IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

23 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Fan letter to CGL, Because we care
CanRay
post Jan 6 2011, 12:06 AM
Post #376


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 5 2011, 04:45 AM) *
The point is, if you think it's going to be a crappy product, don't buy it. CGL is relying on the fact that we'll buy steaming turds if they have the words "Shadowrun" imprinted on it.

Oh, like the "Shadowrun" video game for the PC/X-Box 360!

Look how well that one went.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Acme
post Jan 6 2011, 12:25 AM
Post #377


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Joined: 28-July 10
From: Salem, Tir Tairngere
Member No.: 18,866



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jan 5 2011, 01:07 PM) *
But again, what's your goal? To get them to continue producing, but keep to the level of quality we've enjoyed before? Or to drive the line out of business?


About time someone else asks that. A boycott without an explanation is just going to make Topps think that the game line doesn't have interest any more and they'll kill it. Maybe someone else will pick it up, but there's no guarantee of that. At least with the letter writing, proven someone bothers reading it, they'd understand. And as it is, it's starting to sound like there's not just unanimous "War blows!" opinions here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 6 2011, 12:57 AM
Post #378


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jan 5 2011, 12:07 PM) *
But again, what's your goal? To get them to continue producing, but keep to the level of quality we've enjoyed before? Or to drive the line out of business?

My goal is twofold. One is to get them to stop using shady business practices. The second is to stop shoddy product. Boycotts serve to call attention to both. Letter writing campaigns serve to fill wastebaskets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jan 6 2011, 03:54 AM
Post #379


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 5 2011, 05:57 PM) *
My goal is twofold. One is to get them to stop using shady business practices. The second is to stop shoddy product. Boycotts serve to call attention to both. Letter writing campaigns serve to fill wastebaskets.


Well, Good Luck with that then... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jan 6 2011, 06:46 AM
Post #380


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Shoddy products? Shady business practices? Hell, I thought that was the goal of corporations in this day and age!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Acme
post Jan 6 2011, 11:08 AM
Post #381


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Joined: 28-July 10
From: Salem, Tir Tairngere
Member No.: 18,866



Well, you know, it could be a hell of a lot worse. Just look at Cyberpunk 3.0. At least Shadowrun hasn't resorted to using Barbie dolls for art..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 6 2011, 01:02 PM
Post #382


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Acme @ Jan 6 2011, 06:08 AM) *
Well, you know, it could be a hell of a lot worse. Just look at Cyberpunk 3.0. At least Shadowrun hasn't resorted to using Barbie dolls for art..

Have you looked at the SR4 cover recently?

Edit: …wait, it just clicked. The characters all look like they're miniatures!

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jan 6 2011, 02:15 PM
Post #383


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 5 2011, 07:57 PM) *
My goal is twofold. One is to get them to stop using shady business practices. The second is to stop shoddy product. Boycotts serve to call attention to both. Letter writing campaigns serve to fill wastebaskets.


Since neither of your goals seem to be 'get high-quality shadowrun products', I guess we're at cross-purposes then, and clearly your advice does not apply.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Jan 6 2011, 02:42 PM
Post #384


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jan 6 2011, 02:15 PM) *
Since neither of your goals seem to be 'get high-quality shadowrun products', I guess we're at cross-purposes then, and clearly your advice does not apply.


wait how is "stop making shoddy product" any different than 'get high-quality shadowrun products' other than on a basic semantic level.. Although I guess it means he'll settle for normal quality shadowrun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Jan 6 2011, 02:49 PM
Post #385


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 5 2011, 07:57 PM) *
My goal is twofold. One is to get them to stop using shady business practices. The second is to stop shoddy product. Boycotts serve to call attention to both. Letter writing campaigns serve to fill wastebaskets.

What's wrong with doing both?

I mean, you're coming down on the letter writing like it's going to actually hurt something. At worst it's a waste of time.




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jan 6 2011, 03:05 PM
Post #386


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



What would you suggest then? Tying someone to a chair and using The Chair Leg of Truth on them?

...

Actually, that might be an idea for a variety of problems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jan 6 2011, 03:12 PM
Post #387


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (sabs @ Jan 6 2011, 09:42 AM) *
wait how is "stop making shoddy product" any different than 'get high-quality shadowrun products' other than on a basic semantic level.. Although I guess it means he'll settle for normal quality shadowrun.


If the Shadowrun line dies, permanently, they would no longer be making 'shoddy products'. In fact, specifically, the best way to ensure no more shoddy products are made is to prevent ANY products from being made.

To the contrary, I'd rather shoddy products be made than no products. So I guess that puts us at odds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blade
post Jan 6 2011, 03:24 PM
Post #388


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,009
Joined: 25-September 06
From: Paris, France
Member No.: 9,466



From what I've been told, CGL has already reacted to the rumors of fan letter(s). Someone working on the French translation, who had already told CGL about the drop of quality, has been asked by one of CGL bosses (Bills I guess) to send a list of what's wrong with the book.

If you want to help, please post the errors you've found.
It's better if you stick to undebatable mistakes (for example, only post the use of carnivorous trees by Aztlan if you've got solid arguments to back it up) keep the description short, always give the page number and organize them in categories such as :
- editing (typos, layout problems, errors in names...)
- rules errors (contradiction with existing rules, broken gear/spell...)
- continuity error (contradiction with existing background, ic/ooc contradictions...)

Thank you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Jan 6 2011, 03:27 PM
Post #389


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jan 6 2011, 10:12 AM) *
If the Shadowrun line dies, permanently, they would no longer be making 'shoddy products'. In fact, specifically, the best way to ensure no more shoddy products are made is to prevent ANY products from being made.

To the contrary, I'd rather shoddy products be made than no products. So I guess that puts us at odds.

Seriously? You're not understanding that "stop making shoddy products" is meant to say "stop making shoddy products and go back to making good ones"?

Are we being reduced to petty dithering over semantics here?




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
otakusensei
post Jan 6 2011, 03:33 PM
Post #390


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 2-January 07
From: He has here a minute ago...
Member No.: 10,514



The only likelihood of Shadowrun not being produced is that:

A) Topps has a capitalism fail and decides that they don't want free money

B) Topps sells the rights for Shadowrun to someone who has a capitalism fail and decides that they don't want free money

C) Topps looks for a new publisher, and no one in the world wants to make new Shadowrun content

Just thought I'd mention. The publisher makes all the difference as far as quality goes. So anyway you manage to tell Topps that you aren't happy with way things are going, is a good way.

...

Well, maybe skip any of the options that sound like something you'd do in a game of Shadowrun. So no fun options, just stick to letter writing and boycotting or selective purchasing.

And seriously, if anyone has an insight on the corporate structure at Topps, or knows someone, it would be helpful. Just as a matter of making sure the letter gets to the right people and doesn't waste anyone's time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jan 6 2011, 03:50 PM
Post #391


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (CanRay @ Jan 6 2011, 04:05 PM) *
What would you suggest then? Tying someone to a chair and using The Chair Leg of Truth on them?

...

Actually, that might be an idea for a variety of problems.


Is there a Fred Christ working at Topps and/or CGL? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 6 2011, 03:51 PM
Post #392


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Blade @ Jan 6 2011, 10:24 AM) *
From what I've been told, CGL has already reacted to the rumors of fan letter(s). Someone working on the French translation, who had already told CGL about the drop of quality, has been asked by one of CGL bosses (Bills I guess) to send a list of what's wrong with the book.


I still plan on mailing my letter with a return receipt.

QUOTE
If you want to help, please post the errors you've found.
It's better if you stick to undebatable mistakes (for example, only post the use of carnivorous trees by Aztlan if you've got solid arguments to back it up) keep the description short, always give the page number and organize them in categories such as...


I (horror of horrors) pirated a copy of War! yesterday so I could take a peek through it to try and find some of these errors, although I haven't had the time to sit down and read it. I had no plans on purchasing it in the first place (the first I heard about it was here saying it was terrible). But I'll try and run it through a spellchecker later today.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jan 6 2011, 04:07 PM
Post #393


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Blade @ Jan 6 2011, 11:24 AM) *
If you want to help, please post the errors you've found.

How about they moved away from the design theory of War! being about, you know, WAR in the 2070s, and gave us a city splat book with some new gear? From what I understand, this is the major issue.

'Course, I have no issue of the book and can't comment one way or another properly. Someone confirm/deny this, please?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 6 2011, 04:09 PM
Post #394


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (CanRay @ Jan 6 2011, 11:07 AM) *
'Course, I have no issue of the book and can't comment one way or another properly. Someone confirm/deny this, please?


That's what I've heard. I'll try and read through it better at some point in the next week.

But from my skim last night it appears to be about Bogoda. Or however you spell that South American city's name (it has a whole chapter just about it).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Acme
post Jan 6 2011, 08:47 PM
Post #395


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Joined: 28-July 10
From: Salem, Tir Tairngere
Member No.: 18,866



Wow, Blade offers *gasp* a chance that maybe actually they'll fix the book and people are still complaining. I guess that's just the state of Dumpshock lately.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 6 2011, 08:54 PM
Post #396


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Acme @ Jan 6 2011, 03:47 PM) *
Wow, Blade offers *gasp* a chance that maybe actually they'll fix the book and people are still complaining. I guess that's just the state of Dumpshock lately.


Emphasized critical phrase.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jan 7 2011, 01:49 AM
Post #397


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



"Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!" - The Nac Mac Feegle, Wee Free Men, Terry Pratchett

A chance is not a "We'll fix it. Period."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 7 2011, 02:27 AM
Post #398


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (CanRay @ Jan 6 2011, 05:49 PM) *
"Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!" - The Nac Mac Feegle, Wee Free Men, Terry Pratchett

A chance is not a "We'll fix it. Period."

That's exactly my point. It took *how* many years for them to fix Augmentation?

Applying a little financial force isn't going to kill Shadowrun. On the contrary, it will make it better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheMadderHatter
post Jan 7 2011, 02:36 AM
Post #399


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 18-September 09
Member No.: 17,649



QUOTE (CanRay @ Jan 6 2011, 08:49 PM) *
A chance is not a "We'll fix it. Period."


And even if CGL said something to that effect, issuing an apology calling their own product shoddy and promising a rewrite (neither of which are really feasible from a corporate standpoint), I don't think many people currently angry over WAR! would, or should, quietly sit and wait for it. If anything, either they'll get tired and quit posting eventually or they'll be appeased by a visible change in the quality of the products.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 7 2011, 02:38 AM
Post #400


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



"Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me."

I'm not risking my money unless I am sure I am buying a quality product.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

23 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th January 2025 - 06:45 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.