IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Electronic skin
Blog
post Aug 12 2011, 04:16 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 124
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 3,782



Electronic skin

Electrical wiring in/on the skin surface
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Aug 12 2011, 04:41 PM
Post #2


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



And away we go... Will be interesting to see the developments that come from this. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zaranthan
post Aug 12 2011, 05:40 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 503
Joined: 3-May 08
Member No.: 15,949



I, for one, welcome our... ah, you know the rest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christian Lafay
post Aug 13 2011, 03:18 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 673
Joined: 9-May 08
Member No.: 15,965



I always love these articles. "One day, after millions in research, we will be able to do what we already can. But with smaller equipment. That you will have to pay more for." While I LOVE advances in technology I can't understand this. Ok, so my skin is wired. So is my house and it really doesn't do anything... Conductive circuitry does not advancement make. But, thanks for the article. Sorry, had to rant.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheOOB
post Aug 13 2011, 08:54 AM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,290
Joined: 23-January 07
From: Seattle, USA
Member No.: 10,749



QUOTE (Christian Lafay @ Aug 12 2011, 10:18 PM) *
I always love these articles. "One day, after millions in research, we will be able to do what we already can. But with smaller equipment. That you will have to pay more for." While I LOVE advances in technology I can't understand this. Ok, so my skin is wired. So is my house and it really doesn't do anything... Conductive circuitry does not advancement make. But, thanks for the article. Sorry, had to rant.


All new technologies have to come from somewhere, and while it's true many discoveries never lead to market viable products, it is impossible to tell which is which until the discovery is made, tested, and advanced upon. Some of the best technologies we have came from unlikely sources so I for one encourage any scientific advancement(so long as it is achieved in an ethical manner).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Aug 13 2011, 12:23 PM
Post #6


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



And while it may not do anything on its own, it may be a enabler for something else.

Right now tho, i think what is holding us back is the cumbersome interfaces between man and machine. The basics have not changed much since the typewriter! And still requires a wide flat surface to be employed effectively. I wonder if we ever will find a interface that can work while we have both hands full and with the same or lower error rates.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zaranthan
post Aug 13 2011, 08:38 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 503
Joined: 3-May 08
Member No.: 15,949



QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Aug 13 2011, 07:23 AM) *
I wonder if we ever will find a interface that can work while we have both hands full and with the same or lower error rates.

Voice recognition is advancing at a rate similar to RTS games' research mechanics. We'll have 99% accuracy within our* lifetimes. Once that happens, somebody will come up with a clever way to replace the mouse, perhaps a Google-like command line.

* User made in the 80s, for reference.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Aug 13 2011, 09:30 PM
Post #8


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



Now that you mention it, i think a related article mentioned that one could get very high word accuracy by reading the neural signals of the throat even when no word was actually spoken.

ah, found it. Good old Ars Technica. http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/0...ent-devices.ars

Seems they used it to read throat muscle activity tho, so i guess it is more sub-vocal then non-vocal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 05:33 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.