[X] My Assistant

[Paul Kauphart]

OK, and because I feel retarded today. If you modd a rocket launcher to be full auto and use it for supression fire, does each shot still scatter?

Lol, I've been imagining that, and I can't stop laughing !!

But in case of a FA rocket launcher, my first question would even be, how do you rule even a single burst (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

[Yerameyahu]

Yes, certainly the sane thing is to simply not allow it at all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Even bursts of grenades are problematic, but rockets are expensive. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) The only canon example is the Fleche Hail; it makes separate rolls for each rocket (multiple shots). They each impose the -2 multiple target penalty, and it's not BF or FA at all, so no suppression.

It's not clear that you can mod a launcher to do it, either:

This modification is not available for weapons using unusual loading mechanisms or exotic ammunition, like the Sakura Fubuki or Pain Inducer.

Possibly that includes rocket launchers. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[TommyTwoToes]

Yes, certainly the sane thing is to simply not allow it at all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Even bursts of grenades are problematic, but rockets are expensive. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) The only canon example is the Fleche Hail; it makes separate rolls for each rocket (multiple shots). They each impose the -2 multiple target penalty, and it's not BF or FA at all, so no suppression.

It's not clear that you can mod a launcher to do it, either:Possibly that includes rocket launchers. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I agree that it would be problematic with the rockets, but I think you hit on something with gernades. Doesn't the 1 launcher use a magazine/clip? I think this would be a crowd pleaser.

Hmmmm need to take a look for Shadowwars.

[Yerameyahu]

Well, go search for the last time someone statted it up. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) The Mk19 is usually mentioned, although it's more like a HMG with explosive shells.

Given the balance of SR4 equipment, I'd rule grenades to be 'exotic ammunition'; anything not firing normal bullets from normal mechanisms. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[TommyTwoToes]

Well, go search for the last time someone statted it up. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) The Mk19 is usually mentioned, although it's more like a HMG with explosive shells.

Given the balance of SR4 equipment, I'd rule grenades to be 'exotic ammunition'; anything not firing normal bullets from normal mechanisms. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

How funny, I wasn't reading the Auto Cannon recoil thread, but they are both drifting down the same path.

[Paul Kauphart]

I'd say id does. And I would also rule out the suppressive fire if you don't have 20 shot available, though I would consider it if you have 20 shot available in two weapon you'd be holding in two hands.

[sabs]

I agree that it would be problematic with the rockets, but I think you hit on something with gernades. Doesn't the 1 launcher use a magazine/clip? I think this would be a crowd pleaser.

Hmmmm need to take a look for Shadowwars.

ArmTech MGL-12: This bullpup-configuration model is popular,
since it fires in semi-auto mode and carries more minigrenades than
its competitors.
ArmTech MGL-12 Grenade — SA — 12 © 10F 2,000¥
+FA Mod
+extended clip +4 ammo (unless you can talk your GM into the Drum, in which case 50 or 100 ammo)

Although really, BF mdoe might be enough of a mod. As a Gm do you rule that it shoots 3-9 grenades that each roll scatter?

[KarmaInferno]

How does suppression fire work with that full auto shotgun on wide choke?

There was a movie recently that purports to examine this very question.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)




-karma

[sabs]

There was a movie recently that purports to examine this very question.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)




-karma

Expendables (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
and the answer is. REALLY SCARY WELL

Chunky Salsa aint got nothing on this.

[Yerameyahu]

Assuming you rule that BF is possible on a grenade launcher, I'd keep it simple: all three impact as one, using the normal Narrow/Wide rules for bursts. Possibly, you could rule that only Narrow *or* Wide is possible (either they all impact roughly the same spot, or there's som GM-fiat 'saturation' effect).

Just because no one wants to make all those scatter rolls.

[Paul Kauphart]

There was a movie recently that purports to examine this very question.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)




-karma

Exept that in that case, it's not rounds, but HE slugs (thoses new things someone posted about somewhere in dumpshock)

[Yerameyahu]

Which *is* chunky salsa. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

[Paul Kauphart]

Well, yeah, I can't argue with that huhu

[Social Reject]

Just because no one wants to make all those scatter rolls.

I'm sure somebody does, lol.

[Dumori]

I'm sure somebody does, lol.

Lot of dice meh I play a 40k where I regularly roll 200+ a turn 80 for the scatter of 20 rockets isn't that bad.

[Social Reject]

40K was the first thing I thought of too.

But given the nature of 4th edition's already giant dice pools, it seems like rolling a few more won't chap too many hides. Especially if it leads to bad guy cheese soup.

This post has been edited by Social Reject: Sep 8 2010, 09:25 PM

[Aerospider]

I came up another weird thing with suppressive fire. It fires 20 shots, and last from one action phase of the firing character, to ne beginning of the next action phase for the character. So effectively, to maintain a suppressed zone for one combat turn, a 1IP character will use 20shots, and a 4IP character will have to use 80 shots....

Unless I've missed something, it doesn't feel right.

Something to bear in mind re: IPs and delaying actions is that suppressive fire is not only a concern to those who enter the area between the shooter's actions but also those who were there to begin with.

So a 1IP character can cover an area with 20 bullets until his action phase in the next combat round. Everyone there at the start must roll to dodge (Reaction + Edge) and so must everyone moving in the area for the duration. Conversely, a 4IP character would spend 80 bullets to achieve the same duration, but on every action he continues the suppression everyone within the area has to make the test again.

Example:

IP1: Suppressive fire commences – Goon runs into and across the danger zone which requires a dodging roll, but finds his route out blocked.
IP2: Suppressive fire continues – Goon must make a second roll for being exposed. Goon runs to a door, requiring a third roll, but finds it locked.
IP3: Suppressive fire continues – Goon must make a fourth roll. Goon manages to find a way out of the fire arc, requiring a fifth roll.
IP4: Suppressive fire continues with fire arc adjusted to catch Goon – Goon must make a sixth roll. Goon dives behind cover, requiring a seventh roll.

A 1IP character would have forced only three dodge rolls – one for moving in, one for moving within and one for moving out. If another character had run in one side and out the other in the same action they'd have been forced to make only one roll.

So more IPs pays off by giving more chances to hit, allowing a change in fire arc and allowing a premature ceasefire should the need arise. Compared to the extra ammo expenditure, that's still well worth it.

As for realism the whole rate of fire thing being dependent on IPs is indeed somewhat unsatisfactory, but in the case of suppressive fire it actually does make a bit of sense. I don't think suppressive fire is meant to mean firing blindly left, right and centre. I see it as more controlled than that, firing at places that are likely to have people in them or people who intend to be in them very soon. You're not careless about where you aim, just not thinking too hard about timing or accuracy, stuff like that. So a character with more IPs is able to get more in because they can switch their aim that much quicker.

Think about it. If you're covering an area do you just wave a constantly-discharging barrel around in circles, making interesting patterns and trying to write your name like it were a sparkler? Or would you concentrate your bullets in variable bursts on the disconnected empty spaces where people might actually be at some point?

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

Yes, certainly the sane thing is to simply not allow it at all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Even bursts of grenades are problematic, but rockets are expensive. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) The only canon example is the Fleche Hail; it makes separate rolls for each rocket (multiple shots). They each impose the -2 multiple target penalty, and it's not BF or FA at all, so no suppression.

Though the rules for the Fleche Hail Rocket Launcher do allow you to Ripple fire all (AS many as you want to take a penalty for) of the rockets in the pod... Thisnk of it as a MLRS... Fire 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20 (Whatever) with the incrementing penalties of course... but you can effectively "Suppress" an area by picking a specific target, and letting the scatter deal with the increasing area of effect... (At the worst, you are going to get a scatter of 4d6 per rocket from initial point of impact (with 0 Net Hits), which you could reduce to 2d6 with various targeting seekers/airburst links)... Seems like suppression fire to me... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smokin.gif)

[Yerameyahu]

Except it's not. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[Dumori]

Though the rules for the Fleche Hail Rocket Launcher do allow you to Ripple fire all (AS many as you want to take a penalty for) of the rockets in the pod... Thisnk of it as a MLRS... Fire 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20 (Whatever) with the incrementing penalties of course... but you can effectively "Suppress" an area by picking a specific target, and letting the scatter deal with the increasing area of effect... (At the worst, you are going to get a scatter of 4d6 per rocket from initial point of impact (with 0 Net Hits), which you could reduce to 2d6 with various targeting seekers/airburst links)... Seems like suppression fire to me... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smokin.gif)

Adept riggers love that weapon soak magic and initiate grade worth of negatives. You can fire 6+ missiles no penalty might eat you nu-yen though. Still also by RAW you can have any 20 missiles so you don't need to load all of one type I think I've just spotted how to make fighter bombers work right in SR4 also you can slap that on a Nimrod at a push.

[Neurosis]

As far as I know you don't even make an attack roll for suppressive fire, you just spray and pray? Not getting hit is the burden of the character moving through the area.

Of course I didn't read the rule that carefully.

Though the rules for the Fleche Hail Rocket Launcher do allow you to Ripple fire all (AS many as you want to take a penalty for) of the rockets in the pod... Thisnk of it as a MLRS... Fire 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20 (Whatever) with the incrementing penalties of course... but you can effectively "Suppress" an area by picking a specific target, and letting the scatter deal with the increasing area of effect... (At the worst, you are going to get a scatter of 4d6 per rocket from initial point of impact (with 0 Net Hits), which you could reduce to 2d6 with various targeting seekers/airburst links)... Seems like suppression fire to me...

This seems like it would take FORVER to resolve. Rolling to-hit, scatter direction, and scatter damage on every shot?

It also sounds AWESOME AS SHIT.

Rockets and missiles are one of the things I most frequently hand-wave in my game, but that is because every time players have used them (a rarity, as none of my PCs are specc'd for that) it has been necessary for them to "work like in the movies" for the PCs to survive.

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

Except it's not. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

If it walks like a Duck, and Talks Like a Duck, It might as well be a Duck...(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)

[Yerameyahu]

But it doesn't. Suppressive Fire uses 20 rounds (subject to special rules), is a Success Test, and creates a static area effect that any number of targets can be damaged by. Multiple rockets are single-rocket attacks, Opposed Tests, and create transient area blasts. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) You can 'suppress' with it, but you can 'suppress' with harsh language. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I'm just talking about the rules keywords, here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

But it doesn't. Suppressive Fire uses 20 rounds (subject to special rules), is a Success Test, and creates a static area effect that any number of targets can be damaged by. Multiple rockets are single-rocket attacks, Opposed Tests, and create transient area blasts. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) You can 'suppress' with it, but you can 'suppress' with harsh language. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I'm just talking about the rules keywords, here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I get what you are saying... but in the end, the effect on the ground is really not all that much different... But you are very correct... the Rules/Mechanics that get you to that point are indeed two entirely different things... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smokin.gif)

[Yerameyahu]

Also, MLRS attacks are just vastly cooler. It's insulting to equate them to something a pistol can do. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)