IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> House or RAW?, Tacnet question
AppliedCheese
post Sep 5 2011, 03:58 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 459
Joined: 2-October 10
Member No.: 19,092



For some reason it is deep in my brain that tacnets require 4^(rating) sensors to add their bonus.

So + 1 needs 4 sensors linked
+2 need 16
+3 64
+4 256.

Anytime the sensor minimum isn't met, the net is degraded to next level down, even if it is higher software.

I can not find the relevant info in unwired. Am I on target or remembering an old house rule?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 5 2011, 04:05 PM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



QUOTE (AppliedCheese @ Sep 5 2011, 04:58 PM) *
For some reason it is deep in my brain that tacnets require 4^(rating) sensors to add their bonus.

So + 1 needs 4 sensors linked
+2 need 16
+3 64
+4 256.

Anytime the sensor minimum isn't met, the net is degraded to next level down, even if it is higher software.

I can not find the relevant info in unwired. Am I on target or remembering an old house rule?


Sounds like an old house rule. RAW is something like 2*Rating sensor channels per participant, and the worst participant drags the tacnet rating down to his level.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 5 2011, 05:33 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



Indeed, RAW is 2x rating sensor channels and at least 2+rating participants to get the full bonus. Drones only contribute as many sensors channels as their sensor rating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Sep 6 2011, 02:43 PM
Post #4


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Sep 5 2011, 11:05 AM) *
and the worst participant drags the tacnet rating down to his level.


Actually, the worst participant either:

a) can't join at all
or
b) makes the entire system shut off for everybody
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Sep 6 2011, 03:46 PM
Post #5


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Sep 6 2011, 08:43 AM) *
Actually, the worst participant either:

a) can't join at all
or
b) makes the entire system shut off for everybody


Why do you say that? At worst, the Tacnet operates at the lowest of the Participants. If you have 5 people with a Tacnet Rating 3 operating, and a character who can only support a Tacnet 2 links up, the system only provides bonuses at Rating 2 from that point. Why wouild it shut down, and why would it not allow the lower rated guy to link in? Now, the other particiapnts on the Tacnet may not let him link in, but that is a different thing altogether.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Sep 6 2011, 07:13 PM
Post #6


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Sep 6 2011, 10:46 AM) *
Why wouild it shut down, and why would it not allow the lower rated guy to link in?


Because the rules say so. It says that a person cannot join the tacnet if he can't provide enough sensor channels.

This results in scenario A.

Scenario B is an extension where the rules make no indication that it operates at a "lower level" if not enough sensor channels are supplied and thus cannot function at all without enough channels from all participants.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Sep 6 2011, 07:45 PM
Post #7


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Sep 6 2011, 12:13 PM) *
Because the rules say so. It says that a person cannot join the tacnet if he can't provide enough sensor channels.

This results in scenario A.

Scenario B is an extension where the rules make no indication that it operates at a "lower level" if not enough sensor channels are supplied and thus cannot function at all without enough channels from all participants.


So, you set it at Rating 2... Done... You can have 50 guys all at rating 2 in the same net.
I agree that it would not work as Rating 2 for one guy and Rating 3 for another, but you can run software at lower ratings than it has. It is in the rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warlordtheft
post Sep 6 2011, 09:05 PM
Post #8


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



QUOTE (Miri @ Sep 5 2011, 12:33 PM) *
Indeed, RAW is 2x rating sensor channels and at least 2+rating participants to get the full bonus. Drones only contribute as many sensors channels as their sensor rating.


Unless of course you decide to upgrade the drones sensor package. This can get quite fun....

BTW-as I understand it a Drone counts as a participant and can recieve tacnet bonuses..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 6 2011, 09:22 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Sep 6 2011, 03:05 PM) *
Unless of course you decide to upgrade the drones sensor package. This can get quite fun....

BTW-as I understand it a Drone counts as a participant and can recieve tacnet bonuses..


Yes a drone can count as a participant and receive bonuses. However the rules for tacnets specifically say that drones can only contribute as many channels as their sensor rating. So even tricking out your drone with the best sensors you can the best they can do is a rating 3 tacnet since you need 2 * (tacnet rating) worth of channels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 6 2011, 09:52 PM
Post #10


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



IIRC, they don't 'specifically' say that. They say that drone *can* contribute channels=Sensor. AFAIK, this is merely another shorthand (just as Sensor itself is), so there's no reason drones can't contribute individual channels the same way a person does.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Sep 6 2011, 10:20 PM
Post #11


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Sep 6 2011, 02:52 PM) *
IIRC, they don't 'specifically' say that. They say that drone *can* contribute channels=Sensor. AFAIK, this is merely another shorthand (just as Sensor itself is), so there's no reason drones can't contribute individual channels the same way a person does.


And this is how we do it. Not that it matters much anyways, we have yet to actually use a Rating 4 Tacnet in game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 6 2011, 10:40 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



Unwired page 125.

"Sensor Systems: Data acquired from worn, carried,
or mounted sensor systems of various types (cameras, microphones,
range finders, motion sensors, etc.) may also be
contributed to the network as a sensor channel. Drones sensor
systems also count; each drone can supply a number of sensor
channels equal to its Sensor rating."


Seems pretty straight forward to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warlordtheft
post Sep 7 2011, 01:04 AM
Post #13


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



Miri, the problem with that is that once you meddle with the sensor package there is no longer an overall rating. The overall rating is a shorthanded sensor rating, and that is the number you use if you don't modify the sensors.

So do you go with the rating 6 camera or the rating 4 ultra-wideband radar.
Also note that thermo, lowlight, regular vision, shotgun mike and so forth count as seperate channels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 7 2011, 01:18 AM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Sep 6 2011, 07:04 PM) *
Miri, the problem with that is that once you meddle with the sensor package there is no longer an overall rating. The overall rating is a shorthanded sensor rating, and that is the number you use if you don't modify the sensors.

So do you go with the rating 6 camera or the rating 4 ultra-wideband radar.
Also note that thermo, lowlight, regular vision, shotgun mike and so forth count as seperate channels.


There is a nice big paragraph in 4A, page 334 to determine what the rating of the sensor suite is if you have different rated sensor modules. In the case of your above example of a rating 6 camera and rating 4 radar, the overall package would be a rating 5 suite.

As far as the thermo, lowlight, regular vision, shotgun mike counting as separate channels, that is all fine and dandy.. but the drone still can't contribute more channels then its overall sensor rating. A drone can only contribute between 1 and 6 channels because there are no sensor modules that go over rating 6 to bring the average up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warlordtheft
post Sep 7 2011, 04:02 PM
Post #15


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



QUOTE (Miri @ Sep 6 2011, 09:18 PM) *
There is a nice big paragraph in 4A, page 334 to determine what the rating of the sensor suite is if you have different rated sensor modules. In the case of your above example of a rating 6 camera and rating 4 radar, the overall package would be a rating 5 suite.

As far as the thermo, lowlight, regular vision, shotgun mike counting as separate channels, that is all fine and dandy.. but the drone still can't contribute more channels then its overall sensor rating. A drone can only contribute between 1 and 6 channels because there are no sensor modules that go over rating 6 to bring the average up.



The problem is that the rating is higher with one rating 6 sensor rather than a rating 6 plus a rating 4 or less sensor. So if you shut down/remove the rating 4 sensor the sensor rating goes up? This to me makes no sense from a logic stand point. Note, you're right by RAW from what you have quoted-but I've kinda given up on that rule cause it seems to be one of those instances where a serious errata/rules rewrite is needed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 7 2011, 06:49 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



If you are using a stock Doberman, it has a sensor rating 3 and can only contribute 3 channels, enough to take part in a Tacnet rating 1.

If you decide to trick out your Doberman with a rating 6 camera, a motion sensor and a rating 4 ultrawideband radar then your sensor rating for all that is 5 (the motion sensor doesn't have a rating and is thus not used in the calculation) and can participate in a rating 2 tacnet. Turn off the wideband radar and it will go up to a 6 allowing you to participate in a rating 3 tacnet.

Once you start defining with detail what is in the senor module you have to keep its specifics in mind and recalculate what is going on on the fly. If you just say, its a stock rating 3 sensor thats the end of it there, if you upgrade it to a stock rating 6 sensor then thats it. Once you start defining what is in the sensor you have to start keeping track of what is turned on or off and or is working in that environment.

If you are using a drone for a tacnet buddy then you are well served getting a single rating 6 camera with 6 vision options (plus the standard vision and generic microphone). That gives you a rating 6 sensor and you pick the 6 input channels that it will dedicate to your rating 3 or less tacnet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Sep 7 2011, 06:57 PM
Post #17


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Miri @ Sep 7 2011, 01:49 PM) *
If you decide to trick out your Doberman with a rating 6 camera, a motion sensor and a rating 4 ultrawideband radar then your sensor rating for all that is 5 and can participate in a rating 2 tacnet. Turning off the wideband radar will you to participate in a rating 3 tacnet.


This.
Makes.
No.
Logical.
Sense.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 7 2011, 07:22 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Sep 7 2011, 12:57 PM) *
This.
Makes.
No.
Logical.
Sense.


The explain why it doesn't make logical sense, cause it makes perfect sense to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ascalaphus
post Sep 7 2011, 07:29 PM
Post #19


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,899
Joined: 29-October 09
From: Leiden, the Netherlands
Member No.: 17,814



Yes, the Sensor rules are busted, and because TacNets rely on them, so are the TacNet rules.

I've used a house rule whereby the TacNet worked a bit differently. To participate, you needed a camera, smartlink and gps, so the net could create a composite picture of the battlefield. Then, against any target, everyone used the best (= lowest penalty) visibility that any member of the TacNet enjoyed. And of course it tracked ammo and medical condition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Sep 7 2011, 07:57 PM
Post #20


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Miri @ Sep 7 2011, 02:22 PM) *
The explain why it doesn't make logical sense, cause it makes perfect sense to me.


By REMOVING a sensor channel the tacnet gets BETTER?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 7 2011, 08:13 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Sep 7 2011, 01:57 PM) *
By REMOVING a sensor channel the tacnet gets BETTER?


The radar doesn't provide as much detail as the camera does, it is afterall a lower rated module. Since you have to take the average if more then one sensor is running the radar drags it down. Find yourself a Rating 5 or 6 radar (since you round up) and your good to go with a rating 6 overall sensor suite.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Sep 7 2011, 08:38 PM
Post #22


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



That doesn't matter.

Information is removed from the tacnet. This is not how you upgrade it logically.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Sep 7 2011, 08:47 PM
Post #23


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Miri @ Sep 7 2011, 03:13 PM) *
The radar doesn't provide as much detail as the camera does, it is afterall a lower rated module. Since you have to take the average if more then one sensor is running the radar drags it down. Find yourself a Rating 5 or 6 radar (since you round up) and your good to go with a rating 6 overall sensor suite.


So.

If I have a computer with 1 stick of RAM (4GB).
And I add a second stick (2GB).
It's "the same" as if I replaced that 4GB stick with a 3GB stick?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Miri
post Sep 7 2011, 08:50 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Firebase Zulu
Member No.: 32,769



You know what.. never mind. Figuring out how a drones sensors contribute to a tacnet seems very straightforward to me. If you have problems with it.. just don't put anything other then a rating 2, 4, or 6 module into the drone so it can contribute to a rating 1, 2, or 3 tacnet without issue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Sep 7 2011, 08:53 PM
Post #25


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



Just because the rules are clear doesn't mean they makes sense.

That's all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 05:17 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.