IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> .5 Essence of Options hidden in CyberEyes, two ways of doing the arithmetic
Cybereyes accept up to .5 essence points of options without further essence loss. How do you calculate this?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 93
Guests cannot vote 
RedmondLarry
post Mar 24 2004, 11:23 PM
Post #1


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



We all know that Cybereyes hold .5 essence of options at no further essence loss, but...

Say I buy a pair of replacement Cybereyes (.2 essence) and have them implanted with Low-light (.2), Thermo (.2), and Image Link (.2). The sum of the options is .6 essence.

There appears to be two ways I might interpret the rule in the book. It might be that only complete options fit inside, and I have to pick one of the options to be completely outside the eye. With this method I lose .2 + .2 essence.

It might be that I do simple arithmetic. The sum of the options is .6, and .5 of that is covered by the eye. Therefore my total loss is .2 + .1 essence.

Which way do you play? Is your way Canon?

Main description from the book. SR3.299 "Cybereyes":
Cybereyes will accept additional vision enhancements of up to .5 Essence Cost without further Essence loss.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Mar 24 2004, 11:28 PM
Post #2


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



The way i see it (and i'm going to run for cover after i say this), they can fit part of that last .2 essence option into the eye but have to let the other .1 dangle out into oyur ocular cavities, possibly in the back, between the cybereye and your skull.
Then again, it's been proven that i'm not as rigid as some of the posters on this site.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Grifter
post Mar 24 2004, 11:29 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 478
Joined: 18-December 03
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 5,918



Well, at .6 Essence you're over the limit, so I'd advise going alphaware. I'd personally say if it's over.5, it costs you the extra essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Mar 25 2004, 12:09 AM
Post #4


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Interesting -- I've never seen it be a problem before, but I've always gone with (.2 + .1 for spilling out of the eye) way myself.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tziluthi
post Mar 25 2004, 01:48 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 596
Joined: 18-February 03
Member No.: 4,112



Likewise. I figure that the rules are pretty arbitrary, so they don't have to make a lot of sense :)

That and nowhere does it state that it is either all or nothing for the cybereye mods.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Mar 25 2004, 02:48 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



I use the simple arithmetic method. Whatever essense cost over the .5 you incur, you pay for in extra essence. Of course, you could say that the .5 is a sort of cybereye FCU, and that it represents a total amount of space that can be filled. Therefore, the image link in the above example could not be taken, but something like flare comp could. That's probably being a little anal, but would prevent a pair of cybereyes with cameras, low-light, thermo, flare comp, MS vision, lasers, a datajack and a toaster in them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Mar 25 2004, 02:52 AM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



As long as you pay the essence cost for the toaster, why couldn't you cram it in someplace?

My thinking is, that .5 was the default essence for some default, off-the-shelf cybereyes. You can get SOTA toaster models, but they're gonna cost you more chedda and more essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Mar 25 2004, 03:16 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



Plus you have to consider if you want a 2-slice model or 4. I've even heard that Sader-Krupp is researching deltatoasters with orichalcum heating elements, but no new info has come to light

QUOTE
why couldn't you cram it in someplace?


Heh heh...I have a suggestion. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Mar 25 2004, 03:53 AM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



Oh, i see. That's... that's hysterical.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Mar 25 2004, 05:06 AM
Post #10


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



If a modification takes it over the 0.5 "free" limit, you incur the full cost of the modification. Check out the example of the covert ops specialist on pg. 61 of the main book. She has Low-Light, Thermographic, Retinal Duplication, and Flare Compensation, giving her 0.48 Essense worth of modifications, which are free. Then they say that the Camera modification costs 0.32 Essense. Note - not 0.30 Essense (3.2 minus the 0.02 of free Essense remaining), but 0.32. So by canon, modifications only count towards the "free" Essense space of cyberears and cybereyes if you can fit the entire Essense cost of the modification in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Mar 25 2004, 05:10 AM
Post #11


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



Well, you could just get alphaware add-ons for the eyes. That would get you an extra .1 Essence.

OK, I admit its a quick fix and not a solution but it solves the example problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 25 2004, 05:17 AM
Post #12


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



Very good, Glyph. I noticed that last night and decided to take a poll to see if anyone played it that way. I think the polling was about 22 to 2 before your post. All 5 votes since them have been the book's way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Mar 25 2004, 05:24 AM
Post #13


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



QUOTE (OurTeam @ Mar 25 2004, 05:17 AM)
Very good, Glyph. I noticed that last night and decided to take a poll to see if anyone played it that way. I think the polling was about 22 to 2 before your post. All 5 votes since them have been the book's way.

And here I thought toturi was the Archangle of Rules Fu...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Mar 25 2004, 05:32 AM
Post #14


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



No, torturi is the Archangel of Rules-Fu.

I'm the Archangle of Rules-Fu.

I'm very acute. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Mar 25 2004, 05:35 AM
Post #15


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



QUOTE (Glyph @ Mar 25 2004, 12:32 AM)
I'm the Archangle of Rules-Fu.

I'm very acute. :D

Ow.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Mar 25 2004, 05:53 AM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



QUOTE (Glyph)
No, torturi is the Archangel of Rules-Fu.

I'm the Archangle of Rules-Fu.

I'm very acute. :D

Clever. :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mimick
post Mar 25 2004, 06:07 AM
Post #17


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 26-February 02
From: BC
Member No.: 1,677



Add up and subtract .5 essence.

Check out p.44 MM for eye mod limits. Basically you get max 1.2 essence of mods installed per pair of eyes, and only one accessory per eye may be an opticam, laser, or weapon system.

[edit]I really should have more coffee when I wake up and before I start arguing - ignore me[/edit]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Mar 25 2004, 06:40 AM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



QUOTE (Mimick @ Mar 25 2004, 01:07 AM)


Check out p.44 MM for eye mod limits.  Basically you get max 1.2 essence of mods installed per pair of eyes, and only one accessory per eye may be an opticam, laser, or weapon system.


Thanks, Mimick. I had completely forgotten about that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post Mar 25 2004, 07:00 AM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



Which version of the main book is that math from, about the covert ops specialist. There is some FAQ regarding how exactly this is handled, and Im wondering if its the current printing that is done that way. Because Ive always seen it done as the net cost - .5 = applied cost. It could be that the correct template is in fact done this way. Or not, but thats what Im posting to find out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Mar 25 2004, 07:15 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



It's on Page 61 of SR3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mimick
post Mar 25 2004, 11:09 AM
Post #21


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 26-February 02
From: BC
Member No.: 1,677



I'd forgotten those too until I had a player who wanted to cram almost everything into his eyes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Mar 25 2004, 03:49 PM
Post #22


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



The White Dwarf, I just checked the FAQ and don't find this issue addressed.

Perhaps the FAQ entry you are thinking of is about Alphaware options in an Alphaware eye: do you count the original option Essence amount or the reduced option essence amount when determining what fits inside the .5 limit? At one point the FAQ stated you use the original option essence amount, but the FAQ has been revised to match what the book describes for the Covert Ops Specialist on p. 61. You count the reduced option essence amount when determining what fits within the .5 limit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Mar 25 2004, 03:53 PM
Post #23


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Something else I've been thinking of doing in my games...

If you read a lot of cyberpunk books, and even the old runs (Crimson Mary I think it is, from Dragon Hunt), some cyber eyes are really in a class of their own, and thats reflected in the price. I've been thinking of making certain cyber eyes which cost significantly more than standard (like quadruple the price), but come with certain features essence free, for instance level 2 mag, flare comp., "basic" stuff every simsense star would need. Maybe this would be a good place to introduce them, so those cyber eyes that are so expensive, they're removed from the star's body as soon as her contract expires.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rev
post Mar 25 2004, 06:21 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 675
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 2,034



The archtypes are notoriously illegal charachters though. Personally I would never even try to look up something like this. Why go out of your way to stick it to the player over a measly 0.1 eyeware essence?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Mar 25 2004, 06:28 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



QUOTE (Rev)
Personally I would never even try to look up something like this. Why go out of your way to stick it to the player over a measly 0.1 eyeware essence?

It was mostly (for me anyway) curiosity. I, and most other people, by the looks of the poll, just tack on the extra Essence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th November 2025 - 12:02 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.