IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dart gun : Zing you're hit
Karoline
post Sep 21 2010, 08:00 PM
Post #26


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 21 2010, 11:20 AM) *
1:3 seems fair at first blush, Karoline. Impact or Ballistic? Higher/lower of the two?

I figure ballistic, as a dart is fairly similar to a bullet.

I like my method because it considers both the ability of the dart to pierce armor outright, and for the dart to hit an unarmored spot because armor rating is a combination of strength and coverage of the worn armor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 21 2010, 08:12 PM
Post #27


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



It's certainly intended to be Impact, by the RAW. I was just asking because someone would, and we're talking about house rules. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I say Impact.

Indeed, KarmaInferno. So what's that mean for SR4? If it takes dozens of shots (simultaneous also means Dodge penalties), then armor should be pretty effective, no?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Sep 21 2010, 08:18 PM
Post #28


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (Karoline @ Sep 21 2010, 09:00 PM) *
I figure ballistic, as a dart is fairly similar to a bullet.

I like my method because it considers both the ability of the dart to pierce armor outright, and for the dart to hit an unarmored spot because armor rating is a combination of strength and coverage of the worn armor.


I will have you note that Bullet Proof vests stop arrows about as well as they stop knives.
Which is to say, way worse than bullets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Sep 21 2010, 08:25 PM
Post #29


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 21 2010, 03:12 PM) *
It's certainly intended to be Impact, by the RAW. I was just asking because someone would, and we're talking about house rules. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I say Impact.

Indeed, KarmaInferno. So what's that mean for SR4? If it takes dozens of shots (simultaneous also means Dodge penalties), then armor should be pretty effective, no?

Oh, is it? I was just guessing. Use impact then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 21 2010, 08:28 PM
Post #30


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



I mean, I wasn't trying to trick you. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I could see using the higher or lower of the two, if that helped the balance. Armor in SR4 is *mostly* balanced for B/I, so it's probably that a big issue in the first place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongoose
post Sep 21 2010, 08:42 PM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 21 2010, 05:20 PM) *
1:3 seems fair at first blush, Karoline. Impact or Ballistic? Higher/lower of the two?


Higher of Ballistic or TWICE impact. Impact armor is specifically designed to block pokey things from breaking your skin. Called shots to bypass armor are figured before this doubling, so very advisable vs folks with decent impact armor.

Though I prefer the "armor rolls to resist" idea. Allows there to be the (small) possibility that somebody with only a couple attack dice could still get a dart past heavy armor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 21 2010, 08:50 PM
Post #32


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



*shrug* Knives and flechette don't have to go against double Impact. The idea is to use something that's fair, functional, balanced. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) If you have the standard 6 Impact, that's 4 *net* hits; pretty prohibitive, esp. for NPCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Sep 21 2010, 08:51 PM
Post #33


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Mongoose @ Sep 21 2010, 03:42 PM) *
Though I prefer the "armor rolls to resist" idea. Allows there to be the (small) possibility that somebody with only a couple attack dice could still get a dart past heavy armor.

Yeah, or someone to luck out and have someone hit the hardest part of their armor, which is why I suggested it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jakephillips
post Sep 22 2010, 12:21 AM
Post #34


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 26-July 10
Member No.: 18,852



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 21 2010, 08:21 AM) *
That's the Called Shot to Bypass Armor. The problem is that this means darts will probably never work now; if that's not what you wanted in your game, the solution doesn't fit. :/ It also requires using a Called Shot action (unless you also waive that).

The simplest house rule to keep dart guns in the realm of options, but not auto-ignoring armor, is to just raise that Threshold from 2 to 3, 4, etc. Wherever is hard enough to be fair, and easy enough to be possible at your table.


I agree. I remember that in 2nd I think you needed net hit = to impact armor to punch with a narcoject dart. Houserule for us is net hits = to half impact armor +1 to inject
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DMiller
post Sep 22 2010, 03:22 AM
Post #35


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 681
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Japan
Member No.: 18,343



We use (firmly in the realm of house rules here):
Attacker rolls attack test, Defender rolls ranged dodge
If attacker's net hits >= modified impact armor (dart guns do have an AP of -2) then the dart connects with flesh, toxin delivered.

-D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 22 2010, 03:28 AM
Post #36


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



So that's 4 *net* hits on the standard 8/6 'good' armor. I don't know if that's doable, especially considering Impact armors of 8 or 10+. :/ Hmm. I thinking of NPCs, not runner super-shooters, is the thing. You're also not going to be getting any help from Wide Bursts (except with the Fingertip Dartguns). It's certainly fair for a heavily armored runner to be basically immune to darts, but it'd be nice if the 'immunity' level of armoring was more special for MilSpec.

On the other hand, it's only 6 dice more than the current rules require. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It's annoying for balance to hinge on such small increments. What do you guys think? Should the goal be that CorpSec can reliably dart an 8/6 'normal Dodger' foe within 2-3 shots, or some other baseline?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Sep 22 2010, 03:38 AM
Post #37


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



Personally, I like Karoline's idea where the target rolls reaction (+dodge) + armor straight up against the shooter's pool. 1 net hit from the attacker means that the target gets stuck.

Well, it would actually be the regular attack rules, really. So, the player/BBEG can use edge on each test. The dodge and the soak.
That means a shooter's net hits can be dropped by edge, just like a regular attack, and armor's net hits can be raised by edge as well. Besides, it adds more variation than the threshold based on 1:3 armor, since that's basically just assuming 1 hit for every 3 armor for this same test.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DMiller
post Sep 22 2010, 03:54 AM
Post #38


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 681
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Japan
Member No.: 18,343



Yera,

We still allow the called shot to bypass armor as well. At which point you only need 1 net hit past the dodge. I'm not sure if that makes the whole thing easier or harder, but it's an option.

We just started using dart guns in our game, so it's not completly play-tested. We have found that (at least in our games) NPC's aren't usually worried too much about killing the players, so we have yet to see non-lethal attacks directed against us. We have however seen APDS directed against us. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

-D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Sep 22 2010, 03:56 AM
Post #39


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Sep 21 2010, 10:38 PM) *
Personally, I like Karoline's idea where the target rolls reaction (+dodge) + armor straight up against the shooter's pool. 1 net hit from the attacker means that the target gets stuck.

Well, it would actually be the regular attack rules, really. So, the player/BBEG can use edge on each test. The dodge and the soak.
That means a shooter's net hits can be dropped by edge, just like a regular attack, and armor's net hits can be raised by edge as well. Besides, it adds more variation than the threshold based on 1:3 armor, since that's basically just assuming 1 hit for every 3 armor for this same test.

Glad so many people seem to like my idea (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I considered doing 1:4 originally (the normal ratio for buying hits) but that seemed like it would go through armor a little too easily. Even heavy milspec would only take 4 net hits to bypass, so figured 1:3 was a little better, and then figured I'd add 'or just roll like normal' since the idea of a fixed net hits in a situation like this isn't the greatest in the first place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th April 2026 - 03:59 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.