IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Mundanes vs. Spirits, Killing spooks without SnS
Yerameyahu
post Sep 18 2010, 04:52 PM
Post #151


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



'Toxins' certainly require an organic body; that's part of what toxins are. What you're asking (and it's a good question) is about non-drug/non-toxin *chemicals*. 'Generic acid' is probably the easiest example.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Badmoodguy88
post Sep 18 2010, 09:31 PM
Post #152


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 347
Joined: 28-June 10
Member No.: 18,765



I consider any allergies a host has to act as allergies to the spirit aswell. But I also consider any immunities to affect the spirit as well. This is somewhat disputed by some people.

So a spirit possessing a shapeshifter would have silver bypass their immunity to normal weapons. A spirit possessing a wood golem would have a vulnerability to fire. Spirits don't need to breath but wile possessing a human they might need to breath to keep the vessel alive.

As for acid, it is a chemical burn, like fire but some things "burn" better than others. I guess you need to ask if immunity to poisons and toxins grants protection from acid. You could rule either way. I don't think anything has an immunity to just poison. It either case I think spirits would still get some protection in the form of immunity to normal weapons.

Just some things to consider. Excuse the spelling. I am away from a spellchecker at the moment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Sep 19 2010, 01:42 AM
Post #153


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 18 2010, 11:52 AM) *
'Toxins' certainly require an organic body; that's part of what toxins are. What you're asking (and it's a good question) is about non-drug/non-toxin *chemicals*. 'Generic acid' is probably the easiest example.



I just used the term toxin 'cuz that's what the book uses for the most part. I guess if we want to be nit picky the better word here would be poisons, but by the RAW these things are all still rated based on their toxicity and use the same rules, so it hardly matters that much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Sep 19 2010, 01:53 AM
Post #154


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 19 2010, 04:09 AM
Post #155


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



But that's my point, Whipstitch: the book isn't very careful about these issues, and you're right to mention it. It's not 'nit-picking' when it matters. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Sep 19 2010, 03:41 PM
Post #156


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 18 2010, 10:45 AM) *
Try to ignore Neraph, he always takes the anti-common-sense position. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It's not a character flaw, it's an intellectual exercise.

I was going to take offense until the underlined part (emphasis mine). Thank you for noticing.

QUOTE (Badmoodguy88 Posted Yesterday, 03:31 PM )
Spirits don't need to breath but wile possessing a human they might need to breath to keep the vessel alive.

Only if the spirit cares about the vessel. Possession spirits can possess corpses just as easily as living bodies (barring willing summoners, that is).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd October 2025 - 09:05 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.