won't run his full movement in the first pass if there are more passes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jake
post Nov 24 2009, 10:42 PM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Melbourne, Australia
Member No.: 872



I can't remember the math but going from memory, we found that a human with STR 9 AGI 9 could move at 100km/hr (short distances obviously).

- J.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Nov 24 2009, 11:10 PM
Post #14


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



Note that one really useful house rule is that you can simply limit the movement rate per Combat Turn and don't worry about dividing it evenly between all the passes. Instead, you can split it up however you like; all in one pass, some in one and most in another, or none at all. Whatever you need to get the job done in your eyes.

Like everything else, initiative passes are an abstraction. Since passes are also front loaded, meaning everyone gets to use one after the other at the beginning of a turn regardless of how reactive anyone is, there's no reason at all that the guy with only one pass should be able to move further before acting than you can, especially when getting to the destination is important for whatever reason. This house rule doesn't give you extra speed. It just opens the abstract nature of the rules up to movement which is strangely restrictive.

If someone has an issue with the "realsm" of that, just remind them that by the same rules, the guy with a higher reaction also somehow gets the ability to talk super fast. You get to speak one full sentence or phrase per Free Action, and you can have upwards of three Free Actions per pass. That allows someone with 4 passes to get 12 full sentences off. In just three seconds. And yes, I know the rules say GMs should watch out for goofiness like that, but it demonstrates just how abstract the whole Combat Turn thing is. Movement shouldn't be any different.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tsuul
post Nov 25 2009, 12:16 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 22-October 05
Member No.: 7,876



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Nov 24 2009, 05:36 PM) *
By RAW, Movement is per Combat Turn, and maintained until the next Action Phase - and movement is diveded by the number of passes in that turn.

So Joe Average won't run his full movement in the first pass if there are more passes.

QFT / +1

Last paragraph pg 148 SR4A 'Movement'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Nov 25 2009, 01:51 AM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



Or you limit the amount of actions people can spend on running. You could only take a Sprint action during any one of your initiative passes, but not necessarily the first one, for example.

But yeah, it's an abstraction of "reality."

IP stacking: what about Wired Reflexes 1 and Edge? It seems unfair if you can't get a 3rd pass that way.. (But I agree a 5th is right out.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Nov 25 2009, 09:08 AM
Post #17


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



As long as you are below 4, you can spend edge and gain one additional IP up to 4 IP's.
When you are at 3 IP's, you can get one and go up to 4. If you are at 4 allready, you can spend edge and gain NOTHING.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Nov 25 2009, 03:53 PM
Post #18


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



Or you just read the rules and a person with 4 IP moves the exact same distance as someone with 1 IP in a single combat turn.

I'm going to start a new thread on this particular issue, since it seems everyone on DS is incapable of reading the rules for this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongoose
post Nov 25 2009, 09:31 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Nov 25 2009, 02:51 AM) *
IP stacking: what about Wired Reflexes 1 and Edge? It seems unfair if you can't get a 3rd pass that way..


That's basically what prompted me to ask about it. I was looking at Move By Wire and realized a starting character can only get MBW1, for one extra initiaitve pass, while Wired 2 and various level 3 magical boosts are also allowed to starting characters. And realistically, how often is a character in play EVER gonna upgrade from MBW1 to MBW2? Sure, MBW1 offers a few other (minor) benefits, but it kinda looks like a dud if you can't EVER get more than 2 IPS because you had it put in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Nov 25 2009, 09:39 PM
Post #20


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Mongoose @ Nov 25 2009, 04:31 PM) *
That's basically what prompted me to ask about it. I was looking at Move By Wire and realized a starting character can only get MBW1, for one extra initiaitve pass, while Wired 2 and various level 3 magical boosts are also allowed to starting characters. And realistically, how often is a character in play EVER gonna upgrade from MBW1 to MBW2? Sure, MBW1 offers a few other (minor) benefits, but it kinda looks like a dud if you can't EVER get more than 2 IPS because you had it put in.


Well, you can get more than 2IPs, but it can't be from something that only gives you +1 IP. You could get an improved reflexes spell that gives +2 IP and that would get you 3IP total.

I'm not sure about the edge stacking or not. I agree that it seems like it should, because it never mentions 'Only works if you only have a single IP' and edge tends to break the rules for the game, in this case the rule that IPs from different sources don't stack.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crizh
post Nov 25 2009, 10:39 PM
Post #21


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,666
Joined: 29-February 08
From: Scotland
Member No.: 15,722



QUOTE (Neraph @ Nov 24 2009, 09:02 PM) *
IP-enhancing materials are not cumulative - only the highest applies.


I am not sure I can find any support for that statement anywhere in the rules.

Many, many IP enhancers have extensive rules on what they don't stack with but I have found no rules to suggest that one cannot take Jazz and Kamikaze followed up with a nice Force 2 Increase Reflexes for a grand total of 4 IP's.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Nov 25 2009, 11:11 PM
Post #22


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (crizh @ Nov 25 2009, 05:39 PM) *
I am not sure I can find any support for that statement anywhere in the rules.

Many, many IP enhancers have extensive rules on what they don't stack with but I have found no rules to suggest that one cannot take Jazz and Kamikaze followed up with a nice Force 2 Increase Reflexes for a grand total of 4 IP's.


I'm fairly sure I've seen the rule somewhere before. Couldn't tell you where exactly though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Nov 26 2009, 12:03 AM
Post #23


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



It's not a general, it's a specific rule. For example "Wired reflexes cannot be combined with any other form of Initiative enhancement, except Reaction Enhancers."

It's intention is to keep, say, an adept from getting Improved Reflexes 1 and Wired Reflexes 1. Personally, I consider temporary boosts to be an exception. Blowing Edge, popping a drug, etc. are all fine in my book whether you have enhanced reflexes or not. They all come at a price that's greater than the bonus they provide. Well, unless you're in a game where they refresh Edge every fight or something. Either way, the limit of 4 IPs keeps any abuses in check and allows people who did bother to use their resources to improve their reflexes to keep their advantage if they so desire even when some schmuck decides to go the cheap way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Nov 26 2009, 06:24 AM
Post #24


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Mongoose @ Nov 25 2009, 03:31 PM) *
That's basically what prompted me to ask about it. I was looking at Move By Wire and realized a starting character can only get MBW1, for one extra initiaitve pass, while Wired 2 and various level 3 magical boosts are also allowed to starting characters. And realistically, how often is a character in play EVER gonna upgrade from MBW1 to MBW2? Sure, MBW1 offers a few other (minor) benefits, but it kinda looks like a dud if you can't EVER get more than 2 IPS because you had it put in.

You're not supposted to start with MBW at all, although you can get Alpha-grade MBW 2 with a Restricted Gear IIRC. You're supposted to start with Wired Reflexes, possibly a Reaction Enhancer, and maybe skillwires, then "upgrade" them in-game for MBW, which would take not only the Essence hole left from removing the aforementioned 'ware, but duplicate their bonuses as well (and give you a little extra kick).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th April 2026 - 12:58 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.