![]() ![]() |
Jun 7 2011, 03:02 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 10-January 10 Member No.: 18,025 |
shows you what successful drug cartels can come up with.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-13676259 |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2011, 03:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 10-November 10 From: Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia Member No.: 19,166 |
Very nice.
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2011, 04:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
Old technology, really. And the gangs have nothing if not stacks of cash laying around that they just can't launder fast enough...
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:23 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 9-November 08 Member No.: 16,575 |
Another link to a different place talking about this story http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/06/06/1153...ilding-own.html
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:29 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
To be really effective, they'd need to work with a different platform, such as a half-track (Which they don't make any more), or a Caterpillar Tread System (Maybe a stripped down construction vehicle?).
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:41 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 9-November 08 Member No.: 16,575 |
To be really effective, they'd need to work with a different platform, such as a half-track (Which they don't make any more), or a Caterpillar Tread System (Maybe a stripped down construction vehicle?). I was thinking something along those lines myself... though these 'tanks' are a lot closer to APCs in truth. Still they are probably somewhat effective.. until someone grabs an RPG anyways. |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:44 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:22 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
Or shoot out the unarmored tires to immobilize the vehicle and then throw balloons filled with gasoline at the car. Apply road flare. See how long it takes for the occupants to exit car.
-k |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:38 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 10-November 10 From: Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia Member No.: 19,166 |
I'm sure the security forces are trying to stay on the public opinion side, and stay away from illegalities (for the most part). While public opinion is to get rid of the power the drug cartels hold, I'm sure using weapons such as (possibly illegally attained) RPG's and tactics involving boiling occupants/greivous burns are deemed "too far". Honestly, I figure this is where a deniable black-ops team would be very nice, but I suppose we'll eventually see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2011, 02:56 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
I think Karma and I were suggesting options that are available for the other gangs that those vehicles are supposedly supposed to be used against.
I know I was. |
|
|
|
Jun 9 2011, 02:43 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 9-November 08 Member No.: 16,575 |
I'm sure the security forces are trying to stay on the public opinion side, and stay away from illegalities (for the most part). While public opinion is to get rid of the power the drug cartels hold, I'm sure using weapons such as (possibly illegally attained) RPG's and tactics involving boiling occupants/greivous burns are deemed "too far". Honestly, I figure this is where a deniable black-ops team would be very nice, but I suppose we'll eventually see what happens. It might be a little much for the police to use RPGs, it wouldn't be going too far out on a limb to assume that if they ran into one of the Mexican Army units that are assisting in the security efforts to use... whatever anti-armor weapon the Mexican Army uses. |
|
|
|
Jun 9 2011, 03:16 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
It might be a little much for the police to use RPGs, it wouldn't be going too far out on a limb to assume that if they ran into one of the Mexican Army units that are assisting in the security efforts to use... whatever anti-armor weapon the Mexican Army uses. According to Wiki (Whose reliability is ensured by the public!): B-300 82 mm light anti-tank rocket RL-83 Blindicide 83 mm light anti-tank rocket RPG-29 RPG-7 |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 01:21 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 02:00 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 9-November 08 Member No.: 16,575 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 05:48 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 583 Joined: 1-October 09 From: France Member No.: 17,693 |
To be really effective, they'd need to work with a different platform, such as a half-track (Which they don't make any more), or a Caterpillar Tread System (Maybe a stripped down construction vehicle?). Why ? Treads are slower and noisier, use more fuel, and needs more maintenance than wheels. I don't think those things are intended to be used off-road, and dubbing them 'tanks' is misleading. As Jekolmy said, they should be viewed as as makeshift APC. |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 02:12 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
Why ? Treads are slower and noisier, use more fuel, and needs more maintenance than wheels. And displace better over a wider area. OK, I'm not saying that the NarcoGangs care about roads after they're done driving through them (Armoured cars IRL, both civilian and military, are horrendous to road maintenance!), but I'm not exactly sure that something like this would even make it to the gunfight if there's so much as a gravel track they have to deal with. Just looking at it from a design point of view. 'Course, as I have stated before, I'm just a civvie puke, what do I know? |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 02:59 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
To be really effective, they'd need to work with a different platform, such as a half-track (Which they don't make any more), or a Caterpillar Tread System (Maybe a stripped down construction vehicle?). I have seen systems that can attach to existing axle and provide 4 smaller treads surfaces vs 2 large ones. Another option, similar to half-tracks, would be to find one with double sets of back wheels, and basically wrap treads around them. |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 03:18 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 03:22 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
Yeah, a friend of mine had some dealings with those on a job site once when he was cleaning oil refineries. He found them interesting and practical in a heavy mud/snow environment. |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 04:02 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 583 Joined: 1-October 09 From: France Member No.: 17,693 |
You can navigate some serious mess on wheels even with an heavyly loaded truck - at least with the right tires and driver. Just look at this video
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 04:06 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
You can navigate some serious mess on wheels even with an heavy load - at least with the right tires an truck. Just look at this video Ok, the path chosen confuse me. |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 04:17 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 583 Joined: 1-October 09 From: France Member No.: 17,693 |
I suppose it is a cleared path for lumber exploitation that is thawing in early spring, and possibly run over by meltwater from the snow
This helps understanding why the russian mud is (in)famous, and why brands like Tatra or Kamaz designed some impressive all-wheel drive models. |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 05:06 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
Mostly it looked like a road when the video started, but turned out to be something like a river when the truck passed by.
Tho now that you mention it, it kinda reminds me of the WW2 videos of german troops battling the russian mud. One mental image was a soldier getting in to almost his knee, and leaving the boot in there as there was no way to pull it out... |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 05:21 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,946 Joined: 1-June 09 From: Omaha Member No.: 17,234 |
As i was told many years ago, nothing is Hollywood bullet proof for most degrees of armor sustained fire will punch through almost anything given enough time. Full on main battle tanks are the exception and even they don't want to stand still in case some joker gets creative with the arty or other pucker factor weapons. So the best thing for these vehicles to do is get in and out of the fight quickly and deploy their payloads.
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 06:22 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
One of the clever/nasty anti-tank weapons do not even penetrate armor. Instead it applies force on the outside to hammer loose a piece of the inside that will fly around the crew area...
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th November 2025 - 09:41 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.