![]() ![]() |
Jun 20 2010, 08:59 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 226 Joined: 29-July 03 Member No.: 5,137 |
I would definitely not want to impose a system like this on all mages. In earlier editions the option to play an aspected mage vs. a full mage gave the ability to have a specialist who was great in his/her area, but had full mages who would look down on them as inferior due to their limitations. Good for mechanics and role-playing. By eliminating full mages you loose just as much of that as they did by eliminating aspected mages. The more I've thought about it, the more I think your cutting costs for spells is probably the right way to do it, and provides plenty of incentive. I almost never played a full mage in SR2, and the incentive for playing an aspected mage was entirely extra spell points at chargen (or whatever else you wanted to use Priority A for). Give it as an option and I bet you have people take it.
Lucy |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th November 2025 - 07:02 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.