![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 935 Joined: 2-September 10 Member No.: 19,000 ![]() |
QUOTE also IMHO Control thoughts needs to be banned as well That is THE WORST idea I have seen in a long time. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 ![]() |
I really don't think any "game balance" based changes to ever happen in SRM, unless it's using a published optional rule.
Missions is supposed to be the "official" Shadowrun campaign. It's supposed to represent Shadowrun. Having a bunch of houserules kinda runs counter to that. -k |
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 151 Joined: 18-February 10 Member No.: 18,170 ![]() |
I really don't think any "game balance" based changes to ever happen in SRM, unless it's using a published optional rule. Missions is supposed to be the "official" Shadowrun campaign. It's supposed to represent Shadowrun. Having a bunch of houserules kinda runs counter to that. -k I think that's an excellent point, Karma. I think it's well worth keeping that in mind when making any decisions about the Missions campaign. And my understanding is that Bull and Jason have been working closely for just that reason. Although I suggested a change to the 4:1 rule, it does have to balance the needs of the campaign with the integrity of the system it represents. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 ![]() |
Heck, even 4:1 wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for the degrading dice part.
-k |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,946 Joined: 1-June 09 From: Omaha Member No.: 17,234 ![]() |
Well i don't normally make game balance suggestions, the problem with possesion is it is poorly worded, poorly understood and insanely powerful. It requires a signifigant amount more GM overhead then normal spirits. The best argument from a balance perspective though is the pages in Digital Grimore devoted to telling us how "possession is totally balanced you guys" and then having to go on for a further page or so suggesting ways to counter or control it.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 301 Joined: 25-August 04 From: Tampa, FL Member No.: 6,602 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 ![]() |
Possession traditions are rough ... I personally had 3 possession mages in the denver missions ... one even combined possession Tradition ... Shapechange (Ape) and Weapon foci .... it was insane
Control Thoughts and the AE version of it my thoughts on this one is basically that spell is the Swiss Army spell .... there is almost nothing a mage CANT do with that spell ... and theres no real reprocussions if the spell wears off ... now note I did not say Control Actions or Influence .... as both of those are IMHO more balanced ... Actions - willpower as a Negative dice pool to the commanded actions Influence - Permenant effect after a sustainable duration + Target gets a Spell resistane test anytime they are confronted with the wrongness of said action Thoughts ... you get pretty much nothing .... once hit with it ... depending how bad the mage is .... your pretty much dead sorry for lack of clarification on my reasons |
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 935 Joined: 2-September 10 Member No.: 19,000 ![]() |
If 'dead' is the issue, manabolt makes you dead faster and more reliably for less drain.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 ![]() |
AE Version .... Mob mind (think thats the thoughts AE version).... all players put their guns to their head and start pulling trigger .... Dead team
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 ![]() |
AE Version .... Mob mind (think thats the thoughts AE version).... all players put their guns to their head and start pulling trigger .... Dead team They get a roll against suicide by RAW. A better use would be to have the disarm the guns and sitdown and comple to the HTR teams instructions. Also ManaBALL is still better for the killing. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 ![]() |
They get a roll against suicide by RAW. A better use would be to have the disarm the guns and sitdown and comple to the HTR teams instructions. Also ManaBALL is still better for the killing. While I agree that they Should ..... No ... they dont .... your thinking influence which is the Permanent duration where they are given a test every time they are confronted with the wrongness of the Idea .... Control thoughts there is no such resistance test ... its been hashed out over and over on these forums BUT ... if you can give me a page # and book I will believe you |
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,946 Joined: 1-June 09 From: Omaha Member No.: 17,234 ![]() |
I concur, one of the best arguments for outright banning control thoughts is there are multiple spells that do basically the same thing that are not patently ridiculous.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#38
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 ![]() |
The Influence and Compulsion powers of spirits (Invoked in the case of Compulsion) should be included in anything that happens to Control Thoughts/Mob Mind. They act much the same without any Counterspelling resistance.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#39
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 ![]() |
I've found that mind-control builds in nearly every game system tend to be broken.
-k |
|
|
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#41
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 301 Joined: 25-August 04 From: Tampa, FL Member No.: 6,602 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#42
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 ![]() |
I think he meant it as "It IS mind control, after all, it's inherently broken."
-k |
|
|
![]()
Post
#43
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 ![]() |
It wasn't as bad in prior editions where there was a threshold of the targets willpower. Adding that makes it very easy to mitigate or allow on a goon by goon basis.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#44
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 ![]() |
It wasn't as bad in prior editions where there was a threshold of the targets willpower. Adding that makes it very easy to mitigate or allow on a goon by goon basis. Id forgotten about that .... and yes ... IMHO Control thoughts with a threshhold equal to the targets Willpower would HELP the spell signifigantly .... I dont think it would fix it |
|
|
![]()
Post
#45
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 ![]() |
Thresholds in 4th reduce hits so its pretty harsh to have a threshold of willpower.
EG: Caster: 6 hits GM: Threshold 4 so you have 2 hits (rolls 3 willpower dice and 4 counterspelling dice) ...the target gets 2 hits, so you net no hits. The example above assumes 18 casting dice (Spellcasting 6, magic 6, mentor spirit for 2 and restricted gear rating 4 power focus) versus a target with willpower 3 and a enemy mage providing 4 counterspelling dice. On average its a tie and thus a fail. The threshold is HARSH and even moreso against Dwarves and such. It pretty much means you'll have to spend edge to net any hits and thats about as far as a nerf stick can go before flat out arbitrary removal. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#46
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 935 Joined: 2-September 10 Member No.: 19,000 ![]() |
Um, wouldn't the Threshold be 3 if the target's Willpower is 3?
I hate the idea of removing Control Thoughts. It is dumb and it sets a dangerous precedent. Control Thoughts is a perfectly balanced spell. You want to talk about a spell that's ACTUALLY broken? Stunbolt. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#47
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 301 Joined: 25-August 04 From: Tampa, FL Member No.: 6,602 ![]() |
Um, wouldn't the Threshold be 3 if the target's Willpower is 3? I hate the idea of removing Control Thoughts. It is dumb and it sets a dangerous precedent. Control Thoughts is a perfectly balanced spell. You want to talk about a spell that's ACTUALLY broken? Stunbolt. I'm 99% positive that SRM will not remove a core spell from play. SRM is now backed by ShadowRun, and how does it look to say that your sponsor has a rule that is so broke we can't play with it. I do agree with the stunbolt, it's been a problem for a while. Link: My dumpshock post/essay on why stun spells are broke |
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 935 Joined: 2-September 10 Member No.: 19,000 ![]() |
IMHO Stunbolt is the single most powerful spell in Shadowrun 4E, and is much more glaringly overpowered than in previous editions. You can cast it at whatever force you want and you will take no drain. Force 10 Stunbolt all day and all night. And it doesn't stop you from killing people.
But more importantly, THIS: QUOTE I'm 99% positive that SRM will not remove a core spell from play. SRM is now backed by ShadowRun, and how does it look to say that your sponsor has a rule that is so broke we can't play with it. I emphatically agree. Even including stunbolt. SRM has to be representative of the core game. It can't just go houseruling out spells. EDIT: Wow that topic you linked me to sure is old! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#49
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 165 Joined: 4-August 10 From: West Seattle, WA. Member No.: 18,888 ![]() |
I say BAN shadowrunners...there illegal anyway!!!!
PC creation process: Roll for which corp you start in, now here is your skill soft and datajack..... and 1 cubicle. PC created lets start to role play a day at work! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#50
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 151 Joined: 18-February 10 Member No.: 18,170 ![]() |
I say BAN shadowrunners...there illegal anyway!!!! PC creation process: Roll for which corp you start in, now here is your skill soft and datajack..... and 1 cubicle. PC created lets start to role play a day at work! Your first assignment is to extract some donuts from the office next door. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th March 2025 - 08:54 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.