My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Oct 26 2011, 11:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 292 Joined: 20-April 09 From: Sydney 'plex Member No.: 17,094 |
Smokin' Aces sniper scene
OK dudes - is this doable in SR4A? Target designator type thing? Can I have a flying drone on the other end of the sniper rifle? I'm thinking a kind of mild mannered hacker with a bad ass mobile wingman keeping him safe! |
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 01:06 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 944 Joined: 19-February 03 Member No.: 4,128 |
Sounds like a perfect application of a tacnet. Anything you see/hear goes up on the tacnet (I picture it as a wireframe built up in AR), you just tell the drone to engage target 1, and he does, even if no LOS.
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 02:27 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,989 Joined: 28-July 09 From: Somewhere along the brazilian coast Member No.: 17,437 |
Tacnets for the win.
A good example of a game that describes a sort of tacnet is Frozen Synapse. It has a "Dark mode" setting where you have the last position of the enemies to tactically decide your moves. |
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 02:30 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 189 Joined: 21-February 11 Member No.: 22,370 |
Flyspy spotter drone at ground level and a Stormcloud drone with a Barret is a pretty standard sniper-rigger setup.
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 02:39 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,546 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
Absolutely. You just need unrequited love between the front line face and the shooter. Hit tacnet with the jammers, and layer those visibility modifiers. Spotting at the end just requires a little narrativium on the part of the GM (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 07:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 292 Joined: 20-April 09 From: Sydney 'plex Member No.: 17,094 |
Thanks all. Which book is the tacnet from?
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 07:52 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 189 Joined: 21-February 11 Member No.: 22,370 |
Unwired, under Tactical AR Software
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2011, 10:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,782 Joined: 28-August 09 Member No.: 17,566 |
Also Information Guided Targeting from arsenal. I believe its referenced in the tacnet rules.
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 12:52 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
Hit tacnet with the jammers, And hope the players don't realize there's Beam Link (laser and microwave) technology to make the connection immune to those Jammers. Otherwise you'll be constantly trying to come up with excuses why there's no line of sight between the drones. Not so hard on indoor 'runs, but outdoor 'runs might be problematic. -k |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 12:56 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 271 Joined: 5-July 11 From: Firebase Zulu Member No.: 32,769 |
And hope the players don't realize there's Beam Link (laser and microwave) technology to make the connection immune to those Jammers. Otherwise you'll be constantly trying to come up with excuses why there's no line of sight between the drones. Not so hard on indoor 'runs, but outdoor 'runs might be problematic. -k Even more fun with short range versions of beam links (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Gotta do a run in a shielded building? Have your flyspy fit with geko tips, laser beam link, a repeater and somehow smuggle it into the build and have it find a window. Sticks to the window and points that laser beam link out it, a duplicate drone finds that beam and sticks to the window opposite it and the two act as a bridge letting the teams inside and out keep in touch. |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 01:18 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
It's still pretty finicky. I don't see much evil in having them be much less reliable than normal wireless. It's up to them to 'come up with excuses' why they *do* have clear LOS. This doesn't preclude a solid (and somewhat expensive) plan like Miri mentions… if there's a window.
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 01:32 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
I imagine most people don't go through the trouble my rigger does of carrying a dozen FlySpys each with beam links, purely to act as a daisy chain maintaining line-of-sight.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) -k |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 01:54 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Not since SR3, anyway. I kinda miss when you had to make your own network, just for the limitations.
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 01:28 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 366 Joined: 17-March 10 Member No.: 18,317 |
Funny thing, I saw that film a few days past and have been thinking about this exact question since (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Yeah, Tacnet is the way to go. Drones can even help other drones with their sensor-guided lock-on. So even if you don't get much out of the standard tacnet bonus because you lack members, this will still go. I've been thinking about setting this up with an assault cannon on a smart platform... |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 01:59 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,546 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
Smoke is still an issue with lasers, and we certainly saw that in the video!
I don't know about SR4, but in SR3 you actually had to aim the laser at the receiver (sticking your arm around a doorway and hitting a tiny lens in a distant building with a handheld laser is a bit ... goofy). I can't imagine anyone in a firefight running around being able to maintain even near-constant laser communication. MAYBE radio to a stationary laser transmitter, but then you get back to the jamming problem. |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 02:13 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
Microwave comms shouldn't have that problem, though, as they produce a narrow cone rather than a straight line.
They should probably be slightly easier to intercept, though - you don't have to be exactly in line with the "beam", just be in the cone's range. -k |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 02:38 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Microwave *beam* comms do have a beam, and that's the only kind of microwave available in the game. You can also use direction RF, but that's still subject to jamming.
Yeah, nezumi, it's assuming a certain level of magical tech. But that's what the RAW (implies), because it doesn't warn about laser links being so delicate as that. |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 02:43 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
Eh. Lasers do beams because they're coherent light.
Microwaves generally don't do "beams". At least with standard microwave emitters, the best you can do is a tight narrow cone. You CAN create "coherent microwaves", though, but that's a MASER, which is distinctly "something else". -k |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 02:52 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
What's this 'reality' you speak of? Besides, for all I know, the microwave version of the beam link is a maser: "Similar to a laser link, except this device emits microwaves for communication."
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 03:38 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 673 Joined: 9-May 08 Member No.: 15,965 |
For that scene I would also go Tacnet but would go a little different. Have some drones outside using the x-ray millimeter of doom and my bio-metrics put in, aprox height, size, exotic shape(s). Then with some nice simple AI treat the entire system like an X-Box Kinect. Make hand and body gestures the commands. The drones stay outside, and would link themselves and the weapon with lasers to increase chance of always having LOS. THen make use of simple command gesture like "Both hands go up, shoot everyone else." Think it would work?
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 03:46 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
"Put your hands up!" "You wouldn't like that." "Frag you, hands up or we shoot!" "Well, if you're going to threaten me with physical violence..." *Raises both arms up*
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 03:50 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 245 Joined: 17-August 10 Member No.: 18,943 |
For that scene I would also go Tacnet but would go a little different. Have some drones outside using the x-ray millimeter of doom and my bio-metrics put in, aprox height, size, exotic shape(s). Then with some nice simple AI treat the entire system like an X-Box Kinect. Make hand and body gestures the commands. The drones stay outside, and would link themselves and the weapon with lasers to increase chance of always having LOS. THen make use of simple command gesture like "Both hands go up, shoot everyone else." Think it would work? Heh, I'd have it keyed to me making my fingers into a gun, pointing at somebody and saying "Bang!" |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 03:53 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 04:14 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 673 Joined: 9-May 08 Member No.: 15,965 |
At least y'all seem to think it is a decent idea..... MWUAHAHAHAHAHAH
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2011, 05:53 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,001 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Michigan Member No.: 1,514 |
Step one, get a box. Wait crap.
In a more serious note I see no reason why you couldn't set up a sniper to back up your team. With a little proper prior planning you could pretty easily get into place, establish surveillance and your concealed (Potentially covered) position. Take a look at some real world sniper videos for some inspiration, and blend it with the scene in question. If you're a player discuss this with your GM. See what sort of things he or she see's as an issue, obstacle or favorable circumstance for your character. If you're the GM...well I feel sorry for someone. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 06:24 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.