Shadowrun package to be added to Lone Wolf's Hero Lab, Making character creation and game management easier |
Shadowrun package to be added to Lone Wolf's Hero Lab, Making character creation and game management easier |
May 13 2010, 03:26 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 595 Joined: 12-May 05 Member No.: 7,392 |
An exciting announcement went up on both the Catalyst website and Shadowrun4.com. For your convenience, here's the whole thing:
QUOTE ("Catalyst Game Labs") FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Catalyst Game Labs and Lone Wolf Development are pleased to announce that they have entered into a new, long-term license for the Shadowrun intellectual property. Lone Wolf will shortly begin development of a Shadowrun data package for its award-winning character management software, Hero Lab. The new data package will initially cover the core Shadowrun Fourth Edition game system, and will later be expanded with content from Shadowrun’s many great supplements. “We’ve been working with Lone Wolf to make this happen for a long time,” states Randall Bills, Managing Developer of Catalyst Game Labs. “Once we finalized the details, Topps approved the license quickly, signifying their appreciation of the importance of digital tools in further developing the Shadowrun line. Lone Wolf Development has a history of bringing innovative technology to the gaming industry, and we look forward to diving into this great new opportunity for Shadowrun alongside them.” Released in 2006, the ENnie award-winning Hero Lab includes an easy-to-use, intuitive interface atop a versatile database engine. Data packages for more than a dozen different role-playing games from a wide range of publishers are already available. Users can add their own custom content to existing games or even create data files for entirely new game systems. The combination of powerful, user-friendly software and the diverse RPGs it supports make Hero Lab one of the most successful character management tools ever released. ”We’re very excited to add Shadowrun to the list of games Hero Lab supports”, said Rob Bowes, President of Lone Wolf Development. “Catalyst recognizes that digital tools like Hero Lab are critical to the success of the gaming industry in the 21st century. By lowering the barrier of entry, Hero Lab makes it easier than ever for RPGs to attract new players, and for existing players to maximize their gaming experience.” Look to www.wolflair.com and www.catalystgamelabs.com for future announcements concerning this exciting development! Catalyst Game Labs Catalyst Game Labs is dedicated to producing high quality games and fiction that mesh sophisticated game mechanics with dynamic universes-all presented in a form that allows beginning players and long-time veterans to easily jump into our games and fiction readers to enjoy our stories even if they don’t know the games. Catalyst Game Labs is an imprint of InMediaRes Productions, LLC, which specializes in electronic publishing of professional fiction. This allows Catalyst to participate in a synergy that melds printed gaming material and fiction with all the benefits of electronic interfaces and online communities, creating a whole-package experience for any type of player or reader. Find Catalyst Game Labs online at www.catalystgamelabs.com Lone Wolf Development Lone Wolf Development specializes in creating innovative digital tools for the tabletop gaming industry, allowing players to streamline game preparation, eliminate errors, and spend more time playing the games they love. With an ever-growing suite of tools, including the award-winning Army Builder and Hero Lab products, Lone Wolf’s digital tools are in regular use by tens of thousands of gamers, from miniatures games to card games to role-playing games. Find out more about Lone Wolf Development by visiting our web site at www.wolflair.com. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:31 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,838 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,669 |
I really hope that they can make it work with SR 5e. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/devil.gif)
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:35 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 308 Joined: 17-March 10 Member No.: 18,303 |
I'd have my doubts that Topps would let this license go through if they weren't intending to renew the license with CGL. I could certainly be wrong, but there seems to be a lot of hints offered there to the overall license renewal.
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:54 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 9-April 10 Member No.: 18,429 |
I'm sorry, I admit my confusion here.
Mr Hardy - Is this confirmation that CGL has retained the licence for Shadowrun for the foreseeable future? Years? |
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:57 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 251 Joined: 17-March 10 From: Bug City Member No.: 18,315 |
I'm sorry, I admit my confusion here. Mr Hardy - Is this confirmation that CGL has retained the licence for Shadowrun for the foreseeable future? Years? I'm sure that would warrant a separate announcement. This is just about Lone Wolf becoming another licensee of Shadowrun, though CGL was involved in the process. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 04:02 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 604 Joined: 1-December 08 From: Sacramento, California Member No.: 16,646 |
Does this have any effect on the the similar apps and excel files that are in discussion on the "Community Projects" section of this page? In other words, will this limit their ability to continue doing what they've done?
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 04:03 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 510 Joined: 19-May 06 From: Southern CA Member No.: 8,574 |
Well, that's pretty flipping pointless, we already have the SR4CharGen from DaisyBox for 4th edition and before that we had the NSRCG for 3rd edition. If the company had jumped on this when the new edition first came out, it would have been great, but they dragged their feet for forever and were long ago scooped.
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 04:27 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,188 Joined: 9-February 08 From: Boiling Springs Member No.: 15,665 |
I still think Daegann's Character Generator is one of the best, if not THE best SR4 character generator out there. Sure, it's missing a couple of things, but DaisyBox is also missing those things as well.
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 04:35 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
I find Daegann's very user-hostile, actually. Additional competition in this area can only help.
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 04:44 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 595 Joined: 12-May 05 Member No.: 7,392 |
I'm sorry, I admit my confusion here. Mr Hardy - Is this confirmation that CGL has retained the licence for Shadowrun for the foreseeable future? Years? At the moment, I can't say anything about the license, and this is a separate deal. I'm happy about it, though, and I'm glad Topps approved it so promptly. Jason H. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 04:49 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 9-April 10 Member No.: 18,429 |
Thanks Jason for the prompt response. With the seemed demise of the CGL speculation thread, I'm trying to gather whatever info is out there to determine whether I should be putting all of my newly acquired 4th ed books on eBay in preparation for a 5th ed.
Right now, I have one shelf dedicated to 4th ed and a lot of 3rd ed which hardly got used due to a lack of SR players in Newcastle, Aus. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 05:24 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 748 Joined: 22-April 07 From: Vermont Member No.: 11,507 |
Thanks Jason for the prompt response. With the seemed demise of the CGL speculation thread, I'm trying to gather whatever info is out there to determine whether I should be putting all of my newly acquired 4th ed books on eBay in preparation for a 5th ed. Right now, I have one shelf dedicated to 4th ed and a lot of 3rd ed which hardly got used due to a lack of SR players in Newcastle, Aus. IMHO, I would be very surprised if even a new company would do a Fifth Ed. any time soon. SR4A only came out last year, and it would probably annoy almost all customers if a new edition came out in the near future. Remember that most of the Shadowrun player base probably has no idea that any of the legal stuff is going on. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 05:33 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 992 Joined: 2-August 06 Member No.: 9,006 |
At the moment, I can't say anything about the license, and this is a separate deal. I'm happy about it, though, and I'm glad Topps approved it so promptly. Jason H. The hold up, I had heard, was Microsoft approval. Since it is electronic media, it has to also be paying Microsquish, the same way Heavy Metal is paying Microsoft. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 06:15 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Shadow Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 |
IMHO, I would be very surprised if even a new company would do a Fifth Ed. any time soon. SR4A only came out last year, and it would probably annoy almost all customers if a new edition came out in the near future. Remember that most of the Shadowrun player base probably has no idea that any of the legal stuff is going on. New editions always annoy people. But just to note that SR4A wasn't a new edition. It was the same edition with the errata incorporated. We tend to refer to SR4A sometimes rather than SR4 as both a shorthand of explaining which page numbers we're using and to confirm that we're aware of / using the errata. Other than the nice artwork and not having to refer to the separate errata sheet, it's the same edition. K. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 06:22 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 748 Joined: 22-April 07 From: Vermont Member No.: 11,507 |
New editions always annoy people. But just to note that SR4A wasn't a new edition. It was the same edition with the errata incorporated. We tend to refer to SR4A sometimes rather than SR4 as both a shorthand of explaining which page numbers we're using and to confirm that we're aware of / using the errata. Other than the nice artwork and not having to refer to the separate errata sheet, it's the same edition. Whether the average customer sees it as a New Edition or a New Revision is less important than the fact that 2009 saw a new rulebook, and that makes 2010, 2011, or even 2012 too soon for another. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 07:05 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,188 Joined: 9-February 08 From: Boiling Springs Member No.: 15,665 |
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 12:42 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Shadow Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 |
Whether the average customer sees it as a New Edition or a New Revision is less important than the fact that 2009 saw a new rulebook, and that makes 2010, 2011, or even 2012 too soon for another. I disagree. Would most people (i.e. outside heavy Dumpshockers like myself) go and buy a new print of the book just because it was a new print? They might for the reasons of SR4A's lovely artwork and incorporation of the errata but not because it was an upgrade in terms of edition. For that, you just download the errata sheet and print the few pages out. I mean I bought two copies of SR4A just because, but I doubt I'm typical. SR4A wasn't a new edition in any meaningful sense. It was a kind of celebratory collectors edition. K. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 01:35 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
The interface is simply clunky, and breaks a lot of UI conventions. Many tasks require more clicks than they should. No context menus. These kinds of things. Don't let me distract the thread about this, sorry. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 01:44 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 695 Joined: 2-January 07 From: He has here a minute ago... Member No.: 10,514 |
I disagree. Would most people (i.e. outside heavy Dumpshockers like myself) go and buy a new print of the book just because it was a new print? They might for the reasons of SR4A's lovely artwork and incorporation of the errata but not because it was an upgrade in terms of edition. For that, you just download the errata sheet and print the few pages out. I mean I bought two copies of SR4A just because, but I doubt I'm typical. SR4A wasn't a new edition in any meaningful sense. It was a kind of celebratory collectors edition. K. I've heard SR4A referred to as SR4.5 in some circles. I would buy reprints of the core books if they were given the SR4A treatment. For IMR or a new licensee that's money in the bank, all the benefit of a fifth edition cash flow with less of an outlay of effort. It's one of the reasons I was disappointed with the reprint of RC, I'd rather they started revamping the core books. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 02:04 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
I would buy reprints of the core books if they were given the SR4A treatment. There was an anecdote concerning of "enhanced core books" – though given the current state of things… |
|
|
May 13 2010, 02:47 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,087 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 |
Does this have any effect on the the similar apps and excel files that are in discussion on the "Community Projects" section of this page? In other words, will this limit their ability to continue doing what they've done? My first thought as well... So far, the fan-made character generators basically are an addition to the game and since the they are useless without the actual books it didn't hurt to tolerate them. The news means that the fan-made chargens now are a direct competition to a paid program... |
|
|
May 13 2010, 02:51 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,755 Joined: 5-September 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 9,313 |
It's my understanding this has been in the works for a very long time. IIRC Lone Wolf was flying an SR flag at there Gen Con booth several years ago. I've had the opportunity to mess around with Hero Lab for Savage Worlds and Mutants & Masterminds. Been happy with the software and the team behind it seems to be on the ball as far as updating and inclusion of all the stuff players want.
|
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:12 PM
Post
#23
|
|
The King In Yellow Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,922 Joined: 26-February 05 From: JWD Member No.: 7,121 |
QUOTE I've heard SR4A referred to as SR4.5 in some circles. Yeah, angry people do that a lot. Vampire PC don't really sparkle either, unless you add two SURGE qualities. Neither is Anniversary a new edition just because it incorporates Errata. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:27 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 695 Joined: 2-January 07 From: He has here a minute ago... Member No.: 10,514 |
Yeah, angry people do that a lot. Vampire PC don't really sparkle either, unless you add two SURGE qualities. Neither is Anniversary a new edition just because it incorporates Errata. I think it's a fair distinction. While not on the same level as D&D 3.5, it does make some serious changes that I would like to see carried through to the rest of the line going forward. |
|
|
May 13 2010, 03:34 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 |
Getting off the debate back to the Hero Labs package: Jason, the presser says the package will cover the core game system, and then be expanded.
By Core: Does that mean SR4A, or SR4 original? Also: Does core include books like Augmentation, Arsenal, etc? Or are those going to be covered by later releases? Finally: When're we going to see reciprocal announcement on the Hero Labs website? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th January 2025 - 12:49 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.