IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What goes wrong on the run table
TheOOB
post May 6 2011, 07:58 AM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,290
Joined: 23-January 07
From: Seattle, USA
Member No.: 10,749



I was bored and made this table. Sure there is something else like it, but here you go.

The Shadowrun “Whats Goes Wrong With The Mission”

Roll 2d6 at the begging of the mission

2 : An opposing shadowrunner shows up after same objective
3 : Police or corp security heard about the run and set up a trap
4 : The objective was recently moved to a different location without the runners knowing
5 : The security is extra tight due to a recent break in
6 : There is a new security feature not discovered in the briefing or legwork
7 : There are no unexpected wrenches in the works, or terribly faulty data(standard run)
8 : Johnson either omits a key piece of info or gives false info(intentionally or not, GMs choice)
9 : Johnson puts an unreasonable extra objective that will lower pay if not completed
10 : The run was part of a much bigger set up, and the runners may end up in hot water for being involved
11 : Johnson either runs away or tries to get out of paying the runners.
12 : It’s a trap! Johnson is trying to get the runners killed/captured.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IKerensky
post May 6 2011, 09:12 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 303
Joined: 26-May 10
Member No.: 18,622



Like it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nebular
post May 6 2011, 01:27 PM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,918
Joined: 14-March 11
From: Calgary, AB
Member No.: 24,349



Haha, this is neat. I'm sure this will find its way into some of my games. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post May 6 2011, 02:15 PM
Post #4


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



Interesting and Entertaining... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dez384
post May 6 2011, 03:08 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 187
Joined: 3-May 11
Member No.: 29,372



I believe there are tables like this for random run generation in the book Contacts and Adventures
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post May 6 2011, 03:10 PM
Post #6


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,338
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



QUOTE (TheOOB @ May 6 2011, 03:58 AM) *
2 : An opposing shadowrunner shows up after same objective
3 : Police or corp security heard about the run and set up a trap
4 : The objective was recently moved to a different location without the runners knowing
5 : The security is extra tight due to a recent break in
6 : There is a new security feature not discovered in the briefing or legwork
7 : There are no unexpected wrenches in the works, or terribly faulty data(standard run)
8 : Johnson either omits a key piece of info or gives false info(intentionally or not, GMs choice)
9 : Johnson puts an unreasonable extra objective that will lower pay if not completed
10 : The run was part of a much bigger set up, and the runners may end up in hot water for being involved
11 : Johnson either runs away or tries to get out of paying the runners.
12 : It’s a trap! Johnson is trying to get the runners killed/captured.

Hmmm. It looks as if our current run in the Post or Die thread has 2, 4, 5, 8 and possibly 10 or 12 in play.

Lucky us!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post May 6 2011, 03:24 PM
Post #7


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Random table?

One of everything, please. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dez384
post May 6 2011, 04:18 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 187
Joined: 3-May 11
Member No.: 29,372



Ironic that having no twist is a twist itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
longbowrocks
post May 6 2011, 04:25 PM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,109
Joined: 13-March 11
From: Portland, Oregon
Member No.: 24,230



Love it. Especially how you made the standard run more likely. That was clever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post May 6 2011, 10:40 PM
Post #10


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Dez384 @ May 6 2011, 11:18 AM) *
Ironic that having no twist is a twist itself.

If I wanted a Twist in the game, I'd bring out a Burned-Out Pacifistic Dog Shaman. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheOOB
post May 6 2011, 11:55 PM
Post #11


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,290
Joined: 23-January 07
From: Seattle, USA
Member No.: 10,749



I tried to make the worst and least common twists less probable.

If you do it right, the party should always be worried on a 7. It doesn't mean things are easy, just no extra twists (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) .

Anyways, glad people seem to like it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th September 2025 - 08:19 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.