IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

23 Pages V  « < 15 16 17 18 19 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Fan letter to CGL, Because we care
Cain
post Jan 7 2011, 02:44 AM
Post #401


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (TheMadderHatter @ Jan 6 2011, 06:36 PM) *
And even if CGL said something to that effect, issuing an apology calling their own product shoddy and promising a rewrite (neither of which are really feasible from a corporate standpoint), I don't think many people currently angry over WAR! would, or should, quietly sit and wait for it. If anything, either they'll get tired and quit posting eventually or they'll be appeased by a visible change in the quality of the products.

Worked for car manufacturers. CGL should be no different.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheMadderHatter
post Jan 7 2011, 03:23 AM
Post #402


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 18-September 09
Member No.: 17,649



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 6 2011, 09:44 PM) *
Worked for car manufacturers. CGL should be no different.

If you mean a recall, they don't work for car manufacturers, at least not in any positive sense. It's a very costly way of ensuring they don't get sued for someone dying due to a known flaw in their product, and it's only ever employed after all cheaper legal alternatives have been considered. It's almost purely a prophylactic measure.

No one's going to sue CGL over trauma caused by reading a poorly written book (and win), so it becomes much less likely that anyone on the corporate end is going to suggest that they hurt sales of an existing product still more by any sort of rewriting, at least this soon into the sales run.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kid Chameleon
post Jan 7 2011, 03:34 AM
Post #403


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 251
Joined: 17-March 10
From: Bug City
Member No.: 18,315



QUOTE (TheMadderHatter @ Jan 6 2011, 09:23 PM) *
If you mean a recall, they don't work for car manufacturers, at least not in any positive sense. It's a very costly way of ensuring they don't get sued for someone dying due to a known flaw in their product, and it's only ever employed after all cheaper legal alternatives have been considered. It's almost purely a prophylactic measure.


Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jan 7 2011, 03:51 AM
Post #404


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Jan 7 2011, 02:38 AM) *
"Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me."

I'm not risking my money unless I am sure I am buying a quality product.


Thank you. I've been fooled twice now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 7 2011, 04:07 AM
Post #405


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Doc Chase @ Jan 6 2011, 10:51 PM) *
Thank you. I've been fooled twice now.


I've been bit over computer games (hiss, Spore, hiss) so I'm significantly more cautious than I used to be. I'm even skeptical over Portal 2 and Natural Selection 2 (although I've paid for that already; I wanted beta access). With rare exception I don't buy anything unless its been out for at least 6 months.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Acme
post Jan 7 2011, 08:53 AM
Post #406


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Joined: 28-July 10
From: Salem, Tir Tairngere
Member No.: 18,866



Yeah, I think it's just time I stop posting on DS to save my health.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jan 7 2011, 09:40 AM
Post #407


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Then why do you post that to tell everyone?

Blade is making some progress - excellent. It's not a guarantee. I wouldn't even give it 50/50 odds of really addressing the issue. But it's a huge step.

We got two people who committed to sending letters (sent those yet??) - Good! Worst case, it ends up in the trash. Best case, someone actually listens.

We've got a bunch of people who are pausing to consider if War! is high enough quality to be worth spending their time and money on - Good! That's the strongest (although, IMO, most risky) avenue for communication.

I don't know why anyone is getting stressed out about this. This is a great thing. It's called a feedback loop. The people making the products get feedback on what went well and what didn't. That is a critical component of managing a product lifecycle! If CGL wasn't getting this information before, they really should be. If you discount the vitriol and look at the actual, hard results from this situation, it's been very positive. You can't get caught up in the fact that other people have different emotional states than you (and may be more aggressive in posting about it). Just understand that people love the product line, aren't happy with the product, but are taking active, constructive steps to address the gap. That's wonderful.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 7 2011, 09:43 AM
Post #408


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (TheMadderHatter @ Jan 6 2011, 07:23 PM) *
No one's going to sue CGL over trauma caused by reading a poorly written book (and win), so it becomes much less likely that anyone on the corporate end is going to suggest that they hurt sales of an existing product still more by any sort of rewriting, at least this soon into the sales run.

But you highlight the point. Sales pressure is the only kind of message they'll listen to. If War! flops, for whatever reason, they'll learn or the license will go to someone else.

Look, I'm not advocating wildcat strikes or anything of the sort. I'm simply pointing out that if it's a crappy product, don't spend your money on it. Wait until they have a good product to buy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheMadderHatter
post Jan 7 2011, 10:36 AM
Post #409


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 18-September 09
Member No.: 17,649



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 7 2011, 04:43 AM) *
But you highlight the point. Sales pressure is the only kind of message they'll listen to. If War! flops, for whatever reason, they'll learn or the license will go to someone else.

Look, I'm not advocating wildcat strikes or anything of the sort. I'm simply pointing out that if it's a crappy product, don't spend your money on it. Wait until they have a good product to buy.


And I never disputed that (although I think the writers have enough love of the craft that, all else being equal, they'd rather improve it than leave it be). I agree completely, in fact. Buying WAR! is probably the worst way to get any sort of change made to future products.

My original post in this vein referred to the comment that people are still complaining even after we've been told changes are being made. I intended to suggest that no amount of promised change, no matter how injurious to CGL those promises would be, is going to quiet those already clearly dissatisfied; that either time or improvement will. I was also indicating that it's probably a good thing that simply being told things are changing won't get people to stop complaining, if only because the alternative would suggest that damage control was a sufficient counter to consumer dissatisfaction. It is necessary but not sufficient.

My apologies for the confusion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 7 2011, 02:33 PM
Post #410


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jan 7 2011, 04:40 AM) *
We got two people who committed to sending letters (sent those yet??) - Good! Worst case, it ends up in the trash. Best case, someone actually listens.


No, it's sitting on my desk. <.<
Not like I'd get to the post office today anyway (lol snow*).

*I may not even make it into work. There's an accident between me and the freeway already, plus the freeway is backed up basically the whole length I need to travel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blade
post Jan 7 2011, 02:41 PM
Post #411


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,009
Joined: 25-September 06
From: Paris, France
Member No.: 9,466



I've sent my two registered letters (to CGL and Topps) today.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brazilian_Shinob...
post Jan 7 2011, 05:43 PM
Post #412


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,989
Joined: 28-July 09
From: Somewhere along the brazilian coast
Member No.: 17,437



I've sent letters to both Topps and CGL, copying the letter on nezumis 348th post of this thread.
I expect them to arrive in 2-3 weeks...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 7 2011, 09:42 PM
Post #413


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 5 2011, 01:50 PM) *
I've heard through the internet grapevine that Borders may be going out of business. So, that's one channel CGL can't use anymore.

...while in financial trouble the company itself is not completely going out of business but instead is scaling back their operations in an effort to restructure their debt. Along with stores under the Borders name, the parent company (Borders Group) also owns Waldenbooks and has already shut down over 100 WB stores with another 200 slated to close this year.

...don't expect them to have much in the way of new titles for a while though as part of the restructuring Borders has frozen payments to vendors prompting them (the vendors) to stop sending books to the company.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Jan 7 2011, 10:33 PM
Post #414


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid @ Jan 7 2011, 10:42 PM) *
...don't expect them to have much in the way of new titles for a while though as part of the restructuring Borders has frozen payments to vendors prompting them (the vendors) to stop sending books to the company.


Chrysler did that back in '07. It did not end well for them. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 8 2011, 10:35 AM
Post #415


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid @ Jan 7 2011, 01:42 PM) *
...while in financial trouble the company itself is not completely going out of business but instead is scaling back their operations in an effort to restructure their debt. Along with stores under the Borders name, the parent company (Borders Group) also owns Waldenbooks and has already shut down over 100 WB stores with another 200 slated to close this year.

...don't expect them to have much in the way of new titles for a while though as part of the restructuring Borders has frozen payments to vendors prompting them (the vendors) to stop sending books to the company.

Good to have confirmation, I only had internet rumor to go on.

I guess my point is, send letters if it makes you feel better. But don't expect results without applying financial pressure. War!, by all accounts is a crappy product. Don't spend your money on crap. Maybe a boycott of War! will get their attention.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Jan 8 2011, 11:07 AM
Post #416


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



QUOTE (Doc Chase @ Jan 6 2011, 07:50 AM) *
Is there a Fred Christ working at Topps and/or CGL? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


No, but it is funny you should bring up an alien cult in relation to CGL's difficulties...


TOS. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sarcastic.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jan 8 2011, 12:09 PM
Post #417


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 8 2011, 05:35 AM) *
I guess my point is, send letters if it makes you feel better. But don't expect results without applying financial pressure. War!, by all accounts is a crappy product. Don't spend your money on crap. Maybe a boycott of War! will get their attention.


I think the book sales issue is, for the most part, out of our hands. Hopefully that issue will settle itself. If not... I guess we're out-voted. At least we're doing what we can and waving our flags about trouble down the track.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Jan 8 2011, 01:54 PM
Post #418


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 8 2011, 11:35 AM) *
Good to have confirmation, I only had internet rumor to go on.


A posting in a mesage board is much more reliable than a internet rumor? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Jan 8 2011, 02:38 PM
Post #419


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



I'll send my two letters, too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jan 8 2011, 05:51 PM
Post #420


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (TheMadderHatter @ Jan 7 2011, 03:36 AM) *
And I never disputed that (although I think the writers have enough love of the craft that, all else being equal, they'd rather improve it than leave it be). I agree completely, in fact. Buying WAR! is probably the worst way to get any sort of change made to future products.


Assuming that you agree witht that sentiment, which some people do not...
Just Sayin'... :wobble
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jan 8 2011, 06:33 PM
Post #421


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



How about a group of Dumpshockers get the folks from CGL backed into a corner during a Con and explain in very calm and mature tones exactly how they screwed up in War!?

And, when that doesn't work, stop being calm and mature.

I'll bring The Chairleg of Truth!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 8 2011, 08:12 PM
Post #422


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (nezumi @ Jan 8 2011, 04:09 AM) *
I think the book sales issue is, for the most part, out of our hands. Hopefully that issue will settle itself. If not... I guess we're out-voted. At least we're doing what we can and waving our flags about trouble down the track.

Book sales is entirely in our hands. There's a question of how much profit they'll lose on this run, but if War! flops, future runs will be hurt and slashed deeply. This is what a company understands.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jan 8 2011, 08:58 PM
Post #423


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Cain @ Jan 8 2011, 01:12 PM) *
Book sales is entirely in our hands. There's a question of how much profit they'll lose on this run, but if War! flops, future runs will be hurt and slashed deeply. This is what a company understands.


I still think that you are being overly optimistic in this opinion Cain... As others have pointed out, By the time that the book hits the streets, CGL has already made their money on the product. I do not see a minor blip in the sales (which is all that you could POSSIBLY represent, and even then, not likely) will bother them in the slightest. It is not like there have not been such blips in the past 20 years of Shadowrun, I am sure, and it is not like there won't be others in the future. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omenowl
post Jan 8 2011, 11:27 PM
Post #424


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 473
Joined: 11-May 09
From: Fort Worth, TX
Member No.: 17,167



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jan 8 2011, 02:58 PM) *
I still think that you are being overly optimistic in this opinion Cain... As others have pointed out, By the time that the book hits the streets, CGL has already made their money on the product. I do not see a minor blip in the sales (which is all that you could POSSIBLY represent, and even then, not likely) will bother them in the slightest. It is not like there have not been such blips in the past 20 years of Shadowrun, I am sure, and it is not like there won't be others in the future. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)



If the book flops they won't make a reprint. They spent the money to publish it and they assume they will get a return as the book is sold to distributers/resellers. The pdf already sold. The physical copy has not. The other possibility is they will stop printing books and merely release pdfs then the quality doesn't have to be there to get a better return.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jan 9 2011, 12:35 AM
Post #425


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jan 8 2011, 12:58 PM) *
I still think that you are being overly optimistic in this opinion Cain... As others have pointed out, By the time that the book hits the streets, CGL has already made their money on the product. I do not see a minor blip in the sales (which is all that you could POSSIBLY represent, and even then, not likely) will bother them in the slightest. It is not like there have not been such blips in the past 20 years of Shadowrun, I am sure, and it is not like there won't be others in the future. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)

Like I said, there are 12,000 Dumpshockers alone. There's also a considerable number of Shadowrun fans on other web forums that link to here. Let's stick with just Dumpshcokers, and imagine the effect if they all boycotted War! I don't care how big your print run is, that would make more than a "minor blip".

Let's be a bit more reasonable and assume that only 10% of Dumpshockers know and care about War! and the CGL fiasco, enough to boycott. That's still a net loss of 1,200 books to CGL. Given the fact that the rpg hobby is a niche market at best, that's still going to be a hit to the bottom line.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

23 Pages V  « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th January 2025 - 11:18 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.