IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Persona Non Grata and corporate citizens, Can a state do it?
Krojar
post Sep 12 2010, 04:24 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 69
Joined: 30-August 10
Member No.: 18,986



We all know that Corporations have extraterritoriality, making their property a cross between a diplomatic embassy and an enclave. The question is, can a host state "kick out" a corporate citizen? In current diplomacy this is done against diplomats who commit some crime or are suspected of espionage but have managed to escape into their home embassy. Say a Mitsuhama wetwork team is identified after they get their target by UCAS FBI agents but manage to escape into their corporate HQ. The FBI asks Mitsuhama for an extradition (let's say the target was prominent enough to warrant it) and Mitsuhama tells them to fuck off and die since the team is 1) Mitsuhama citizens and 2) residing in an extraterritorial area. Can the UCAS declare the team "Persona Non Grata" and order the team to leave UCAS soil?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 12 2010, 04:32 PM
Post #2


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Don't see why not. Corporations as Countries just means they have to work under the same laws as Countries. The Corporate Court can work to change those laws, of course.

Of course, politics plays a big role as well. Sure, S-K can say, "Slot off.", but then there will be issues with S-K when negotiating with the UCAS Government for various things (For example, when S-K wants someone that escaped onto UCAS Soil.).

Anyhow, if the FBI caught said MCT team, then they failed the first law of black ops: "Thou Shalt Not Get Caught".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Sep 12 2010, 04:54 PM
Post #3


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



The enforcement of this is that you blockade the embassy until they do what you want. No traffic across your territory to their embassy, plus the possibility of turning off the power and water.

There is the informal version of this, where "road construction" and "utility repairs" digs a series 20 foot deep trenches across roads, and due to some terrible confusion, blocks all the access roads.

When the "errors" are discovered a stop work order is issued and court summons are issued to the highway officials and the contractors so that this can be properly sorted out. In a few months...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Method
post Sep 12 2010, 05:01 PM
Post #4


Street Doc
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,508
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 6,114



Ah, bureaucracy at work. Ain't it beautiful?! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 12 2010, 06:45 PM
Post #5


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Red Tape, the best weapon a Government has.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 12 2010, 06:51 PM
Post #6


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



I'm not sure you see it right. IIRC, it goes like this:

* Embassy soil is leased or given by the host country to whoever the embassy is for. As long as the lease lasts, that soil belongs to the embassy's patron.

* Senior embassy staff receive diplomatic immunity; they cannot be prosecuted in the host country, although they are expected to respect the host country's laws. They just can't be prosecuted.

* When a person is declared Persona Non Grata, they're not allowed into the host country. This doesn't mean they're not allowed in the embassy. However, they can't just leave the embassy back into the host country.

In practice, if a diplomat is declared PNG, they're usually recalled, because they're not very effective if they can't move about. But this in no way stops embassies from being a good place to seek (political) asylum for people wanted in the host country. They may have to remain shut up in the embassy for a long time however.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Krojar
post Sep 12 2010, 07:21 PM
Post #7


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 69
Joined: 30-August 10
Member No.: 18,986



QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Sep 12 2010, 06:51 PM) *
In practice, if a diplomat is declared PNG, they're usually recalled, because they're not very effective if they can't move about. But this in no way stops embassies from being a good place to seek (political) asylum for people wanted in the host country. They may have to remain shut up in the embassy for a long time however.

Ah, I thought the offending person(s) had to leave by order of the host country not the home country though it would seem that, technically, the home country is the one that sends the person packing.

So in the case of the Mitsuhama wetwork team (assuming that MCT doesn't just decide to off them) they could keep them on Corp territory indefinitely or smuggle them out and the UCAS gov't can't do anything official except maybe lodge a complaint with the Corporate Court?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 12 2010, 07:31 PM
Post #8


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Krojar @ Sep 12 2010, 02:21 PM) *
...and the UCAS gov't can't do anything official except maybe lodge a complaint with the Corporate Court?

And blare the evidence on the news. If they're willing to deal with the political/business fallout involved in that. But, legally, nope, nothing.

Welcome to the wonderful world of international espionage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Sep 12 2010, 08:01 PM
Post #9


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Krojar @ Sep 12 2010, 02:21 PM) *
Ah, I thought the offending person(s) had to leave by order of the host country not the home country though it would seem that, technically, the home country is the one that sends the person packing.


If a country declares someone Persona Non Grata and orders the person's expulsion, that person has to leave that country's soil.

The thing is, an embassy (or corporate enclave) is NOT that country's soil, even if it resides in that country.

In the example, the MCT team has ALREADY left UCAS soil. The enclave grounds are are considered Mitsuhama territory. Not UCAS.

That's the whole point of extraterritorial rights. A country or corporation's enclave or embassy is considered part of the that country or corporation, not part of the country it's sitting in.


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 12 2010, 08:04 PM
Post #10


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



The one exception that happens to Corporations (And possibly other countries, I'm not sure) is Eminent Domain.

That's how the UCAS was able to drive in and take over the Renraku Archology in Seattle. The nuclear reactors (Four of them) in the basement of it, no longer under control of a "Friendly Government" posed a risk to UCAS Soil.

Which is why I figure that Embassies tend to not have nuclear weapons placed in their basements. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) (At least, I'm hoping they don't!).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 12 2010, 10:21 PM
Post #11


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



QUOTE (CanRay @ Sep 12 2010, 10:04 PM) *
The one exception that happens to Corporations (And possibly other countries, I'm not sure) is Eminent Domain.

That's how the UCAS was able to drive in and take over the Renraku Archology in Seattle. The nuclear reactors (Four of them) in the basement of it, no longer under control of a "Friendly Government" posed a risk to UCAS Soil.

Which is why I figure that Embassies tend to not have nuclear weapons placed in their basements. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) (At least, I'm hoping they don't!).


Do you have a source for that? I was under the impression that Renraku basically unloaded the arcology on the UCAS because they didn't want it anymore. Using eminent domain against extraterritorial soil seems rather like an act of war...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 12 2010, 10:29 PM
Post #12


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Don't remember the book, but it's the scene where the General walks into the United Corporate Council in Seattle and goes, "We're taking over.".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Sep 12 2010, 10:56 PM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



actually, i'm pretty sure it went something along the lines of the UCAS telling renraku they could foot the bill for retaking the arcology (note: government sponsored militaries have never been particularly cheap to run that i know of, and probably still won't be in 2070), or give up the arcology. i don't think they technically forced renraku to give them the arcology though... they just made it extremely unappealing to not give it to the UCAS.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 12 2010, 11:49 PM
Post #14


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 12 2010, 05:56 PM) *
actually, i'm pretty sure it went something along the lines of the UCAS telling renraku they could foot the bill for retaking the arcology (note: government sponsored militaries have never been particularly cheap to run that i know of, and probably still won't be in 2070), or give up the arcology. i don't think they technically forced renraku to give them the arcology though... they just made it extremely unappealing to not give it to the UCAS.

"OK, we've freed the Arcology, there you go." "Thank you very much." "And, our bill." "WHAT?" "Well, you've given us so many bills for your service, it's about time we've been able to repay the favour..."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Sep 13 2010, 12:59 AM
Post #15


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (CanRay @ Sep 12 2010, 02:04 PM) *
The one exception that happens to Corporations (And possibly other countries, I'm not sure) is Eminent Domain.

You can't use that on an embassy. It's another country!

However, it's another country. So you always have recourse to the "Last Argument of Kings", and just drive through the front gate with a mech company.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 13 2010, 01:10 AM
Post #16


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



I thought they declared eminent domain. Looks like I'll have to look that up again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 13 2010, 01:14 AM
Post #17


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Here we go, Renraku Shutdown, Page 26. A General shows up and goes, "I'm from the Government, I'm here to help, BECAUSE YOU HAVE FRAGGIN' NUKES IN THE BASEMENT!" (Essentially).

I read (Or misremembered) that as a declaration of "Eminent Domain", and am obviously mistaken.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 13 2010, 09:39 AM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



Ah, that makes more sense then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Sep 13 2010, 12:50 PM
Post #19


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (kzt @ Sep 13 2010, 12:59 AM) *
You can't use that on an embassy. It's another country!

Nope, diplomatic missions are actually still standing on the soil of the host nation. The area and certain persons are merely exempted from that nation's law by the Vienna Conventions, which in turn imposes some obligations on the guests - for example to remove any person in a certain timeframe or even close the whole thing down if the host nation insists.
Think of it like renting a flat, just because the landlord lets you live there for free and ignore the house rules the place doesn't belong to you (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Shadowrun extrateritoriality, however, seems to turn corporate belongings into true enclaves. Renraku is a souvereign international entity, and if the UCAS doesn't like the nose of one of some guy living on Renraku territory they can ask nicely to relocate him, but if 'Raku refuses they can't do shit about it...except for the ultima ration regum, of course.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Master of Malfea...
post Sep 14 2010, 07:39 AM
Post #20


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 14-September 10
Member No.: 19,044



There are ways the problem could be physically addressed, but international relations don't really work like that. It is entirely a question of how badly the city/county/state/feds want those suspects. If they want them badly enough, they will cajole and curry favors until they get them out or get them gone.

Also, since they committed a crime on UCAS soil (and basically got caught), they're still criminals. Diplomatic immunity most certainly does NOT extend to every person living in a corporate enclave. Likewise, the UCAS can label the wetworks team terrorists, enemies of the state, etc and throw MCT into the spotlight as being a corporation that supports international terrorism which I'm pretty sure will still be a crime in 60 years. Ultimately, it is in MCTs best interest to either give them up, stage an extraction, or cut them loose.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 14 2010, 11:10 AM
Post #21


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



Dissidents/Freedomf Fighters/Terrorists have used embassies to gain asylum for ages.. the Cold War was full of people in East Bloc countries hiding out in the American embassy, sometimes for years at a time.

Trying to involuntarily extract someone from an embassy takes a lot of cojones. The host nation is a natural suspect, and the Corporate Court wouldn't just let such a key violation of the Business Accords slide.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Sep 14 2010, 12:13 PM
Post #22


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Sengir @ Sep 13 2010, 12:50 PM) *
ultima ration regum

You guys know that "OMG, what did I write there" feeling?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Angelone
post Sep 14 2010, 04:23 PM
Post #23


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,286
Joined: 24-May 05
From: A 10x10 room with an orc and a treasure chest
Member No.: 7,409



I just thought you were trying to cast the Ultima spell (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)

I think the way it would go down is kinda like this.

UCAS: We want these guys, they kicked the presidents poodle.
MCT: No speaka the americano.
UCAS: Screw em send in the runners.
MCT: Why is our facility tipped over and on fire?
UCAS: No idea, good luck with that. *snicker*

I think the whole diplomacy thing will be a distraction if the people in question are wanted badly enough.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LurkerOutThere
post Sep 14 2010, 05:13 PM
Post #24


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,946
Joined: 1-June 09
From: Omaha
Member No.: 17,234



Folks are getting a couple concepts mixed up, not that it matters in context of a game but this is the sort of thing I dig on about the setting so it's what I think on.

First off there's diplomatic immunity, sovereign territory, and extradition. Personally I cannot see corporations operating in a sovereign nations territory without some sort of extradition agreement on paper. That's not to say extradition requests might not get lost from time to time but for the day to day requests and for certainly high profile screw ups like the theoretical hit team it is just not worth it to antagonize national governments. Even outside of the "large argument of kings" there are a myriad number of ways a national government could screw with a megacorp in their territory that would have a disproportionate affect on the bottom line.

Anything beyond that and you get into the questions of active or passive dystopia that seuoq mentions elsewhere. But by and large in most cases if a national government asks for someone the extraterritorial corp is going to hand them over. But the opposite is also true.

A corporation or nation actually granting someone asylum is a whole different matter. But that person is effectively going to be a prisoner in the enclave/consulate until they can be smuggled out or their safe passage negotiated.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 14 2010, 05:44 PM
Post #25


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



QUOTE (Angelone @ Sep 14 2010, 06:23 PM) *
I just thought you were trying to cast the Ultima spell (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)

I think the way it would go down is kinda like this.

UCAS: We want these guys, they kicked the presidents poodle.
MCT: No speaka the americano.
UCAS: Screw em send in the runners.
MCT: Why is our facility tipped over and on fire?
UCAS: No idea, good luck with that. *snicker*

I think the whole diplomacy thing will be a distraction if the people in question are wanted badly enough.


Corporate Court: We find the UCAS guilty; they'll hand over this year's taxes to MCT in damages.

Keep in mind that particularly the AAA corps are just as powerful as, if not more powerful than, national governments.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 06:14 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.