My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Jul 15 2010, 04:26 PM
Post
#326
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,051 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 |
However at the same time it also invites all of those parties to try to do exactly those sorts of things in a way that cannot be traced back to them. That's why the law is secret, the CC does not want people to think about the possiblity (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) And developing things like ASAT missiles or crash worms tends to leave traces...those traces might only be found until after the strike, but they WILL be found and the megas WILL be extremely unhappy at what you did. |
|
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 05:07 PM
Post
#327
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 303 Joined: 26-May 10 Member No.: 18,622 |
And dont forget one thing about Magic User in the Army : they are part of an organisation that could help them Initiate/progress. It make sense that all the incorporated magicians are trained in a specific tradition and join special organisation (especially if drafted young).
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 06:00 PM
Post
#328
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 14-January 08 Member No.: 15,275 |
Personally, i think that you are talking totally wrong thing here. it isn't skill which is important, it's overall performance. In my time in Finnish army, after i did manage to shoot at least X points in test (can't remember test name or score) no one asked me to go shooting. There was few guys who had to go range even after 6 months in service with new guys to shoot.
So in Conscription army i would say that there actually quite many people who don't actually have any skill, they just have enough talent to task and technical helpers. So in game terms, how much you need to have dice so that you can hit man sized target in 150 meters, which does not move and you have 3 seconds time to shoot ? There is your base level for all logistic people, artillery and drivers ( some may have much more, but everyone has at least some level performance) |
|
|
|
Jul 15 2010, 06:06 PM
Post
#329
|
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 |
I agreee that straight off boot camp would be a 1-2 but a grunt with almost any combat experience I see as a 3. So unless they are as green as grass they are a 3.
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 03:36 AM
Post
#330
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Personally, i think that you are talking totally wrong thing here. it isn't skill which is important, it's overall performance. In my time in Finnish army, after i did manage to shoot at least X points in test (can't remember test name or score) no one asked me to go shooting. There was few guys who had to go range even after 6 months in service with new guys to shoot. So in Conscription army i would say that there actually quite many people who don't actually have any skill, they just have enough talent to task and technical helpers. So in game terms, how much you need to have dice so that you can hit man sized target in 150 meters, which does not move and you have 3 seconds time to shoot ? There is your base level for all logistic people, artillery and drivers ( some may have much more, but everyone has at least some level performance) Overall performance in SR is a combination of both skill and attribute. So someone who lacks natural coordination, or some other facet of Agility, can still be trained to a level that enables him to qualify and pass his shooting test, but this low Agility guy needs higher skill to compensate. Remember that someone with no skill actually defaults. In game terms, the lowest difficulty threshold is 1. To get 1 on average, you need about 3 dice. Since nobody is shooting at you, I would say that 4 dice is sufficient to trade for 1 success. From my time in the Singapore army (which is mostly a conscript/mandatory service force), I would say that the man-sized target at 300m (ours is at 300m), is there to give freebie points to the shooter. And if you can miss that, god help you on the other trickier targets; when you have run a hundred meters, sweat is getting into your eye, the hot tropical sun has baked the ground to oven heat, and now there are more than 1 fucking moving targets that you to bring down in a limited time. And then there are the torso and head shot targets, albeit at closer range. All that is in the day. There's more fun and games at night (which I do not enjoy since I have nightblindness; -6 to dice pool means I miss most of my shots unless I Edge (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) ). |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 03:59 AM
Post
#331
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 16-December 05 From: new jack city Member No.: 8,077 |
On the note of nations not wanting to drop money on its grunts, i was given $15k to server 6 years in the Air National Guard. Yup, no real combat going on here in Missouri. I would think that they would spend something like that on a soldier to enhance him. I figure they can cyber up grunts with some removable and traceable wares and make then sign long standing contracts to get their moneys worth. This is a time where 16 and 18 hour work days are the norm. Making someone sign up for 6 to 10 years is not that big a deal. Not to mention the huge pool of poor the military can pick up and the amount of skill wires they can pump in a soldier for cheap. I think a grunt in the Army would be a well rounded 400 point character after all their training and some experience.
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 04:07 AM
Post
#332
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 368 Joined: 18-April 10 From: Boulder, PCC Sector, Denver Member No.: 18,468 |
This wikianswer estimates that the US spends well over $400k for every infantryman they train.
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 02:56 PM
Post
#333
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,408 Joined: 31-January 04 From: Reston VA, USA Member No.: 6,046 |
In response to the general "What would the makeup of the Army look like, re-posting from an older thread:
[ Spoiler ]
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 05:37 PM
Post
#334
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,174 Joined: 13-May 04 From: UCAS Member No.: 6,327 |
All that is in the day. There's more fun and games at night (which I do not enjoy since I have nightblindness; -6 to dice pool means I miss most of my shots unless I Edge (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) ). Well, at least you're human so you can spend that extra edge point. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 07:56 PM
Post
#335
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,768 |
To answer the original question, a starting Shadowrunner team seems to be roughly on par with a special forces unit in terms of skill, if you compare some of the archetypes with the actual special forces in the NPC chapters. Even in the Sixth world, your standard grunt is likely to be an unaugmented dude equipped with gear that doesn't even exceed the availability limits for starting characters, so a team of runners will likely have a big advantage against them.
An actual team of Red Samurai or Ghosts is supposed to be a big challenge to a runner team. A group of normal infantry is likely to be only a little harder than the corpsec guards or standard cops presented in the corebook. |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 08:00 PM
Post
#336
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 765 Joined: 28-December 09 Member No.: 18,001 |
To answer the original question, a starting Shadowrunner team seems to be roughly on par with a special forces unit in terms of skill, if you compare some of the archetypes with the actual special forces in the NPC chapters. Even in the Sixth world, your standard grunt is likely to be an unaugmented dude equipped with gear that doesn't even exceed the availability limits for starting characters, so a team of runners will likely have a big advantage against them. An actual team of Red Samurai or Ghosts is supposed to be a big challenge to a runner team. A group of normal infantry is likely to be only a little harder than the corpsec guards or standard cops presented in the corebook. The Special Forces you mentioned are SIGNIFICANTLY better statted and geared than your average Shadowrunner. You contradict your very own statement. |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 08:27 PM
Post
#337
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,768 |
I don't actually see much difference between the stats of a Red Samurai member (who's supposed to be one of the toughest special forces around) and the sample Street Samurai. The latter even has an extra die for shooting with his weapon, I think. The armor for the Samurai and Ghosts is certainly better than what a starting runner can scrounge up, and the Ghosts may be a couple dice ahead of a starting street sam, but that's OK. That's why I said "roughly".
The point is, a normal military grunt will be way behind both of them in terms of "raw power". He'll probably be more or less comparable to the Lone Star Cop statted one page before the Red Samurai. Add Automatics, jiggle the gear a bit, and there you go. A starting runner team will beat even a full squad of these guys, assuming they're built for combat at all. If your PCs are a bunch of accountants, though, or a small orichalchum-making operation, then, well, they shouldn't even get to meet actual soldiers as an opposing force. |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 08:30 PM
Post
#338
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 746 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 459 |
-- So is the (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) 400K soldier the military variant of the pink mohawk (green mohawk)? I still can't believe people are using current US military expenditures as being relevant though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
-- I liked Apathy's breakdown. Good starting point. |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 08:31 PM
Post
#339
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
I keep hearing 'average shadowrunners' or 'average team', but we addressed this earlier in the thread: the average runner team isn't 100% combat. Maybe 75%, maybe less? My impression was that we were comparing something like a 'shadowrunner combat team' against military squads, but I dunno. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 08:42 PM
Post
#340
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,179 Joined: 10-June 10 From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border Member No.: 18,688 |
A 400bp troll versus your average combat unit.
Give him some security armor and he's set! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 08:47 PM
Post
#341
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 368 Joined: 18-April 10 From: Boulder, PCC Sector, Denver Member No.: 18,468 |
-- So is the (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) 400K soldier the military variant of the pink mohawk (green mohawk)? I still can't believe people are using current US military expenditures as being relevant though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It was $400k. Who knows what inflation and exchange rates will do to that in the intervening 60 years. But the point is that training people is expensive, and that the military will probably be willing to shell out for good weapons, 'ware, and drone support because of the cost of each naked soldier (at least, developed nations will). |
|
|
|
Jul 16 2010, 11:13 PM
Post
#342
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Well, at least you're human so you can spend that extra edge point. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Well, I must have only Edge 2 since I missed all but 2 of my night shots except the silhouettes where they backlight the targets brightly. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2010, 10:14 PM
Post
#343
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,401 Joined: 23-February 04 From: Honolulu, HI Member No.: 6,099 |
I think it depends on several factors:
1)Who has the advantage of setting/environment. Not all military types are setup for close quarters combat or urban combat. Not all runners are adept in areas OUTSIDE urban environments. 2)Skill levels. General riflemen? SAS operatives? Newbie Runners? Hardened Street Vets? 3)Related to 2, cohesion and previous activity experience with existing group. In either case, slapping together a group of guys that have never worked with each other will have different challenges than groups that have experience with each other. 4)Goal of encounter. What constitutes victory? Military approaches tend to have more straightforward goals and intentions, Shadowrunners ops can have waaay different parameters. 5)What else do they bring? Magic has been noted, but also equipment. Runners tend to be ....varied...in their gear, you've got the pistols dude, the akimbo assault rifle dude, the ninja the hand to hand warrior, etc. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 07:12 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.