IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Starting character with 35/29 armor (no encumbrance)
Shaikujin
post Jun 30 2011, 04:04 PM
Post #26


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 16-March 11
Member No.: 24,616



QUOTE (Summerstorm @ Jun 30 2011, 03:32 PM) *
Hm... possibly the way to go is the MP-Laser III? 9P / -half. But you would need to have an aimed sniper shot with spotting extra-dice, tac-net etc.

Say you throw out 10 hits (maybe edged) That is straight up 23 P against half impact armor.

Oh: also don't forget to insulate, shield etc. your armor when you are at it. 30 armor is better if it is 30 armor against anything *g*.



The really scary weapon is Ares Screech Sonic Beam Rifle. "Regular armor does not apply".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Jun 30 2011, 04:09 PM
Post #27


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (Shaikujin @ Jun 30 2011, 03:55 PM) *
Dump the SWAT armour which is only 12/10 (or 13/11 with gel packs) and requires restricted quality.

Get a full Steampunk suit (which can be combined)-

3/3 Overcoat
2/2 Vest
1/1 Slacks
1/1 Shirt


Add Delta-amyloid 3/1 (from Arsenal) to each piece.
Next add Gel packs 1/1 to each (it'll make the suit bulky, but bulky steampunk clothes aren't really that odd).

7/5 Overcoat
6/4 Vest
5/3 Slacks
5/3 Shirt

That'll give 23/15. Plus you can still add FFA, PPP, shield and helmet.

Good luck finding a GM who allows shenanigans like that (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
QUOTE (Summerstorm @ Jun 30 2011, 06:32 PM) *
Hm... possibly the way to go is the MP-Laser III? 9P / -half.

Dont you mean Ares Heavy MP Laser, MP-Laser III is only 7P / -half .
in any case Ares Thunderstruck Gauss Rifle is a much better choise, its 9P / -half-4 and over 50% cheaper then the Heavy MP-Laser.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 30 2011, 04:10 PM
Post #28


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Jun 30 2011, 07:43 AM) *
I was just thinking this the other day. Has anyone considered making it 100% dependent on strength?


Having carried a crapton of combat gear (Deuce gear, Body Armor, etc) in the Corps, Body IS involved... Strength + Body would be the way to go, at least in my mind, though I really do not have that many issues with 2xBody.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 30 2011, 04:12 PM
Post #29


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Shaikujin @ Jun 30 2011, 09:34 AM) *
Ahh, but is walking around in SWAT armour any more stylish? At least steampunk is designer clothing.

Besides, rule-wise, style can be fixed simply by a fashion spell.


I know... Steampunk is Classier than SWAT Armor, But so much less stylish than Mortimer or Zoe. *Shrug*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 30 2011, 04:13 PM
Post #30


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Jun 30 2011, 11:00 AM) *
Neither has ever been incompatible with Troll-Dermal-Plates . .
Wether you are adding more plates or toughening up the skin beneath, you always got the benefits of both . .


huh that seems slightly wrong to me...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 30 2011, 04:14 PM
Post #31


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Summerstorm @ Jun 30 2011, 09:40 AM) *
Oh... and just adding: you might be able to enhance your armor with plates quickened with a "Harden" spell. (Also you can enhance your armor with the standard spell... and barriers). Which of course prompts me to say: you are a body/Strength troll: Carry your own barrier. Not just a shield, but a full fence with armored plates or something. Of course you can't fight anymore... but ah hell.


My Troll was always partial to using the Bulkhead Door from a Navy Cruiser as a Shield... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaikujin
post Jun 30 2011, 04:25 PM
Post #32


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 16-March 11
Member No.: 24,616



QUOTE (Aku @ Jun 30 2011, 04:13 PM) *
QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Jun 30 2011, 04:00 PM) *


QUOTE (Aku @ Jun 30 2011, 11:46 AM) *

Why do i remember dermal plating and troll natural armor not stacking, or is that orthoskin?


Neither has ever been incompatible with Troll-Dermal-Plates . .
Wether you are adding more plates or toughening up the skin beneath, you always got the benefits of both . .


huh that seems slightly wrong to me...



Well, Dermal plating is incompatible with Orthoskin.

But either one is compatible with a Troll's dermal deposits and the dermal deposit metagenic quality in RC.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaikujin
post Jun 30 2011, 04:36 PM
Post #33


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 16-March 11
Member No.: 24,616



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jun 30 2011, 04:12 PM) *
I know... Steampunk is Classier than SWAT Armor, But so much less stylish than Mortimer or Zoe. *Shrug*



True that.

The steampunk line has 1 extra piece and is better for min-maxing.
Personally, I prefer Synergist. I like clean simple styles. Plus it has a Longcoat as part of it's ensemble.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Jun 30 2011, 04:59 PM
Post #34


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



This troll is an excellent candidate for a Vessel for my Possession spirits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
suoq
post Jun 30 2011, 05:04 PM
Post #35


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,272
Joined: 22-June 10
From: Omaha. NE
Member No.: 18,746



QUOTE (Shaikujin @ Jun 30 2011, 09:39 AM) *
In 2012, they come in 3 types of thickness, 3mm, 4 mm and 6 mm - http://www.d3o.com/d3o_products/sheet-plain/
Looking at actual protective products, they tend to be 11mm (just under 1/2 inch thick) http://www.d3o.com/category/markets/personal-protection/
QUOTE
In 2067, probably thinner. Or just as thick, but stronger.
At 2 gelpacks per point of body, how thin do you expect it to be?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Jun 30 2011, 05:30 PM
Post #36


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



Or if you're a mage with the Fashion spell, choose whichever line is cheaper and then use Fashion to change it to what you want.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaikujin
post Jun 30 2011, 05:42 PM
Post #37


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 16-March 11
Member No.: 24,616



QUOTE (suoq @ Jun 30 2011, 05:04 PM) *
Looking at actual protective products, they tend to be 11mm (just under 1/2 inch thick) http://www.d3o.com/category/markets/personal-protection/



Those 3DO products are entirely shaped elbow and knee guards. I'm guessing they had to make it thicker so that it it can retain the formed shapes.

But in the SR4 world, the gel packs are used to cover or line an existing piece of the base armour to add an extra level of protection. I'd say it's more logical to use the 3-5mm and more flexible sheets.


QUOTE (suoq @ Jun 30 2011, 05:04 PM) *
At 2 gelpacks per point of body, how thin do you expect it to be?



Where did the 2 gelpacks per point of body rule come from?

As to how much thinner it can get in 50 years' time - in WW II, bulletproof glass was around 100mm to 120mm thick. Due to advancements in technological and materials, modern day bullet proof glass is around 20mm thick.

It is possible that these things can be made thinner than the 3mm sheets they are making now, or if not thinner, then stronger.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eyeBliss
post Jun 30 2011, 07:02 PM
Post #38


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 18-February 11
Member No.: 22,173



Does it seem like a horrible omission to anyone else that gel-packs, carbon-boron, etc. become more effective the smaller the piece of armor they are installed on? Doesn't it seem more reasonable to apply the bonus from any of the above options once to the entire armor ensemble rather than to individual pieces? Thats the way I would rule it anyway...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jun 30 2011, 07:15 PM
Post #39


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Aku @ Jun 30 2011, 06:13 PM) *
huh that seems slightly wrong to me...

Why?
See here:
QUOTE (Shaikujin @ Jun 30 2011, 06:25 PM) *
Neither has ever been incompatible with Troll-Dermal-Plates . .
Wether you are adding more plates or toughening up the skin beneath, you always got the benefits of both . .


huh that seems slightly wrong to me...



Well, Dermal plating is incompatible with Orthoskin.

But either one is compatible with a Troll's dermal deposits and the dermal deposit metagenic quality in RC.

Cyber and Bioware Versions of stuff that do the same things have usually been incompatible or not additive at least.
But everything always was completely compatible with anything you got naturally . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 30 2011, 07:17 PM
Post #40


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Jun 30 2011, 02:15 PM) *
Why?
See here:

Cyber and Bioware Versions of stuff that do the same things have usually been incompatible or not additive at least.
But everything always was completely compatible with anything you got naturally . .

it seems wrong because, well troll skin and orthoskin seem to be the same thing, to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jun 30 2011, 07:21 PM
Post #41


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



Nope, if anything, Troll Skin is the same as Dermal Armor.
Orthoskin functioned differently back then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christian Lafay
post Jun 30 2011, 07:47 PM
Post #42


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 673
Joined: 9-May 08
Member No.: 15,965



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Jun 30 2011, 06:30 PM) *
Or if you're a mage with the Fashion spell, choose whichever line is cheaper and then use Fashion to change it to what you want.

So, min-max and still look suave. Frightening.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
suoq
post Jun 30 2011, 08:49 PM
Post #43


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,272
Joined: 22-June 10
From: Omaha. NE
Member No.: 18,746



QUOTE (Shaikujin @ Jun 30 2011, 12:42 PM) *
Where did the 2 gelpacks per point of body rule come from?

Gel packs (unless I'm missing a rule) like most pieces of armor, count for encumbrance. Since the gel packs are (if I recall correctly) 1/1, than each pair of gelpacks takes 1 body worth of encumbrance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kerbarian
post Jun 30 2011, 10:13 PM
Post #44


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,387



QUOTE (eyeBliss @ Jun 30 2011, 11:02 AM) *
Does it seem like a horrible omission to anyone else that gel-packs, carbon-boron, etc. become more effective the smaller the piece of armor they are installed on? Doesn't it seem more reasonable to apply the bonus from any of the above options once to the entire armor ensemble rather than to individual pieces? Thats the way I would rule it anyway...

Yeah, that's how I'd rule it also. Any armor modification that can be applied to an entire suit of armor or clothing only applies once per character, even if you're wearing your armor in 3 layers of 5 pieces each.

If you want to be literal about things, one way of supporting that interpretation is that the places that tell you to ignore the normal armor stacking rules tell you to do so for certain types of armor pieces, not those armor pieces plus their modifications. So if you're wearing an Armor Jacket with Gel Packs (8/6 + 1/1) and Form-Fitting full body suit with Gel Packs (6/2 + 1/1), you only take the highest-rated piece of armor as usual (Jacket at 9/7) and then add the FFBA per its special rule (+6/+2) but ignore its modifications, since Gel Packs don't have an exception to the "armor doesn't stack" rule.

It's a bit of a stretch, and the simplest rules interpretation does favor being able to wear 7 layers of Gel Packs, but I think this is less of a rules stretch than 7 layers of Gel Packs are as a plausibility stretch (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Jun 30 2011, 10:37 PM
Post #45


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



I'd allow the character from the OP. Then the first run would require crossing a body of water without a boat big enough to support that much weight. Of course it would mostly be stolen when they get back across.


Better yet, a troll ganger would be wearing it all and be upset the team is crossing his turf.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christian Lafay
post Jun 30 2011, 10:41 PM
Post #46


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 673
Joined: 9-May 08
Member No.: 15,965



QUOTE (Bigity @ Jun 30 2011, 11:37 PM) *
I'd allow the character from the OP. Then the first run would require crossing a body of water without a boat big enough to support that much weight. Of course it would mostly be stolen when they get back across.


Better yet, a troll ganger would be wearing it all and be upset the team is crossing his turf.

Rule -1, What ever you can make for your character the GM can xerox for a dozen NPCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Jun 30 2011, 10:43 PM
Post #47


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (Bigity @ Jul 1 2011, 01:37 AM) *
I'd allow the character from the OP. Then the first run would require crossing a body of water without a boat big enough to support that much weight. Of course it would mostly be stolen when they get back across.

So you would aprove a character concept and then then make up a contrived situation to steal away the characters stuff?
You sir are what is generally called an ass-hole-GM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
suoq
post Jun 30 2011, 10:55 PM
Post #48


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,272
Joined: 22-June 10
From: Omaha. NE
Member No.: 18,746



QUOTE (Mäx @ Jun 30 2011, 04:43 PM) *
So you would aprove a character concept and then then make up a contrived situation to steal away the characters stuff?
You sir are what is generally called an ass-hole-GM.

I'd be happy to sits at Bigity's table. I likes "ass-hole-GM"s. They drive away all the players I didn't want to play with. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Jul 1 2011, 02:24 AM
Post #49


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



QUOTE (Mäx @ Jun 30 2011, 05:43 PM) *
So you would aprove a character concept and then then make up a contrived situation to steal away the characters stuff?
You sir are what is generally called an ass-hole-GM.


Or maybe it was tongue-in-cheek. But I think we now know what kind of forumer you are.


I think it would be an effective way to get the point across personally. Even if it was all recovered. Then you probably don't have to worry about the same problem with a different flavor next time around.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Jul 1 2011, 02:41 AM
Post #50


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



I don't generally have a problem with stacking of things meant to be stacked, like FFBA or PPP. I would draw the line, though, at B.S. like getting mods like gel packs to piecemeal armor, or trying to stack multiple suits of FFBA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th August 2025 - 03:24 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.