IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Assault canon recoil, So much bang, so little buck
Aerospider
post Sep 7 2010, 12:46 AM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,150
Joined: 15-December 09
Member No.: 17,968



The Arsenal description of the Ares Vigorous Assault Cannon describes "massive recoil".
Where?

Have I missed something, or is there in fact no recoil at all unless you shell out for the semi-automatic, in which case it's 1 point of recoil doubled to 2 for being a heavy weapon? I don't get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Sep 7 2010, 01:55 AM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



You haven't missed it. Maybe the "massive recoil" is what made it stock a SS weapon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 7 2010, 01:59 AM
Post #3


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



That, and you can't exactly fire it one-handed while running, for example. Those restrictions are basically from recoil, just not Recoil.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jakephillips
post Sep 7 2010, 02:08 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 26-July 10
Member No.: 18,852



You are correct.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kraegor
post Sep 7 2010, 02:09 AM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 44
Joined: 26-February 10
Member No.: 18,204



Always look at converting to a mini-gun. Much better bang for the buck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Sep 7 2010, 02:10 AM
Post #6


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Kraegor @ Sep 6 2010, 08:09 PM) *
Always look at converting to a mini-gun. Much better bang for the buck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)


A Minigun Shotgun... Too brutal to contemplate, but nothing creates more bang for your buck in my opinion... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smokin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kruger
post Sep 7 2010, 02:44 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 1-August 10
From: Occupied San Diego
Member No.: 18,877



The massive recoil is flavor text, unfortunately, and an attempt to appeal to the common sense of the sillier players who might want to treat it as anything other than the massive anti-material weapon it is. Unfortunately the game doesn't include mechanics to accurately model such weapons.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jaellot
post Sep 7 2010, 03:06 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 26-August 10
From: Greensboro, NC
Member No.: 18,971



Another thing is the Concealability is less than nil. Of course if a character is using an assualt cannon, stealth isn't on the menu...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkeus
post Sep 7 2010, 03:16 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 210
Joined: 15-May 06
Member No.: 8,562



This is where GM common sense comes into play. Of course that thing can kick you to teh ground if not held right and it is not hard to come up with a quick rule to go with the fluff.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Sep 7 2010, 03:55 AM
Post #10


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



There's an optional rule in Arsenal that firing large weapons like that deals stun damage to the firer unless their body is over a certain number. Or something like that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hagga
post Sep 7 2010, 04:32 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 825
Joined: 21-October 08
Member No.: 16,538



Stating they can fire without a gyromount if they have body 8 or more, and must take stun dv equal to half the dv of the weapon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stingray
post Sep 7 2010, 05:01 AM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 21-March 09
Member No.: 17,002



QUOTE (Hagga @ Sep 7 2010, 07:32 AM) *
Stating they can fire without a gyromount if they have body 8 or more, and must take stun dv equal to half the dv of the weapon.

That is OPTIONAL rule for heavy weapons..
(rule says is need Body AND Str be 8 or more fire/carry Heavy Weapons)
(That rule means saying GOOBYE! to Ares Alpha/Colt M23..)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kruger
post Sep 7 2010, 05:37 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 1-August 10
From: Occupied San Diego
Member No.: 18,877



No it wouldn't, because an under-barrel grenade launcher is technically a weapon accessory, not a weapon itself.

Denoting what a "Heavy Weapon" actually is, is something that Arsenal should have specified.

Utilizing this rule simply means exercising common sense. It was horribly underwritten. Anyone should be able to fire a "heavy weapon" using a bipod from the prone or having it braced on something without risking damage. But, at the same time, a shoulder fired grenade launcher isn't some kind of horribly unwieldy beast that would need a gyro mount and shouldn't fall under the same rule as a machinegun or an assault cannon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Sep 7 2010, 06:24 AM
Post #14


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



Yeah, that rule is so badly written i can't comprehend how it got added to the book.
Considering that its saying you need superhuman strenght and body to fire a pistol grenade launcher, makes that rule silly beyond belief (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hagga
post Sep 7 2010, 06:49 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 825
Joined: 21-October 08
Member No.: 16,538



QUOTE (Stingray @ Sep 7 2010, 05:01 AM) *
That is OPTIONAL rule for heavy weapons..
(rule says is need Body AND Str be 8 or more fire/carry Heavy Weapons)
(That rule means saying GOOBYE! to Ares Alpha/Colt M23..)

Yes, I'm aware of that. I was responding to the post directly above mine. The one saying "An optional rule in arsenal.."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Sep 7 2010, 08:06 AM
Post #16


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 7 2010, 03:59 AM) *
That, and you can't exactly fire it one-handed while running, for example. Those restrictions are basically from recoil, just not Recoil.

how do you figure?
Trolls can do that just fine O.o
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Sep 7 2010, 09:42 AM
Post #17


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,091
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Sep 7 2010, 03:10 AM) *
A Minigun Shotgun...

There is no rule against using flechettes in regular firearms...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 7 2010, 01:18 PM
Post #18


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Not everyone's a troll, Stahlseele, and there are plenty of trolls not big and strong enough to do that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dumori
post Sep 7 2010, 02:25 PM
Post #19


Dumorimasoddaa
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,687
Joined: 30-March 08
Member No.: 15,830



QUOTE (jaellot @ Sep 7 2010, 04:06 AM) *
Another thing is the Concealability is less than nil. Of course if a character is using an assualt cannon, stealth isn't on the menu...

Not quite you could slap on a scope and a silencer and have a pretty nasty sniper just using heavy weapons not long arms plus gauss-rifle. That's likely a better build full stop with the some being able to be uses like an 250 round AR with no recoil. in fact heavy weapons almost covers all your combat bases bar small and concealable so grab pistols as well if needed automatic could work too but a load of redundancy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Sep 7 2010, 02:28 PM
Post #20


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 7 2010, 03:18 PM) *
Not everyone's a troll, Stahlseele, and there are plenty of trolls not big and strong enough to do that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

*shrugs* not my problem, i play big and strong trolls for fun like this ^^
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StealthSigma
post Sep 7 2010, 03:44 PM
Post #21


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,536
Joined: 13-July 09
Member No.: 17,389



QUOTE (Kruger @ Sep 6 2010, 10:44 PM) *
The massive recoil is flavor text, unfortunately, and an attempt to appeal to the common sense of the sillier players who might want to treat it as anything other than the massive anti-material weapon it is. Unfortunately the game doesn't include mechanics to accurately model such weapons.


I've always considered the assault cannons to be sniper rifles for use against armored vehicles (or trolls).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Sep 7 2010, 03:46 PM
Post #22


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (StealthSigma @ Sep 7 2010, 03:44 PM) *
I've always considered the assault cannons to be sniper rifles for use against armored vehicles (or trolls).


I think of them as 50 Cal Sniper Rifles.. like this one:

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http:/...ved=0CC0Q9QEwAg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matsci
post Sep 7 2010, 03:54 PM
Post #23


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 664
Joined: 3-February 08
Member No.: 15,626



I consider assult cannons 20mm+ Anti-tank rifles, liek the Lahti L39 or the Type 97.

Massive, Impractical, and about the smallest caliber you are going to find explosive shells as standard (which makes it a cannon)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kruger
post Sep 7 2010, 04:10 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 1-August 10
From: Occupied San Diego
Member No.: 18,877



QUOTE (StealthSigma @ Sep 7 2010, 07:44 AM) *
I've always considered the assault cannons to be sniper rifles for use against armored vehicles (or trolls).

Pretty much.

http://www.vincelewis.net/20mm.html (video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXLRYf9EV2Y ) Of course, this puppy is a two man (one troll I guess) carry, lol

http://www.strategypage.com/military_photo..._200481522.aspx
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 7 2010, 05:21 PM
Post #25


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Haha, Stahlseele. I didn't say it was your problem, but obviously not all trolls and basically no one else can 1-hand/unbraced fire an assault cannon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd August 2025 - 06:58 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.