Permaban - Welcome to dsf Options

[fistandantilus4....]

Sorry, I should know better than to use a phrase like always. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) "Usually" is a better term.

Also, just because we send a notice doesn't mean your Warn Level got ratcheted up. ...

Frank for example had a few things noted that hadn't gone onto his "Warn Level", so he was/should have been well above the limit of 10.

You've really throttled back on the aggressive behavior though. WHen I stepped down, We had been discussing reviewing our members who have warnings and reducing the warn levels after a probationary period, and I know you were on the top of the list.

Bull

A number of people have recently been lowered. The guideline we were going off of was "No Warnings within 6 months of active posting. So just not being an issue while you're not here doesn't cut it, the poster has to show that they're actually moving away from whatever the previous issues were. Hopefully that addresses some of your issues with the past problems Cain.

[Dread Moores]

Wow, the lounge closed.... 8 years ago? 7?

Cripes. I feel really old now. I remember being around when the Lounge first opened. And when Bulldrek subsequently got the boot. Thanks alot, Lindt! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[Freejack]

And still a post count of zero, despite another post right before this one.

*Cue Twilight Zone theme music*

I don't believe your posts here count towards your total.

Carl

[Ol' Scratch]

--------------------
Signature removed for violating dumpshock's standards of indecency and nastiness.

Golly, it's almost like you're trying to make it look like the mods censored you. Tip of the future: Capitalize the name of the forum and use proper grammar; they'd much more likely say "standards of decency" rather than what you faked. If they did anything of the sort at all, that is. Which they don't. I seriously doubt they'd make it a flashy red bit of text, too. But hey, either way, thanks for all but confirming my suspicions for me. 'Preciate it greatly. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[Saint Sithney]

I actually thought that Frank's attack on ketjak was done just to show that he was an equal-opportunity asshole and wasn't going to act like a buddy just because ket was confirming the accusations FT was throwing around.

I basically read it as FT trying to prove he wasn't in cahoots with ket just because they agreed on the facts, just as ket brought it up in the first place to say that he holds no special love for Mr. F Trollman.

Is even the perceived need for this kind of behavior something messed up? Sure.
Was it some kind of malicious textual assault? Hardly.

Is closing every thread opened here designated to talk about it helping keep all this garbage out of the main forum? Does it seem that way?

[crash2029]

I don't suppose you could put me on that "watch" list? It would make me feel rebellious.

I hope I didn't just piss somebody off.

[DireRadiant]

I don't suppose you could put me on that "watch" list? It would make me feel rebellious.

I hope I didn't just piss somebody off.

Everyone is on the "Watch" list.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Everyone can feel free to rebel.

[crash2029]

Everyone is on the "Watch" list.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Everyone can feel free to rebel.

Neat! Before this the worst I ever rebelled was during my teenage rebellion when I stayed up past my bedtime reading. Now I am a hardcase! Or at least a firmcase. Excuse me while I revel in my new outlaw status.

[Adarael]

I believe I am the only dumpshock user who was given a temporary ban due to "child pornography." I kinda feel like that's a disgusting badge of honor.

(It was a very offensive text description of a PC, from a MUSH.)

(Edit: It was also *A* PC, not *my* PC.)