IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Vehicle Flight Ceilings, How Low (High) can you go?
Nexushound
post Jun 14 2010, 06:10 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 9-February 09
From: F.R.F.Z. C.A.S. Sector
Member No.: 16,861



Oi Chums,

Just peicing together the latest stats on the opposition for my groups next run and have been wondering for a while now about flight ceilings. What elevation does a L.A.V. fly at, how high can an attack helo go before they have to stop? I have scanned through the Rigger Black Book, Rigger 2, on up through 4th Ed A just to see if I could find a general table or something on the subject. I remember there being a flight ceiling chart but can't find it so if any of you could point me in the right direction that would be great.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Jun 14 2010, 06:33 AM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



There is a table of this somewhere... I know I just saw it the other day.


I can't find it for the life of me...

I wanna say Rigger 3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Jun 14 2010, 07:05 AM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



Found it. All numbers are in meters.

Thunderbird* 1,500
Zeppelin 4,000
Helicopter† 6,000
Jet Propeller (single engine) 12,000
Jet Propeller (Twin-engine & Airliner) 12,000
Jet Turbine Fixed Wing Aircraft 17,000
Fighter Aircraft 20,000

*Includes jump-jet fighters operating in vectored-thrust mode
†Includes tilt-wing aircraft operating in auto-rotation/hover mode
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mesh
post Jun 14 2010, 11:50 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: 11-April 10
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 18,443



QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jun 14 2010, 03:05 AM) *
Found it. All numbers are in meters.

Thunderbird* 1,500
*Includes jump-jet fighters operating in vectored-thrust mode


How can Tbird ceilings be under a mile? What's the rationale behind that? Wouldn't that mean that if one were transported to Denver that it couldn't even take off? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I would think the Tbird ceiling would be limited by whether or not its cabin is pressurized and oxygenated.

Mesh
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jun 14 2010, 01:07 PM
Post #5


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



They're supposed to be near-ground craft. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Jun 14 2010, 02:02 PM
Post #6


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Jun 14 2010, 01:07 PM) *
They're supposed to be near-ground craft. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Low altitude vehicles isn't quite the same as near-ground.
Still the T-bird doesn't make much sense. It's fast, but it stalls out easily, and its' got crappy maneuverability, but it's the prefered smuggler vehicle?

That makes no sense.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DrZaius
post Jun 14 2010, 02:04 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,856
Joined: 25-July 07
Member No.: 12,360



QUOTE (sabs @ Jun 14 2010, 10:02 AM) *
Low altitude vehicles isn't quite the same as near-ground.
Still the T-bird doesn't make much sense. It's fast, but it stalls out easily, and its' got crappy maneuverability, but it's the prefered smuggler vehicle?

That makes no sense.


Look-down, shoot-down Radar doesn't exist in SR either, apparently.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Jun 14 2010, 02:08 PM
Post #8


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (DrZaius @ Jun 14 2010, 02:04 PM) *
Look-down, shoot-down Radar doesn't exist in SR either, apparently.

I know this thing is a sitting target compared to Military jets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Jun 14 2010, 02:40 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (sabs @ Jun 14 2010, 03:02 PM) *
Still the T-bird doesn't make much sense. It's fast, but it stalls out easily, and its' got crappy maneuverability, but it's the prefered smuggler vehicle?

That makes no sense.

The whole concept of smuggling in a goddamn TANK doesn't make sense, even less once you crossbreed the tank with a flying bedstead. But that is one of those cases where I gladly suspend my disbelief, Hardwired was just too cool (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jun 14 2010, 02:41 PM
Post #10


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



It's a Hover-Tank that can get a bit higher.
It's not MADE to fight against military JETS.
It's there to counter military ground bound units.
You can go in circles around any other ground bound unit.
And you can go OVER them too.
You are faster and can do more crazy maneuvres and still retain similar levels of armor and armament the tracked tanks do.
But any dedicated aircraft will go above your head so far it's not even funny anymore . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PBI
post Jun 14 2010, 02:48 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 123
Joined: 9-March 09
Member No.: 16,955



QUOTE (Mesh @ Jun 14 2010, 08:50 AM) *
How can Tbird ceilings be under a mile? What's the rationale behind that? Wouldn't that mean that if one were transported to Denver that it couldn't even take off? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I would think the Tbird ceiling would be limited by whether or not its cabin is pressurized and oxygenated.

Mesh



I imagine the TBird (and some others) ceilings are AGL (Above Ground Level) and not Above Sea Level.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mesh
post Jun 14 2010, 03:16 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: 11-April 10
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 18,443



QUOTE (PBI @ Jun 14 2010, 10:48 AM) *
I imagine the TBird (and some others) ceilings are AGL (Above Ground Level) and not Above Sea Level.


So what I'm curious about is Why? What's significant about 1500m to this vehicle? Is there any explanation? I'm not an ultra-realist when it comes to RPGs, but I do like to know why something that behaves in accordance with the laws of physics can or can't do something. An aircraft ceiling is a limit at which the aircraft's normal function or ability to preserve the life of its occupants is compromised to the point at which that function or life ceases. Does anyone have an explanation for the significance of 1500m to the Tbird other than RAW?

Mesh
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jun 14 2010, 04:30 PM
Post #13


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



Because you need bigger engines and more fuel to lift higher and keep going there.
It simply becomes uneconomic to do so.
Even 500m would be enough for this kind of vehicle.
But 1500m takes out out of reach of most handheld weapons and leaves mostly vehicle grade weapons to endanger it.
So technically, it's a better armed and armored helicopter than can sit safely outside of the reach of grunts and fire down upon them . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mesh
post Jun 14 2010, 05:33 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: 11-April 10
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 18,443



I hear your RAW. No problem there, but it's untrue from a physics standpoint. You don't need bigger engines and more fuel to surpass 1500m if your range exceeds 1500m. That's not what a ceiling means. You need acceleration to gain altitude, acceleration that surpasses the pull of gravity. Even a single engine prop plane goes many times past 1500m so I'm still curious if anyone has a physics explanation for this number. I'm gathering it's just a RAW deal. Just curious.

Mesh
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nexushound
post Jun 14 2010, 08:21 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 9-February 09
From: F.R.F.Z. C.A.S. Sector
Member No.: 16,861



Oi Chums,

Thanks Saint that was just what I was looking for. Awesome job.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jun 14 2010, 08:47 PM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Mesh @ Jun 14 2010, 05:33 PM) *
I hear your RAW. No problem there, but it's untrue from a physics standpoint. You don't need bigger engines and more fuel to surpass 1500m if your range exceeds 1500m. That's not what a ceiling means. You need acceleration to gain altitude, acceleration that surpasses the pull of gravity. Even a single engine prop plane goes many times past 1500m so I'm still curious if anyone has a physics explanation for this number. I'm gathering it's just a RAW deal. Just curious.

Mesh


Uh, you're gonna require more fuel and power to go up than you are to go forward. If that wasn't the case, your average jetliner would be an orbital, and we know this isn't the case.

A T-bird is a directed thrust VTOL brick. VTOL craft are normally hobbled by range and loadout - you burn a lot of fuel to go straight up with no running start, and you're not going to get any decent weapons loadout. That's the trade-off of having no runway.

Just look at the T-bird stats in the BBB. Their ranges suck compared to your average fixed-wing. Off the cuff numbers (at work, so I can't et the direct stats of a few of 'em) average about 750 klicks. That's approximately 466 miles on one full tank.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
svenftw
post Jun 14 2010, 08:55 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 26-January 10
Member No.: 18,081



QUOTE (Mesh @ Jun 14 2010, 09:33 AM) *
I hear your RAW. No problem there, but it's untrue from a physics standpoint. You don't need bigger engines and more fuel to surpass 1500m if your range exceeds 1500m. That's not what a ceiling means. You need acceleration to gain altitude, acceleration that surpasses the pull of gravity. Even a single engine prop plane goes many times past 1500m so I'm still curious if anyone has a physics explanation for this number. I'm gathering it's just a RAW deal. Just curious.

Mesh


I think it has to do with the lack of wings. To keep an LAV aloft requires pure brute thrust. It might have small wings to aid in maneuvering and provide a token amount of lift, but all of the pictures and descriptions have these things blasting around on thrust alone. You lose your ground effect pretty quickly. I personally think 1,500 meters is WAY too high for a T-Bird, I pictured something that struggles to get to 100 meters off the ground.

*shrug*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Jun 14 2010, 08:55 PM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



Personally, I find it hilarious how they go out of their way to differentiate the different prop planes, and then go ahead and give them all the same ceiling. I suppose it must be a holdover from another table..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Jun 14 2010, 08:57 PM
Post #19


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
svenftw
post Jun 14 2010, 09:00 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 26-January 10
Member No.: 18,081



QUOTE (Sengir @ Jun 14 2010, 01:57 PM) *
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m...


But only for a few minutes, right? I think T-Birds wouldn't operate at that altitude, but to each his own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jun 14 2010, 09:02 PM
Post #21


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Sengir @ Jun 14 2010, 08:57 PM) *
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m...



And then you look at the LLRV and think, 'Whyever would I want to be over 20 feet high in this contraption?'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mesh
post Jun 14 2010, 09:05 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: 11-April 10
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 18,443



QUOTE (Sengir @ Jun 14 2010, 04:57 PM) *
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m...


# Maximum speed: 40 mph
# Service ceiling: 6,000 ft (1,800 m)
# Rate of climb: 3,600 ft/min (17.9 m/s)

It had a fraction of a Tbird's power, too: 40mph

It had an open "cockpit" (seat) so I'm also going to guess the ceiling was designed around safety limits for the pilot rather than a limit to how high its rockets could push it. Rockets are also a different propulsion system than a Tbird's.

Mesh
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Jun 14 2010, 09:08 PM
Post #23


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Is the T-bird limit problematic for your game?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jun 14 2010, 09:08 PM
Post #24


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Mesh @ Jun 14 2010, 09:05 PM) *
# Maximum speed: 40 mph
# Service ceiling: 6,000 ft (1,800 m)
# Rate of climb: 3,600 ft/min (17.9 m/s)

It had a fraction of a Tbird's power, too: 40mph

It had an open "cockpit" (seat) so I'm also going to guess the ceiling was designed around safety limits for the pilot rather than a limit to how high its rockets could push it. Rockets are also a different propulsion system than a Tbird's.

Mesh


Service ceilings typically don't take the cockpit into account - only the vehicle's power output.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mesh
post Jun 14 2010, 09:12 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: 11-April 10
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 18,443



QUOTE (Doc Chase @ Jun 14 2010, 04:47 PM) *
Uh, you're gonna require more fuel and power to go up than you are to go forward. If that wasn't the case, your average jetliner would be an orbital, and we know this isn't the case.

A T-bird is a directed thrust VTOL brick. VTOL craft are normally hobbled by range and loadout - you burn a lot of fuel to go straight up with no running start, and you're not going to get any decent weapons loadout. That's the trade-off of having no runway.

Just look at the T-bird stats in the BBB. Their ranges suck compared to your average fixed-wing. Off the cuff numbers (at work, so I can't et the direct stats of a few of 'em) average about 750 klicks. That's approximately 466 miles on one full tank.


I'm honestly looking for info on this so I'll cut out my own smartass remarks. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Jetliners travel under 1000mph. You must achieve 17,500mph to break away from Earth's gravity and achieve an orbit so there's no way a jetliner will ever come close before stalling (not to mention the fact that its wings require air passing over them to maintain lift and there is less and less of that stuff the higher you go).

Yes, Tbirds are bricks which means that they are almost completely supporting their weight with downward thrust. On top of that they are also thrusting forward. If they can travel forward 750Km, they have the fuel to travel much farther than 1500m off the ground. I have the impression that 1500m is nothing more than a RAW number picked either for balance or to give a general sense of how high they travel while maintaining full range (750Km), because it does take more fuel to travel upwards... but there's no way 750Km translates to as little as 1500m up when NASA in the 60s was creating VTOL vehicles that had "safe" ranges of 1800m up.

Mesh
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd May 2024 - 11:30 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.