[X] My Assistant

[TheOOB]

I realize this might be a touchy subject, but it is my belief that lack of a cap on the magic attribute is irrelevant in 90+% of shadowrun games.

Your average starting magician has 5 in their magic. Assuming 7 average karma a run(taking the average of the 6-8 accepted), it takes approximatly 5 runs to get 6 in your magic, another 2 to initiate, and another 5 to 6 runs to get a 7 in magic. Your looking at a dozen or more runs just before the magician gets a 7, which mind you, isn't incredibly powerful(trolls starting with a body in the double digits is common, and most characters with 'ware I've seen start with 5(7) agility). After that you are looking 8+ runs for each additional point of magic, which takes quite some time. A what does each point of magic get you? +1 to sorcerery and conjuration rolls(not a huge bonus, will take a very high bonus before becoming irrelevant), and the ability to use spells/spirits 1 force higher without taking physical drain(which notable magic gives you no increased ability to absorb drain).

It takes a hugely long time to improve your magic attribute, longer and longer with each point above 6, and you pay for it, you really do, and remember the example above, those times are short. Thats a magician who a)isn't increasing any skills, b)isn't increasing any non magic attributes(including their drain attribute), and c)isn't binding any foci. While is is true magicians have no ceiling, it would take an absurdly long time for their magical abilities to get so powerful that it becomes unmanageable.

And remember, while the magician is doing that, the other characters aren't just twildling their thumbs, their increasing their skills and attributes, buying positive qualities, and installing increasingly better 'ware. 'ware(which magicians can't benefit strongly from without sacrificing their magical ability) while having a ceiling has a very very high ceiling with deltaware, to the point I've never seen a character that didn't feel like they couldn't advance anymore.

In fact, the only times I've every seen magicians being "overpowered" have always occured for 1 of 2 reasons, a)the GM never uses magical and astral defenses(they'll use guards and cameras for physical, ice and hackers for matrix, and maybe just a ward for astral), and b)The GM gives out way little money(While it is true karma gives magicians more power than any other archtype, without using 'ware nuyen is considerably less useful for them, meaning that if a GM gives less that 5k every run, of course the person who needs karma and not nuyen will prosper.

If the lack of a glass ceiling for magic is becoming a problem, either a)The GM needs to rethink how they balance the game, or b)the campaign has run on way too long and you might want to start a new one with fresh characters.

And to put another point, it IS the GM's job to make sure the game is balanced. The whole entire point of PnP games is that they are infinitely more flexible than electronic games, but the disadvantage is that the only thing that truly keeps the game running is the GM. Just as the book doesn't prevent you from having to roll dice for yourself, the book also doesn't prevent you from having to keep out of hand. The rewards for a run, the gear and equipment available, the challenges the party must over come are all 100% under the GM's control.

[Scyldemort]

Diminishing returns technically does occur once you max out your drain attributes, it just takes a while - sure, you can always get another die to resist drain with by increasing your initiation grade (if you have the centering attribute), but every point of magic is going to increase the potential drain you can take by +1P. Given that you're only likely to get 1 hit per three dice you roll, mages get to the point where they can no longer cast full powered spells.

Assume we have a mage with a willpower of 9 and a logic of 9. Let's give him magic six and six initiation grades. 24 dice for drain tests, and his drain from a maxed out spell is going to be 6 plus or minus spell modifiers. Normally, he should be fine (unless the spell has a DV of +3). He ups his magic and init grade both by 1 (7, 7). His drain from a maxed out spell is now 7 plus or minus spell modifiers.

8, 8: 8P+/-, 26 dice, no damage on average unless spell is at least DV +1
9, 9: 9P+/-, 27 dice, no damage on average unless spell is at least DV +1
10, 10: 10P+/-, 28 dice, takes 2P on average, +/- DV modifiers
11, 11: 11P+/-, 29 dice, takes 4P on average, +/- DV modifiers
12, 12: 12P+/-, 30 dice, takes 6P on average, +/- DV modifiers
13, 13: 13P+/-, 31 dice, takes 8P on average, +/- DV modifiers
And so on.

He could make a Drain Pact to help him, but Drain Pacts are addictive, and the spirit can cut off the service at any time (and they often demand karma as payment to keep that increasingly addictive sweetness flowing), and now we are traipsing down the path of burnout through addiction. Foci present the same problems with addiction, of course, which is a great way to lose points of Essence.

Not to mention, an opposing magician can always just dispel the quickened spells that are increasing our hypothetical magician's drain attributes. Or we could have geomancy that is aspected against the magician (which he can negate temporarily with appropriate metamagic), or any number of other things.

[darthmord]

I keep telling myself I need to make a mage character in order to force myself to read the magic rules in depth, but I feel I've read enough to question this.
Wouldn't an initiation grade of 8 allow you to raise your magic up to 9 again? Then again, capping magic would necessitate some re-wording of the rules. Maybe this is one of those things.

Well, you cannot have more Grades than Magic rating. So if you had Initiation of 8, you had 8 Magic already. So you could be anywhere from Magic 8 to Magic 15 at the time you reached Initiation Rank 8.

[longbowrocks]

Being able to do it in orbit? That's what the Ares bughunters do.

Will more magic increase your range? I thought you would want the hawkeye quality, or lots of myometric rope for that.

[Thanee]

Just put a maximum on Initiate Grade equal to 6 (or Essence (rounded down), whatever is lower). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Bye
Thanee

[bluedao]

The oppositions counterspelling scales at the same rate.
A bullet to the mages brain scales at almost the same rate.
Ambushes don't have to scale.

Their are many ways to deal with a omg i have magic 9000 mage. Their not what you have to watch for, frankly their easy to deal with cause their dumb. You have to watch for the clever mages. Their power lies in their flexibility and ability to adapt in ways no other kind of character can. Their the ones that will use a force 1 fire spirit to set off the fire alarm causing the entire building to lock down. Their the ones that will use magic fingers to pinch the waitresses causing a bar room fight to break out. Or who use their down time to teach their bound spirits muay thai. Fear the mage who realizes he isn't playing DnD, not the one who can kill you deader then you've ever been dead before.

Mages are scary from magic 1 on.

[Fortinbras]

Look, I am not a newb so please save the patronizing tone when it comes to GMing, I've been doing it for thirty years now

I have difficulty believing someone who uses the word "newb" has been doing anything for thirty years.
Unlimited Magic will not be a problem for your group. By the time it's an issue for your mage, everyone else will have a body full of deltaware and an army of drones to do their bidding.
If it's that big a deal, then: Magic maximum = 9. Done and done. I'll print it out in a pdf and call it a supplement if you want to make it official.
I also find it difficult to reconcile your distaste for static numbers and your feeling that GM fiat equates to a "broken" system.
If you really have been GMing for as long as you say, I'll presume your familiar with the OSR v. 4E argument of Rules v. Rulings(If not, it's well summed up here.) I also feel safe in the idea that someone gaming since John Lennon was still alive is more likely going to fall into the OSR camp, so your need for "system advice" seems a little left of center.

What I feel you are trying to do is make us sell you Shadowrun 4. Talk up it's positives, play down it's negatives and dissuade your fears and doubts in the hopes that you might be so kind as to grace our meager system with your trepidations consent. I'm not going to do that. You know your group and what they like better than I do. You know what they like, what they hate and what they'll exploit. You've also taken a good look at the SR4 book, so you've got a idea of the system. You have the information you seek, so an attempt to goad folks into an argument over hypothetical system mechanics accomplishes nothing.
If you like it, play it. If it's not for you, don't.
Just don't jump on board, claim our system is broken and then demand we fix it. That dog won't hunt.

[Faelan]

Sorry I stirred up a hornets nest, it was not my intent. I have examined the game in detail, own all the books, even ran a couple short mini-campaigns, but I don't like the way the magic is uncapped it creates a bias I am not entirely comfortable with. I guess I will just have to run with it and use initiation as its singular control valve.

"I have difficulty believing someone who uses the word "newb" has been doing anything for thirty years." -Fortinbras-

Once again if you took offense, felt I was trolling, or trying to whiz on your game, I apologize. I have owned every edition of the game, and while I was much more active with it during mostly the early 3rd edition years, I have always had a soft spot for the setting, and have considered seriously exploring it again since 4th came out. While I feel 4th has cleaned up, and fixed many of the problems or rather clutter of older editions, the Magic System is the one place where I feel that they took a step back, and it might not even entirely be the mechanics, but the individual spell descriptions. As to my use of an idiom which has nothing to do with my actual age, or duration of involvement, though if I were to use a similar word frozen in the chrysalis of the 70's I might more appropriately say noog or newg indicating the new guy, so once again sorry for offending you.

[Irion]

High magic had been a problem, when the attributes for so damn cheap.
(Because the attack pool went through the celling, but the defance pool stayed the same)
(It is still a problem, if you allow the "I take ware, I buy magic up from one to two" kind of stuff)
But without it, it aint.
If you have to pay 50 Karma for this one point of magic ( nine to ten), you wonder how this could be worth it in any way.
Only with background count. But having a backgroundcount of 6 would give you 6 dices less for your drain pool.
So in any way you would be better of getting automatics 0 to 5 and agility 2 to 3. And you can still got some Karma left.

(I still dislike how BC is managed, but thats an other slice of cake)

[Fortinbras]

Sorry I stirred up a hornets nest, it was not my intent. I have examined the game in detail, own all the books, even ran a couple short mini-campaigns, but I don't like the way the magic is uncapped it creates a bias I am not entirely comfortable with. I guess I will just have to run with it and use initiation as its singular control valve.

"I have difficulty believing someone who uses the word "newb" has been doing anything for thirty years." -Fortinbras-

Once again if you took offense, felt I was trolling, or trying to whiz on your game, I apologize. I have owned every edition of the game, and while I was much more active with it during mostly the early 3rd edition years, I have always had a soft spot for the setting, and have considered seriously exploring it again since 4th came out. While I feel 4th has cleaned up, and fixed many of the problems or rather clutter of older editions, the Magic System is the one place where I feel that they took a step back, and it might not even entirely be the mechanics, but the individual spell descriptions. As to my use of an idiom which has nothing to do with my actual age, or duration of involvement, though if I were to use a similar word frozen in the chrysalis of the 70's I might more appropriately say noog or newg indicating the new guy, so once again sorry for offending you.

No offense taken. You felt disrespected and unheard, so there was a bit of a lash involved, and thusly I felt the same way. No harm done. I'm also going to be in Critias' game a Texicon, and feel we Texans have to stick together.

As I said, by the time the mage's Magic gets out of hand everyone will have a Thor missiles from space anyway. I've yet to hear from anyone about a mage surpassing the abilities of the rest of the team because he had too high a Magic attribute. But if you feel it's an issue, cap Magic at 9. It's not a book rule because you want to leave such things open to dragons and Immortal Elves and what-not.
If the mage get's to 9 and you feel it's not enough, the ambient mana level of the Sixth World just increased to to whatever.
As for why most mages don't just let their magic go up and up and up, it's because 150+ Karma folks are extremely rare. Most Shadowrunners don't last that long and most normal people don't accumulate Karma that quickly. If you find someone with enough kaboom in their rear view to accumulate that much Magic, they pretty much should have that much Magic and be major player in the Sixth World. The type of mundane with enough Karma to push a mage past a usable limit is Damien Knight.

But do take it easy on the internet slang. At best it makes us sound like a kid counting his 100 pokemon. At worst it makes us sound like the old guy at the club. Now I'm not old, but I'm too old for the club.

[Mäx]

I have examined the game in detail, own all the books, even ran a couple short mini-campaigns, but I don't like the way the magic is uncapped it creates a bias I am not entirely comfortable with.

This is a point i have never understood, getting a super high (10+) magic doesn't really give you much of anything in a way of power boost over having a magic of 8-9, except maybe that you can go up into orbit and still use magic, which isn't much of an use on a shadowrun campaign.

And ofcource if you give the mage an even closely equal in power opposition, there isn't much he can do thanks to counterspelling.

[Thanee]

Their are many ways to deal with a omg i have magic 9000 mage.

I don't think there is a whole lot, that can effectively deal with a Magic 9000 Mage. Maybe a Magic 10000 Mage. Or the Drain. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)

Bye
Thanee

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

I've been seriously considering the following house rule: if you overcast, you take drain BEFORE you roll the spellcasting test.

And that would change anything how? You take the drain regardless of whether the spell is effective. In actuality, you take it as you cast, so it really changes nothing. And really, A F9 Stunball has almost no drain to it whatsoever.

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

Sorry no disdain here, but seriously when the GM is the only thing keeping a rule from breaking a game it deserves to be looked at. In previous editions controlling initiations was no where near as important due to the way the target numbers were set up. You hit a point of seriously diminishing returns, in SR4 that point never really occurs.

Actually, that point arrives at about magic 9 in SR4. Assuming, of course, that you allow that advancement, which seems obvious from your posts.

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

If the mage get's to 9 and you feel it's not enough, the ambient mana level of the Sixth World just increased to to whatever.
As for why most mages don't just let their magic go up and up and up, it's because 150+ Karma folks are extremely rare. Most Shadowrunners don't last that long and most normal people don't accumulate Karma that quickly. If you find someone with enough kaboom in their rear view to accumulate that much Magic, they pretty much should have that much Magic and be major player in the Sixth World. The type of mundane with enough Karma to push a mage past a usable limit is Damien Knight.

I have to agree with Fortinbras, and It cannot be said enough. High Magic characters are rare. And in fact, are more common in 3rd Edition than in 4th Edition. At least from my experience. Since every character stareted out with a 6 Magic, by default, in earlier editions, it was easier to gain that high magic rating. Especially since it was granted automatically each and every time that you Initiated. 3 Initiations and you were at a 9.

4th Edition, that is no longer the case. I woulds argue that Most Mages DO NOT start at the 5-6 Range as was stated earlier. Most mages I have seen in 4th start at Magic 3-4, with the odd one at Magic 5-6 (Yes, Yerameyahu, I know). At that point, Initiations cost points, and yet you do not increase in Magic along with the initiation, you have to raise the Magic attribute seperate. We have a fairly long running game, with characters in the 300-350 Karma range. Our Magician has a magic of 7, and 5 Initiate Grades. He really has no need to have a higher magic than 7, as the things he wants dead usually die with a single spell. Why put the points into something that gives out such little return on investment (you can only be so dead, after all)? Especially when the mage is in need of additional Spells, additional Skill increases, additional Foci (he only has 2 currently), Need for increased Attributes, and even the need for new skills.

Put a mage in a white room, and you will quickly come to the conclusion that he is so overpowered that he should never be allowed into play. His magic can go through the roof, and no one can compete with him on any level. Put that mage into the World he lives in, and it comes out completely different. Life happens, and the points that he wanted to spend on that new Ally Spirit he has been saving up for go into the trash as he uses those points to cover a hole he has discovered because of lack of Skill, or lack of Spell. I see it happen all the time. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smokin.gif)

[Fringe]

Except that the Natural Maximum will increase with Initiation Grades. Starts at 6, Each Initiation raises that Maximum by a Point. And nothing raises Magic through augmentation (Like Power Foci used to do in previous editions). Honestly, I have never seen Magic get so high it becomes an issue. I have seen a Grade 8 Initiate Adept with a Magic Rating of 11 once. He was not really over the top in any regard. Dice Pools in SR4A for that character were still below 20 for all of his actions.

Ignoring Background count with Initiation is counter to everything Shadowrun. That is why there are Metamagics to help compensate for it, but not just ignore it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)

What I'm trying to suggest is to consider initiation to be the augmentation. ("If you consider initiation to be a sort of magical "augmentation", then the augmented maximum would be 1.5 x the natural maximum.") Under such a system, initiation would do nothing to the natural maximum. (Of course, then there's additional tracking of being able to have a certain "augmented" Magic vs. actually having a different Magic score if you haven't paid to raise the Magic score.)

"Counter to everything Shadowrun"? I disagree, since you point out that metamagics are available to compensate, and especially since the Cleansing power allows the complete (albeit temporary) removal of an existing BC (assuming the initiate rolls well enough). Clearly, it's not RAW, but such a house rule wouldn't necessarily destroy the "Shadowrun-ness" of the setting or game. If it does, then you're overusing BCs.

I'll agree with you on one point: I also have never seen a Magic rating get high enough to become a problem, at least not in 4th ed. Quite the contrary, I've seen more than one mage initiate multiple times while never increasing Magic. (My Missions character, for example, is an uncybered grade-2 initiate with Magic 5. There just isn't enough Karma...)

[Fringe]

And that would change anything how? You take the drain regardless of whether the spell is effective. In actuality, you take it as you cast, so it really changes nothing. And really, A F9 Stunball has almost no drain to it whatsoever.

But the suggestion to take the drain before the spellcasting test does one thing: If you fail to soak all of the drain, what's left would give you the appropriate wound modifier to the spellcasting test. True, a F9 stunball/bolt/whatever spell has almost no drain, but occasionally a point or so will get through.

I disagree with this house rule, though. I think there's enough of a cost to cast spells in the drain as written to inspire caution. Where I suspect a lot of people have a problem is where the stun spells have lower drain than other combat spells. I'm not sure where that line lies, though, since you have to balance the usefulness of the spell (doing only stun damage, unless you overflow the target's stun monitor) against its limits (having no effect if the target lacks a stun monitor, like a drone or vehicle). I suspect the usefulness outweighs the limitations in most cases, so if I had been writing the spell list stunbolt/ball would be at least even with manabolt/ball as far as drain. On one hand, a mage can learn multiple spells and choose which one to cast based on situation. On the other hand, you have characters like my Missions character whose only combat spells are stuns (for roleplaying reasons), but are in trouble against drones.

[Draco18s]

So to get to Magic 9 that takes 150 karma, and if we set the, what I consider to be, average amount of karma earned per session to 4 and playing once a week we're talking 38 weeks to get to that IF the mage put every single point into getting their magic up, which would be surprising.

4 karma a session? You clearly play with increased karma costs (5x New Attribute) but at the old Karma rewards level (max 7 per session) and not the new (average 7 per session).

[Cheops]

The problem you are going to run into in a long campaign, if you have a clever player, is a mage who plows most of their points into increasing their grimoire. The single biggest break point of magic is the sheer versatility of spells and the number of unique tricks they have. You should be happy if your player spends all his karma on Magic attribute instead of more spells -- he is severely crippling his ability. 5-6 Initiations is usually all you'll ever need to get the Metamagics you are looking for. If you want to allow a player to have more metamagics than his Magic attribute allows just use the optional rules in Street Magic. That may alleviate the need to keep raising Magic.

I should be so lucky to have players that get off on casting their force 10 powerbolts (well, I have 1 player like that) -- most of them prefer finding clevers ways to wreck my carefully planned runs with one spell I didn't consider. Levitate and Clairvoyance tend to be big culprits. Honorable mention goes to Shapechange and Mind Probe.

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

What I'm trying to suggest is to consider initiation to be the augmentation. ("If you consider initiation to be a sort of magical "augmentation", then the augmented maximum would be 1.5 x the natural maximum.") Under such a system, initiation would do nothing to the natural maximum. (Of course, then there's additional tracking of being able to have a certain "augmented" Magic vs. actually having a different Magic score if you haven't paid to raise the Magic score.)

I'll agree with you on one point: I also have never seen a Magic rating get high enough to become a problem, at least not in 4th ed. Quite the contrary, I've seen more than one mage initiate multiple times while never increasing Magic. (My Missions character, for example, is an uncybered grade-2 initiate with Magic 5. There just isn't enough Karma...)

Understandable...

Yes, I see much more in the way of Initiation than I do in the Increase of Magic Rating. And you hit it right on the head. There JUST ISN'T enough Karma , which is why I think you are worrying about it for no reason. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

[Tymeaus Jalynsfe...]

But the suggestion to take the drain before the spellcasting test does one thing: If you fail to soak all of the drain, what's left would give you the appropriate wound modifier to the spellcasting test. True, a F9 stunball/bolt/whatever spell has almost no drain, but occasionally a point or so will get through.

You cannot have drain without the Spellcasting, though, as it has not happened yet. Drain is a result of the spellcasting, not the other way around, which is why it does not work as intended.

I disagree with this house rule, though. I think there's enough of a cost to cast spells in the drain as written to inspire caution. Where I suspect a lot of people have a problem is where the stun spells have lower drain than other combat spells. I'm not sure where that line lies, though, since you have to balance the usefulness of the spell (doing only stun damage, unless you overflow the target's stun monitor) against its limits (having no effect if the target lacks a stun monitor, like a drone or vehicle). I suspect the usefulness outweighs the limitations in most cases, so if I had been writing the spell list stunbolt/ball would be at least even with manabolt/ball as far as drain. On one hand, a mage can learn multiple spells and choose which one to cast based on situation. On the other hand, you have characters like my Missions character whose only combat spells are stuns (for roleplaying reasons), but are in trouble against drones.

Spell selection is Key. It is why my current Magical Character (Mystic Adept with 2 Spellcasting, 3 Adept Split) has 31 spells or so(with a list of another 30 or so to learn) . And honestly, that is what makes a versatile mage. Spell Selection is King, not how powerful a spell that they can cast.

[James McMurray]

Trying to pull this back on topic and identify/rectify Faelen's specific concerns:

Since you resist spells with a fixed attribute it strikes me that no matter what happens eventually the Magic characters are going to have a completely different level of ability when compared with unawakened characters.

The attributes that you resist with are usually easier to boost than magic (except Willpower for soem reason), and counter spelling is there to augment them as well. While it is true that a mage at 150 karma has a 8 or 9 magic, he's still only tossing 15-ish dice and the other characters have had 18+ dice in their specialties since character creation.

Anyway I am looking for ideas, I want something that works, because as it stands I don't see how a long running game can survive, and since most of my games last a while, I don't want to get into something that will give me headaches down the road.

I think this is a large part of the disconnect people are feeling here. you don't see how it can possibly work, when many of the posters have sat at the table and watched it work.

I worry because spells offer very powerful stackable defensive options which cyberware and bioware do not.

Have you seen the kinds of things someone can cram into their body? Wired reflexes, bone lacing, pain editors, and all the rest don't require any karma at all and they don't come attached to a -2 dice penalty for sustaining spells. I guess I'm just not seeing the lack of options taht'ware is supposed to have. What sorts of high-powered combos worry you?

Likewise all three lack in the offensive options.

All three what? If you mean magic, cyber, and bioware then I'm just confused, since it sounds like you're saying they're balanced offensively. If you're saying 'ware and something else, then in general those things don't need a lot of offensive options because a bullet to the face stops just about anyone in their tracks.

SR4A is definitely set up for a more dice = more successes, and when one characteristic in the game which can influence things as much as magic is given a completely free reign (yes I know GM control, well if it requires it, it is just not designed that well) it is a recipe for issues. I am just looking for options within the framework of the mechanics which would provide the kind of play I want to see supported at my table from the beginning to the very highest strata of the game.

A recipe for what issues. Perhaps if you had specific concerns we could help more? In general counter spelling + base resistance rolls means the attacking mage is at a disadvantage. On defense the mage might have the edge, but only if he's willing to negate his dice pools or drop a lot of karma. In social situations the face is much better than the mage since even Control Thoughts is only a die pool modifier.

Sorry no disdain here, but seriously when the GM is the only thing keeping a rule from breaking a game it deserves to be looked at.

The GM is not the only think holding the rule in chekc. The rule itself is. What are the other players doing with the 150 karma the mage spent to get 3 extra dice?

Sorry I stirred up a hornets nest, it was not my intent. I have examined the game in detail, own all the books, even ran a couple short mini-campaigns, but I don't like the way the magic is uncapped it creates a bias I am not entirely comfortable with.

Can you explain the bias you're seeing? Is it a gut feeling of "that ain't right," a technical flaw you can lay out in detail, or something you've seen in actual play?

[Mäx]

While it is true that a mage at 150 karma has a 8 or 9 magic, he's still only tossing 12-ish dice and the other characters have had 18+ dice in their specialties since character creation.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
Mage with 9 magic should have much more then 12 dice, hell all of my starting mage builds have more then that for their speciality.
Both of the following are combat spell dice pools of mystic adept characters:
Magic 2 + spellcasting 4 + specialization 2 + mentor 2 + spellcasting focus 5 = 15 dice
Magic 4 + spellcasting 4 + specialization 2 + mentor 2 + power focus 4 = 16 dice

So if a pure mage character with magic 9 only ha 12-ish dice, somethink is seriously wrong.

[Yerameyahu]

Admittedly, that's the 'obscene munchkinism' school of thought. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) You absolutely can make it much higher, but some people have asked 'why bother'?

For me, the real 'danger' of a (unrealistically-) high karma Awakened is the Mysad with augmentations. More Magic doesn't make a spellcaster vastly stronger than Mäx's 'starting' examples, but more PP (and of course metamagic) sure does.

[James McMurray]

Sorry, had a brain fart. It should have been 15-ish dice. I was ignoring specialization and mentors because they don't apply every time you use the ability, though you're right that they're worth another 4 dice. I'm also ignoring power foci because we're talking about 150 karma spent towards initiating and raising magic. Your numbers are adding another 32 karma on top of that.

Then again, let's go ahead and include all of that. The basic magician's starting pool is 5 Magic + 5 Sorcery + 2 Mentor + 2 Specialization = 14. After 32 karma it jumps to 18 from a power focus. Why on earth is he spending 150 karma for another 3 dice? And did he never get any other foci, quicken/anchor any spells, or realize there was a skill he wanted that he hadn't started with?