IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Neurosis
post Oct 20 2010, 08:12 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 935
Joined: 2-September 10
Member No.: 19,000



This is an offshoot of the "Concealment Power in Combat Thread" below.

The assumption is that the invisibility spell provides Blind Fire penalties in combat or at least the same penalties it provides (based on hits) to Perception tests.

The question is:

If a character who is invisible opens fire with a weapon, attacks in melee, or does something else blatantly unsubtle, is the invisibility effect canceled?

I am aware that at the core of this discussion is what is, for me, a kind of foggy gray area between RAW, RAI, and House Rules. When I am GMing, I generally make it so that--like in D&D, a game system I am not even fond of--attacking while 'Cloaked' immediately 'Uncloaks' you. I know that this may technically be a House Rule. But my reason for enforcing this while GMing has to do with the fact that I think that, somewhere, there is evidence that supports this as the intention of the rules, even if I can't find them. Without this or something like it, the problem I feel is that Invisibility is disproportionately good. The fact that it lets you semi-reliably avoid detection is very powerful as-is. When you also have it impose a -6 PENALTY to all incoming attacks it becomes an all-around-better spell than things like Combat Sense because it also makes it so that you are incredibly difficult to hit.

So, I ask of you, GMs: at what level, if any, do you consider the PCs actions to be unsubtle enough that invisibility either goes away or is a wash? Please try to answer the question on an RAW level, an RAI level, and a how you you actually play level.

Side-Note: I read in an FAQ somewhere that Thermographic and other types of vision don't allow you to see Invisible characters. What about Astral Perception?

Even more tangenitally: Is there anything that anyone can do to conceal themselves on the astral plane i.e. while projecting? Does Invisibility, Concealment, or stealth work there at all?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Neurosis   Attacking Whilst Invisible   Oct 20 2010, 08:12 PM
- - deek   As long as the spell is up, they get the benefits ...   Oct 20 2010, 08:15 PM
|- - Medicineman   QUOTE (deek @ Oct 20 2010, 04:15 PM) As l...   Oct 21 2010, 01:12 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Invisibility definitely stays up regardless. Conce...   Oct 20 2010, 08:18 PM
- - Neurosis   Could you go into more detail about how Radar and ...   Oct 20 2010, 08:25 PM
- - Yerameyahu   AFAIK, the book specifically says attacking invisi...   Oct 20 2010, 08:27 PM
- - Neurosis   Getting into the subjective here, but what if you...   Oct 20 2010, 09:27 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Oh, jeez. Well, there are no rules for manually-di...   Oct 21 2010, 12:57 AM
- - SleepIncarnate   Doesn't improved invisibility beat just about ...   Oct 21 2010, 02:20 AM
- - Yerameyahu   It's still only 'normal visual spectrum...   Oct 21 2010, 02:22 AM
|- - Semerkhet   QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 20 2010, 09:22 PM...   Oct 21 2010, 05:13 PM
- - Glyph   Invisibility never worked like an "I don...   Oct 21 2010, 05:42 AM
- - Brainpiercing7.62mm   Invis has gotten more balanced in SR4, because you...   Oct 21 2010, 11:43 AM
- - Yerameyahu   AFAIK, 'pointing' does not count as Info-G...   Oct 21 2010, 04:46 PM
- - Yerameyahu   I agree, it's a funny rule. But, we do know ba...   Oct 21 2010, 05:29 PM
- - deek   Does "astral" count as a sense? If so, ...   Oct 21 2010, 05:43 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Astral is a special exception, basically. It...   Oct 21 2010, 05:53 PM
|- - Semerkhet   QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 21 2010, 11:53 AM...   Oct 21 2010, 06:00 PM
- - Yerameyahu   I agree: Concealment shouldn't work on Astral,...   Oct 21 2010, 06:04 PM
- - pbangarth   Even if Invisibility did work in the astral, or yo...   Oct 21 2010, 07:28 PM
- - TheScrivener   I wouldn't say it's unrealistic for an Inv...   Oct 21 2010, 08:03 PM
- - Yerameyahu   I think that's an important point: magic is fu...   Oct 21 2010, 08:09 PM
- - TheScrivener   My fallback for almost all invisibility-in-combat ...   Oct 21 2010, 08:16 PM
- - Yerameyahu   I wonder if the paint actually works against the s...   Oct 21 2010, 08:22 PM
- - TheScrivener   Absolutely. Invisibility or active camo is great ...   Oct 21 2010, 08:33 PM
- - KarmaInferno   Yeah, even with a stealth suit you shouldn't b...   Oct 21 2010, 09:13 PM
- - Neurosis   Okay, so if a character makes a non-visual percept...   Oct 22 2010, 12:29 AM
- - Yerameyahu   It doesn't work like that. Without a Perceptio...   Oct 22 2010, 12:51 AM
- - Neurosis   But you don't get the penalty to audio/smell p...   Oct 22 2010, 03:09 AM
|- - Neurosis   QUOTE But you don't get the penalty to audio/s...   Oct 22 2010, 04:55 AM
- - Yerameyahu   Which penalty? Blind Fire is a Ranged Combat penal...   Oct 22 2010, 04:09 AM
- - Yerameyahu   Oh. Yes, certainly not.   Oct 22 2010, 05:36 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd July 2025 - 07:28 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.