Vehicle Flight Ceilings, How Low (High) can you go? |
Vehicle Flight Ceilings, How Low (High) can you go? |
Jun 14 2010, 06:10 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 9-February 09 From: F.R.F.Z. C.A.S. Sector Member No.: 16,861 |
Oi Chums,
Just peicing together the latest stats on the opposition for my groups next run and have been wondering for a while now about flight ceilings. What elevation does a L.A.V. fly at, how high can an attack helo go before they have to stop? I have scanned through the Rigger Black Book, Rigger 2, on up through 4th Ed A just to see if I could find a general table or something on the subject. I remember there being a flight ceiling chart but can't find it so if any of you could point me in the right direction that would be great. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 06:33 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
There is a table of this somewhere... I know I just saw it the other day.
I can't find it for the life of me... I wanna say Rigger 3. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 07:05 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
Found it. All numbers are in meters.
Thunderbird* 1,500 Zeppelin 4,000 Helicopter† 6,000 Jet Propeller (single engine) 12,000 Jet Propeller (Twin-engine & Airliner) 12,000 Jet Turbine Fixed Wing Aircraft 17,000 Fighter Aircraft 20,000 *Includes jump-jet fighters operating in vectored-thrust mode †Includes tilt-wing aircraft operating in auto-rotation/hover mode |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 11:50 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 11-April 10 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 18,443 |
Found it. All numbers are in meters. Thunderbird* 1,500 *Includes jump-jet fighters operating in vectored-thrust mode How can Tbird ceilings be under a mile? What's the rationale behind that? Wouldn't that mean that if one were transported to Denver that it couldn't even take off? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I would think the Tbird ceiling would be limited by whether or not its cabin is pressurized and oxygenated. Mesh |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 01:07 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
They're supposed to be near-ground craft. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 02:02 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Prime Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,996 Joined: 1-June 10 Member No.: 18,649 |
They're supposed to be near-ground craft. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Low altitude vehicles isn't quite the same as near-ground. Still the T-bird doesn't make much sense. It's fast, but it stalls out easily, and its' got crappy maneuverability, but it's the prefered smuggler vehicle? That makes no sense. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 02:04 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,856 Joined: 25-July 07 Member No.: 12,360 |
Low altitude vehicles isn't quite the same as near-ground. Still the T-bird doesn't make much sense. It's fast, but it stalls out easily, and its' got crappy maneuverability, but it's the prefered smuggler vehicle? That makes no sense. Look-down, shoot-down Radar doesn't exist in SR either, apparently. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 02:08 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Prime Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,996 Joined: 1-June 10 Member No.: 18,649 |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 02:40 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,082 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 |
Still the T-bird doesn't make much sense. It's fast, but it stalls out easily, and its' got crappy maneuverability, but it's the prefered smuggler vehicle? That makes no sense. The whole concept of smuggling in a goddamn TANK doesn't make sense, even less once you crossbreed the tank with a flying bedstead. But that is one of those cases where I gladly suspend my disbelief, Hardwired was just too cool (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 02:41 PM
Post
#10
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
It's a Hover-Tank that can get a bit higher.
It's not MADE to fight against military JETS. It's there to counter military ground bound units. You can go in circles around any other ground bound unit. And you can go OVER them too. You are faster and can do more crazy maneuvres and still retain similar levels of armor and armament the tracked tanks do. But any dedicated aircraft will go above your head so far it's not even funny anymore . . |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 02:48 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 123 Joined: 9-March 09 Member No.: 16,955 |
How can Tbird ceilings be under a mile? What's the rationale behind that? Wouldn't that mean that if one were transported to Denver that it couldn't even take off? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I would think the Tbird ceiling would be limited by whether or not its cabin is pressurized and oxygenated. Mesh I imagine the TBird (and some others) ceilings are AGL (Above Ground Level) and not Above Sea Level. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 03:16 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 11-April 10 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 18,443 |
I imagine the TBird (and some others) ceilings are AGL (Above Ground Level) and not Above Sea Level. So what I'm curious about is Why? What's significant about 1500m to this vehicle? Is there any explanation? I'm not an ultra-realist when it comes to RPGs, but I do like to know why something that behaves in accordance with the laws of physics can or can't do something. An aircraft ceiling is a limit at which the aircraft's normal function or ability to preserve the life of its occupants is compromised to the point at which that function or life ceases. Does anyone have an explanation for the significance of 1500m to the Tbird other than RAW? Mesh |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 04:30 PM
Post
#13
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Because you need bigger engines and more fuel to lift higher and keep going there.
It simply becomes uneconomic to do so. Even 500m would be enough for this kind of vehicle. But 1500m takes out out of reach of most handheld weapons and leaves mostly vehicle grade weapons to endanger it. So technically, it's a better armed and armored helicopter than can sit safely outside of the reach of grunts and fire down upon them . . |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 05:33 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 11-April 10 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 18,443 |
I hear your RAW. No problem there, but it's untrue from a physics standpoint. You don't need bigger engines and more fuel to surpass 1500m if your range exceeds 1500m. That's not what a ceiling means. You need acceleration to gain altitude, acceleration that surpasses the pull of gravity. Even a single engine prop plane goes many times past 1500m so I'm still curious if anyone has a physics explanation for this number. I'm gathering it's just a RAW deal. Just curious.
Mesh |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:21 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 9-February 09 From: F.R.F.Z. C.A.S. Sector Member No.: 16,861 |
Oi Chums,
Thanks Saint that was just what I was looking for. Awesome job. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:47 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,179 Joined: 10-June 10 From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border Member No.: 18,688 |
I hear your RAW. No problem there, but it's untrue from a physics standpoint. You don't need bigger engines and more fuel to surpass 1500m if your range exceeds 1500m. That's not what a ceiling means. You need acceleration to gain altitude, acceleration that surpasses the pull of gravity. Even a single engine prop plane goes many times past 1500m so I'm still curious if anyone has a physics explanation for this number. I'm gathering it's just a RAW deal. Just curious. Mesh Uh, you're gonna require more fuel and power to go up than you are to go forward. If that wasn't the case, your average jetliner would be an orbital, and we know this isn't the case. A T-bird is a directed thrust VTOL brick. VTOL craft are normally hobbled by range and loadout - you burn a lot of fuel to go straight up with no running start, and you're not going to get any decent weapons loadout. That's the trade-off of having no runway. Just look at the T-bird stats in the BBB. Their ranges suck compared to your average fixed-wing. Off the cuff numbers (at work, so I can't et the direct stats of a few of 'em) average about 750 klicks. That's approximately 466 miles on one full tank. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:55 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 26-January 10 Member No.: 18,081 |
I hear your RAW. No problem there, but it's untrue from a physics standpoint. You don't need bigger engines and more fuel to surpass 1500m if your range exceeds 1500m. That's not what a ceiling means. You need acceleration to gain altitude, acceleration that surpasses the pull of gravity. Even a single engine prop plane goes many times past 1500m so I'm still curious if anyone has a physics explanation for this number. I'm gathering it's just a RAW deal. Just curious. Mesh I think it has to do with the lack of wings. To keep an LAV aloft requires pure brute thrust. It might have small wings to aid in maneuvering and provide a token amount of lift, but all of the pictures and descriptions have these things blasting around on thrust alone. You lose your ground effect pretty quickly. I personally think 1,500 meters is WAY too high for a T-Bird, I pictured something that struggles to get to 100 meters off the ground. *shrug* |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:55 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
Personally, I find it hilarious how they go out of their way to differentiate the different prop planes, and then go ahead and give them all the same ceiling. I suppose it must be a holdover from another table..
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 08:57 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,082 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 |
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m...
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:00 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 26-January 10 Member No.: 18,081 |
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m... But only for a few minutes, right? I think T-Birds wouldn't operate at that altitude, but to each his own. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:02 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,179 Joined: 10-June 10 From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border Member No.: 18,688 |
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m... And then you look at the LLRV and think, 'Whyever would I want to be over 20 feet high in this contraption?' |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:05 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 11-April 10 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 18,443 |
Just for some real-life numbers, according to WP the LLRV had a service ceiling of 1,800m... # Maximum speed: 40 mph # Service ceiling: 6,000 ft (1,800 m) # Rate of climb: 3,600 ft/min (17.9 m/s) It had a fraction of a Tbird's power, too: 40mph It had an open "cockpit" (seat) so I'm also going to guess the ceiling was designed around safety limits for the pilot rather than a limit to how high its rockets could push it. Rockets are also a different propulsion system than a Tbird's. Mesh |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:08 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Is the T-bird limit problematic for your game?
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:08 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,179 Joined: 10-June 10 From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border Member No.: 18,688 |
# Maximum speed: 40 mph # Service ceiling: 6,000 ft (1,800 m) # Rate of climb: 3,600 ft/min (17.9 m/s) It had a fraction of a Tbird's power, too: 40mph It had an open "cockpit" (seat) so I'm also going to guess the ceiling was designed around safety limits for the pilot rather than a limit to how high its rockets could push it. Rockets are also a different propulsion system than a Tbird's. Mesh Service ceilings typically don't take the cockpit into account - only the vehicle's power output. |
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:12 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 11-April 10 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 18,443 |
Uh, you're gonna require more fuel and power to go up than you are to go forward. If that wasn't the case, your average jetliner would be an orbital, and we know this isn't the case. A T-bird is a directed thrust VTOL brick. VTOL craft are normally hobbled by range and loadout - you burn a lot of fuel to go straight up with no running start, and you're not going to get any decent weapons loadout. That's the trade-off of having no runway. Just look at the T-bird stats in the BBB. Their ranges suck compared to your average fixed-wing. Off the cuff numbers (at work, so I can't et the direct stats of a few of 'em) average about 750 klicks. That's approximately 466 miles on one full tank. I'm honestly looking for info on this so I'll cut out my own smartass remarks. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Jetliners travel under 1000mph. You must achieve 17,500mph to break away from Earth's gravity and achieve an orbit so there's no way a jetliner will ever come close before stalling (not to mention the fact that its wings require air passing over them to maintain lift and there is less and less of that stuff the higher you go). Yes, Tbirds are bricks which means that they are almost completely supporting their weight with downward thrust. On top of that they are also thrusting forward. If they can travel forward 750Km, they have the fuel to travel much farther than 1500m off the ground. I have the impression that 1500m is nothing more than a RAW number picked either for balance or to give a general sense of how high they travel while maintaining full range (750Km), because it does take more fuel to travel upwards... but there's no way 750Km translates to as little as 1500m up when NASA in the 60s was creating VTOL vehicles that had "safe" ranges of 1800m up. Mesh |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd May 2024 - 11:30 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.