IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Tripods realism question, Should recoil be like a vehicle mount?
Dreadlord
post Jun 7 2010, 07:59 PM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 175
Joined: 5-May 08
From: Matt, GA
Member No.: 15,959



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jun 6 2010, 01:30 PM) *
Okay, a realism question for our military buffs.

Does it make sense that the tripod operates different from a vehicle mount for the purpose of halving recoil (versus a flat +6 rc)? Shouldn't they each have the same value?


Wait... What? Where are you getting the half recoil for vehicle mounts?

In my game, I am using the BOD of the drone/vehicle as additional RC for the weapon. This keeps the silliness of putting large/high rate-of-fire weapons on small drones down, as suggested by Arsenal p.105.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deadmannumberone
post Jun 7 2010, 09:15 PM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 298
Joined: 15-March 09
Member No.: 16,974



QUOTE (Dreadlord @ Jun 7 2010, 01:59 PM) *
Wait... What? Where are you getting the half recoil for vehicle mounts?


It's a SR2/3 legacy rule.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jun 8 2010, 01:22 AM
Post #28


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yes, I prefer the BOD rule: 1/2 can be less useful than a flat RC (as mentioned above), and it's exactly right that it makes tiny drones versus big trucks make sense.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Jun 8 2010, 01:49 AM
Post #29


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



I don't see any problem whatsoever w/ the tripod rules.. Even the smart firing platform which technically is a drone, has no movement capability whatsoever, so nothing wrong with it trading it's ability to move to be an ultra-stable firing platform. Given the tech in SR... they have gecko-tips or foot anchors or whatever built in...


Also, look up something on "traverse and elevation mechanism" (T&E). It's the key to to the long-range stability and fine aiming. In a tripod, the gun, isn't aimed, it's locked into position... A pintle mount on a vehicle is a bit different as the ability to quickly move the gun is a lot more important. Also the vehicle isn't generally imobilized and planted in position while firing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jun 8 2010, 11:52 AM
Post #30


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (Dreadlord @ Jun 7 2010, 03:59 PM) *
In my game, I am using the BOD of the drone/vehicle as additional RC for the weapon. This keeps the silliness of putting large/high rate-of-fire weapons on small drones down, as suggested by Arsenal p.105.


I have never heard of this crazy rule, but by Jove, it might just work. That's a neat suggestion, thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deadmannumberone
post Jun 8 2010, 05:49 PM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 298
Joined: 15-March 09
Member No.: 16,974



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jun 8 2010, 04:52 AM) *
I have never heard of this crazy rule, but by Jove, it might just work. That's a neat suggestion, thanks!


Arsenal pg. 105
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th July 2025 - 09:16 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.