![]() ![]() |
Feb 3 2012, 07:19 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 10-January 10 Member No.: 18,025 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 04:54 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
OK, Holland & Holland stopped making the .600 Nitro Express as being "Too excessive", only to bring it back due to popular demand, and then created the .700 Nitro Express for the same reason.
Now THIS? Honestly, this has to be a case of "I need something bigger to make up for something that I have that is very, very small." |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 04:56 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
So… why don't they just take emplaced weapons and put grips on them? Let the users take the consequences.
Anyway, isn't this kind of thing basically what assault cannons are? |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:09 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 213 Joined: 19-August 10 Member No.: 18,949 |
I always thought of the assault cannons as low-to-mid-pressure weapons, more like a grenade launcher with 20-25mm ammunition. This thing is is just under 23mm, so the caliber is about right, even if it's really more of an undersized anti-materiel rifle. Which, I guess, makes it a good stand in for the SR assault cannons.... Just need some Raufoss rounds. Pushing mere slugs through it is a waste of potential.
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:18 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,180 Joined: 22-January 07 From: Rochester, NY Member No.: 10,737 |
Just need some Raufoss rounds. Pushing mere slugs through it is a waste of potential. *looks at link* Well, that there's the granddaddy of the EX-Explosive round... |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:18 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Nah, assault cannons are 'light tank guns'. I don't really know the difference between a big rifle and a small tank gun (explosives?). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) So I guess the Raufoss clearly fits the bill. We do know that assault cannons fire 'special assault cannon ammo', after all.
And, of course, the 'Cobra Assault Cannon' was a Barrett with explosive shells (in the movie). |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:34 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
And, of course, the 'Cobra Assault Cannon' was a Barrett with explosive shells (in the movie). State-of-the-Art Bang Bang. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) And for comparison, look up the 2-Bore Rifle. It is bigger than the .905 linked in the OP. 3500 Grain Bullet (1/2 lb. of Lead in the bullet) 320 grains of Black Powder in the Charge (Cannot use Smokeless powder due to excessive recoil, and engineering issues - the barrel would need to be able to withstand several TONS/Inch - Crazy, fortunately, Black Powder does not produce the same pressure issues as smokeless does) 1.326 Inch Diameter Bore (33.68mm) 1500 fps at the bore, 17,487 ft/lbs of Energy Rounds cost between $80 and $85 per shot. Rifle weighs 32 pounds, and has a 3 foot long barrel. It is custom made on order (With quoted prices STARTING at $26,000) IIRC, The total cased Round is about the size of a Red-Bull can in Diameter and length |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:39 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 881 Joined: 13-November 11 From: Vienna, Austria Member No.: 43,494 |
Light tank cannons normally range from 20mm to 37mm, exept some crazy russian bmp which has a 105mm cannon.
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:44 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
Light tank cannons normally range from 20mm to 37mm, exept some crazy russian bmp which has a 105mm cannon. Yeah, the 2-Bore is more like a Light Anti-Tank Weapon from an earlier era. Not sure why I would buy one over a .375 Holland and Holland (which I MIGHT actually be able to afford, though I would have no place to actually use it to hunt), but wow, what a gun. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 05:55 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
So… we're agreed that this is a (low-tech) assault cannon? It certainly seems to be Heavy Weapons, SS, etc. Everything fits, except maybe the need for explosive shells?
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 06:04 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
So… we're agreed that this is a (low-tech) assault cannon? It certainly seems to be Heavy Weapons, SS, etc. Everything fits, except maybe the need for explosive shells? That is what I would call it, personally. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Heavy Weapon Indeed. Not sure about the need for explosive shells on that one, but who knows. They would be impressive, I think. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 06:34 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,000 Joined: 30-May 09 From: Germany Member No.: 17,225 |
"Because who wants to be known as "that underkill guy"?"
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 09:51 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 213 Joined: 19-August 10 Member No.: 18,949 |
Heh. Maxim 6: If violence wasn't your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
(Schlock Mercenary) |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 11:18 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 693 Joined: 26-March 03 Member No.: 4,335 |
I always figured the Assault Cannon was a recoiless rifle.
Man-portable, fires cannon rounds, little recoil. |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 11:31 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 213 Joined: 19-August 10 Member No.: 18,949 |
That's not a bad thought, but recoilless rifles tend to be fairly large calibers (75mm+), and have backblast issues. The recoil is compensated by diverting some of the propellent gasses.
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 11:38 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
And we know that they're not; they're described as 'light tank cannons' and having 'massive recoil'.
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 05:43 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 983 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 326 |
Just need some Raufoss rounds. Pushing mere slugs through it is a waste of potential. My understanding of assault cannons in Shadowrun is that they fire something very like Raufoss rounds - "shells equivalent to explosive bullets, but without the inherent instability." And then they have huge barrels on them, presumably full of heat sink, so they can handle belted ammunition. But my understanding could be highly outdated. |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 04:34 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Horror ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,322 Joined: 15-June 05 From: BumFuck, New Jersey Member No.: 7,445 |
I always figured that "Assault Cannon" was an Ares Arms marketing way of trademarking an autocannon that wound up as a generic trademark itself.
So I always saw the things as basically firing something between 20mm and 40mm high-explosive penetrating (HEAT) rounds belt-fed, fully-automatic, if not particularly quickly for a fully-automatic weapon. |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 04:36 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Except they've always (okay, mostly) been single shot. An SA assault cannon is the fast version, barring any questionable player modding.
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 05:23 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 983 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 326 |
Except they've always (okay, mostly) been single shot. An SA assault cannon is the fast version, barring any questionable player modding. As man-portable weapons, anyway. Autocannons existed in SR3. [Rigger 3, p91.] They were, we're told, "extremely popular," which is a phrase you don't hear often enough being applied to fully automatic cannons. |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 05:36 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
In that case, 3278, they exist in Arsenal too. But assault cannons are inherently defined as man-portable, while autocannons are Vehicular.
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 06:36 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
If you cyber up a troll enough, is he considered vehicular?
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 06:39 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 881 Joined: 13-November 11 From: Vienna, Austria Member No.: 43,494 |
well, the cyborg drone bodies are considered vehicles, so yes - but then, a cyborg gnome is also a vehicle ^^
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 06:55 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Man In The Machine ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
So this is for hunting what, several moose in a row? Mack trucks? Regardless, its awesome and that's all it needs to be.
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 07:45 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
But there are also vehicle body requirements! Ha. Granted, the cyborg bodies *break* most of the vehicle body standards, but oh well.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 06:10 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.