![]() ![]() |
Mar 24 2004, 11:23 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior GM ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,406 Joined: 12-April 03 From: Redmond, WA Member No.: 4,442 |
We all know that Cybereyes hold .5 essence of options at no further essence loss, but...
Say I buy a pair of replacement Cybereyes (.2 essence) and have them implanted with Low-light (.2), Thermo (.2), and Image Link (.2). The sum of the options is .6 essence. There appears to be two ways I might interpret the rule in the book. It might be that only complete options fit inside, and I have to pick one of the options to be completely outside the eye. With this method I lose .2 + .2 essence. It might be that I do simple arithmetic. The sum of the options is .6, and .5 of that is covered by the eye. Therefore my total loss is .2 + .1 essence. Which way do you play? Is your way Canon? Main description from the book. SR3.299 "Cybereyes": Cybereyes will accept additional vision enhancements of up to .5 Essence Cost without further Essence loss. |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2004, 11:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191 |
The way i see it (and i'm going to run for cover after i say this), they can fit part of that last .2 essence option into the eye but have to let the other .1 dangle out into oyur ocular cavities, possibly in the back, between the cybereye and your skull.
Then again, it's been proven that i'm not as rigid as some of the posters on this site. |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2004, 11:29 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 478 Joined: 18-December 03 From: Louisville, KY Member No.: 5,918 |
Well, at .6 Essence you're over the limit, so I'd advise going alphaware. I'd personally say if it's over.5, it costs you the extra essence.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 12:09 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Interesting -- I've never seen it be a problem before, but I've always gone with (.2 + .1 for spilling out of the eye) way myself.
-Siege |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 01:48 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 596 Joined: 18-February 03 Member No.: 4,112 |
Likewise. I figure that the rules are pretty arbitrary, so they don't have to make a lot of sense :)
That and nowhere does it state that it is either all or nothing for the cybereye mods. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 02:48 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 407 Joined: 22-March 04 Member No.: 6,183 |
I use the simple arithmetic method. Whatever essense cost over the .5 you incur, you pay for in extra essence. Of course, you could say that the .5 is a sort of cybereye FCU, and that it represents a total amount of space that can be filled. Therefore, the image link in the above example could not be taken, but something like flare comp could. That's probably being a little anal, but would prevent a pair of cybereyes with cameras, low-light, thermo, flare comp, MS vision, lasers, a datajack and a toaster in them.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 02:52 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191 |
As long as you pay the essence cost for the toaster, why couldn't you cram it in someplace?
My thinking is, that .5 was the default essence for some default, off-the-shelf cybereyes. You can get SOTA toaster models, but they're gonna cost you more chedda and more essence. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 03:16 AM
Post
#8
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 407 Joined: 22-March 04 Member No.: 6,183 |
Plus you have to consider if you want a 2-slice model or 4. I've even heard that Sader-Krupp is researching deltatoasters with orichalcum heating elements, but no new info has come to light
Heh heh...I have a suggestion. :grinbig: |
||
|
|
|||
Mar 25 2004, 03:53 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191 |
Oh, i see. That's... that's hysterical.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 05:06 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
If a modification takes it over the 0.5 "free" limit, you incur the full cost of the modification. Check out the example of the covert ops specialist on pg. 61 of the main book. She has Low-Light, Thermographic, Retinal Duplication, and Flare Compensation, giving her 0.48 Essense worth of modifications, which are free. Then they say that the Camera modification costs 0.32 Essense. Note - not 0.30 Essense (3.2 minus the 0.02 of free Essense remaining), but 0.32. So by canon, modifications only count towards the "free" Essense space of cyberears and cybereyes if you can fit the entire Essense cost of the modification in.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 05:10 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,751 Joined: 8-August 03 From: Neighbor of the Beast Member No.: 5,375 |
Well, you could just get alphaware add-ons for the eyes. That would get you an extra .1 Essence.
OK, I admit its a quick fix and not a solution but it solves the example problem. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 05:17 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior GM ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,406 Joined: 12-April 03 From: Redmond, WA Member No.: 4,442 |
Very good, Glyph. I noticed that last night and decided to take a poll to see if anyone played it that way. I think the polling was about 22 to 2 before your post. All 5 votes since them have been the book's way.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 05:24 AM
Post
#13
|
|||
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,751 Joined: 8-August 03 From: Neighbor of the Beast Member No.: 5,375 |
And here I thought toturi was the Archangle of Rules Fu... |
||
|
|
|||
Mar 25 2004, 05:32 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
No, torturi is the Archangel of Rules-Fu.
I'm the Archangle of Rules-Fu. I'm very acute. :D |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 05:35 AM
Post
#15
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191 |
Ow. |
||
|
|
|||
Mar 25 2004, 05:53 AM
Post
#16
|
|||
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,751 Joined: 8-August 03 From: Neighbor of the Beast Member No.: 5,375 |
Clever. :P |
||
|
|
|||
Mar 25 2004, 06:07 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 26-February 02 From: BC Member No.: 1,677 |
Add up and subtract .5 essence.
Check out p.44 MM for eye mod limits. Basically you get max 1.2 essence of mods installed per pair of eyes, and only one accessory per eye may be an opticam, laser, or weapon system. [edit]I really should have more coffee when I wake up and before I start arguing - ignore me[/edit] |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 06:40 AM
Post
#18
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 407 Joined: 22-March 04 Member No.: 6,183 |
Thanks, Mimick. I had completely forgotten about that. |
||
|
|
|||
Mar 25 2004, 07:00 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 614 Joined: 17-June 03 From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas Member No.: 4,754 |
Which version of the main book is that math from, about the covert ops specialist. There is some FAQ regarding how exactly this is handled, and Im wondering if its the current printing that is done that way. Because Ive always seen it done as the net cost - .5 = applied cost. It could be that the correct template is in fact done this way. Or not, but thats what Im posting to find out.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 07:15 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 407 Joined: 22-March 04 Member No.: 6,183 |
It's on Page 61 of SR3.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 11:09 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 26-February 02 From: BC Member No.: 1,677 |
I'd forgotten those too until I had a player who wanted to cram almost everything into his eyes.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 03:49 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior GM ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,406 Joined: 12-April 03 From: Redmond, WA Member No.: 4,442 |
The White Dwarf, I just checked the FAQ and don't find this issue addressed.
Perhaps the FAQ entry you are thinking of is about Alphaware options in an Alphaware eye: do you count the original option Essence amount or the reduced option essence amount when determining what fits inside the .5 limit? At one point the FAQ stated you use the original option essence amount, but the FAQ has been revised to match what the book describes for the Covert Ops Specialist on p. 61. You count the reduced option essence amount when determining what fits within the .5 limit. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 03:53 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,548 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
Something else I've been thinking of doing in my games...
If you read a lot of cyberpunk books, and even the old runs (Crimson Mary I think it is, from Dragon Hunt), some cyber eyes are really in a class of their own, and thats reflected in the price. I've been thinking of making certain cyber eyes which cost significantly more than standard (like quadruple the price), but come with certain features essence free, for instance level 2 mag, flare comp., "basic" stuff every simsense star would need. Maybe this would be a good place to introduce them, so those cyber eyes that are so expensive, they're removed from the star's body as soon as her contract expires. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 06:21 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 675 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 2,034 |
The archtypes are notoriously illegal charachters though. Personally I would never even try to look up something like this. Why go out of your way to stick it to the player over a measly 0.1 eyeware essence?
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2004, 06:28 PM
Post
#25
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 407 Joined: 22-March 04 Member No.: 6,183 |
It was mostly (for me anyway) curiosity. I, and most other people, by the looks of the poll, just tack on the extra Essence. |
||
|
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th November 2025 - 12:02 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.