![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,150 Joined: 15-December 09 Member No.: 17,968 ![]() |
The Arsenal description of the Ares Vigorous Assault Cannon describes "massive recoil".
Where? Have I missed something, or is there in fact no recoil at all unless you shell out for the semi-automatic, in which case it's 1 point of recoil doubled to 2 for being a heavy weapon? I don't get it. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
You haven't missed it. Maybe the "massive recoil" is what made it stock a SS weapon.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 ![]() |
That, and you can't exactly fire it one-handed while running, for example. Those restrictions are basically from recoil, just not Recoil.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 172 Joined: 26-July 10 Member No.: 18,852 ![]() |
You are correct.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 26-February 10 Member No.: 18,204 ![]() |
Always look at converting to a mini-gun. Much better bang for the buck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Always look at converting to a mini-gun. Much better bang for the buck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) A Minigun Shotgun... Too brutal to contemplate, but nothing creates more bang for your buck in my opinion... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smokin.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 542 Joined: 1-August 10 From: Occupied San Diego Member No.: 18,877 ![]() |
The massive recoil is flavor text, unfortunately, and an attempt to appeal to the common sense of the sillier players who might want to treat it as anything other than the massive anti-material weapon it is. Unfortunately the game doesn't include mechanics to accurately model such weapons.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 26-August 10 From: Greensboro, NC Member No.: 18,971 ![]() |
Another thing is the Concealability is less than nil. Of course if a character is using an assualt cannon, stealth isn't on the menu...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 210 Joined: 15-May 06 Member No.: 8,562 ![]() |
This is where GM common sense comes into play. Of course that thing can kick you to teh ground if not held right and it is not hard to come up with a quick rule to go with the fluff.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
There's an optional rule in Arsenal that firing large weapons like that deals stun damage to the firer unless their body is over a certain number. Or something like that.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 825 Joined: 21-October 08 Member No.: 16,538 ![]() |
Stating they can fire without a gyromount if they have body 8 or more, and must take stun dv equal to half the dv of the weapon.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 695 Joined: 21-March 09 Member No.: 17,002 ![]() |
Stating they can fire without a gyromount if they have body 8 or more, and must take stun dv equal to half the dv of the weapon. That is OPTIONAL rule for heavy weapons.. (rule says is need Body AND Str be 8 or more fire/carry Heavy Weapons) (That rule means saying GOOBYE! to Ares Alpha/Colt M23..) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 542 Joined: 1-August 10 From: Occupied San Diego Member No.: 18,877 ![]() |
No it wouldn't, because an under-barrel grenade launcher is technically a weapon accessory, not a weapon itself.
Denoting what a "Heavy Weapon" actually is, is something that Arsenal should have specified. Utilizing this rule simply means exercising common sense. It was horribly underwritten. Anyone should be able to fire a "heavy weapon" using a bipod from the prone or having it braced on something without risking damage. But, at the same time, a shoulder fired grenade launcher isn't some kind of horribly unwieldy beast that would need a gyro mount and shouldn't fall under the same rule as a machinegun or an assault cannon. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 ![]() |
Yeah, that rule is so badly written i can't comprehend how it got added to the book.
Considering that its saying you need superhuman strenght and body to fire a pistol grenade launcher, makes that rule silly beyond belief (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 825 Joined: 21-October 08 Member No.: 16,538 ![]() |
That is OPTIONAL rule for heavy weapons.. (rule says is need Body AND Str be 8 or more fire/carry Heavy Weapons) (That rule means saying GOOBYE! to Ares Alpha/Colt M23..) Yes, I'm aware of that. I was responding to the post directly above mine. The one saying "An optional rule in arsenal.." |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,091 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 ![]() |
Not everyone's a troll, Stahlseele, and there are plenty of trolls not big and strong enough to do that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 ![]() |
Another thing is the Concealability is less than nil. Of course if a character is using an assualt cannon, stealth isn't on the menu... Not quite you could slap on a scope and a silencer and have a pretty nasty sniper just using heavy weapons not long arms plus gauss-rifle. That's likely a better build full stop with the some being able to be uses like an 250 round AR with no recoil. in fact heavy weapons almost covers all your combat bases bar small and concealable so grab pistols as well if needed automatic could work too but a load of redundancy. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 ![]() |
Not everyone's a troll, Stahlseele, and there are plenty of trolls not big and strong enough to do that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) *shrugs* not my problem, i play big and strong trolls for fun like this ^^ |
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,536 Joined: 13-July 09 Member No.: 17,389 ![]() |
The massive recoil is flavor text, unfortunately, and an attempt to appeal to the common sense of the sillier players who might want to treat it as anything other than the massive anti-material weapon it is. Unfortunately the game doesn't include mechanics to accurately model such weapons. I've always considered the assault cannons to be sniper rifles for use against armored vehicles (or trolls). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,996 Joined: 1-June 10 Member No.: 18,649 ![]() |
I've always considered the assault cannons to be sniper rifles for use against armored vehicles (or trolls). I think of them as 50 Cal Sniper Rifles.. like this one: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http:/...ved=0CC0Q9QEwAg |
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 664 Joined: 3-February 08 Member No.: 15,626 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 542 Joined: 1-August 10 From: Occupied San Diego Member No.: 18,877 ![]() |
I've always considered the assault cannons to be sniper rifles for use against armored vehicles (or trolls). Pretty much. http://www.vincelewis.net/20mm.html (video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXLRYf9EV2Y ) Of course, this puppy is a two man (one troll I guess) carry, lol http://www.strategypage.com/military_photo..._200481522.aspx |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 ![]() |
Haha, Stahlseele. I didn't say it was your problem, but obviously not all trolls and basically no one else can 1-hand/unbraced fire an assault cannon.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd August 2025 - 06:58 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.