IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> citizen journalists, who watches the watchers...
hobgoblin
post Sep 15 2010, 09:50 PM
Post #1


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2010/..._camcorder.html

Are there much in the way of freelance journalists catching the corps with their proverbial pants down in SR?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Sep 16 2010, 02:12 AM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Sep 15 2010, 05:50 PM) *
http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2010/..._camcorder.html

Are there much in the way of freelance journalists catching the corps with their proverbial pants down in SR?

Sure, why not? They might often do that catching through the use of runners to get the evidence needed, but PR is a big deal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 16 2010, 03:19 AM
Post #3


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Which is why Police in various parts of the USA (And maybe Canada) are pulling out the old "Wiretapping" laws when they're being recorded.

Despite, you know, it happening in public. While they're recording themselves with their dashboard cameras built into the cars. And so on.

Expectation of privacy when you're already being watched by traffic cameras, ATM Machines, and your own CAR?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Summerstorm
post Sep 16 2010, 03:39 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,000
Joined: 30-May 09
From: Germany
Member No.: 17,225



But one thing to keep in mind is: In SR much "evidence" isn't worth anything, just as much as a photo with two people shaking hands was great proof in the cold war it is nearly worthless now.

Since video can be manipulated in post processing with high level of realism... and with people with high levels of skill/programs even in realtime i just can't help myself to think that all video/audio recordings are just a "suggestion" in the year of 2072. Also many people with their cybereyes/microcameras running around having a live-videoblog all the time flood the matrix with LOADS of useless data. Which can be easily used to introduce "accidental" footage which was carefully manipulated.

In fact i am using that angle in my campaign soon.

Well, at least i think there are hundreds of analysts in all states and all corporations busy with sorting out through billions of videos to find fakes alone. Only after that they get to be considered at all by other branches.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 16 2010, 03:43 AM
Post #5


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Ironically, traditional photography (As in film and development and so on) is probably more reliable in court than digital photography/video because of the ease that computers can change things digitally. It's harder to pull of a photographic fake. (Harder, but not impossible, mind.).

Another good reason for the old SLR Cameras... Magicians. Walking to the roof with a telescope is suspicious. Going up there with photography equipment and a press pass (Or an appointment for taking "Cityscape Photographs" for a magazine) no so much.

Another reason to get that Artisan Skill.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnny Bones
post Sep 16 2010, 07:05 AM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 21-December 09
Member No.: 17,985



In Seattle 2072 they make mention of journalists, in the Places of Interest section of Auburn for Bowman Metal Works, "They even buried evidence they were increasing cancer rates in the local area, along with the journalist and company snitch who dug up the info." So it didn't work out very well for the journalists, but hey, they got a mention. Hmm, journalists could make good Mr. Johnsons for data steal runs. A company snitch gives them some intel via word of mouth, or they hear rumors, etc. so they hire some runners to break into a corp facility and gather some data from a secure HUB that proves the rumors or intel is correct, and hopefully its also enough to do their story on. You're not a good journalist until you've risked the wrath of Aztechnology right? Haha.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Sep 16 2010, 07:08 AM
Post #7


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



That is a good point summer, and all the more reason that people need runners to gather actual physical evidence to support the stuff. Come to think of it, it would be very cool to have a mission where the runners are all given old style film cameras and just told to photograph something inside a corp's research facility to act as evidence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Sep 16 2010, 12:53 PM
Post #8


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Karoline @ Sep 16 2010, 02:08 AM) *
That is a good point summer, and all the more reason that people need runners to gather actual physical evidence to support the stuff. Come to think of it, it would be very cool to have a mission where the runners are all given old style film cameras and just told to photograph something inside a corp's research facility to act as evidence.

Or hired to just develop the film, as the photographer did not know how "complicated" it would be (Compared to plugging their camera into the nearest pocket comp/CommLink), and they need someone they can "trust" to do it.

Of course, someone without that necessary skill also wouldn't have noticed the tail they pick up, and now the 'Runners have photographs of footage and a hit team on their tails... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/devil.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 08:52 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.