IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Using two pistols, and a smartlink 2...
Yasha
post Mar 18 2004, 06:37 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 20-December 02
Member No.: 3,759



I have come up with an idea on how to use two pistols with a Smartlink 2 with an extra ballistics processor. I picked the Smartlink 2 because it is the more advanced version. Anyway, I simply use the shotgun spread chart and the character’s Intelligence subtracted from 10 as the choke. If you shoot at the same target you get the -2TN for each weapon (all over mods apply, two weapon, ambidextrous. etc.). If you shoot at two targets they must be with the spread and then you only get a -1TN for each target.

Example: A crazy ex-Lone Star medic is shooting at two victims...err... targets. Her INT is 5. The targets are 15 meters away and 7 meters apart. At 15 meters away she would only be able to aim at targets 5 meters apart.

What do you guys think of that? And yes, go ahead and complain about how the rules say you can’t use two blah, blah, blah. If this has already been mentioned sorry I didn’t realize it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Mar 18 2004, 06:48 PM
Post #2


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



So the dumber you are the wider apart your targets can be? Or am i stupid? :dead:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 18 2004, 06:59 PM
Post #3


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I personally wouldn't even begin to allow it, but assuming it's allowed, I'd change that to be intelligence is maximum choke rather than choke at all.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Mar 18 2004, 08:19 PM
Post #4


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



Why would it be easier to shoot 2 weapons at 1 target that shooting a single weapon?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowGhost
post Mar 18 2004, 08:25 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 376
Joined: 14-July 03
Member No.: 4,928



I'll only allow dual-targeting smartlinks provided they are hardwired into a cranial kink-bomb set to explode when both smartlinks are active at the same time. :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yasha
post Mar 18 2004, 09:19 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 20-December 02
Member No.: 3,759



QUOTE
So the dumber you are the wider apart your targets can be? Or am i stupid?


The way I understand it the rating of the choke the number of meters before the next spread? Therefore someone with an INT of 2 would have a "choke" of 8. Meaning that every 8 meters the spread opens up two meters
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Steel Machine
post Mar 19 2004, 01:02 AM
Post #7


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Michigan
Member No.: 6,098



Searching these forums should reveal a number of threads that this has been hashed out in pretty well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tziluthi
post Mar 19 2004, 02:36 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 596
Joined: 18-February 03
Member No.: 4,112



Would't it make sense for quickness to replace INT in this case?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sidartha
post Mar 19 2004, 04:57 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Joined: 27-January 04
Member No.: 6,025



QUOTE
Would't it make sense for quickness to replace INT in this case?

Would you like me to tell you how many Quickness 10/11 characters I've had? ;)
I wouldn't like this for the simple reason that it requires the GM to either keep track of the exact position of all combatants and have more than a passing knowledge of triginomitry. Or, set up miniatures on a grid sheet that not everyone has, and have said Trig skills 8)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bearclaw
post Mar 19 2004, 04:31 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



Here's how I rule it:

If you've got two SGL2's implanted, and 2 pistols with SGL, and you shoot at one target, you get normal bonuses and penalties, including the -2 TN for the SGL. You also get the recoil penalties and stuff. I don't think firing multiple guns at the same target should be any harder than firing one, other than recoil and such.

If you've got two SGL2's implanted and 2 pislots with SGL and you try to shoot at different targets, you not only lose the bonus, you get an additional +2 because of the crazy sight reticals dancing around your eye's confusing you. As well as the penalty on the second one for firing at a different target.

If you only use one SGL, and have the other one off, then you get normal TN's (per the book) for both, including getting the SGL bonus for one. In other words, you're concentrating on the one you're shooting at with the SGL, so your base TN is 2, the other one you're just throwing a slug at, and your TN is 6.

That works for me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcb
post Mar 19 2004, 08:14 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 16-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 6,083



Wielding two handguns is such a Hollywood thing. If that is the feel your after in your game then go for it.

I would say though, get yourself two paintball guns, Nerf dart guns, Soft-air pellet guns or some similar safe toy handgun and have two of your buddies run around on either side of you and try to hit them with both guns simultaneously or even in very rapid succession. I think you will find duel-wielding pistols difficult at best. The off hand is going to really suck unless you have practiced with it a lot or are ambidextrous. In general it’s far easier to use one gun and engage both target one after the other.

As far as duel wielding handguns go I cannot think of any group now or since the inception of firearms where it is taught even to the most elite soldiers or swat officers. It is always taught to use one weapon at a time.

Even in the ‘old west’ carrying two or more handgun was not for duel wielding but because is took so darn long to load the old black powder revolvers and even with the invention of the cartridge based revolvers like the Colt peacemaker and other side gate loading single action pistols unloading and reloading was a chore done one chamber at a time. Even then it was rare that one could afford more than one side arm and not many that could afford it wanted the extra weight of the second gun on their belt.

It looks good on the big screen but I feel reality has proven it less then effective. Maybe with smart gun links you can argue otherwise. It is an RPG so don’t let reality stop you if you want to.

mcb
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 19 2004, 08:54 PM
Post #12


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



I'd have to agree that it's very hard. Seen a mate play a shooting game with the red gun in his left, blue in his right. if he need to shoot anything moving he rocked and his accuracy didn't suffer that much, but when it came to blue gun blue targets etc. both guns suffered majorly.

And that doesn't factor in recoil or the fact the targets may not be in a meter by meter square..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dEdDaWg
post Mar 19 2004, 11:41 PM
Post #13


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 26-February 02
From: The Morgue
Member No.: 676



Ok... instead of starting a whole new thread, I'll ask my question here (it's a related one). What kind of penalties would you give if a character wants to fire more than two firearms? Let's say the character has an articulated arm (or two) or maybe an eye-gun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Method
post Mar 20 2004, 06:13 AM
Post #14


Street Doc
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,508
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 6,114



QUOTE (mcb)
I cannot think of any group now or since the inception of firearms where it is taught even to the most elite soldiers or swat officers


mcb hit the nail on the head. Special Operators and CQB specialists don't even bother with two pistols because one is just more effective when you consider the loss of accuracy with two.

IRL they spend a great deal of time practicing "transitions"- changing from one weapon to another as quickly and efficiently as possible while under fire. They practice these until it is damn near a reflex action. A well trained operator will count the number of rounds he runs thought his SMG and will begin transitioning to his pistol almost as soon as the last round leaves the barrel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moonstone Spider
post Mar 20 2004, 12:09 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 20-November 03
Member No.: 5,834



I suppose you could create the skill "Off-hand pistols" or "Off-hand SMGs" and make the player take lots of extra skill if they want to fire two guns at once. That would be consistent with the melee weapon skills.

I seem to recall that in one of the books Hatchetman had two Smartlinks and had two reticules with different colors in his vision to tell them apart. While obviously the books aren't canon that would suggest it's possible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Mar 20 2004, 02:24 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



The rules are in SR3, and are pretty clear - you can fire 2 guns if you want, but you'll be on +2s for both guns, and uncompensated recoil from one gun effects the other. Smartlinks and Laser sites are no help.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowGhost
post Mar 20 2004, 05:45 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 376
Joined: 14-July 03
Member No.: 4,928



The only thing that will help with two guns is the enhance Aim Spell and Full Ambidexterity.

However, since Enhance Aim can be resisted by the target you're shooting at (all detection spells are resisted), it's ambiguous at best - it needs to be high force, sustained or in a sustaining focus, the TN is 6, with every two successes reducing your TN by for, up to 1/2 the force of the spell max.

I've found enhance aim to work really well with elemental manipulation area-effect spells. Just target the ground in front of the guys you want to frag (ground doesn't get to resist). Two successes on a force 2 enhance aim in a Force 2 Sustaining focus, and you're TNs are 2s (-1 TN for stationary target [the ground]).

This means a lot more dice to reserve for drain on Elemental Manips.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 20 2004, 06:12 PM
Post #18


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Regarding Hatchetman, if someone had two smartlink processors I would most definitely allow two reticles to exist, one tracking one gun, one the other. The smartlink would work perfectly, it just wouldn't give a bonus.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 12:53 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.