![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
Nah an troll adept with "PITY" and "FOOL" and a mohawk. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Boo! you stole my pun! Furthermore, Weapon-Foci have to come in the form of a Weapon made into a Focus. OK, you COULD argue that Adept-Fists are weapons . . Especially on Orks and Trolls. But why would you even do that? There's adept-powers that completely replicate weapon focus with his own body. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
Boo! you stole my pun! Furthermore, Weapon-Foci have to come in the form of a Weapon made into a Focus. OK, you COULD argue that Adept-Fists are weapons . . Especially on Orks and Trolls. But why would you even do that? There's adept-powers that completely replicate weapon focus with his own body. for the extra dice ofcource. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
That's what you have improved ability"punching stuff" for. You DO have improved ability"punching stuff" right? O.o
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 689 Joined: 16-September 03 From: Colorado Member No.: 5,623 ![]() |
Right,
I was thinking of anchoring not foci. In which case pretty interesting idea. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 492 Joined: 28-July 09 Member No.: 17,440 ![]() |
Attacking a foci from the Astral just deactivates it. It doesn't damage you and they certainly can't "grab it and run off". Implanted foci just seem smart to me, enchanted cyberware, just enchant a bonescrew or surgical staple if you don't want to lose essence, tattoos and earrings for more superficial ones. These are very expensive, in both nuyen and karma, why would you ever make them something that can be taken from you easily? Well, perhaps not as a tattoo, but in the case of making a piece of cyber a foci (or any other essence paid object) then by RAW it is consider a part of the character. So yes, attacking an active essence paid foci can damage the person, but only until the foci is disrupted. After all, if you made your cyberarm into a foci then the arm is duel natured while active and subject to attack, just the same as if a spirit punched the arm when the character is astrally perceiving. It's a considered an intrinsic part of them and it is on the astral. Likewise if you made your gun into a foci then it can be knocked from your hands in the physical realm from the astral while it is active. While attacking a foci directly definitely does deactivate it, it is not necessarily the only thing that happens. Regular combat rules apply to astral combat per p193 SR4A, so attacking a part of a person's body can cause them damage, weapons can be disarmed, etc. The tattoo in this case isn't essence paid, so your game can decide what it likes in it's case. Me, it makes sense to me that some things still become a part of you even without essence drops, such as tattoos, but I can see the point in an argument for not playing it that way. As for tattoo magic in SR4, there is some mention of it in Vice I think, but I don't think there are any mechanics associated with it (or anywhere else in that book, not it's intention). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 6-March 10 Member No.: 18,253 ![]() |
Biggest problem with skin-foci? Don't you even dare THINK about upgrading them . . And do you remember what happens, if the physical component of a focus is damaged? The focus is destroyed. Now you have such a nice tattoo on the equally nice leg of your equally nice female magician . . and you need to shave your legs to look all sexy. You cut yourself. Congradulations, there goes your focus! And don't even get me started on Bullets and knives (and Cannons too) going your way in a regular fashion. Tattoos actually heal really well. And the fact that it's a blob of ink should make it more resistant to something that would be considered "damage." I'd say unless you cut out a big chunk of the tat that it would still retain it's power. Take enough scars or bullets and the force might drop down a notch? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Tattoos actually heal really well. And the fact that it's a blob of ink should make it more resistant to something that would be considered "damage." I'd say unless you cut out a big chunk of the tat that it would still retain it's power. Take enough scars or bullets and the force might drop down a notch? Well... That is what the Silky Skin Treatrment is for... Remove those scars, and restore the look of your tattoos at the same time I always say... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,444 Joined: 18-April 08 Member No.: 15,912 ![]() |
It's the same problem as with built in guns. "DROP IT!" does not work . . so what happens if you don't listen to the nice angry voice telling you to do that? The owner drops you, for good usually. Skin-Poket for a Focus is a good idea though. Also, you're going to make every ward-owner pretty angry pretty fast, if you walk around town. Then wait till you have extended masking |
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 21-June 10 Member No.: 18,737 ![]() |
Well, perhaps not as a tattoo, but in the case of making a piece of cyber a foci (or any other essence paid object) then by RAW it is consider a part of the character. So yes, attacking an active essence paid foci can damage the person, but only until the foci is disrupted. After all, if you made your cyberarm into a foci then the arm is duel natured while active and subject to attack, just the same as if a spirit punched the arm when the character is astrally perceiving. It's a considered an intrinsic part of them and it is on the astral. Likewise if you made your gun into a foci then it can be knocked from your hands in the physical realm from the astral while it is active. While attacking a foci directly definitely does deactivate it, it is not necessarily the only thing that happens. Regular combat rules apply to astral combat per p193 SR4A, so attacking a part of a person's body can cause them damage, weapons can be disarmed, etc. The tattoo in this case isn't essence paid, so your game can decide what it likes in it's case. Me, it makes sense to me that some things still become a part of you even without essence drops, such as tattoos, but I can see the point in an argument for not playing it that way. As for tattoo magic in SR4, there is some mention of it in Vice I think, but I don't think there are any mechanics associated with it (or anywhere else in that book, not it's intention). I don't see what you're basing this on, from what I can see attacking a focus' astral form doesn't even damage the focus. it just disrupts it. If I manabolt your magic wand focus' astral presence it does not get destroyed, it just turns off. And this makes sense since the focus isn't a living thing, and mana spells cannot damage non-living things it just "kills" the astral form a focus creates when you turn it on. Hence why Digital Grimoire has a special spell to both disrupt the focus and impose a "cool down" on it while it "heals" the damage, because otherwise a magician can just turn it right back on. I don't even know if you can knock things away from people, we had this discussion when someone was talking about making his car into a focus, going astral with it and ramming some poor dual natured guy. I don't think there's any momentum in a plane where you can go from 0 to 6,000 kph instantly, with a thought. In any case, even if you can damage a person by targeting their implanted commlink focus, I don't really see that as a vulnerability considering you'll have your astral perception (or projection) going actively fighting this astral entity so it could just as easily hit you directly. Regarding killing you for our power focus, yep you're right it'd be 125,000 nuyen, but that's still up there with things like synaptic boosters or move by wire systems. I think what generally dissuades the muggers for trying for a payday is that anyone who has something like this is a badass way out of their league. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
No, you could not ground out since SR3.
Attacking a Focus only hurts the focus, and nothing more. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#38
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 492 Joined: 28-July 09 Member No.: 17,440 ![]() |
I don't see what you're basing this on, from what I can see attacking a focus' astral form doesn't even damage the focus. it just disrupts it. If I manabolt your magic wand focus' astral presence it does not get destroyed, it just turns off. And this makes sense since the focus isn't a living thing, and mana spells cannot damage non-living things it just "kills" the astral form a focus creates when you turn it on. Hence why Digital Grimoire has a special spell to both disrupt the focus and impose a "cool down" on it while it "heals" the damage, because otherwise a magician can just turn it right back on. Basing it on SR4A p 193 astral combat rules and that essence paid pieces of cyber/bio/whatever are considered a part of the person's whole. Otherwise mages couldn't use cybereyes to spell target LOS spells. It's more then just a focus once it has been essence paid, it's also a part of the character at that point. Making this object that is a part of yourself duel natured means that you are putting a part of yourself on the astral. When the character isn't on the astral this one part still is, so long as it's still duel natured. I don't even know if you can knock things away from people, we had this discussion when someone was talking about making his car into a focus, going astral with it and ramming some poor dual natured guy. I don't think there's any momentum in a plane where you can go from 0 to 6,000 kph instantly, with a thought. There was GOING to be some new rules on this in a book that got scrapped, but yea, I think once apon a time we were going to see rule about running people over in the astral. Sadly that magic source book won't see the light of day anymore if I recall correctly. Shame because it sounded like there were some neat tricks in it. In any case, even if you can damage a person by targeting their implanted commlink focus, I don't really see that as a vulnerability considering you'll have your astral perception (or projection) going actively fighting this astral entity so it could just as easily hit you directly. This in a nutshell. It doesn't really come up for any mage that's acting smart. It's just a vulnerability that exists if the mage ignores the astral, and few who do live long. Also, this only applies to essence paid objects and mages tend to not use those quite as much. Honestly, the whole thing likely won't ever come up in 98% of games. QUOTE (Stahlseele) No, you could not ground out since SR3. Attacking a Focus only hurts the focus, and nothing more. No, nothing more when the focus is just a focus. When the focus is something that is another object governed by it's own set of rules then those rules also apply, it's just for most things those rules mean nothing on the astral. For instance, making a gun into a focus. It can still shoot bullets because making it into a focus did not negate the existing rules on it being a firearm. Likewise, if a cyberarm is made into a focus it does not stop being a cyberarm and applicable to it's own set of rules. Since damaging an essence paid object can damage the person, then damaging that same thing on the astral can damage the person. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#39
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,946 Joined: 1-June 09 From: Omaha Member No.: 17,234 ![]() |
Tagz, I don't dispute your logic, but a lot of people are going to run into a problem as it goes into a lot of fluff things not specifically spelled out in the fourth edition rules.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 ![]() |
It sounds like there's a problem here: does an astral actually damage a focus, or not? If not, it doesn't matter if the focus is part of your body. If so, then the question remains to be considered.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#41
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#42
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
Exactly.
And since SR3, NOTHING you do on the astral can affect meat space . . |
|
|
![]()
Post
#43
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 ![]() |
So, it doesn't matter at all to talk about 'becoming dual-natured' or whatever. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Done.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#44
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 492 Joined: 28-July 09 Member No.: 17,440 ![]() |
Well, not really. Once again, that's what happens to a focus that is just a focus. We're talking about a case where it's more then just a focus, it's an essence paid item. If the attack is made by something that causes damage then it should cause damage to things that can take damage, and anything paid in essence can.
Also, Stahlseele, I would direct you to ANOTHER form of construct on the astral known as Alechera. Additionally, mana storms are cases where "regions where raw and chaotic mana actually leaks into the physical world, causing spontaneous elemental and illusory manifestations". Spirit materialization, inhabitation, possession, etc are all powers used in the astral that have physical world effects. Your statement that nothing on the astral can effect the physical is not quite true. There are some specific, rare, or unusual circumstances where the astral does have an effect on the physical. Also, consider I didn't say that the attack suddenly jumped into the physical world, it's a case of attacking a target like a astrally perceiving character, the character still feels the pain on the physical world despite the attack being on the astral because they are duel natured. Now, funny thing is, in all this I found an actual argument against my interpretation that nobody here has mentioned that actually is a good argument against my case. And that is a separation of astral forms. Foci have an astral form. Projectors and Perceivers have one. Spirits have one. Anything duel natured has one. What happens when a single object or thing is governed by TWO forms? Does it merge? Are they separate? Can two different forms occupy the same location at the same time in astral space considering forms are substantial on the astral? If someone can provide a proper argument here I may concede this one, but I'm of the mindset that the forms would become permanently merged in this case as the object is becoming a part of the whole and the forms are also a part of that whole of being. I don't think there is a definitive RAW answer to this but I'd love to hear some opinions. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#45
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 ![]() |
I still don't see how an implanted focus opens your body to damage. The focus alone wouldn't take damage, and your body alone wouldn't take damage. An implanted focus does not make you Dual-Natured, Astrally-Percieving, etc., unless the rules say so. It would be an instance of a side effect being vastly larger than the main effect, and not something to be simply interpreted into reality.
Your main premise is that something new and wildly different is the result, and I'm not convinced to grant that, is all. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#46
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Well, not really. Once again, that's what happens to a focus that is just a focus. We're talking about a case where it's more then just a focus, it's an essence paid item. If the attack is made by something that causes damage then it should cause damage to things that can take damage, and anything paid in essence can. Also, Stahlseele, I would direct you to ANOTHER form of construct on the astral known as Alechera. Additionally, mana storms are cases where "regions where raw and chaotic mana actually leaks into the physical world, causing spontaneous elemental and illusory manifestations". Spirit materialization, inhabitation, possession, etc are all powers used in the astral that have physical world effects. Your statement that nothing on the astral can effect the physical is not quite true. There are some specific, rare, or unusual circumstances where the astral does have an effect on the physical. Also, consider I didn't say that the attack suddenly jumped into the physical world, it's a case of attacking a target like a astrally perceiving character, the character still feels the pain on the physical world despite the attack being on the astral because they are duel natured. Now, funny thing is, in all this I found an actual argument against my interpretation that nobody here has mentioned that actually is a good argument against my case. And that is a separation of astral forms. Foci have an astral form. Projectors and Perceivers have one. Spirits have one. Anything duel natured has one. What happens when a single object or thing is governed by TWO forms? Does it merge? Are they separate? Can two different forms occupy the same location at the same time in astral space considering forms are substantial on the astral? If someone can provide a proper argument here I may concede this one, but I'm of the mindset that the forms would become permanently merged in this case as the object is becoming a part of the whole and the forms are also a part of that whole of being. I don't think there is a definitive RAW answer to this but I'd love to hear some opinions. Essence or not, you cannot target a physical object (the Essence paid whatever) from the Astral... and if you are physical already, there is no reason to target something paid with essence... you can already target the meat as it is... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) As for the Astral Forms argument, I was under the impression that it went without saying... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#47
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 821 Joined: 4-December 09 Member No.: 17,940 ![]() |
Biggest problem with skin-foci? Don't you even dare THINK about upgrading them . . And do you remember what happens, if the physical component of a focus is damaged? The focus is destroyed. Now you have such a nice tattoo on the equally nice leg of your equally nice female magician . . and you need to shave your legs to look all sexy. You cut yourself. Congradulations, there goes your focus! And don't even get me started on Bullets and knives (and Cannons too) going your way in a regular fashion. I think you're pushing it a tad too far : if focus where that fragile, weapon focus would be worthless : nick the blade on an opponent's bone and 'poof' a gone focus. And forget about notches on the handle to count kills. Same for jewelry, a mere scratch would ruin them... The tatoo getting sliced in hals with a sword is another matter, but I'd think something as minute as a shaving cut won't be enough to ruin the focus. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 572 Joined: 6-February 09 From: London Uk Member No.: 16,848 ![]() |
Whilst I would agree that something small like a nick or a small cut it unlikly to disrupt a focus I would say that taking physical damage to the area of the tatt (heaven forbid its fire / acid damage) would proberbly cause some issues.
But more worrying to me would be any situation where you are captured, having the enermy skin you to make sure you dont have access to some of your more fun abilities is nasty. Also something that has come up in one of my runs the mage might not be allowed to go some places if they have a weapons and focus at the door lock up ( we actually had this issue at a Johnson meet, The place was pretty high class and had a secure lock up for weapons and such much like a cloakroom nowdays) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#49
|
|
Great, I'm a Dragon... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 6,699 Joined: 8-October 03 From: North Germany Member No.: 5,698 ![]() |
Say hello to the Masking metamagic. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#50
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Say hello to the Masking metamagic. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Extended Masking anyways... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd September 2025 - 12:09 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.