![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#176
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 ![]() |
Armorers workshop seams more usefull than one for chem tech guns need mantinance so does armor. Plus with the communal desktop forge we have the abilty to add any nodds to our guns an armor at sea. Along with ones for medical use and cybertech and ship repairs we have alot of our bases covered. For longterm independance from needing to dock. If we can get a microfab for chemistry as well all the better.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#177
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 20-March 05 Member No.: 7,194 ![]() |
I think i'm going to change over form intell gal to financier/bean counter. Someone's got to keep up with the cash on this endeavor.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#178
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
Foxx:
A voice of God response (in other words, not a suggestion, this is fundamental stuff I'd like everyone to keep in mind): That really only works: As an OOC thing, and as an Additional Duty (the purser, it's properly called) on top of anything else you do ICly. Even then, don't expect to see it come up too often after chargen - It'll come up, yes, but we're talking very basic double-entry bookkeeping that one could do with a scrap of paper or an excel spreadsheeet on the OOC side, and ICly you'll have custom accounting software on the ship's computer to help you do it. You do need someone to do it, but it can't be the only thing you do. Realistically, especially if we're talking a smaller crew, everybody needs to have an operational role of some sort. The situation starts to allow more support roles as we reach 8 players, and with 10-12 players I specifically look for someone to act in the total-support roles as a dedicated MD (with background and stats to match) onboard ship. Okay, end of VOG stuff, back to my usual GM posture of "These are strictly suggestions until I say otherwise": I'm seeing a lot of role overlap as I look at concepts. My one tip as GM is that it'll probably make people somewhat happier in the long-run if roles are...Well, some overlap is expected, but you want to also have your bases covered, and clearly define who does what primarily, and who backs up whom. If you need help defining roles, tell me the context you need to define roles in, and I can scribble up a list of potential roles so everybody is working off a common vocabulary. --- A brief note about karma expenditure and stuff. Because this campaign doesn't lend itself to a neat dividide between "action" and "non-action" like a normal campaign, I handle it differently. There's time operational, and shore leave. Shore leaves I'll declare - they're basically "downtimes", times for you to do the stuff you'd ordinarily do between runs (that you can't do aboard ship). The quickie rule of thumb I use is that when you're docked, it's a shore leave. That's when I process karma expenditures, when new players are added, etc. Outside of shore leaves, you do stuff. You train, stand watches (quick and dirty rule: For training time purposes, each half hour spent standing a watch counts as one hour training time in the associated skill, I'll go into this more if need be), go after ships, and...yeah, this is sort of the run period. Edge is tricky - my initial insticnt is to refresh it with each shore loeave, but that's a gut instinct. As that note: look at This thread. It's long, it includes a lot of sausagemaking, but it has some handy rulings and stuff from the last time a group did the chargen process with me; As that was only in September, I've not really had chance to change my mind on rules-fu stuff, though I'm entirely persuadable. What I've posted previously on this thread wins, but rather than repeat myself, I figure it just saves sanity if I point you guys to there, and you can ask questions with that knowledge of how I've ruled in the past. --- Finally: While we are nowhere *near* being ready to start play yet, that doesn't mean I don't think about the first moves. My initial instinct is to repeat, with modifications, the training sequence the initial crew underwent onboard the Fedallah last campaign. It'll be modified to remove some of the drudgery, but it seems kind of nuts to just recruit you, hand over the keys to the boat (or whatever) and send you off. I wouldn't do that if I were the UCAS Navy, at least. So they'll probably do something, at the very least to bond you guys together and make sure you can handle life at sea before they turn over the ship and send you off on your own. We can montage it as much as you guys want, that said. I know it dragged on a bit for those who did it last time, and my hope this time is that I can shake out some of the bugs and get it to run faster. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#179
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
On that note, since today I've been through what remains of my old files (mostly karma logs and the like) for the last campaign, here's the Zodiac boat that I found in one of the threads, that maybe sticks out to you guys as a subcraft.
Zodiac International Hurricane VI RHIB With over 80 years of history and development, Zodiac's Hurricane line of rigid hull inflateable boats is the best selling and most well-known RIB in the 6th world. The Hurricane is fast, small, manuverable, and easy to transport. They are commonly used by militaries and law enforment officials who need a quick an power craft that can be easily deployed from a larger ship or helicopter. Over the years the Hurricane base model has been kept highly streamlined, boasting only simple manual controls and only the most basic of sensors. These options can be added-on in more advanced models. Std. Upgrade: Assembly Time Improvement Handling +3 Accel 15/35 Speed 90 Pilot 0 Body 10 Armor 4 Sensor 1 Avail 9 Cost 30,000Y --- Rulings I'm making: Each Zodiac holds 16 people, including the 1 operator. Disassembled, your typical Zodiac fits in about a cubic foot, excluding the engine. Assembly takes Body minutes, and uses one tank of compressed air - which costs 1Y at your local gas station and .5Y for refills. This is only your 'stock' version. Zodiac sells numerous modified versions, all made in the UCAS. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#180
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,026 Joined: 13-February 10 Member No.: 18,155 ![]() |
I'm seeing a lot of role overlap as I look at concepts. My one tip as GM is that it'll probably make people somewhat happier in the long-run if roles are...Well, some overlap is expected, but you want to also have your bases covered, and clearly define who does what primarily, and who backs up whom. If you need help defining roles, tell me the context you need to define roles in, and I can scribble up a list of potential roles so everybody is working off a common vocabulary. I think we need a clear sound off of who's currently intending to do what to help us figure out what we have covered. So far, my character is a MD/Hacker with a couple repair skills. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#181
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 ![]() |
I'm going ex-SBS so a sam type also a diver and steath to some extent
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#182
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 368 Joined: 18-April 10 From: Boulder, PCC Sector, Denver Member No.: 18,468 ![]() |
My character probably counts as a pure hacker (though with some very particular focuses), though she's capable of fighting if absolutely necessary.
EDIT: Spelling |
|
|
![]()
Post
#183
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 137 Joined: 4-May 06 Member No.: 8,525 ![]() |
I would like to add a character if a position is still open. An ex smuggler magician. A few technical skills other than the required, some rather expected magical skills, some inflitration skill, and little combat skills except those used in self defense or fishing take your pick.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#184
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
Position's open, yes. Same rules as everybody else.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#185
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 174 Joined: 28-February 08 Member No.: 15,719 ![]() |
I would like to add a character if a position is still open. An ex smuggler magician. A few technical skills other than the required, some rather expected magical skills, some inflitration skill, and little combat skills except those used in self defense or fishing take your pick. That'll be 2 magicians, not a major issue, but from your description I think you and me are going to have a fair bit of overlap... here's a quick skill/spell list for my mage: Active Skills: Conjuring group 2 Spellcasting 5 Astral Combat 3 Counterspelling 3 Perception 3 Infiltration 3 Shadowing 2 Pistols 3 Swimming 1 Nautical Mechanic 1 Spells: Increase Reflexes Heal Powerbolt Manaball Improved Invis Silence Armor Magic Fingers Mist Levitate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#186
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,717 Joined: 23-March 09 From: Weymouth, UK Member No.: 17,007 ![]() |
Pure Watercraft Rigger. Pilot Watercraft 6 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Navigation/Pilot for me Combat skills consist of mounted weaponry and a backup sidearm in a cyberarm |
|
|
![]()
Post
#187
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,026 Joined: 13-February 10 Member No.: 18,155 ![]() |
Pure Watercraft Rigger. Pilot Watercraft 6 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Navigation/Pilot for me Combat skills consist of mounted weaponry and a backup sidearm in a cyberarm Any significant mechanical skills to speak of? (Can you fix our boat with duct tape and a soldering iron?) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#188
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 368 Joined: 18-April 10 From: Boulder, PCC Sector, Denver Member No.: 18,468 ![]() |
Alright, here we go. One Communications Officer, right here. I'd also like to put Cherry forward for the position of Purser (she has a Math SPU and is probably one of the crew that our employers will trust more) and XO (she has some military command experience).
I can post the full spreadsheet if anyone really feels that's necessary. EDIT: I just realized I forgot to make Cherry a SINner. Whoops. Dropping Codeblock for SINner. Vital Stats [ Spoiler ] Biography in 3 Paragraphs [ Spoiler ] Physical and Personality Description [ Spoiler ] Skillz (Yes, with a Z) [ Spoiler ] Qualities [ Spoiler ] Gear A bunch. I spent 50 BP on gear, and really don't want to list it all here, though I'll list her 'ware. [ Spoiler ] Drones/Vehicles 2 Aztechnology Armadillos Contacts [ Spoiler ]
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#189
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 178 Joined: 1-October 09 From: Edmonton, AB Member No.: 17,696 ![]() |
So, been sitting back and playing with stuff.
Think I'll claim the Gunnery Officer position as Dumori switched to quarterpounder errr quartermaster. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Any issues with the restricted gear quality Penta? Or taking it multiple times for that matter? While asking that... if you OK'd it, would taking ammo for an assault cannon require a separate quality pick? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#190
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,026 Joined: 13-February 10 Member No.: 18,155 ![]() |
So, been sitting back and playing with stuff. Think I'll claim the Gunnery Officer position as Dumori switched to quarterpounder errr quartermaster. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Any issues with the restricted gear quality Penta? Or taking it multiple times for that matter? While asking that... if you OK'd it, would taking ammo for an assault cannon require a separate quality pick? Considering he ok'd my rough character sheet with restricted gear, I doubt you'd have too many issues. >.> I think we're dealing with a "no-munchinks plz" kind of GM. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#191
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 178 Joined: 1-October 09 From: Edmonton, AB Member No.: 17,696 ![]() |
The heavy weapon to start would be the only thing i'd really consider munchy.
Just fits with the concept in my head that's struggling to break surface |
|
|
![]()
Post
#192
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 368 Joined: 18-April 10 From: Boulder, PCC Sector, Denver Member No.: 18,468 ![]() |
Considering he ok'd my rough character sheet with restricted gear, I doubt you'd have too many issues. >.> I think we're dealing with a "no-munchinks plz" kind of GM. Yeah, I have a piece of forbidden gear, and got approval for a couple others I decided not to use in the end. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#193
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 ![]() |
Pure Watercraft Rigger. Pilot Watercraft 6 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Navigation/Pilot for me Combat skills consist of mounted weaponry and a backup sidearm in a cyberarm I was going for Navigator with Outdoors 3, but only Pilot Watercraft 1. More of a do-not-get-lost kind of Navigator. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#194
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
I should note for Michandre's sake that of the elected positions, you can only have one - So, Purser OR XO.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#195
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
Some stuff unrelated to anything:
Michandre, no need to post up your sheet again, but for everybody else I recommend posting your full gear listing, too, not just cyberware. Spoiler codes can be used inside of each other. This will become vital when I create the OOC thread for the campaign, as you guys will post your sheets before I repost the ship stuff. The reason is that in case something happens to my hard drive (which has happened before) or I or others are away from our normal computers, the sheets on the OOC thread will be our reference copies. Especially for me, I keep the excel sheets orwhatnot at home on my computer. I don't bring it around with me on a flash drive or anything. For everybody. I use google chat and/or AIM extensively, and/or MSN messenger. If you don't, that's fine. If you do, I'll happily share my contact info via PM if you ask. If you don't use it regularly, understand that I filter my AIM list (though not my google list, it filters itself) every so often for people who don't talk to me much. I'm happy to chat about the game, or just babble about anything. However, while I'll outline stuff and even negotiate stuff over AIM or Google (I can even, over AIM, do 1-on-1 scenes for later posting), for fairness it should be considered tentative until posted. Email: Yeah, as you finish sheets or backgrounds, PM me and you'll get my email address. Like with instant messenging, I'm happy to chat about the game, or just babble, or whatever. However, so far as game stuff goes - actual rules rulings, same rule as for IMs - it's tentative until I post something about it. If you want to do 1-on-1 scenes via email, we can do that too. Same broad guidelines apply to PMs - I don't use em as much because I kinda don't like the interface, but I can work with it. Scenes using it are a bit harder, but totally possible. --- Oh, and nobody's asked, but since Zzyxzs is posting here, I figured I'd mention: If you previously played in Blood in the Water, feel free to bring over your chracter from that campaign. Or creating a new one. Just PM me and we'll work out the details. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#196
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
Considering he ok'd my rough character sheet with restricted gear, I doubt you'd have too many issues. >.> I think we're dealing with a "no-munchinks plz" kind of GM. Exactly right. I pay attention to the RAW, but I pay far more attention to how it all fits together, and how it all balances out. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#197
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 20-November 04 Member No.: 6,844 ![]() |
I don't think anyone else did already thus I'd like to call dibs on the Medical Officer position with a former russian medical officer/battlefield surgeon, if possible.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#198
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
We have a medic/comms person, but I don't think we've a dedicated medic.
Oh, one thing...Nobody's fallen foul of this yet, but I highly recommend y'all pick a language everybody should have in common. Thusfar for the record, English seems to be winning on that score. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#199
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 ![]() |
English seams the best bet any way being the universeal language in aviation and sailing.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#200
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 368 Joined: 18-April 10 From: Boulder, PCC Sector, Denver Member No.: 18,468 ![]() |
I don't think anyone else did already thus I'd like to call dibs on the Medical Officer position with a former russian medical officer/battlefield surgeon, if possible. Hey, my character speaks Russian! I mean, not well... English should definitely be the common language, especially considering our employers. EDIT: I'd also like to note that I really like the former-military vibe that so many of our group seem to be developing. I think it'll give the game an interesting tone, compared to the usual options on Mirror Shades/Pink Mohawk continuum. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th September 2025 - 11:48 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.